UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2008 12
Speedy Deletions Archive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.
Speedy Deletion Queue
Brooksville Hospitals
Same reason: Matthias General Hospital and St. John's Hospital (Brooksville) --Lithedarkangel 05:57, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Image:501st Insignia.PNG
Unlinked to, and duplicated here. Crit 1.
Linkthewindow Talk 12:32, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- I know it is a dupe and unlinked, but it is much larger than the other one and just upped today. I think we can let it sit since he may use the larger image for something. If it was the same size/quality I would clear it out right away for you though. --– Nubis NWO 13:38, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Okay. I'll post on the group's talk page asking if they need it wiped. Linkthewindow Talk 13:41, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Served Speedy Deletions
NecroTech Brooksville
Reason: All content moved to individual location pages. The Flooks Building The Culling Building and The Foreman Building . --Lithedarkangel 05:46, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
User_talk:Iscariot/Damon_Young/Culture_Tour
Crit It's-mine-and-I-don't-want-idiocy-connected-to-my-projects -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:27, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
The Black Knights
Crit 1, no content that can be expanded. Also as per this discussion, I find Boxy's argument that 'vandals shouldn't win' to be straightforward moderation. This page would have been deleted if anyone else had found it, it's only being kept against standard procedures at the will of a bureaucrat. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 21:57, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- Served, Crit 6 and A/VB can cover the rest and with that it as no reason to stick around.--Karekmaps?! 01:09, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
An image with a very long title
Breaks tables, and I uploaded a duplicate with a shorter title here. --HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS 18:08, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
More Crit 1's
- Journal:No journal-no content, no-one seems to be adding to it
- Journal:The Envoy-ditto. Not edited since before the purge (with the exception of categorization.)
- The Borg-not edited since late October. Just an image and a line of text
- Crazy Cookie Brigade-not edited since July, no content
- Disciple of Zeko-not edited for over a year, no content
I've always been meaning to ask to, does Crit 1 apply to content-less group pages? Linkthewindow Talk 13:08, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Journal:No journal - This is linked to and used as a place holder link. It shouldn't be deleted.--– Nubis NWO 13:16, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- The Borg-not edited since late October. Just an image and a line of text
- Boxy posted on the creator's talk page in Nov. and he says they are still active. (and compared them to the Dead *smirk*)
- Disciple of Zeko-not edited for over a year, no content was originally scheduled for deletion in 2006 but missed or recreated.
- Journal:The Envoy-Although we hesitate to delete Journals on here it was clearly unused and with barely one entry. This does not mean it is open season on them.--– Nubis NWO 13:29, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- As far as group pages go, I think we take them on a case by case basis depending on the length of time it has been up and the activity level of the creator. I think Crit 12 was repealed so that slightly successful groups wouldn't be trashed. Groups that aren't DEM/DHPD sized, but bigger than CCB (one person) need special considerations.--– Nubis NWO 13:35, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Criterion 8
■■ 03:37, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Criterion 9
--HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS 02:36, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Karek got it -- boxy talk • teh rulz 05:40 17 December 2008 (BST)
Red Cresent Pages
These pages were merged into Red Cresent Emergency Management/Protocols after they were posted on Move Requests. G-Man said the group was disbanded (and said to delete the pages) but instead the information on these pages was merged and now the little content pages that are in the wrong name space are being put up for Speedy Delete.
Experiment 02843 Also, is "cresent" the Non-US English spelling? Just curious.--– Nubis NWO 20:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- crescent is how it's spelled in australia.--xoxo 05:03, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Its meant to represent the word, but not take on the direct meaning of it, therefore (At least I hope) its not spelled that way anywhere, although I could easily be mistaken.--G-Man 12:31, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Keep - Two weeks should be enough to ensure that this isn't another former leader gone rogue. Take in to A/D. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 04:52, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- But none of the info is being lost, just reorganised by Nubis -- boxy talk • teh rulz 05:41 15 December 2008 (BST)
- I left a message on the page. Posted it on the A/MR page asking for someone from the group to weigh in. G-man is showing as the author of all of these pages (and many under the group). It's a Crit 7 I just did the work. --– Nubis NWO 13:09, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Groups structure is a bit too messy and unappealing. The whole thing went down the tube and everyone gave up and left. I'll admit the failure is my fault and I've considered restarting something much, much simular to avoid the same mistakes, but the point is, its hard to be rouge when your the only one left making the rules isn't it?--G-Man 12:31, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Done. (I was just making sure the author was happy with the new merged content before clearing these anyway.)--– Nubis NWO 13:11, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- "A Speedy Deletion may be circumvented by a single vote of Keep under the request. If this occurs, the system operator shall move the Speedy Deletion request to the Deletion Request Queue, where the normal rules for Deletion of the page shall apply." -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 17:21, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Fine, push if you wish for it to happen. Waste of time for the system op.s, not me, the only thing that eludes me is why you would think I would rather have such pages deleted then hand them over to a new leader? I spent hours bringing that all together and would love if someone was left to maintain them, but with the group dead its wasted space. If you care to look you'll see I originally authored all the pages, although a few may be linked to my old profile (before I found out about the nickname feature) zach016. We had one hellva arguement over the basis behind infection if you happen to remember.--G-Man 01:29, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
- "Should the exact wording of the policies run contrary to a system operators' best good-faith judgment and/or the spirit of the policies, the exact wording may be ignored. ", G-Man made his views on it clear and, frankly, his were the only ones that mattered.--Karekmaps?! 01:43, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah Iscariot there's a clause that says if a sysop disagrees with your keep vote it doesn't count. Further reading: october drama.--xoxo 05:31, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
- Fine, push if you wish for it to happen. Waste of time for the system op.s, not me, the only thing that eludes me is why you would think I would rather have such pages deleted then hand them over to a new leader? I spent hours bringing that all together and would love if someone was left to maintain them, but with the group dead its wasted space. If you care to look you'll see I originally authored all the pages, although a few may be linked to my old profile (before I found out about the nickname feature) zach016. We had one hellva arguement over the basis behind infection if you happen to remember.--G-Man 01:29, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
- "A Speedy Deletion may be circumvented by a single vote of Keep under the request. If this occurs, the system operator shall move the Speedy Deletion request to the Deletion Request Queue, where the normal rules for Deletion of the page shall apply." -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 17:21, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Done. (I was just making sure the author was happy with the new merged content before clearing these anyway.)--– Nubis NWO 13:11, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Groups structure is a bit too messy and unappealing. The whole thing went down the tube and everyone gave up and left. I'll admit the failure is my fault and I've considered restarting something much, much simular to avoid the same mistakes, but the point is, its hard to be rouge when your the only one left making the rules isn't it?--G-Man 12:31, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
SIM-5,5-suburb
Crit 1? --Janus talk 21:22, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Indeed, no expandable content, unless someone from the SIM wishes to enlighten me, Crit 1. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 04:33, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
LordDragonfang
Scheduled Deletion, it's a user page redirect.
-- Linkthewindow Talk 04:28, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Danger reports
- User:DangerReport/a warehouse (10,60) duplicated at User:DangerReport/Warehouse 10,60,
- User:DangerReport/a warehouse (12,65) duplicated at User:DangerReport/Warehouse 12,65,
- User:DangerReport/a warehouse (13,65) duplicated at User:DangerReport/Warehouse 13,65,
- User:DangerReport/a warehouse (17,66) duplicated at User:DangerReport/Warehouse 17,66,
- User:DangerReport/a warehouse (19,63) duplicated at User:DangerReport/Warehouse 19,63,
- User:DangerReport/Cottam Way Police Station duplicated at User:DangerReport/Cottam Way Police Department,
- User:DangerReport/a warehouse (19.63) duplicated at User:DangerReport/Warehouse 19,63,
All crit 1's that were created in the wrong place -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:59 14 December 2008 (BST)
Dakerstown Hospitals
Duplicated on the other Dakerstown Hospital pages, now split off. Crit 1.
Linkthewindow Talk 11:06, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Talk:ZEMA_Profile
Crit 5 -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 13:40, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Shouldn't it just be moved to here? Linkthewindow Talk 20:31, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted -- boxy talk • teh rulz 12:16 14 December 2008 (BST)
Pitneybank_Resistance_Front
Crit 1 and Crit 7. --Janus talk 16:55, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Crit 3
By the way, is there a way to internally link to redirects without it redirecting you?
--Pedentic 04:36, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Boxy got it. No, I don't know of a way to link to a redirect without an auto redirect. Linkthewindow Talk 04:47, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted - the easiest way is to put {{speedydelete}} up the top of the page, that breaks the redirect and you can link like normal (it's also supposed to be added to every page up for speedydelete anyway) -- boxy talk • teh rulz 04:48 12 December 2008 (BST)
Crit 1?
The_Massacre_of_the_178th. Abandoned and unfinished. It hasn't been edited in over a year, isn't linked to except for an old archive page, and the user who created it hasn't been around for quite some time. --Pestolence(talk) 01:13, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Crit 13?
--Janus talk 15:53, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- Removed. Unlinked, everything it linked to did not exist. No longer exists. Deleted --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 19:12, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Crit 10
--– Nubis NWO 15:40, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Crit 1
20070409_Zombie_Scissor_Fingers
20070412_Stuff_That_Won't_Pass
20070420_Chainsaw_Vending_Machines
All crit 1 due to the fact that they didn't even get into the main suggestions system for whatever reason (I can't check due to the history purge). Might not have been cycled, might not have been entered correctly.
All are now useless to the suggestions systems due to the date in the page title that renders them invalid for consideration. Look at them, no-one with half a mind's going to re-enter them for fear of being mistaken for the original author and even Talk:Suggestions would tear these apart. Therefore incoherent content, crit 1.
Also, as some of them have current user sigs on them deletion will save an escalation for certain people under rule 10 of suggestions rules. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 13:12, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- They are in the humourous suggestions category for a reasons -- boxy talk • teh rulz 13:15 11 December 2008 (BST)
- The history of them is that when I was setting up the current suggestions system, we tested it out (before implimentation) by submitting humourous suggestions and seeing how the templates and voting systems worked. These are the test ones, which have at least some worth, I feel, in that some of them are quite funny. They definitely don't qualify for any speedydelete criteria -- boxy talk • teh rulz 13:18 11 December 2008 (BST)
- Having not gone through the system and being in inconsistent formatting means there should really be a template on these telling users why they still exist. Otherwise they could be shuffled into the system and a host of rule 10s issued. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 13:25, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- They are clearly dated from 2007 by the naming format. They are in the humorous category. Boxy knows the history and would reverse any rule 10s that probably won't happen anyway. If someone was dumb enough to cycle in as a new suggestion something that already had votes on it from 2007 then they deserve a VB charge. They don't need a template and they are part of the wiki history. --– Nubis NWO 15:49, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- Having not gone through the system and being in inconsistent formatting means there should really be a template on these telling users why they still exist. Otherwise they could be shuffled into the system and a host of rule 10s issued. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 13:25, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - and move to humorous suggestions. --WanYao 23:39, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Speedied after move
--xoxo 02:52, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Aftermath_of_Malton_Population:_Zero
Crit 1 - duplicated content of User:Soldier/Aftermath_of_Malton_Population:_Zero after successful move request. Also attendant talk page. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 22:44, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
User:JaredV and User talk:JaredV
I have a new account, don't need these anymore. --JAREDPlay the game 02:33, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Randallbank Police Department
As below. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 19:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
East Grayside Police Department
There's going to be quite a few of these this week. Orphaned info on individual pages. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 16:32, 7 December 2008 (UTC) Deleted - Karekmaps?! 19:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
File:Yungblood.jpg
Crit 1. image file was entirely blank. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 18:38, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
New Wasson Square
Crit 3? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 11:58, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted - unused redirect -- boxy talk • teh rulz 12:15 7 December 2008 (BST)
Pitneybank_Police_Department
To qoute Ross, who is quoting Grim "We have an orphan. Let's kill it."
(dupe.)
-- Linkthewindow Talk 10:42, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
User:Linkthewindow/Userboxes/Loc._userbox
Just found this. I don't use it, and it needs a good nuking (Crit 7, 10.)
Thanks.
Linkthewindow Talk 22:56, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- And this too. Linkthewindow Talk 22:59, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Tick, tick, tick tick, BOOM. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 23:00, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Missed the late comer. Linkthewindow Talk 23:01, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Tick, tick, tick tick, BOOM. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 23:00, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
User:Reklawd
Crit 11? --Janus talk 15:28, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- Karek got it. Linkthewindow Talk 04:11, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
The NOT so secret diary of a sysop
Author edit only, deleting redirect after moving page to Help Namespace. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 18:44, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Self Immolation. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 18:44, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- These are scheduled deletions, unused redirects resulting from page moves, and don't need reporting on A/SD -- boxy talk • teh rulz 05:27 5 December 2008 (BST)
- Oh yeah. UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines. How long can I get away with the "it's my first day" Excuse? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 10:09, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- One day ;) --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 10:30, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- You can never go wrong with documenting too much.-Karekmaps?! 10:33, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oh yeah. UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines. How long can I get away with the "it's my first day" Excuse? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 10:09, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- These are scheduled deletions, unused redirects resulting from page moves, and don't need reporting on A/SD -- boxy talk • teh rulz 05:27 5 December 2008 (BST)
Crit 4
Some unused categories:
- Category:Scions of Steel - Made ten days ago, no articles. Group doesn't exist either.
- Category:MDC Member - Created about a year and a half ago, not used in any templates or anything and pretty much orphaned. -- Cheese 21:24, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Image:Seal.jpg
Crit 1 and (more or less) Crit 7. I uploaded a new version of the file. Thanks --Janus talk 23:15, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- Bye bye! =) -- Cheese 21:16, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for nuking it! --Janus talk 21:47, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
User:SBSTAR/sig
Replaced by User:SBSTAR/Sig --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 20:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Reklawd
Crit 7 accedentally created while working on profile. --Jaysed 17:12, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Knights of the Black_Dawn
Knights of the Black_Dawn Author Edit Only, just dont want anymore. --Mr Minos 15:41, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
User:Yetdak
User doesn't exist (Crit 1, 2.) Linkthewindow Talk 10:37, 1 December 2008 (UTC)