UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2011 02: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:00, 18 February 2011

This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.

Served Speedy Deletions

User:Hagnat

and every page under it. Failure to comply will be moved to misconbitration. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 15:27, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

~~Keep~~ ~ 15:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
I assume you meant this one, right? Like you "lolwut" kind of sums it up. I still say ~~Keep~~ though. ~ 15:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

This needs to be moved to Speedy Deletions, and I need a second confirmation of you Hagnat before we start wiping. I discourage it though, I hate removing valuable user history. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 15:55, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

"A Speedy Deletion may be circumvented by a single vote of Keep under the request. If this occurs, the system operator shall move the Speedy Deletion request to the Deletion Request Queue, where the normal rules for Deletion of the page shall apply." Care to move it to deletions? --Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 15:59, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Just wait. Technically yes it should be moved back but let's hear from Hagnat. ~

16:01, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

To clarify, I believe Hagnat made a mistake when posting his own userspace. See his comment on User_talk:Hagnаt, The page name is actually User:Hagn%D0%B0t. If that's what he wants deleted, then I say keep. If he actually wants his own userspace deleted then fine, he can keep it here on Speedy. ~

16:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Wrong Ross. See Here. Users can ask for deletion of their pages and have it served, keep votes or not. Official policy. Precedent too, because I know we had the same issue with Iscariot and eventually he got his way. --

Thadeous Oakley

Talk 16:09, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Um, thats not what is says. "Users may request the deletion of their User and User talk pages, or any subpages therein." Doesn't say anything about it being served keep votes or not. As in the case below, if people want their user pages deleted, they have to put in a crit 7 request. --Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 16:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Or crit 8. --Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 16:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Precedent --

Thadeous Oakley

Talk 16:12, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Lulwut Izzy's self-deletions went as planned? I got taken to A/M for serving some of them. ALso, as Vapor has pointed out, it seems Hagnat has posted a deceptively-named user page that isnt his own, which is why it wasn't bourght to A/SD in the first place. 16:13, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Link to misconduct case at hand? Oh, and I rather doubt this is some sort of joke, since requesting a userpage from 06 to be deleted seems far-fetched. Seems more like Hagnat wants a permanent departure from this wiki. We'll just wait for him to confirm, then we can start wiping if he wants his own userspace gone. --

Thadeous Oakley

Talk 16:18, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

If there was a banned vandal whose userspace looked exactly like mine, I'd want it deleted too. Also case. Whilst it went to a deadlock, and therefre no warning, it was basically a re-affirmation that deletions need to folow a due process - and that means usine A/D if A/SD is ruled with a keep. SPEG doesn't state that userpage deletion requets are automatic, just permissible.

16:23, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Your case stated (Oh I was dumb back then) that deletion requests should happen on this wiki, not off-site, that's it. The policy and precedent still stand. BTW, I'm fine with bringing this to deletions and have it voted upon, but even if he gets a million keeps, and he'll still want it gone, it will be deleted regardless. --

Thadeous Oakley

Talk 16:29, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Sigh. There. I've struck my keep vote but I don't want this deleted until Hagnat confirms that it is his own userspace or the impostor's userspace that he wants deleted. I will take anyone that deletes this page before he confirms to misconduct. Just. Don't. Do. It. ~

16:33, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Never said I would without confirmation. --

Thadeous Oakley

Talk 16:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Sigh. Should have checked that first. Didn't see his comment on it, I thought it was something out of 2006. Yeah, a lot more likely he meant that. I'm pretty sure we don't delete vandals like that normally though. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 16:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

"and every page under it." makes me think its a lolwot request by Haggy to get his entire userspace deleted, probably before a fun undeletions request. --Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 17:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

actually, i really do mean my entire user space... the lolwut comment was made after the request was made afterall as i was checking pages in my userspace and found that bogus vandal (i lolled a lot when i saw it, cuz i remember when they were common in here)... and dont forget to delete the images i have on it, unless you guys decide to keep them in an image ark like i do (did) --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 17:09, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

And now that you guys mention it, could you do me a favor and delete the bogus account as well ? --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 17:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

As impersonation? --Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 17:12, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

hell yeah! i often found it annoying when some sysops would create pages for vandals just to add the banned user template... its meaningless --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 17:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

sure. --Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 17:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

while you guys are at it, could you replace every instance of 'hagnat' in udwiki for something else ? like 'that brazillian crazy d00d'... i'd like to have my nickname in google to not point in here --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 17:18, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

You can change it yourself. Once you've done it let us know which protected pages you need us to change the last ones on. --Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 17:19, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

no can do, that would involve editing other users comments and that would be vandalism... that`s why i need a sysop to do eettttt --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 17:21, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm sure we would deem it a good faith edit. It in no way alters the meaning of the content. Incidentally the other Hagnat has been Deleted anyone need to know the scheduled deletions? --Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 17:24, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

i have plenty of enemies in here who wouldnt like me editing their comments... --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 17:25, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

and if you were really smart you would`ve deleted all the other vandal users whose page only has the banneduser template and some random talk in the talk page... actually, consider that part of my deletion request as well --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 17:27, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

No need. Its a scheduled deletion. --Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 17:28, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

wut are you waiting to start on it then ? --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 17:46, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Can't be bothered. If you provide me with links I'll get right on it. --Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 17:52, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:VandalBan - have fun --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 17:57, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Thats just the template, not the purely vandal alts. You know better than that Hag. --Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 18:00, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

and my request was to delete all pages which the content was mainly the template call ;) --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 18:10, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Keep - I just traded 3 goats and the dreaded polio virus to Haggy's parents for his indentured servitude, and since what is his is now mine, I wish to keep--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 18:34, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Done the namespace stuff bar the signature- the inclusions will have to be fixed if we're gonna delete that. Oh, and if you want to through the keep shit at me, we have ample precedents for crit 7's overriding keep votes. don't make me find them. -- ϑ^anceϑ^ance ℜ^evolution 23:40, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Fiver says they try to stir shit up. -- C h e e s e 23:43, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

So fix the template calls and delete my sig page. I dun want it anymore. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 23:46, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Hags, just replace it with {{Subst:Usr|Hagnat}} and we don't need to delete it. Done? Done.

23:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

There's over 700 inclusions. That would take a while. -- C h e e s e 23:52, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

No, no. The actual sig. If I mean the inclusions I'd have started it already.

23:55, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

I was replying the Hag's comment above yours. -- C h e e s e 23:57, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

cant, page is protected --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 23:58, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

and you forgot about these pages --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 23:58, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Then gimme permission to do it.

00:00, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Crit 8

User:Michaleson/RitA and User:Michaleson/RPkillers plz--^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 22:04, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{^{^{^{^{#nerftemplatedsigs}}}}} 22:21, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Template:FeralUndead

Crit 1. Unused dupe of Template:vulture -- Spiderzed ▋ 13:08, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Yep. ~

07:55, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Thoroaeborus/Anaconda/Talk

Crits 7 (Author edit only) and 8 (User page) ~THOROAEB OR US 03:16, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

EATEN

~ 06:16, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Thoroaeborus/Anaconda/Hall_of_Fame

Crits 7 (Author edit only) and 8 (User page) ~THOROAEB OR US 03:16, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

EATEN

~ 06:16, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

The_Fortress/Anaconda/Header

Under crit 7, Author edit only. I did move the content to a Template page where it should be. ~THOROAEB OR US 19:15, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

done.--Yonnua Koponen^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:27, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Template:Modunapp

An unused dupe of the Template:PromRej. Someone must have merged the above into PromRej in ye olde days, therefore leaving this as redundant code on some of the older bids. I've since cleaned, so its good to go now. -- ϑ^anceϑ^ance ℜ^evolution 08:58, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

He's dead, Jim. ~

23:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Image:Tumblr lasa4sMTQH1qb3dkio1 500.jpg

Unused dupe of Image:Zombie Ewok.jpg -- C h e e s e 15:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. ~

05:27, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Image:Title.png

Unused dupe of Image:Title1.png -- C h e e s e 15:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. ~

05:27, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Image:Dice23.jpg

Unused dupe of Image:Dice24.jpg -- C h e e s e 14:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. ~

05:27, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Image:Dead rising raincoat cult member.png (PNG Image, 314×547 pixels) 1296812699704.png

Broken unused image. -- C h e e s e 14:41, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. ~

05:27, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Image:Commons-logo-390237725.jpg

Larger, unused dupe of Image:Commons-logo.jpg -- C h e e s e 14:38, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. ~

05:27, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Template:List of Families of Malton

Thanks to my messing about on the FoM page the other day this can quite happily be deleted. -- C h e e s e 14:30, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. ~

05:27, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Zombie Lord/profile

--

| T | BALLS! | 20:29 8 February 2011(UTC)

done. If you're getting rid of everything, just post a link to your user prefix and I'll nuke everything.--Yonnua Koponen^{Talk ! Contribs} 20:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC)