UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2010 01
This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.
Speedy Deletion Queue
There are currently no pages in the queue.
Served Speedy Deletions
Crit 4???
I may be wrong, but isn't this an empty category? It's only linked to Boxy's talk, and a piece of text on Red hawk's page that says: "Nuke Category:Motels". I assume it used to exist, but has since been emptied. Can someone with more knowledge investigate and or delete this?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
EATEN |
Motels are to be categorised in Category:Hotels, so this serves no purpose in addition to being empty. Crit 4ed. 22:20, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
I goofed
Sorry need this page deleted Good Grief/recruit I meant to make it a template and turned it into a page by mistkake. Sorry. Uh...Crit7? I believe is which one it is
--
Crit 7
I admit defeat. Template:YonnuaComment --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 17:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
EATEN |
Image:Eexplosion.jpg
Duped and unused. --Haliman - Talk 03:14, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
EATEN |
Doug Carlin
User:Rufus Vanzant/Doug Carlin Criteria 7 I think is the one it is under.--No one ever pays Rufus in gum! 21:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Deleted --~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 21:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Dupe images
Are all dupes of Image:CGR.jpg.-- Adward 18:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Deleted --~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 21:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Line Tactics
Orphaned Crit 1 from december. Although the tactics discussed on the page are brilliant, I sadly feel that it must be lost from the wiki forever.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:18, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sadly the tactical genius that was discussed here is NOM NOM NOMMED. 23:24, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- lol, you need a template for your deletion catchphrase. I think everyone should have deletion catchphrases.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:27, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- lol, you need a template for your deletion catchphrase. I think everyone should have deletion catchphrases.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:27, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
EATEN |
Unused Group Listings
Basically I transferred group listings to pages with better and consistant names as well as changing the code a bit. So all the old malformed ones can go.
The old ones are all templates listed under "T" in this category except for Tapton Groups and Tollyton Groups (which are at the start and end of the T list, so just hit everything except for the first and last) -- RoosterDragon 01:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
* Template:Barrvillegroups * Template:BrookeHillsgroups * Template:Brooksvillegroups * Template:Buttonvillegroups * Template:Central borehamwood groups * Template:Chancelwoodgroups * Template:Chudleytongroups * Template:Countryside (east) groups * Template:Countryside (west) groups * Template:Crooketongroups * Template:Crowbankgroups * Template:Dakerstowngroups * Template:Danversbankgroups * Template:Dartsidegroups * Template:DarvallHeightsgroups * Template:Dentonsidegroups * Template:Dulstongroups * Template:DunellHillsgroups * Template:Dunningwoodgroups * Template:Earletowngroups * Template:East borehamwood groups * Template:EastBecktowngroups * Template:EastBoundwoodgroups * Template:EastGraysidegroups * Template:Eastonwoodgroups * Template:Edgecombegroups * Template:Elstree groups * Template:Elstree studios groups * Template:FoulkesVillagegroups * Template:Fryerbankgroups * Template:GalbraithHillsgroups * Template:Gatcombetongroups * Template:Gibsontongroups * Template:Greentowngroups * Template:GriggHeightsgroups * Template:Gulsonsidegroups * Template:Havercroftgroups * Template:Heytowngroups * Template:Hollomstowngroups * Template:Houldenbankgroups * Template:HuntleyHeightsgroups * Template:Jensentowngroups * Template:Judgewoodgroups * Template:Kempsterbankgroups * Template:Ketchelbankgroups * Template:KinchHeightsgroups * Template:LamportHillsgroups * Template:LerwillHeightsgroups * Template:Lockettsidegroups * Template:Lukinswoodgroups * Template:MillenHillsgroups * Template:Miltowngroups * Template:MockridgeHeightsgroups * Template:Molebankgroups * Template:Morningtongroups * Template:NewArkhamgroups * Template:Nixbankgroups * Template:North borehamwood groups * Template:NorthBlythvillegroups * Template:NortheastBorehamwoodgroups * Template:Northwest borehamwood groups * Template:OldArkhamgroups * Template:Osmondvillegroups * Template:Owsleybankgroups * Template:Pashentongroups * Template:Payntertongroups * Template:PeddlesdenVillagegroups * Template:Pegtongroups * Template:Pennvillegroups * Template:PennyHeightsgroups * Template:Peppardvillegroups * Template:Pescodsidegroups * Template:Pimbankgroups * Template:Pitneybankgroups * Template:Quarlesbankgroups * Template:Radlett groups * Template:RainesHillsgroups * Template:Randallbankgroups * Template:Reganbankgroups * Template:Rhodenbankgroups * Template:RichmondHillsgroups * Template:Ridleybankgroups * Template:Roachtowngroups * Template:Roftwoodgroups * Template:RoltHeightsgroups * Template:Roywoodgroups * Template:Ruddlebankgroups * Template:Santlervillegroups * Template:Scarletwoodgroups * Template:Shacklevillegroups * Template:Shearbankgroups * Template:ShoreHillsgroups * Template:Shuttlebankgroups * Template:South borehamwood groups * Template:SouthBlythvillegroups * Template:Southeast borehamwood groups * Template:Southwest borehamwood groups * Template:SpicerHillsgroups * Template:Spracklingbankgroups * Template:StanburyVillagegroups * Template:Starlingtowngroups * Template:Taptongroups * Template:Tollytongroups * Template:Vinetowngroups * Template:West borehamwood groups * Template:WestBecktowngroups * Template:WestBoundwoodgroups * Template:WestGraysidegroups * Template:Whittensidegroups * Template:Williamsvillegroups * Template:WrayHeightsgroups * Template:WykeHillsgroups * Template:Wykewoodgroups * Template:Yagotongroups
-- boxy talk • teh rulz 03:02 3 January 2010 (BST)
- All the ones I've clicked on so far are still included in the suburb pages :-/ -- boxy talk • teh rulz 03:07 3 January 2010 (BST)
So, as I see it, you've attempted to rename templates using a naming convention that includes underscore spaces between the words, and capitalization of each word. For example: Template:DunellHillsgroups, is now duplicated under the name Template:Dunell_Hills_Groups, and so on. I'm writing this to clarify for others, and to verify that this is correct, since your original statement isn't entirely clear.
Now, in theory, if all of the info is duplicated, then the old listings are redundant and eligible for Crit 1 speedy delete. However, I must point out that some of these templates are not yet redundant and there are incoming links that remain. Like Dunell Hills, for example. Also, Category:Suburb Group Listings should probably be fixed first, as it still shows a number of the old links like Template:DunellHillsgroups.
I didn't check every item on the list, so I don't know how much remains to be done, but perhaps you would find some help putting the list up in a community area and making it a group project where people can check items off the list as they are completed. Because, as I understand crit 1, each of the old templates you've listed must first be made redundant by fixing all incoming links to the new templates, before they can be deleted.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 04:15, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- I've gone through them all and fixed every single non-admin link since there were only a handful. At this point, Template:DunellHillsgroups and Template:Dunningwoodgroups are the only two with links, and they're all from archived admin pages. The rest are just linked from here, though about 2/3 to 4/5 have that phantom inclusion. —Aichon— 05:19, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Template:Dulstongroups is now included on my templates page, for posterity.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Chudleyton, Dartside, Darvall Heights, Dulston, East Boundwood, Eastonwood, Gatcombeton, Greentown, Grigg Heights, Gulsonside, Havercroft, Kempsterbank, Lockettside, Pitneybank, Pescodside, Roftwood, Shearbank, South Blythville, Shuttlebank, Stanbury Village, Tapton, Tollyton, Vinetown, West Becktown, Wray Heights, and Yagoton are your phantoms. --Haliman - Talk 02:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- If this is the case, is anyone opossed to clearing out the already-cleaned ones right now? We can come back for the phantoms once they've been dealt with.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 02:46, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- There are no more phantoms, since Halliman cleared them all and didn't even realize it (go through and check his list and you'll see that they don't have any inclusions, phantom or otherwise). Anyway, at this point, the only ones with inclusions are Dulston (on Yonnua's page, though why he did that I don't understand), and Dunell Hills and Dunningwood (on admin pages I can't edit). The rest are completely clear, last I had checked. —Aichon— 02:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- With no objections, I'll get it started.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 04:57, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- There are no more phantoms, since Halliman cleared them all and didn't even realize it (go through and check his list and you'll see that they don't have any inclusions, phantom or otherwise). Anyway, at this point, the only ones with inclusions are Dulston (on Yonnua's page, though why he did that I don't understand), and Dunell Hills and Dunningwood (on admin pages I can't edit). The rest are completely clear, last I had checked. —Aichon— 02:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted all except these two:
- Template:Dulstongroups, Yonnua is insisting on keeping it, despite it being perfectly replicated here
- Template:DunellHillsgroups, There's the old Nubis misconduct case(s), which I'm not really comfortable with editing.
If someone just wants to tidy the misconduct links, and remind Yonnua that there's no point in saving the template, then these two can probably go as well.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 06:04, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- I didn't know it was a dupe, I thought the code had been written on to the page.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 08:23, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- The Dulston groups case refers to edits now lost to database purges anyway, so redlinking the page doesn't change much. I don't see a need to update it to a page that would be inaccurate. -- RoosterDragon 16:35, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- Dulston Groups? It sounds like you're talking about the Dunell Hills template. Anyways, Deleted Dulston; sorry about any confusion, Yonnua.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 19:46, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- The Dulston groups case refers to edits now lost to database purges anyway, so redlinking the page doesn't change much. I don't see a need to update it to a page that would be inaccurate. -- RoosterDragon 16:35, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Undertakers
Crit 1'd by own user with nothing but non-existent link. --
01:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- Deleted. Doesn't this fall under the modified C.7 by proxy now?--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 02:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
D3ad Boi
Crit 1. Only contains a link to a screenshot he uploaded thrice. --Haliman - Talk 21:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Rooster moved it to his userspace rightfully. --
- Oh, that was a past move, he did it again. Deleted, and content added to his userpage. -- 01:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
01:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Image:Zombra's_pub_rangers.jpg
Unused duplicate of Image:Zombra's_pub_rangers1.jpg. --Bob Boberton TF / DW 18:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
User:Drawde/Rants and User:Drawde/Rants/Survivors
Crit 8+7. Thankies.-- Adward 18:32, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Image:Dogranger1.JPG
Crit 1 for Image:Dogranger.JPG. Not sure what's going on with Image:Dogranger1.jpg either. Asked on Taco2's talk page about what she intends to do with the black&white/colour version.-- Adward 18:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Image:Oam1.jpg
Except for the size, a dupe of this. I've left a note for the author on her page about resizing images. A note that I also replaced the smaller image with the larger one, and resized it on the page this image was included on. Linkthewindow Talk 07:48, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Seems to be a dupe of the request below. Ether Cheese didn't delete it, or the image was uploaded again. Linkthewindow Talk 07:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Re-upload. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 11:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, then it's a crit 6, too. Linkthewindow Talk 11:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Re-upload. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 11:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Image:New Signature.jpg
Crit 7 -- Adward 20:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Image:Oam1.jpg
Crit 1 from Image:Oam.jpg -- Adward 17:47, 1 January 2010 (UTC)