Talk:Mod Conspiracy

There is only one conspiracy in this wiki... it did found some results and the wiki got a lot better after it... until the conspiracy dissolved and most its members vanished, and the wiki turned into what we have today... i start to think that we need more conspiracies around here... --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 04:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

True, well if you want you can "un-earth" some conspiracies and add them here. Honestly, although I'm trying to make it a joke I'm not really the kind of person who makes jokes (or writes anything with much content for that matter). =\ This will probably be more of a news article summing up whats happening on the moderation pages if someone else doesn't help contribute. I never was very good on creating content. - Jedaz^{ΣT ΞD GIS S!} 04:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Policy exposed

Well, you're right that the policy grants teoretically unlimited leeway for vandalism, but the fact that you have to be an extremely good contributor (500 edits every 2 months) in one side and an extremely patient vandal (only 2 acts of vandalism allowed) in the other can't be taken seriously as a loophole. Also, I was going to point out that the policy was meant to take off only ONE warning each 250 edits and 2 months, but now that you point it the wording seems to permit 2 struck warning every 2 months provided that you made 500 edits in time. I don't know if "the spirit of the policy" will be used in this case or just the wording (I wrote that part of the guidelines BTW, with corrections from either Xoid, BobHammero or nobody) and the spirit was as I said above. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 05:27, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeah exactly. Oh well I'm thinking of changing this from a "mod conspiracy" thing to a news and other events thing. It'ld be so much easier just to write facts rather than try and make a joke. Anyway we really should have some kind of historical document of the evolution of the wiki. - Jedaz^{ΣT ΞD GIS S!} 07:27, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

New plan, I'm gonna take over Current events, I'll have this page SDed in about a weeks time once everyone sees this message. - Jedaz^{ΣT ΞD GIS S!} 07:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

You're sure? I think a private group page would make things easier. First, that Current events page is unknown, and second, it belongs to the community! Meaning that either you won't be noticed or, if you are, people will start editing your comments as "not NPOV" and adding news to counter yours because you don't own it. Peraphs using this page, plus creating some flagbox template saying "I'm informed, I'm ready: Mod Conspiracy" for everyone that reads it to use it on their user pages and publicise would be better IMHO. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 09:10, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

True. Ok then, well we'll give this a whirl. - Jedaz^{ΣT ΞD GIS S!} 03:43, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

What now, Red Leader?

How best can I help to topple the evil moderation team? Especially that dastardly, dashingly handsome bureaucrat of theirs? –Xoid ^M•T•FU! 22:30, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

That one that calls himself ruler of the wiki troubles me as well. We should look into him, closely.--Gage 22:31, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Oh noes! We need to get rid of them all! --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 22:38, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes I agree. We'll have to expose their secrets to get rid of them, like what hair products they use. I mean, who has hair like that? - Jedaz^{ΣT ΞD GIS S!} 03:43, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

I don't think anyone will be able to stop that Sith Lord what with his Death Star and all... --Darth Sensitive ^W! 05:25, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Hrm.

I only have one problem with this group. I think the idea behind it is great, don't get me wrong. But there's no opportunity for debate. One of your Records could be horribly wrong and misinformed, sending the wrong message to those users who read them. The Wiki Monitors Monitors group is obviously a parody, so they won't be of any real use. I think you guys need to add some kind of protest section, where people (not necessaarily mods) may bring up concerns they might have about your Records.--Absolution 07:51, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

That is true. Well I'll add in a protest section to this talk page. However if people want to they can join up with the group and alter any news item to make it funnier, it's suppose to be a joke (but with some facts to it), however I'm not that flash hot with humour. But thanks for the idea about the protest section. - Jedaz^{ΣT ΞD GIS S!} 08:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Er, I think Absolution may have put that on the wrong group's page - WMM doesn't really apply to this one. Heh. Cyberbob  Talk  08:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I think you are right. My brains a bit dead so I didn't pick that up, but I still think it's a good idea to have a section like that for feedback/constructive criticism. - Jedaz^{ΣT ΞD GIS S!} 09:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

That is what talk pages are for... btw, I'm pretty sure Absolution is in on the conspiracy... he's not a mod here, but Resensitized is close enough! ;) -- boxy ^{T L ZS PA DA} 09:35, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

He isn't a mod on Rezzens, either. Cyberbob  Talk  10:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

The plot thickens -- boxy ^{T L ZS PA DA} 11:09, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

WTF? How so? Cyberbob  Talk  11:18, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, his user page is all about what an awesome mod he is... I'm sure there's a conspiracy in there if we dig deep enough (and add a little bullshite) -- boxy ^{T L ZS PA DA} 11:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Ah. He used to be a Rezzens mod. I assume he simply hasn't updated his page yet - he doesn't spend much time on the wiki. Cyberbob  Talk  11:33, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Wiki Monitors

Excellent article, I had a good laugh out of it. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 08:23, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks =) - Jedaz^{ΣT ΞD GIS S!} 08:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

I object

Boxy said:

A Bothan Spy and The General, yesterday decided to get into a duel, to see who can create the most annoying, and page defacing signature to attach to their posts on the wiki

My sig is in no way part of any "duel" or "pissing match" or anything of the sort. It was a result of sheer boredom. As I've already stated, but you've conveniently ignored.

Boxy said:

a sig longer than 90% of his actual posts to the wiki

I don't think I need to comment here.

In short - please revise that entry to a) be objective and b) show both sides of the story. Thank you. Cyberbob  Talk  11:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Maybe "get into a duel" is taking a bit of artistic license... but, umm, can't see much wrong with the rest. Out of sheer boredom, you decided to attempt to make the most annoying sig in wikidom... I notice you're not denying that it's all part of a scheme to take our minds off the larger, hidden conspiracy though. I take that as PROOF POSITIVE that there is indeed a conspiracy! Hazzah -- boxy ^{T L ZS PA DA} 11:21, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

I missed that, actually. But you can edit that, too. I thought your group's aim was to present facts, not make baseless assumptions. Cyberbob  Talk  11:27, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Na, we're more into propaganda, you're probably thinking of WM. Wherever I go over the top with my allegations, it's a joke, s'alright bob. Wherever I speak facts, they're facts, s'alright... I'll leave the reader to decide which is which by reading the links I give to the real story, and yes, your explaination that it was just a spur of the moment, boredom thing is in the link. Jedaz may decide to mercilessly edit my contribution here, but I don't think I will be -- boxy ^{T L ZS PA DA} 12:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Ah. I totally misinterpreted the style of this group. Never mind. Cyberbob  Talk  12:05, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Thats ok, it happens. We were originaly going to be completly factual but a jokes much more fun. Oh and by the way Boxy, I am going to edit it slightly so that it isn't quite as awkward with some of the wording (mainly the 2nd paragraph), but I found it quite funny. Oh, and nice template (I'm changing the colours because that brown and yellow don't go together well) Keep up the good work =) - Jedaz^{ΣT ΞD GIS S!} 12:23, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Go for it, I may myself too later -- boxy ^{T L ZS PA DA} 12:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Maybe I should explain my view on what it's all about, although it's really Jedaz's idea, I may be outta wack with what she wanted for the page... anyway, I see it as looking at serious stuff on the wiki, in an over the top, a satirically conspiracy theorist kinda way. Do I think there's a problem behind the things I write about there? Yes. Are the allegations that I make a reflection of what those problems are? Not necessarily, usually they're much more mundane, but not always. Do I go too far sometimes? Yeah, I guess I do, I can be a bit aggressive at times I suspect... I just want to be mildly entertaining, so perhaps more wiki users will look at some of the political wranglings that go on -- boxy ^{T L ZS PA DA} 12:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

... oh, and also to expose the evil Mod-Con! -- boxy ^{T L ZS PA DA} 12:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

You do realise, of course, that Jedaz is a guy...? Cyberbob  Talk  12:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Heh, Cyberbobs right. Don't worry about it though, I'm not offended =P - Jedaz^{ΣT ΞD GIS S!} 12:56, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Um, yeah, I think I picked that up somewhere before, come to think of it. It's just it didn't matter much to me, I'm not good with trivial info. Um, sorry Jedaz, I'm sure it's not trivial to you ;) -- boxy ^{T L ZS PA DA} 12:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Eh, thats alright, it happens. Personaly I don't care which gender someone is on the internet because it doesn't make any difference. But as a side note it is easier just to say that everyones a male because it's less embarrassing for the person if you are wrong. - Jedaz^{ΣT ΞD GIS S!} 13:03, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

I'll blame Jeda! -- boxy ^{T L ZS PA DA} 13:09, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Pure-Fucking-Gold

This stuff is great. I siggied the line about me being a Stalinist.--Gage 02:06, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

jeez.. I miss all the Memos... Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 08:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Oh, how entertaining is your next removal of an humorous suggestion going to be, Commissar Gage -- boxy ^{T L ZS PA DA} 11:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Shaving

Lachryma

He then found her near perfect form flawed and shaved her naughty bits.

Woo!, it's the tiny details like this that make a conspiracy! Haahaha, good one, but I liked the mermaid version myself, just that touch of absurdity -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 07:00, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Ha, that wasn't you after all, lol. Teach me not to check the page history -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 11:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Heh.

I love the entry about the :-D CAIGER MALL thing. Pure win. --Hubrid Nox ^{Sys WTF U! B!} 07:52, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Except that it is outdated... the case have been solved already, since i am not looking foward to keep the status there. :\ --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 10:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I know, Hagnat. The fact that it's outdated does not change the fact that it's funny. --Hubrid Nox ^{Sys WTF U! B!} 10:42, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Community Portal

The Mod Conspiracy has its own NewsBox now. Have fun :) --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 04:37, 13 June 2007 (BST)

Hah, nice, thanks. I'll be sure to keep it updated. =) - Jedaz

ΣT MC ΞD CT SR

04:29, 13 June 2007 (GMT)

Rogue-o-op

Just pointing out that it wasnt me the one who started the Policy Discussion, neither the Open Discussion, about Ignore All Rules, while i believe most users found about such wikipedia policy in my signature. It works for the humour on this page, but i'd like to give credit to Gnome for both policy and open discussions --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 13:20, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

I noticed some recent changes to the article, but The Press are still claiming that you were ultimately behind it. --Funt Solo ^QT 15:36, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Aaannndd... since nalikill vandal reports went to the archives, i think it would be better if you guys edited the report to point to the right page. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 14:29, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

sniff-sniff

now I'm feeling left out.... waaaaaahhhhhhhhh! Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 14:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

That was the early edition - late edition now available! --Funt Solo ^QT 18:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh thankyouthankyouthankyou I feel like a real boy now. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 19:49, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

So that's what? 4 items now? One more and I think you get a medal. Or the wiki explodes or something.--Seventythree^Talk 21:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

It'll be you and me next mate. :P -- Cheese 21:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh noes!--Seventythree^Talk 21:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Heh. I was wondering when this was going to be added to... And I was pretty sure it would be this week.--Seventythree^Talk 15:35, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Wouldn't Condrakasleezarice be more appropriate? make sure you get the sleeze factor in there...Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 17:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Ooh! Sleaze! We can only hope that the reporter is listening in to this convo and likes your idea, then steals it and uses it as if they'd thought of it. --Funt Solo ^QT 20:24, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Misconduct and claims of oppression?

Time for another breaking news bulleten surely?--Seventythree^Talk 14:56, 6 May 2008 (BST)

Et Tu, Nubis?

I was not a confidante. If anything, I was a "good dog" that was beaten until I bit. But now that we are entering into a wiki utopia I fear what will become of your little page. We all know that if you kill off the main villain the show is never the same. Well, good luck!--– Nubis ^NWO 01:53, 10 October 2008 (BST)

Given his attitude, don't you think Judas would have been a better choice? --– Nubis ^NWO 02:02, 10 October 2008 (BST)

I reckon his attempt at a coup d'etat was more Julius C than Jebus C. And, it would seem that the reporter of the event exaggerated your relationship for the sake of drama. It all stems from your first mention. And, I know - with the centerpiece villain gone, what now? Maybe he'll get unbanned and return to the wiki to harass the new 'crat/psyop utopia team, thus becoming a freedom fighter for the resistance? Maybe, having rid yourselves of "this troublesome priest", you and Conn will form a New Way that involves the removal of all democratic freedom? Ah, I live in hope...for without drama, what is there in life? (Jokes. It's only jokes.) --Funt Solo ^QT 03:00, 10 October 2008 (BST)

I dunno. With Grim gone maybe we should start a wiki community about a zombie game? I know, that's just crazy talk. (and by the way, it will take a while, but some day we will all be able to post something in a kidding manner without having to say it is lest we face discipline).--– Nubis ^NWO 03:55, 10 October 2008 (BST)

Zombie Ceasar

I thought the first set of Ceasar references were inordinately amusing, but the extended metaphor takes the cake. "barricading himself in the Psyop Senate in the dead of night"...ROFL. --Jen 04:36, 10 October 2008 (BST)