UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2010 01

This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.

Shortcut:
A/SD

Speedy Deletion Queue

Busy busy busy

Category:Rouge_Heart_Aces

This, and everything in it! Vigeous _RHA 23:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Why are you blanking all your pages? Seems a bit odd tbh.-- Adward  23:34, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Are you sure you want them deleted? It would be better to leave them up, because they are linked to a lot of pages, and has plenty of content. Perhaps just put a notice on the page that you are inactive -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 07:27 2 January 2010 (BST)

{{InactiveGroup}} Linkthewindow  Talk  07:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Posted on the user's talk. Linkthewindow  Talk  12:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

1. Speedy - Crit 7 as well as an implied Crit 1 because as group leader he can blank those pages if he chooses to. Specific case editing guidelines gives him control of the pages of his group, this is from both vandalism and unwanted existence. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 11:43, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

   You don't need to vote Speedy Delete when something is already on A/SD, you know. You can just weigh in without the unnecessary pomp. Cyberbob  Talk  11:47, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

   Saves time if someone votes keep and it gets shifted. Also because I've been informed on IRC, Crit 7 isn't valid for all the pages, but it is valid for the main group page, which will then make the rest Crit 13 and the cat Crit 4. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 12:00, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

   You're the only one who really votes Keep on A/SD submissions. Stop projecting. Cyberbob  Talk  12:21, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

2. Keep until Vigeous comes back and reaffirms his decision. If he wants it deleted still, count it as a speedy.-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 12:23, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

   You know, you used to be cool. Cyberbob  Talk  12:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

   O_o-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 12:59, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

So is this going to be wrapped up one way or the other at some point, or are we still waiting on Vigeous so that SA can retract his Keep vote? Cyberbob  Talk  21:22, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Served Speedy Deletions

Crit 4???

I may be wrong, but isn't this an empty category? It's only linked to Boxy's talk, and a piece of text on Red hawk's page that says: "Nuke Category:Motels". I assume it used to exist, but has since been emptied. Can someone with more knowledge investigate and or delete this?--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

EATEN

Motels are to be categorised in Category:Hotels, so this serves no purpose in addition to being empty. Crit 4ed. 22:20, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

I goofed

Sorry need this page deleted Good Grief/recruit I meant to make it a template and turned it into a page by mistkake. Sorry. Uh...Crit7? I believe is which one it is

-- 

•   Timmah!  

•   Talk  

21:02, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Done. Cyberbob  Talk  21:22, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Crit 7

I admit defeat. Template:YonnuaComment --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 17:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

EATEN

17:11, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Image:Eexplosion.jpg

Duped and unused. --Haliman - Talk 03:14, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

EATEN

03:31, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Doug Carlin

User:Rufus Vanzant/Doug Carlin Criteria 7 I think is the one it is under.--No one ever pays Rufus in gum! 21:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Deleted --~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 21:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Dupe images

• Image:CGR.png
• Image:CGRimage.gif
• Image:CGRlogo.jpg
• Image:CGRlogo.png
• Image:Cgrlogo.jpg

Are all dupes of Image:CGR.jpg.-- Adward  18:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Deleted --~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 21:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Line Tactics

Orphaned Crit 1 from december. Although the tactics discussed on the page are brilliant, I sadly feel that it must be lost from the wiki forever.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 23:18, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Sadly the tactical genius that was discussed here is NOM NOM NOMMED. 23:24, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

lol, you need a template for your deletion catchphrase. I think everyone should have deletion catchphrases.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 23:27, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

EATEN

00:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Unused Group Listings

Basically I transferred group listings to pages with better and consistant names as well as changing the code a bit. So all the old malformed ones can go.

The old ones are all templates listed under "T" in this category except for Tapton Groups and Tollyton Groups (which are at the start and end of the T list, so just hit everything except for the first and last) --  RoosterDragon  01:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

   * Template:Barrvillegroups
   * Template:BrookeHillsgroups
   * Template:Brooksvillegroups
   * Template:Buttonvillegroups
   * Template:Central borehamwood groups
   * Template:Chancelwoodgroups
   * Template:Chudleytongroups
   * Template:Countryside (east) groups
   * Template:Countryside (west) groups
   * Template:Crooketongroups
   * Template:Crowbankgroups
   * Template:Dakerstowngroups
   * Template:Danversbankgroups
   * Template:Dartsidegroups
   * Template:DarvallHeightsgroups
   * Template:Dentonsidegroups
   * Template:Dulstongroups
   * Template:DunellHillsgroups
   * Template:Dunningwoodgroups
   * Template:Earletowngroups
   * Template:East borehamwood groups
   * Template:EastBecktowngroups
   * Template:EastBoundwoodgroups
   * Template:EastGraysidegroups
   * Template:Eastonwoodgroups
   * Template:Edgecombegroups
   * Template:Elstree groups
   * Template:Elstree studios groups
   * Template:FoulkesVillagegroups
   * Template:Fryerbankgroups
   * Template:GalbraithHillsgroups
   * Template:Gatcombetongroups
   * Template:Gibsontongroups
   * Template:Greentowngroups
   * Template:GriggHeightsgroups
   * Template:Gulsonsidegroups
   * Template:Havercroftgroups
   * Template:Heytowngroups
   * Template:Hollomstowngroups
   * Template:Houldenbankgroups
   * Template:HuntleyHeightsgroups
   * Template:Jensentowngroups
   * Template:Judgewoodgroups
   * Template:Kempsterbankgroups
   * Template:Ketchelbankgroups
   * Template:KinchHeightsgroups
   * Template:LamportHillsgroups
   * Template:LerwillHeightsgroups
   * Template:Lockettsidegroups
   * Template:Lukinswoodgroups
   * Template:MillenHillsgroups
   * Template:Miltowngroups
   * Template:MockridgeHeightsgroups
   * Template:Molebankgroups
   * Template:Morningtongroups
   * Template:NewArkhamgroups
   * Template:Nixbankgroups
   * Template:North borehamwood groups
   * Template:NorthBlythvillegroups
   * Template:NortheastBorehamwoodgroups
   * Template:Northwest borehamwood groups
   * Template:OldArkhamgroups
   * Template:Osmondvillegroups
   * Template:Owsleybankgroups
   * Template:Pashentongroups
   * Template:Payntertongroups
   * Template:PeddlesdenVillagegroups
   * Template:Pegtongroups
   * Template:Pennvillegroups
   * Template:PennyHeightsgroups
   * Template:Peppardvillegroups
   * Template:Pescodsidegroups
   * Template:Pimbankgroups
   * Template:Pitneybankgroups
   * Template:Quarlesbankgroups
   * Template:Radlett groups
   * Template:RainesHillsgroups
   * Template:Randallbankgroups
   * Template:Reganbankgroups
   * Template:Rhodenbankgroups
   * Template:RichmondHillsgroups
   * Template:Ridleybankgroups
   * Template:Roachtowngroups
   * Template:Roftwoodgroups
   * Template:RoltHeightsgroups
   * Template:Roywoodgroups
   * Template:Ruddlebankgroups
   * Template:Santlervillegroups
   * Template:Scarletwoodgroups
   * Template:Shacklevillegroups
   * Template:Shearbankgroups
   * Template:ShoreHillsgroups
   * Template:Shuttlebankgroups
   * Template:South borehamwood groups
   * Template:SouthBlythvillegroups
   * Template:Southeast borehamwood groups
   * Template:Southwest borehamwood groups
   * Template:SpicerHillsgroups
   * Template:Spracklingbankgroups
   * Template:StanburyVillagegroups
   * Template:Starlingtowngroups
   * Template:Taptongroups
   * Template:Tollytongroups
   * Template:Vinetowngroups
   * Template:West borehamwood groups
   * Template:WestBecktowngroups
   * Template:WestBoundwoodgroups
   * Template:WestGraysidegroups
   * Template:Whittensidegroups
   * Template:Williamsvillegroups
   * Template:WrayHeightsgroups
   * Template:WykeHillsgroups
   * Template:Wykewoodgroups
   * Template:Yagotongroups

-- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 03:02 3 January 2010 (BST)

All the ones I've clicked on so far are still included in the suburb pages :-/ -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 03:07 3 January 2010 (BST)

Yes, a list would help :) Anyway, they're phantom inclusions, a trick of the wiki. There's some harmless dead code on the suburb pages: "suburb_groups={{suburbgroups}}". But since suburb_groups is now an unused variable, nothing actually happens. --  RoosterDragon  03:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

So, as I see it, you've attempted to rename templates using a naming convention that includes underscore spaces between the words, and capitalization of each word. For example: Template:DunellHillsgroups, is now duplicated under the name Template:Dunell_Hills_Groups, and so on. I'm writing this to clarify for others, and to verify that this is correct, since your original statement isn't entirely clear.

Now, in theory, if all of the info is duplicated, then the old listings are redundant and eligible for Crit 1 speedy delete. However, I must point out that some of these templates are not yet redundant and there are incoming links that remain. Like Dunell Hills, for example. Also, Category:Suburb Group Listings should probably be fixed first, as it still shows a number of the old links like Template:DunellHillsgroups.

I didn't check every item on the list, so I don't know how much remains to be done, but perhaps you would find some help putting the list up in a community area and making it a group project where people can check items off the list as they are completed. Because, as I understand crit 1, each of the old templates you've listed must first be made redundant by fixing all incoming links to the new templates, before they can be deleted.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 04:15, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

I've gone through them all and fixed every single non-admin link since there were only a handful. At this point, Template:DunellHillsgroups and Template:Dunningwoodgroups are the only two with links, and they're all from archived admin pages. The rest are just linked from here, though about 2/3 to 4/5 have that phantom inclusion. —Aichon— 05:19, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Template:Dulstongroups is now included on my templates page, for posterity.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Chudleyton, Dartside, Darvall Heights, Dulston, East Boundwood, Eastonwood, Gatcombeton, Greentown, Grigg Heights, Gulsonside, Havercroft, Kempsterbank, Lockettside, Pitneybank, Pescodside, Roftwood, Shearbank, South Blythville, Shuttlebank, Stanbury Village, Tapton, Tollyton, Vinetown, West Becktown, Wray Heights, and Yagoton are your phantoms. --Haliman - Talk 02:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

If this is the case, is anyone opossed to clearing out the already-cleaned ones right now? We can come back for the phantoms once they've been dealt with.--~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 02:46, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

There are no more phantoms, since Halliman cleared them all and didn't even realize it (go through and check his list and you'll see that they don't have any inclusions, phantom or otherwise). Anyway, at this point, the only ones with inclusions are Dulston (on Yonnua's page, though why he did that I don't understand), and Dunell Hills and Dunningwood (on admin pages I can't edit). The rest are completely clear, last I had checked. —Aichon— 02:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

With no objections, I'll get it started.--~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 04:57, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Deleted all except these two:

• Template:Dulstongroups, Yonnua is insisting on keeping it, despite it being perfectly replicated here
• Template:DunellHillsgroups, There's the old Nubis misconduct case(s), which I'm not really comfortable with editing.

If someone just wants to tidy the misconduct links, and remind Yonnua that there's no point in saving the template, then these two can probably go as well.--~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 06:04, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

I didn't know it was a dupe, I thought the code had been written on to the page.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 08:23, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

The Dulston groups case refers to edits now lost to database purges anyway, so redlinking the page doesn't change much. I don't see a need to update it to a page that would be inaccurate. --  RoosterDragon  16:35, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Dulston Groups? It sounds like you're talking about the Dunell Hills template. Anyways, Deleted Dulston; sorry about any confusion, Yonnua.--~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 19:46, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

I redirected the dunellhillsgroups template to the new location, just so that the context of the misconduct case is preserved. All others look to have been done... and dusted -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 00:36 6 January 2010 (BST)

Undertakers

Crit 1'd by own user with nothing but non-existent link. --

 

 

 

 

01:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Deleted. Doesn't this fall under the modified C.7 by proxy now?--~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 02:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

D3ad Boi

Crit 1. Only contains a link to a screenshot he uploaded thrice. --Haliman - Talk 21:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Rooster moved it to his userspace rightfully. --

 

 

 

 

01:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Oh, that was a past move, he did it again. Deleted, and content added to his userpage. --

 

 

 

 

01:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Image:Zombra's_pub_rangers.jpg

Unused duplicate of Image:Zombra's_pub_rangers1.jpg. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 18:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Done. --  RoosterDragon  01:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Drawde/Rants and User:Drawde/Rants/Survivors

Crit 8+7. Thankies.-- Adward  18:32, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Done. --  RoosterDragon  01:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Image:Dogranger1.JPG

Crit 1 for Image:Dogranger.JPG. Not sure what's going on with Image:Dogranger1.jpg either. Asked on Taco2's talk page about what she intends to do with the black&white/colour version.-- Adward  18:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Done. --  RoosterDragon  01:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Image:Oam1.jpg

Except for the size, a dupe of this. I've left a note for the author on her page about resizing images. A note that I also replaced the smaller image with the larger one, and resized it on the page this image was included on. Linkthewindow  Talk  07:48, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Seems to be a dupe of the request below. Ether Cheese didn't delete it, or the image was uploaded again. Linkthewindow  Talk  07:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Re-upload. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 11:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, then it's a crit 6, too. Linkthewindow  Talk  11:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Done. --  RoosterDragon  01:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Image:New Signature.jpg

Crit 7 -- Adward  20:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

All Gone. -- Cheese 22:49, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Image:Oam1.jpg

Crit 1 from Image:Oam.jpg -- Adward  17:47, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Gorned. -- Cheese 22:49, 1 January 2010 (UTC)