UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(848 intermediate revisions by 83 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Administrationnav}}
{{Administrationnav}}
{{Re-evaluations Intro}}
{{Re-evaluations Intro}}
 
==Re-Evaluations Being Discussed==
==Re-Evaluations still open for discussion==
<!--
<!--
''There are currently no open Re-Evaluations.''
''There are currently no open Re-Evaluations.''
-->
-->
===[[User:Revenant|Revenant]]===
{{bid|Revenant}}
It is due today, so I am putting it up as long as it is yet the 15th. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">█ </span>]]</span>''' 19:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - not vouching for Rev means you support zerging, people who pretend to be nazis in shitty online games, and Dracoguard--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 19:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Supreme Vouch''' - certainly one of the best around here {{User:Generaloberst/s}} 20:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
* against - he so not around lately. he must be getting laid. when he gets dumped by the fat girl that he is chasing after he will come crawling back out of kat's pussy and enlighten us all with topical quotes from other wikis and emoticons. if he wants it. get busy man.  i mean <big>'''VOOCH'''</big>--{{User:Sexualharrison/sig}}<small>23:32, 15 January 2012 (bst)</small>
*'''Vouch''' - can I say as per anime? --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 03:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''against''' - when he does manage to hang around he sucks {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 05:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Question''' - How many edits per week, for every week, do you plan on making, on average, if we choose to keep you? --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 06:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Against''' - Never did anything that would justify his antics, let alone his constant spurts of prolonged inactivity. -- [[Image:Cat Pic.png|14px]] [[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''Thadeous Oakley''']]</span> [[User_Talk:MisterGame|<span style= "color: black; background-color: white">'''''Talk''''']]</span>  10:19, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
*Arguably, I've only been around for a month or two, but I have no idea who this is... :/ --[[User:Shortround|Shortround]] 10:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Questions''' - How often do you actually check into the wiki these days? And are you still interested in doing this? ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>14:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)</sub>
*:There are sysops that are less active than Revenant. Have those ever got criticized for that? In my eyes Revenant is a pretty good. {{User:Generaloberst/s}} 00:00, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
*::Yes they have but that wasn't criticism, it was a question; one meant for Revanent. Also learn to indent. ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>02:20, 17 January 2012 (UTC)</sub>
*:::Bwuh how to answer question not addressed to me {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 04:46, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Against''' - Short spurts of activity, followed by long bursts of inactivity, coupled with less than 150 edits in the last six months. Not a good record for a sysop. --{{User:Armpit_Odor/dnsig}} 14:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
*Vouch - {{User:Mazu/sig}}  19:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Against''' - I never really did like his name. And personally just gives me the heeby jeebies whenever I see him on the wiki. That is to say, if I do see a post by him, which is not very common.--[[User:Krazymouse|Krazymouse]] 04:28, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Against''' - I haven't been here for a large chunk of his term, but, quite a number of people were a bit hesitant to promote him back then (most of the sysop team at the time, for example). Not that he hasn't been helpful, but most of what he's been doing doesn't really need sysop powers, I think. Plus the inactivity. Correct me if I'm wrong. --{{:User:Thanatologist/Sig}} 13:08, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Against''' - I have a great deal of respect for Revenant in both his history with the community and his contributions, however with his activity of late its clear that he currently has too much on his plate to continue operating in his current status as a sysop. I would welcome him back when his schedule and demands on his time lessen however. --[[User:Sabanya|Sabanya]] 10:56, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - Helps out, would be better if it was less occasional. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 17:21, 21 January 2012 (UTC)


==Re-Evaluations still needing to be processed==
==Recent Re-Evaluations==
 
The 2020 Re-Evaluations have begun. They will go for 2 weeks and end on 09:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC).


<!--''There are currently no Re-Evaluations to be processed.''-->
Please provide your opinions of the sysops undergoing evaluation below. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 09:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
:The re-evaluation comment period has now elapsed. Please hold while our beloved Crats decide our fates. {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 13:59, 23 July 2020 (UTC)


''There are currently no Re-Evaluations to be processed.''
===Bob Moncrief===
{{bid|Bob Moncrief|RE}}
*'''Vouch''' - Still foolish enough to carry workload in this dying place. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 16:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - I endorse the product/service. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 17:25, 21 July 2020 (UTC)


==Recent Re-evaluations==
===Rosslessness===
<!--
{{bid|Rosslessness|RE}}
''There have been no recent re-evaluations''
*'''Vouch''' - Ceux qui n’ont pas connu l’ancien régime ne pourront jamais savoir ce qu’était la douceur de vivre. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 16:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
-->
*'''Vouch''' - I endorse the product/service. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 17:25, 21 July 2020 (UTC)


===[[User:Karek|Karek]]===
===Stelar===
{{bid|Karek}}
{{bid|Stelar|RE}}
*'''Vouch''' - Shows up on time and sober, which is more than can be said about most sys-ops. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 16:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - I endorse the product/service. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 17:25, 21 July 2020 (UTC)


It's time for Karek's re-evaluation. Community convene.
===Result===


*'''Vouch''' - I'm pretty sure the wiki could explode and he'd know how to put it back together. ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>05:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)</sub>
Unsurprisingly, the sysops under evaluation have been '''retained.''' Thanks to our two ex-sysops for pitching in to second the rubber-stamping. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 14:48, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' as much as i disagree with karek. he is very skilled wikifu ogre, and this dump needs him.--{{User:Sexualharrison/sig}}<small>07:31, 10 January 2012 (bst)</small>
*'''vouch''' {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 07:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - Karek knows what he's doing. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 07:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - I haven't been around much, but I like what Karek did on the sysop demotions policy. Always good to be increasing accountability.--[[User:Shortround|Shortround]] 10:45, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Against''' - Proven biased in a vandal banning case. {{User:Generaloberst/s}} 13:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - Everyone clashes occassionally with Karek, but no one doubts his technical expertise. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">█ </span>]]</span>''' 18:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Couch''' - Certainly capable of entering into wiki-philosophical discussions. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 18:41, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' --{{User:Armpit_Odor/dnsig}} 20:45, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' {{User:Mazu/sig}}  03:08, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - Hates Nazis, but in a good way, like Indiana Jones--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 04:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - He's fine for me. [[User:Asheets|Asheets]] 21:07, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
*He applies the rules without fear or favour, and looks out for the best interests of the wiki. Couldn't ask for anything more, really <small>-- [[User:Boxy|boxy]] 02:16, 12 January 2012 (BST)</small>
*'''Vouch''' - I've always been a Karek fan. {{User:BillyClubThorton/signature}} 23:23, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - The virtues outweigh the vices. Just. -- [[Image:Cat Pic.png|14px]] [[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''Thadeous Oakley''']]</span> [[User_Talk:MisterGame|<span style= "color: black; background-color: white">'''''Talk''''']]</span>  10:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - He's done a good job; don't see any reason not to retain him.--<span>[[User:The General|The General]] <sup>[[User Talk:The General|T]] [[Special:ListUsers/sysop|<span title="System Operator">Sys</span>]] [[Project_UnWelcome|<span title="Project UnWelcome">U!</span>]] [[Project Wiki Patrol|<span title="Project Wiki Patrol">P!</span>]] <span class="plainlinks">[http://urbandeadwiki.smfforfree.com/index.php <span title="Urban Dead Wiki Forum">F!</span>]</span></sup></span> 21:54, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Vouch with a helping of mayo''' - While I personally don't agree with a couple of his views, I still think he's a great Sysop! KEEP IT UP! --[[User:Krazymouse|Krazymouse]] 04:30, 18 January 2012 (UTC)


'''Passed''' Thanks. --[[User:Rosslessness|Ross<sup>less</sup>ness]]  18:46, 18 January 2012 (UTC)


==Archived Evaluations==
See [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/2019-08-06 Re-Evaluations|2019 Re-Evaluations]]
*[[:Category:Re-Evaluations Candidacies|Complete list of Re-Evaluations Requests]]
*[[:Category:Successful Re-Evaluations Candidacies|Successful Re-Evaluations Candidacies]]
*[[:Category:Unsuccessful Re-Evaluations Candidacies|Unsuccessful Re-Evaluations Candidacies]]


==Archived Re-Evaluations==
''For earlier re-evaluations, see the following:''
*[[:Category:{{CURRENTYEAR}}_Re-Evaluation_Archives|This year's re-evaluations]]
*[[:Category:{{LASTYEAR}}_Re-Evaluation_Archives|Last year's re-evaluations]]
*[[A/SA|Sysop Archives]] for older re-evaluations and related sysop activities
{{:UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Check|Re-Evaluations Scheduling}}
{{:UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Check|Re-Evaluations Scheduling}}

Latest revision as of 14:48, 25 July 2020

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

Once a year, all sitting sysops will come up for re-evaluation by the community. The idea of this re-evaluation is to ensure that each sysop still has the trust of the community, which is vital for a sysop to have. This will give the community a chance to voice their opinions about how the sysops have been doing, and re-affirm or decline their trusted user status.

The idea of a sysop being a trusted user is a part of the guidelines for the general conduct of a sysop. The guidelines for the re-evaluation is the same as for being promoted to a sysop (which is reposted below), but with a few minor changes in wording.

Guidelines for System Operator Re-Evaluations

Once a year, on Urban Dead's birthday (July 3rd), all sysops will be subject to a community discussion. Sysops may also put themselves up for re-evaluation at any time (see below). All users are asked to comment on each candidate in question, ask questions of the candidate, and discuss the candidate's suitability for continuing to be a System Operator. This is not a vote. It is instead merely a request for comments from the wiki community. This will continue for two weeks, as all users get a chance to air their opinions on the candidate.

Once the two weeks are up, the Bureaucrats will review the community discussion and make a decision for each candidate based upon it. The user will be notified of the status of their re-evaluation, and will be retained in their position should it appear that the community is willing to continue to accept them as a System Operator. In the event that the decision is negative, then the sysop will be demoted back to regular user status, where after a month's time, the user can re-submit themself for promotion.

Before users voice their opinions on the candidate who wishes to continue their System Operator status, the following guidelines should be reviewed by the user:

General User Guidelines for System Operator Re-Evaluations

Before voicing their opinion on a candidate's re-evaluation bid, a user should consider some of the following questions:

  • Has the candidate spent significant time within the community as a sysop?
We define this as the candidate having made at least one edit in the past 3 months. It is recommended that a user look over the the sysop activity check and last 500 edits to determine the level of activity of the candidate.
Note: The Truly Inactive Sysops policy dictates that a sysop who hasn't made an edit within four months is automatically demoted. Therefore, for a sysop to be re-evaluated, they need to have made an edit before that time-frame is up.
  • Has the candidate maintained significant activity within the community?
We define this as at least 50 edits under the candidate's name since their last re-evaluation. It is recommended that a user look over the candidate's last 50 edits in order to get a feel for the activity of a candidate.
Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history used to be periodically purged on this wiki.
  • Has the candidate expressed interest in maintaining the community?
We define this as clear evidence that the candidate is already performing maintenance tasks and continuing taking a leadership role on the wiki.
  • Has the candidate expressed a desire to continue to be a System Operator?
We define this simply as indicating in the candidate's request their desire to continue to maintain the position.
  • Is there an indication of trust in the candidate.
We define this as a minimum of three other users (preferably users with at least 200 edits under their name and at least one System Operator), willing to vouch for the candidate's suitability for the role.

If a candidate is highly exemplary in one guideline, a certain level of flexibility should be extended to the other guidelines. Other guidelines for qualifications may be used, these are just a few suggested things to consider before a user voices their opinion.

Re-Evaluations Being Discussed

Recent Re-Evaluations

The 2020 Re-Evaluations have begun. They will go for 2 weeks and end on 09:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC).

Please provide your opinions of the sysops undergoing evaluation below. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 09:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

The re-evaluation comment period has now elapsed. Please hold while our beloved Crats decide our fates. Bob Moncrief EBDW! 13:59, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Bob Moncrief

Rosslessness

Stelar

Result

Unsurprisingly, the sysops under evaluation have been retained. Thanks to our two ex-sysops for pitching in to second the rubber-stamping. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 14:48, 25 July 2020 (UTC)


See 2019 Re-Evaluations

Archived Re-Evaluations

For earlier re-evaluations, see the following:

Re-Evaluations Scheduling

User Position Last Contribution Seat Available
A Helpful Little Gnome (Contribs) Bureaucrat 2021-10-29 2021-12-01
DanceDanceRevolution (Contribs) Bureaucrat 2021-10-28 2021-12-01
Rosslessness (Contribs) Sysop 2024-06-10 N/A
Stelar (Contribs) Sysop 2021-10-29 N/A

Total Sysops: 4 (excluding Kevan, LeakyBocks and Urbandead)

Last updated at: 03:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)