Suggestion:20080822 BARRICADE HOLES

20080822 BARRICADE HOLES

Zombie Lord 01:52, 22 August 2008 (BST)

Suggestion type
improvement

Suggestion scope
Zombies, baby!

Suggestion description
Survivors can get into VSB+2 or lower buildings automatically because we assume that there are holes in the cades they can slip through. This suggestion makes it possible for a Zombie to accidentally fall into one of these holes while smashing the Barricades.

Any time a Zombie attacks Barricades that are at VSB+2 or lower, there is a chance they fall into the building by accidentally stumbling through one these holes. The chance is based on the cade level:

VSB__________: 10%

QSB__________: 15%

LB____________: 20%

Secured Doors__: 25%

They would see two new types of messages if they did fall in depending on if they collapsed the Barricades or not with their attack:

"You smash at the Barricades and it collapses as you fall into a small opening in the Barricades and find yourself inside the building."

or: "You smash at the Barricades and you fall into a small opening in the Barricades and find yourself inside the building."

Also, zombies can now attack Barricades even if only Secured Doors are present. They can never smash down the Doors, but they can still fall in on accident, getting these messages:

"You smash at the building. It rattles a bit."

or: "You smash at the building and you fall into a small opening in the building and find yourself inside."

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped. # justification ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Keep Votes

1. Keep! - Authors Vote.--Zombie Lord 01:54, 22 August 2008 (BST)
2. YES! - Just what the game needed! --/~Rakuen~\^Talk I Still Love Grim 03:12, 22 August 2008 (BST)
3. Change - These percentages are WAY too high. This should be a bonus, not a goal. But, I like the gist of the idea. --BoboTalkClown 16:16, 22 August 2008 (BST)

Kill Votes

1. Kill - I find myself thinking of VSB entrances as low windows or cellar doors, places a Human could reach, but a zombie wouldn't be smart enough to. Even if that's not the case, There's a careful balance between realism and playability, and giving one out of ten zombies the ability to slip through VSB Cades doesn't really seem like a change for the better. Techercizer ^(Food) _(TSoE) 02:01, 22 August 2008 (BST)

   I don't know, I think its in genre to have this. In all the movies you see zombies slipping inside buildings through small holes in the cades while Survivors are frantically hammer to keep them up. This would make attacks more exciting. An with the balance thing man, you would probably not even make up for all the lost Headshot AP's zombies have to suffer.--Zombie Lord 02:15, 22 August 2008 (BST)

   Headshots aren't supposed to equal out barricades. Barricades are to allow survivors to be safe while sleeping. This is as close to a Trenchy idea you can get and still be pro-zombie, Don't screw with barricades, and don't bypass the Talk:Suggestions page unless you're 100% sure your suggestion isn't Spamtasticly unbalanced. Techercizer ^(Food) _(TSoE) 02:52, 22 August 2008 (BST)

2. Strong Kill - Dont mess with barricades.--Lt.G Deathnut | TheStayPuftMan 02:39, 22 August 2008 (BST)

   Dont mess with cades answer--Zombie Lord 03:00, 22 August 2008 (BST)

3. Kill - Master of all the zombies? not a bad idea, but you percentages are way too high - Sanpedro 02:44, 22 August 2008 (BST)

   How about 5%/10%/15%/20%? Oh and LB counts for both Lightly and Loosely.--Zombie Lord 03:08, 22 August 2008 (BST)

4. Kill - I think the idiots that are using the don't mess with cades argument are ill informed about pretty much the whole game, but they always do this and have shown a massive penchant for bias in past votes because they think zombies shouldn't be able to do anything and don't know how to do what they can do. Ignoring that_{(I'm just tired of the people who can't think outside of the barricade or play the game without nigh invulnerability)} I don't think this will change anything and will just result in more easy cannon fodder by saving survivors the AP of having to deal with the horde or search for zombies to xp farm, they don't need they're already ridiculous easy of experience gain buffed.--Karek^maps?! 03:14, 22 August 2008 (BST)

   Thanks man, even thought you killed my thing, you're explanation is at least not sheepy. Rock on, brother.--Zombie Lord 03:17, 22 August 2008 (BST)

5. Kill - Trying to argue Urban Dead Logic is close to impossible. According to the game, the barricades are outside as the door is always the last obstacle. Anyways, this suggestion overpowered, any percentage to completely bypass barricades is too much. During a siege (yes there are sieges on VS buildings that aren't entry points), you'll have a bunch of zombies popping in that can begin dismantling the barricades from the inside. However, there is real world logic so I'm not voting spam.--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 03:56, 22 August 2008 (BST)

   Yeah you're probably right on the logic thing lol. Anyway thanks for your constructive input. Any idea on what % might be more acceptable? 5%/10%/15%/20% still too much?--Zombie Lord 04:05, 22 August 2008 (BST)

   At the very least, there could be a percentage to pop through the 'cades on loosely/lightly barricades only. Too many times have I brought barricades down only to have them brought up a single level before I could enter. Annoying for any zombie. :/ --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 04:12, 22 August 2008 (BST)

6. Kill- First of all, two or three organized zombies working together can bring down cades, storm inside and wreck the place in no time, so this skill is not needed at all. Hell, I have even brought down the cades, ran out of AP and had another zombie come along later nad finish the job. Secondly, I always assumed that the survivors would have to climb over objects up a few feet and then enter on VSB. When a building is over caded then the survivors have to enter through the roof or a high window with Free Running. I wouldn't imagine it possible for a zombie to be able to climb up and position itself so that it could fall through the cades, no matter what level they cades are at. Also, it makes any building potentially unsafe if not manned at all times by a logged in human, which is unfair, and it gives the zombies an unfair upper hand when attacking in large hordes.--SirArgo ^Talk 04:13, 22 August 2008 (BST)
7. Kill- Definitely need to put a kill down for this, not because of the spirit of the suggestion, but for the frequency of being able to find a hole. First of all all of the percentages are too high, at most there should only be a 5% chance that a zombie can get through a hole at LB, with probably a .5% to .25% chance of getting through at VSB. The reason why is: 25% is way too high; it makes the barricades only useful as a small deterrent seeing as how 1 in every 4 hits means finding a hole (at 25%). While a 1 in every 20 chance provides a benefit, yes, but does not see nearly the number of finds and still allows the barricade to be what it is supposed to be, a barricade.--BKM 05:22, 22 August 2008 (BST)
8. Kill - Just sort of negates to point of feeling safe behind a barricade, you know? The one advantage the survivors have against the zombies, besides equipment, is the ability to create barricades. Leave them as they are. --User:Shawn O'Hara 11:22, 21 August 2008 (PST)
9. Kill - Lightly barricaded at the most, must have MOL to open the door (swinging door/opens inward, stumbles and opens the door), lower percentage, and then i'll consider it.--User:G-Man 07:43, 22 August 2008(BST)
10. Kill-I don't want to wake up to find that a zombie has fallen inside while I was asleep. Linkthewindow 12:02, 22 August 2008 (BST)
11. Kill I've always figured that survivors get in through like i a fire escape or something like that. maybe a dumpster moved up against a higher window?--Themonkeyman11 16:59, 22 August 2008 (BST)
12. Kill - You need to stop making these ridiculous suggestions. Seriously, think before you post. --Vandurn 00:08, 23 August 2008 (BST)
13. Kill Its a lame idea i mean it suggests that survivors jump over the barricades not thought them --LucasBlack 03:55, 23 August 2008 (BST)

Spam/Dupe Votes

1. Spam - Leave barricades alone. And survivors can get into a VSB+2 building since they can climb a bit and go into a window; at HB and higher, even the windows are blocked, and thus they cannot run into it from the outside. --Aeon17x 02:01, 22 August 2008 (BST)

   Come on, this is a rationalization. Survivors get in with 1 AP. How does that differ from just walking in? No extra effort for all this "climbing". Even if you say Survivors are "moving parts of the Barricades aside" its still just 1 AP. Gotta be a easy to enter hole that a zombie could stumble onto on accident. See I can rationalize too. Either way, this should be a Kill vote, not Spam vote.--Zombie Lord 02:09, 22 August 2008 (BST)

   It's not rational at all. You're proposing that zombies bypass the barricades entirely at 10% chance when VSB, while they take down *one* level of barricade at only 25% chance tops (maxed claws). They won't even have to remove two-three levels of barricade before they slip in "by accident" (and you don't even have to have Memories of Life!), and as such this suggestion is just ridiculous. --Aeon17x 02:20, 22 August 2008 (BST)

   Only two levels of replies are allowed, take it to the Talk page if you want to discuss it further. --Aeon17x 02:31, 22 August 2008 (BST)

2. Spam - Zombies don't just "fall through holes"... And, in pactice this is actually a big zombie nerf. When a zombie breaks down the barricades normally, he has opened the doors for all his zethren to come in... Which has many big advantages -- most of which should be pretty obvious... But here, all you get is inside -- alone -- and all you're gonna get now is a couple of bites and headshot... Feeding Groan is totally castrated by this suggestion... Team play is totally castrated by this suggestion. Etc. etc. etc. Spam-o-fucking-licious. --WanYao 03:28, 22 August 2008 (BST)

   You must have never watched a Zombie movie. They fall through holes in the Barricades and windows all the time. Feeding Groan and Team Play are not "castrated" by this, as usual you're ridiculously exaggerating.--Zombie Lord 03:33, 22 August 2008 (BST)

   I don't actually believe that Zombie Lord even plays a zombie in Urban Dead. It sure doesn't look like it, from the demonstrated ignorance of actual zombie play and gaming mechanics... No, it looks to me more like he is some fort-dwelling, katana-sharpening trencher who's trying to give zombie players a bad name... Hmph. --WanYao 05:12, 22 August 2008 (BST)

3. Spam- and I quote "Spam-o-fucking-licious" --Fo sizzle 04:44, 22 August 2008 (BST)
4. Spam - as Wan. Don't discourage zombie co-operation. --Bob Fortune ^RR 06:55, 22 August 2008 (BST)
5. Spams - one more for the road.--xoxo 07:41, 22 August 2008 (BST)
6. Frog Blast the Vent Core! WRONG. --Nny The Person 08:26, 22 August 2008 (BST)
7. Spam - This suggestion is ridiculously stupid. I very rarely say this, BUT STOP SUGGESTING CRAP. Do you even play the game?  Billy Club Thorton  T!  RR  08:47, 22 August 2008 (BST)
8. Spam - No Barricade Negation. --Midianian^{|T|T:S|C:RCS|} 10:17, 22 August 2008 (BST)
9. Spam - take down the 'cades if you want to eat them. Simple. --Funt Solo ^QT 21:27, 22 August 2008 (BST)
10. Spam - Negating Barricades are not a good idea. I tried it myself, and it went badly. VERY badly. --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 04:07, 23 August 2008 (BST)
11. Spam - Can this get cycled out already? - tylerisfat 20:30, 24 August 2008 (BST)

---

Voting Rules

Current Suggestions Advice to Suggesters Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so. Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed. "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes. Advice to Voters You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated. Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote. One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion. To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam). It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion. Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found. Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.

Rules for Discussions Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20080822 BARRICADE HOLES). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.

Valid Votes Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit. Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page. Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions. Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks. Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied. Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion. Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied. Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}} Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.

Invalid Votes Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide. X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others. Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.

Comments Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting. Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.

All Caps Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.

VOTING EXAMPLES Keep Votes Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT) Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT) Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT) Kill Votes Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT) Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT) Spam/Dupe Votes Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)