UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations

Shortcut:
A/RE

Once a year, all sitting sysops will come up for re-evaluation by the community. The idea of this re-evaluation is to ensure that each sysop still has the trust of the community, which is vital for a sysop to have. This will give the community a chance to voice their opinions about how the sysops have been doing, and re-affirm or decline their trusted user status.

The idea of a sysop being a trusted user is a part of the guidelines for the general conduct of a sysop. The guidelines for the re-evaluation is the same as for being promoted to a sysop (which is reposted below), but with a few minor changes in wording.

Guidelines for System Operator Re-Evaluations

Once a year, on Urban Dead's birthday (July 3rd), all sysops will be subject to a community discussion. Sysops may also put themselves up for re-evaluation at any time (see below). All users are asked to comment on each candidate in question, ask questions of the candidate, and discuss the candidate's suitability for continuing to be a System Operator. This is not a vote. It is instead merely a request for comments from the wiki community. This will continue for two weeks, as all users get a chance to air their opinions on the candidate.

Once the two weeks are up, the Bureaucrats will review the community discussion and make a decision for each candidate based upon it. The user will be notified of the status of their re-evaluation, and will be retained in their position should it appear that the community is willing to continue to accept them as a System Operator. In the event that the decision is negative, then the sysop will be demoted back to regular user status, where after a month's time, the user can re-submit themself for promotion.

Before users voice their opinions on the candidate who wishes to continue their System Operator status, the following guidelines should be reviewed by the user:

General User Guidelines for System Operator Re-Evaluations

Before voicing their opinion on a candidate's re-evaluation bid, a user should consider some of the following questions:

• Has the candidate spent significant time within the community as a sysop?

We define this as the candidate having made at least one edit in the past 3 months. It is recommended that a user look over the the sysop activity check and last 500 edits to determine the level of activity of the candidate.

Note: The Truly Inactive Sysops policy dictates that a sysop who hasn't made an edit within four months is automatically demoted. Therefore, for a sysop to be re-evaluated, they need to have made an edit before that time-frame is up.

• Has the candidate maintained significant activity within the community?

We define this as at least 50 edits under the candidate's name since their last re-evaluation. It is recommended that a user look over the candidate's last 50 edits in order to get a feel for the activity of a candidate.

Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history used to be periodically purged on this wiki.

• Has the candidate expressed interest in maintaining the community?

We define this as clear evidence that the candidate is already performing maintenance tasks and continuing taking a leadership role on the wiki.

• Has the candidate expressed a desire to continue to be a System Operator?

We define this simply as indicating in the candidate's request their desire to continue to maintain the position.

• Is there an indication of trust in the candidate.

We define this as a minimum of three other users (preferably users with at least 200 edits under their name and at least one System Operator), willing to vouch for the candidate's suitability for the role.

If a candidate is highly exemplary in one guideline, a certain level of flexibility should be extended to the other guidelines. Other guidelines for qualifications may be used, these are just a few suggested things to consider before a user voices their opinion.

Re-Evaluations Being Discussed

The current annual re-evaluations are ongoing, and comments will close on July 18th, 2018. All users are encouraged to comment.

A Helpful Little Gnome

• A Helpful Little Gnome (talk | contribs | UDWiki contribs | logs1 | logs2 | vndl data | sysop archive)
• This is not a vote. Oh, and Gnome is super cool. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 15:07, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
• His work with the vandalism sprees this year was indispensable. --^A_O^R_D^M_O^P_R^I _! ^T 17:53, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
• A vote for Gnome is a vote for UDWiki, even if it isn't a vote. -- Spiderzed▋ 21:20, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
• yeah sure. It’s in his damn name. HELPFUL. --User:Sexualharrison22:50, 3 July 2018

Bob Moncrief

• Bob Moncrief (talk | contribs | UDWiki contribs | logs1 | logs2 | vndl data | sysop archive)
• Always there to welcome newbies, and still active in game providing updates to the EMR and more. Also quite active to ban bots and other shit finding it's way in. +1 to Bob! -- ∀UDIO∀TTACK (talk) 13:55, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
• Bob will one day fight me on a mountaintop for the right to be the last sysop of udwiki. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 15:08, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
• The official greeter and newbie helper of the Wiki, and well suited for the task. --^A_O^R_D^M_O^P_R^I _! ^T 17:53, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
• Bob is one of the most active sys-ops these days. Keep him around. -- Spiderzed▋ 21:20, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
• Why does nobody write out your last name, Bob Moncrief? Are they afradi they will mispell id? -- LABIA on the INTERNET ^{Dunell Hills Corpseman} #24 - |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ^TMG 21:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
• my favorite ass wiper. I can’t recall if i ever got to kill him in game. But again let him keep this punishment --User:Sexualharrison22:51, 3 July 2018

Rosslessness

• Rosslessness (talk | contribs | UDWiki contribs | logs1 | logs2 | vndl data | sysop archive)
• Can't we just make him dictator-for-life? --^A_O^R_D^M_O^P_R^I _! ^T 17:53, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
• Not as active as he used to be, but he is there when he is needed and an outstanding veteran of the more drama-heavy days. -- Spiderzed▋ 21:20, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
• box i mean Ross is timeless. We need him. --User:Sexualharrison22:52, 3 July 2018

Recent Re-Evaluations

See the 2017 Re-Evaluations

Archived Re-Evaluations

For earlier re-evaluations, see the following:

• This year's re-evaluations
• Last year's re-evaluations
• Sysop Archives for older re-evaluations and related sysop activities

Re-Evaluations Scheduling

User	Position	Last Contribution	Seat Available
A Helpful Little Gnome (Contribs)	Bureaucrat	2021-10-29	2021-12-01
DanceDanceRevolution (Contribs)	Bureaucrat	2021-10-28	2021-12-01
Rosslessness (Contribs)	Sysop	2024-06-10	N/A
Stelar (Contribs)	Sysop	2021-10-29	N/A

Total Sysops: 4 (excluding Kevan, LeakyBocks and Urbandead)

Last updated at: 03:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)