UDWiki:Administration/Move Requests/Archive/2012 Q4
This page is for the requesting of page moves by normal users. The average user's ability to move pages has been rescinded due to frequent abuse by vandals; as such, users will need to submit requests (similar in nature to those on Speedy Deletions and Protections) for pages to be moved by a sysop.
Guidelines for requesting a Page Move
Copy the template below (Or just type it), replace the text in red with the relevant details, and paste the template under the Move Request Queue heading. A day after a sysop has taken action on the request, move requests should be moved to the Archive.
===[[PAGENAME]]===
*[[MOVE TO HERE]]
*~~~~
|
Move Request Queue
There are no pages in the move request queue
Recent Actions
file:2093709.gif
- file:AliveDOAStatusBar.gif
- Groveer 07:38, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
User:Skyretti
- To User talk:Skyretti. It looks like User:Peralta created this page using {{Welcomenewbie}} rather than the talk page.
- Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 03:46, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Jerden Rules Crowbank: Enemies List
to Jerden Rules Crowbank/Enemies List, might as well fix the links and delete the redirect too I'd imagine. A ZOMBIE ANT 13:47, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
- Done.--Shortround }.{ My Contributions 14:46, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
User talk:Sexualharrison/TZH GOT PWNED
- User:Sexualharrison/War On TZH
- --User:Sexualharrison21:00, 22 November 2012
User:Schiz0
- Move to userspace of Boertje. User:Schiz0 is not a registered user.. Gordon 13:44, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Cleanup from A/RE archives
After/if this A/SD request gets processed, I'd appreciate if the following moves could be made to keep things consistent with the rest of the naming conventions for the pages:
- UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations/Krazy_Monkey_(1) -> UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations/Krazy_Monkey
- UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations/Red_Hawk_One_(1) -> UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations/Red_Hawk_One
- UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations/Rosslessness_(1) -> UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations/Rosslessness
- UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations/The_General_(1) -> UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations/The_General
Thanks. —Aichon— 21:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Done. -- Spiderzed█ 22:05, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- The naming convention was consistent. Once a sysop had multiple RE bids, their first was moved to the A/RE/Sysop (1) position. A better way to handle this would have been to move all the first time bids to the corresponding A/RE/Sysop (1) page. I often took the shortcut to UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations/Krazy_Monkey or the like... if there was a bid there, I knew to archive their next RE at UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations/Krazy_Monkey (2)... if they already had multiple REs, there would be a list there of all of them, and I also knew where to archive the next one. When you're likely to get multiple entries, it's better to start at one, IMO -- boxy 13:27, 22 November 2012 (BST)
- Sorry, I meant that it was no longer consistent with the new convention, not that it was inconsistent with how things were (though it was that too). As for why I did it this way, it was for several reasons:
- The "(1)" was actually only added in 4 out of 10 places where it was applicable, so it was always the minority practice and was never applied consistently to begin with.
- It's redundant to add "(1)" if the person only has one nomination, and if we leave it off in those cases, then the naming for first nominations is not uniform.
- Looking at the wiki software for some guidance, when dealing with links for section headings that have the same name, it only adds numbers for ones after the first one.
- Honestly, I'm fine with it either way, but I thought this way was better, since it means uniform naming, doesn't involve unlinked pages that most people are unaware of but that dictate naming conventions, and means less hassle for us since we no longer need to remember to rename/move pages. Also, the new archive page handles the task you described in a manner that was modeled to resemble the (rather nice) Misconduct archives, and it does it for everyone, rather than just the four people that had those hidden pages. —Aichon— 18:37, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant that it was no longer consistent with the new convention, not that it was inconsistent with how things were (though it was that too). As for why I did it this way, it was for several reasons:
- The naming convention was consistent. Once a sysop had multiple RE bids, their first was moved to the A/RE/Sysop (1) position. A better way to handle this would have been to move all the first time bids to the corresponding A/RE/Sysop (1) page. I often took the shortcut to UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations/Krazy_Monkey or the like... if there was a bid there, I knew to archive their next RE at UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations/Krazy_Monkey (2)... if they already had multiple REs, there would be a list there of all of them, and I also knew where to archive the next one. When you're likely to get multiple entries, it's better to start at one, IMO -- boxy 13:27, 22 November 2012 (BST)
TRP stuff
Courtesy notice that I moved the following:
- TRPNT -> Tactical Resource Point/Syringes
- TRPGun -> Tactical Resource Point/Guns
- TRPFak -> Tactical Resource Point/First Aid Kits
- TRPGasNGen -> Tactical Resource Point/Fuel and Generators
Since they were all variations on Tactical Resource Point. —Aichon— 05:34, 26 October 2012 (BST)
Sarge Mart Applications to Sarge Mart/Applications
Just putting a courtesy note here since I moved their applications page to a subpage of their group page. —Aichon— 22:02, 15 October 2012 (BST)
Archives
| Move Requests Archive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
