User talk:DanceDanceRevolution

edit User talk:DanceDanceRevolution Start a topic. Press: + Is it an emergency?  Email  Archives 2007 2008 2009 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2010 H1 H2 2011 Q1 Q2 H2 MORE 2012 2013 2014-2017

Top of the new talk page

I win.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 23:57, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

--DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

First!

ಠ_ಠ --Orange Talk 23:58, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

--DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Angel is teh bestest sysops evar and I wuv him and never want him to leave the wiki agains!--Orange Talk 00:06, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

I win

Thanks to HTML--Orange Talk 00:18, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

I could win by altering the floating box code to go over it, but can't be bothered so :P -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 00:23, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

It's obviously not considered standard if people keep going "against" because of how many are running. And you know damn good and well that saying it's not a vote in bold was needed. >:( -- SA 00:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Noes

I winz :P -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 00:06, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

A/A

I noticed this particular line on the A/AG page (under "How to Arbitrate"):

4. Between them, the involved users choose an arbitrator

• The people in the case can choose any user of the wiki, be them listed in the Current Arbitrators list or not.
• You can see how an arbitrator has conducted their previous cases at Category:Arbitration Cases.
• If no arbitrator is agreed upon, one will be chosen by the administration team.

There is still no timeline of any kind (or precedent that I know of) as far as when the administration team chooses an arbitrator. But there does appear to be something on the wiki addressing it, if a little vague. --Maverick ^{Talk - OBR 404} 09:02, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

History is tangled. Look at the archive for the number of cases abandoned, sorted by users involved, sent to vandalism, etc. As for precedent, (someone) was trying to set up an archive of particularly ground breaking VB and Misconduct cases, but I can't remember who.--Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 09:30, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Nubis on Izzy? --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:32, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Yonnua put this together.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 14:21, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Nah, that's rubbish. it certainly isn't what they're talking about.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 16:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

That line should be removed, I did once as it's complete shit made up by Hagnat attempting to claw more power when no-one was looking but either Karek or SA reverted it on the grounds that I'd made the change, subtly ignoring the fact that they were sysops and I was right... -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 20:42, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Hmm.. The thing is I would refrain from choosing any sort of arbitrator. Not only because I am indirectly an involved party, but also because I think the case is ridiculous. Might have to get another op to intervene, because the only outcopme I would push for is the closure of the case, or an arbitrator who encompasses that. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 15:56, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

We seriously fucking need to get something sorted to deal with dipshits who think they can cheat the system by doing the sort of thing you're endorsing right there. If the case is so blatantly ridiculous then I'm sure it'll be thrown out - so that "oh what a shit case look at how bad and horrible it is welp guess I'll just fuck with the system instead of taking the risk that I might lose such a "shit" case" crap is really just a bunch of empty posturing. peace Cyberbob  Talk  16:34, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

What he said^.-- SA 19:40, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Ugh...you guys really think I should accept one of Iscaridiot's candidates :/ ? I dunno at this point, I don't think it's a good idea to let Iz believe that he can try to just overthrow every arby case he doesn't like. Though, judging by his lack of activity in the case, I don't think he has enough time or interest to really pursue the case, but is to stubborn to withdraw.--Thadeous Oakley 20:18, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

I wasn't lying when I said Revenant was the best offer Iscariot gave.-- SA 20:27, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm not actually on the Arbitratot list, though. For a reason. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 10:04, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

And you never suspected that's why I'm pushing for Thad to pick you without asking? I might have had a plan you know. >:| -- SA 18:15, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

lolwhat? I'm bad at guess games like that >.< --Thadeous Oakley 18:47, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

It's because you and SA are incompatible >=D --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:24, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Don't make me abandon all hope yet, =( --Thadeous Oakley 11:36, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Next time you have a plan involving me playing along, you might want to tell me that. :P ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 13:36, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

NEXT TIME READ MY MIND THEN. >:| -- SA 20:50, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Just give him his own treatment and drag it out as long as possible. Remember that you are the one with the optimum outcome if the case returns with null result, given Izzy is the one wanting the changes. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 10:00, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Wrong, disputed edit, as the rulings are disputed they don't apply. Therefore J3D is well within his rights to put you, Bob and anyone else he likes on any of his pages with any description. If MonsieurZerger was actually all about getting your case sorted, he'd be all about making his own representation as to why he was a fit and deserving arbitrator. We all know that he wasn't and that he can't defend his conduct to a competent judge. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 20:42, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

moronical

Aaw and I thought you liked me :( Especially harsh as it was your idea to nominate him in the first place... --Honestmistake 14:38, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Despite being the lowest form of wit, sarcasm is often my tool so be used to it. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Add a weapon to your page or I shall remove the category from it!-- SA 21:39, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

I have a userpage with a monster, two dancing kittens and Clint Eastwood... --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

AND NONE OF THOSE ARE EXPLICIT WEAPONS YOU MORAN!-- SA 00:32, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Clint Eastwood. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:47, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

He's close. Very close. But the gun that is hard to see in the thumbnail covers it. You're fine my friend.-- SA 01:03, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Category:Speedy_Deletion_Candidates

D: --Janus ^talk 23:34, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Danke --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 14:53, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

And Link's sandbox? :0 --Janus ^talk 01:08, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Oh. It's been there for ages, for some reason the template's always on his sandbox. I think it's because he's arked it. We don't delete that, we owe more to our beloved Link! --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 01:10, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

That is all. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 14:52, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Question (again)

Would pages like this count as a user redirect? It's a redirect in his namespace, leading to another page in the same namespace. --Haliman - Talk 00:54, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Nah. Redirect pages that are in the namespace to begin with, don't count. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:56, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

If ya' look at the edit summary, he was testing things, so let him be for now.-- SA 00:57, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Let him be... for now? There isn't anything we can do anyway :/ --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:58, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

For now because if he starts vandalising teh wiki we bring out the banhammer. KKK?-- SA 01:06, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

You can always have a drink and relax. User:Pyxzer/sig 01:07, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

I know he was testing something. That's why I came here to ask about it instead of directly to him :P --Haliman - Talk 01:07, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890-- SA 01:09, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Ummm...

What do you think of this? I honestly can't tell if it's a survivor group, political spam, or an advert (the "forum link" is definately the latter).--~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 08:52, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Impressive. Contacting them via IRC now. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 09:37, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

No reply, but it appears they are definitely a survivor group so I'm classifying it as such. As for the add, well, I guess we'll see what's the score. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 10:06, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

dude

chill Cyberbob  Talk  13:35, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

ban me! --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:36, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

I took the whole effort of waking SA to do it, I gave him the links even, and he fell asleep on the keyboard before he could even click the button... --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:37, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

No lie, I was sleeping on my keyboard. :/ -- SA 23:32, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

...

You, you dare to defy my skill of English grammar!? >:o --Thadeous Oakley 13:44, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

I was going to offer you a rap battle in your language of choice, but I quickly chose against it. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:51, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Rap is teh shit...Thanks though. --Thadeous Oakley 13:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

I guess I may have just found something I like about you after all ;D Seriously though, Christmas UDWiki rap anyone? --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 22:30, 2 December 2009 (UTC) --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 22:30, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Thad, take him DDR VB. GET HIS ASS BANNED :D --Haliman - Talk 00:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Also

Good afternoon!-- SA 23:47, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Your opinion please

Hey there. We've been talking about the location images category. I'd like to get your opinion on this template. It would go on the location image page and replace the current subcat template. I'm wondering if you think this is useful and how you feel about it aesthetically. Thanks!--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 00:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

It's nice, and very useful. Hit that shit up. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:05, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

lolz >_< . Mmmbokay. But I'm not sure if I have the editing privileges to remove the subcat template. In fact I'm sure I don't. I'll give you a link to the template after I create a page for it.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 00:19, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Editing privileges? Unless the pages are protected you have every right and opportunity to edit a page in good faith... --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:22, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Yeh it must be protected or something. I can't even see the subcat template on the page. Anyhoo, here is a link to the finished template. If you can hit that shit up I'll give you a cookie!--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 00:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm not exactly sure what you mean. If you are looking to eliminate the instance of subcategories on Category:Location Images, you do so by going to the categories themself and changing {{subcat|Blah Blah}} to [[category:Blah Blah]] manually. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:29, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Ahhhh. I see. Well, this whole time I thought that there was some mysterious hidden subcategory template in play that I couldn't see. But in fact, the listing of subcategories was merely a result of the wiki doing what the wiki does to categories. Buahahah. *slaps forehead*. Okay kewl. Thanks for your help, it's been nice getting feedback from you on this little project. Looks like it's time for phase 3.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 00:43, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Np, good luck. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:44, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Speaking of which. If you feel inclined, I'd appreciate you're opinion here. And I'll give you a cookie anyway, but I'm going to ambush you with it, when you're least suspecting...--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 01:35, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Promotions

Re: your comment.

Exactly. See analysis. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 14:13, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

I've read it plenty before, and every time I, as well as the rest of the community, feels compelled that you actually wrote that bile under the assumption that you could have just "gotten in" without having done any work or input into the wiki for so long. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:09, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Which, in retrospect, would make my point even more understandable: not only would you have no idea of what it's like to be a wiki op, but you also have most likely forgotten what it's like to be involved in hard work with the wiki, at all. Your "reasons" not to ask for promotion were null and void just a few months ago, after the A/RE purge of sysops there was a 3 month block where Boxy, Cyberbob and I were the only active ops, and we needed all the help we could get, hence why we brought SA back and Ross, but the point is, you wouldn't have even been present enough to notice we needed ops, let alone consider yourself for the job. You have such a misguided and dated opinion on Administration in regards to yourself and others that it haunts me. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

I did wonder what you were getting at. Guess now I know? Thanks for being yet another UDWiki sysop convincing me not to bother with it or the associated drama. ;) ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 08:31, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Hmm... I guess you're right then. Hmm --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 08:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

ohnoddrhasdoneaterriblethingtoday. Cyberbob  Talk  12:28, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

That boy needs therapy. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 13:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm gonna kill you... --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:59, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

He'd get more support than Red Hawk One did, and would lie less. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 23:12, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

He'd get more support than Iscariot would, and would lie less. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

When did Red Hawk One lie? Cyberbob  Talk  23:16, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

He said he'd stay out of the drama sections, but has had some minimal presence there already. Iscariot made a point of pointing it out when it first happened. —Aichon— 23:19, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Ahahahahah Iscariot is literally an Archivist. brb editing my list Cyberbob  Talk  23:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Necromancer? --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:27, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

see said dummy spit on open-and-shut case. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:19, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Cry as much as you'd like, said one thing, did another. Liar. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 23:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm the one crying? --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:26, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE Cyberbob  Talk  23:29, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

I'd back up my offers with arbitration rulings.... -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 23:15, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

I'd take people to misconduct when I promised to... --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:16, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

No you don't. You know clearly that Boxy committed misconduct but won't bring it. Also, I seem to remember getting you banned through misconduct for not being able to read.... -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 23:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Hmm? I never promised to. Just waiting on you to fulfil your promise. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:26, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

	Oh, the drama!
	This issue should be a soap opera!

--  RoosterDragon  23:28, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

This template. I love it. 23:32, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Agree. I must remember to use that more often. --Maverick ^{Talk - OBR 404} 08:37, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Here...

‎	A Mary Sue! And it's for you!
	Iscariot has given DDR a pointless Mary Sue because if he insists on having no taste, he can be stuck with what no-one else wants.

-- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:22, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

I lol'd-- SA 01:33, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Fine by me =D --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 01:46, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

idgi Cyberbob  Talk  02:09, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

IRC. DDR <3's mary sues.-- SA 02:17, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

k Cyberbob  Talk  02:20, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Do you know...

... what your mum and a vacuum cleaner have in common? They both suck, blow and get laid in the closet.Axel27 09:18, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Awww. It's okay to be butthurt. I understand. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 11:06, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm slightly worried that he's having sex with his vacuum cleaner. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 11:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Don't be. You're still unique. No one else has to have sex with a vacuum cleaner to understand how it works.Axel27 13:41, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

WHAT THE HELL?!?!?!?!?

You just deleted a bunch of images... Post One, Part One,.... Post One, Part Two, a private message. I used those images.... they were linked to here, and without them, it could change a lot of things. I would ask that you please undelete those screenshots for me. It's not like they weren't being used, weren't linked too, and weren't catagorized. -Poodle of Doom^{M! T} 13:17, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Actually, they were unused, according to Special:Unusedimages. Images can not be undeleted. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

He had linked to them, but they weren't in use on the page.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 13:20, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

[[:Image:Example.jpg]] Doesn't show up as linked, [[Image:Example.jpg]] Do. Thats where the mistake was made. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 13:21, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

He linked to their edit pages; look at the links more closely. If he had linked to the actual image pages they wouldn't have been on the Unused list. Cyberbob  Talk  13:21, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Wrong. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:26, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Text linked images show up as unused. If you want to link to screenshots, use an image hosting site -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 13:22 5 December 2009 (BST)

No, they don't. Read my previous post please. Cyberbob  Talk  13:24, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Hardly. Boxy is right. Don't know what you're drinking tonight, Bob. If an image is only linked via what Ross specifies above, then they show up as unused. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:26, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Here's an idea; maybe you could try not posting instead of posting when you feel like being so snippy towards someone who is on your side? I'm wrong, oh no, better get in with a shot!! Cyberbob  Talk  13:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

I don't need you on my side, dude. I'm just saying your wrong, because you are, and for the sake of Poodle's understanding. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:33, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Saying that I'm wrong is fine - I'm glad that you did. But don't be so quick to get malicious for "the lulz". Cyberbob  Talk  13:38, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry- I didn't intend to. I just thought something was up if our resident "unused deletor" didn't know about it, I guess. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Long story short, these were deleted as a regular maintenance action and they can't be undeleted by myself because I didn't save them myself before deleting them, understandably. You can only remedy this by re-uploading them and then arking them yourself, Poodle. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:28, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

nice edit summary fagmo but I was talking to everyone durrrprprprprprprprprle Cyberbob  Talk  13:31, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

So? You have an amazing tendency to find THE most unserious phrases I say, and then make sure they are the only comments I ever say that you address seriously. Nice work! --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:34, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

sorry d00d but that one's getting pretty worn out Cyberbob  Talk  13:39, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Such a concept is regardless if it's nothing less than true. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Regardless,... A simple click of "What Links Here" would of shown all this right? -Poodle of Doom^{M! T} 13:29, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Depends on how you see it. We have, say, 5 unused images every day we have to delete. Every day. 90% as useless and unused as the next. When sysops have such a job for a couple of years, they start to ignore such obligatory actions such as checking "what links here", especially when it isn't in the required criteria for deletion. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:31, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Haha, like you're in any position to be taking the tired old veteran line with unused image deletions. I never knew about the text linking not affecting the Unused list; I certainly plan on checking What Links Here for any image I delete in future. It's just common sense. Cyberbob  Talk  13:33, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm just saying. Coming from someone who used to enter IRC and openly contemplate deleting images a week ahead of their scheduled date, this is all very amusing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:36, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

And u tok me seirosly????? Llflldfololololrolf Cyberbob  Talk  13:38, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

sorry d00d but that one's getting pretty worn out --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Such a concept is regardless if it's nothing less than true. Cyberbob  Talk  13:51, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

I need to sleep now, go cry yourself through more A/D/S requests in the meantime ;D --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

heh . niec little smile you got there! Cyberbob  Talk  14:00, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

You two really ought to get a room or something. --Thadeous Oakley 16:43, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

hehe, a quality post from our resident Neutral Yet Amused Bystander|||\ Cyberbob  Talk  16:48, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

oh by the way the main reason i havent done much apart from unused images over the last few weeks is because im doing certain thingsi rl that mean i dont have somuch time for literlaly everything on wiki. should be beter after new years thouh, so dont u worry a singl hair on that head of your! Cyberbob  Talk  14:03, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Awesome!!! --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 14:06, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

I thought people knew that text linked images didnt count as they being in use. Next time stick the image in a image ark or something, and it wont get deleted. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 16:39, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Gee,... I didn't know at the time that this was a requirement. Like bob, I didn't know a text link would make it come up as unused. A simple check of "What links here" would of seemed more than appropriate. As for not having the time,.... tough shit. That's your fucking job. You knew that when you signed up for it. Deal with it. If you didn't want to look into that sort of shit, you shouldn't of signed up. -Poodle of Doom^{M! T} 05:07, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

There is nothing in the job of deleting "unused images" that requires me to babysit long term users like you to save their unused images from getting deleted- to the contrary I say tough shit to you, you militant parasite. You so heavily try and convince us that "you are smart" but you so often prove otherwise. You didn't know the system and it bit you. Learn the rules or fucking deal with the consequences. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 05:41, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

i am hard man. hard man rawr Cyberbob  Talk  05:51, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

No I want the last (or unnecessary first) word! --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 05:52, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

LOOK AT ME A I CAN BE A TOTAL ASSHOLE TO PEOPLE TOO-- SA 06:06, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

FUCK YEAH BEIN GAN ASSHOLE IS COOL ALL TH EOOL KIDS ARE ASSHOLES 24/7 Cyberbob  Talk  06:12, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

OH GOD NO WONDER PEOPLE DON'T LIKE ME!-- SA 06:12, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Less butthurt please :/ --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:14, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

dumb comeback, soz Cyberbob  Talk  06:18, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

What would I need to make a comeback for? --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:19, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

You're the only one that can answer that question. Cyberbob  Talk  06:21, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

It was rhetorical, you fucking retard. What say instead of stalking my talk page you get off your fucking arse and do something for the wiki? --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:23, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

~fartz~ there i just equalled your total contribution for the last 2 weeks Cyberbob  Talk  06:24, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Nice imaginary comeback. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:26, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

So you going to answer the question or just keep working on failing you eventual A/RE? --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:28, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

You mean like deleting an image before it was due, because to delete it as a speedy it can't have a keep vote?-- SA 06:25, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

...You drunk? --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:26, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

You can schedule delete an image, yes. But not if it's in the middle of a vote already, and when it has a keep. Sure, ross would have changed it to delete as soon as he noticed. But I'm just telling you, watch out for slip ups like that.-- SA 06:29, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

...I never did this??? :////// --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:35, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Oh look I actually did. Nvm. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:37, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

The retard down there started it- I don't consider it such a daft mistake to assume a wiki user from 2007 would know how the systems work. Especially since we have a score of gnomes on the wiki, who spend 70% of their time here talking about this exact stuff. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:14, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Actually, he's been here since june or july-ish. Back when he joined in 07 he did hardly snything. So he's really only been here, what 5-ish months? Yep, 2 years. And not everyone knows that images that are just linked count as unused, as bob demonstrated. It doesn't say it in any official documents, if I recall correctly. As I said, I considered it standard procedure to check what links here, obviously it's not such a far out thought to think ops would check it just to make sure it's completely unused. But yes, just keep piling abuse on him.-- SA 06:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

god you'rs such a dumb fucking cunt lern the rules or deal w/ teh consequencxes fucken militant parasite ;;;tough shit;;; Cyberbob  Talk  06:21, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Look, it ain't my fault the only job you could ever uphold in this wiki turned to shit once you found out that you didn't have a whole 50% understanding of the job in the first place, but please take it out on someone else. Or the wiki, preferably. It'd be nice to see you do work again and not just behave like you did when Grim was around. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:27, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

It'd be nice to see you not be a cunt to everyone who doesn't understand things. Like you used to be.-- SA 06:33, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

I was a cunt because he was behaving like such a reactionary retard in relation to the whole affair that he needed a bit back to put him into place. He is capable of defending himself you know. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:35, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Reactionary my ass. He's said two things. One was the original complaint. The other is where he asks why something so simple and what should be standard didn't reveal it was in use. You've been more reactionary than him.-- SA 06:38, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

whats been happening

seems like some drama or smoething....fill me in?xoxo 06:37, 6 December 2009 (UTC)