Category talk:Historical Groups

Obtaining Historical Status

A policy is in place which outlines the method to attain historical status.

Groups must no longer actively contribute to the game. A nomination should be made on Category talk:Historical Groups. Within two weeks of a nomination, the group must be approved by 2/3 of the voters, with a minimum of 15 voters for a nomination to pass. The only allowable votes are Yea and Nay. Groups that pass will be added to the category as described below. Groups must allow a week to pass between nominations.

Nominations for Historical Status

When nominating a group, please add a note to Template:Wiki News and add {{HistoricalGroupVoting}} to the top of the group's page.

101st Airborne Unit

101st Airborne Unit

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms: # comments ~~~~ or # ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a moderator.

The only valid voting sections are Yes and No. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Apperentlly I have to do this because I was checking up on old memories and the 101st Airborne Unit is only listed at Inactive. The 101st was very historic. Considering in 06' and 07' we took back nummerous malls and even played a main role in taking back creedy once. I, And about 3 other people are the only surviviors of when we disbanded. We have now formed the 82nd Airborne Division and most people don't even remember The Subtle little 101st Airborne Unit. Well I'm going to change that, I nominate the 101st for historical status!-- Jerrel tlk _{(82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!)}. 20:27, 15 June 2010 (BST)

Yes (101st)

1. Yea Of course I'm going to vote yes. Let's just hope everyone else feels the same way.-- Jerrel tlk _{(82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!)}. 20:42, 15 June 2010 (BST)
2. --Dunstan 20:44, 15 June 2010 (BST)
3. Yes Vague echoey recollection. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 10:38, 16 June 2010 (BST)
4. Yes If I remember correctly you guys had a presence in Peppardville around 2006, meets my definition of a "known group in section of suburb where their influence was seen" - Vantar 07:23, 17 June 2010 (BST)
5. Yes Jed 8:54, 24 June 2010 (EST)

No (101st)

1. Nay. The 101st what? -- Spiderzed▋ 21:42, 15 June 2010 (BST)

   Airborne Unit. ;P -- Rahrah is not too happy about another dead lexicon. 22:00, 15 June 2010 (BST)

2. Maybe if they were the 1st, but if there were 100 others before them they can't really be that special. 21:43, 15 June 2010 (BST)
3. Nay - I would've never heard of them if I didn't make a point of maintaining the formatting of the suburb group listings. I'm afraid I've never seen any effects that they've caused or have heard of anyone working alongside them or commending them for their efforts. Really, this is the very first time I've ever heard anyone talk about them at all. —Aichon— 22:17, 15 June 2010 (BST)
4. As Above --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:18, 15 June 2010 (BST)
5. No -THE 101ST HAS OFFICIALLY DISBANDED FOR SECURITY REASONS! It is now called 82nd Airborne Division.--^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 22:23, 15 June 2010 (BST)
6. No -as Michaleson --Raddox MurTangle 22:28, 15 June 2010 (BST)
7. Spam - But thanks for helping make the point as to why "The groups leader wants it to be historical, then why shouldn't we let him." --VVV ^RPMBG 00:22, 16 June 2010 (BST)
8. No - Did nothing. --Papa Moloch 00:45, 16 June 2010 (BST)
9. No - Not this guy again. --
    
    
    
    
   02:23, 16 June 2010 (BST)
10. No - "I, and about 3 other people are the only surviviors of when we disbanded. We have now formed the 82nd Airborne Division". Those are your words, which to me sounds like there was something about the 101st that made you want to change the name to the 82nd. Personally, I don't even care what the reasons are because that tells me that the group isn't really dead--just shambling along under a new guise. And quite obviously slouching because as Aichon above, if I did not stalk suburb pages I wouldn't have even heard of the 101st. --Maverick ^{Talk - OBR 404} 08:14, 16 June 2010 (BST)
11. No - Who? Oidar 11:44, 16 June 2010 (BST)
12. No - yet another sack of crap did nothing group. what have you unimaginative idiots done to impact the game in any way? ZERO! wow you retook some malls.. holy shit thats never been done before. GAME OVER MAN! your group page is not getting deleted. why all these turds crawling out from under rocks to get into historical status all of a sudden?----sexualharrison ¯\()/¯ 13:31, 16 June 2010 (BST)
13. No - As Oidar. -- Papa Jadkor ^{(RRF) (MotA) (MT11)} 17:22, 16 June 2010 (BST)
14. No - Nein. Group is subjectively not historical enough to be an historical group. --Zarneverfike 19:11, 16 June 2010 (BST)
15. No - Hibernaculum 20:23, 16 June 2010 (BST)
16. No - I never even heard of this group before. The only reason I saw this is because I was looking at the Escape nomination. All this group did was, quote: "took back nummerous malls and even played a main role in taking back creedy once." Sorry but that's nothing special. --FallUpStairs 21:23, 16 June 2010 (BST)
17. No - First, seems to me that you just changed the name of the group. And as most people here, never heard of you. Taking back some malls and a fort once doesn't make you historical. --KyleStyle 22:40, 16 June 2010 (BST)
18. I heard of you, but you didn't really do much to warrant a Historical status. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} (status:‎Mudkip!) 01:55, 17 June 2010 (BST)
19. No - No offense, but I'm not seeing anything significant in your group's resume. --Shatari 06:19, 17 June 2010 (BST)
20. No - I remember the 101st Airborne. He was stupid. --Sonny Corleone ^{DORIS I jizzed in my pants pr0n} 03:10, 22 June 2010 (BST)
21. No - I remember you guys, but you're not influential enough.-- Adward  16:13, 22 June 2010 (BST)
22. No - Who are these guys? --jorm 08:00, 23 June 2010 (BST)

    Seems to me like most of you are too young in this game and ignorent to even remember who we are considering we disbanded in 2007.-- Jerrel tlk _{(82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!)}. 22:42, 23 June 2010 (BST)

    No. And learn to format, for GODS sake. --

     

     

     

     

    23:40, 23 June 2010 (BST)

    Yeah, because Sonny, Jorm and Moloch are all newbs.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 23:48, 23 June 2010 (BST)

    I said MOST. Most of the people who would have supported this have either quit a long time ago, Or are laying flat dead outside the woodbourne building. And most of these "no" votes are from people who have nothing better to do than spam "no" about groups that were disbanded LONGGGG befor they even joined this game.-- Jerrel tlk _{(82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!)}. 00:11, 24 June 2010 (BST)

    Whinge much? 00:15, 24 June 2010 (BST)

    No, it's about you trying to promote one group from a big piece of homogeneous shit demographic of groups, all of which are "1000TH AIRBOURNE MILITARY BATTALION CORPS PEACE ANTI ZOMBIE FORCE 36TH BRIGADE INFANTRY SWAT CORPS SPECIAL OPS" and never really got anywhere and no one recognises, let alone remembers. And what the fuck, even by your logic, your group doesn't stand the test of time. You cry because it won't make historical because no one remembers is and those that do aren't around to vote it in. If it were historical, by definition it wouldn't have the problem of disappearing into the pages of history without anyone remembering it. --

     

     

     

     

    05:19, 24 June 2010 (BST)

    Why would you say it in response to jorm unless it was in directed at him? Don't try to weasel out now with that "most" crap. As for the rest of your excuse, I accidentally kicked a bouncy ball into another kid's head during recess on January 25th, 1993. Don't ask me why I remember that, but it stuck with me. I can hear you asking now, "why should I care about that?" Well, just as my playground mistake from 17 years ago is of no historical importance to anyone else, the same can be said of your group. If your group ever was that important, you should have put them up for historical status back in 2007. As it is, you have no room to complain since you knew what you were getting into when you nominated the group. —Aichon— 13:20, 24 June 2010 (BST)

    Sure, Go ahead and call us a, what did you call it? A..."big piece of homogeneous shit demographic of a group?" I mean, I GUESS that's cool of you to do. But, Either way....-- Jerrel tlk _{(82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!)}. 13:48, 24 June 2010 (BST)

    Uhh...try again. I didn't call you that. —Aichon— 13:56, 24 June 2010 (BST)

    Not you Aichon, Your reason was somewhat legitimate and funny.

23. Never heard of you. =/ -- Cheese 00:02, 24 June 2010 (BST)

Recent Nominations

• Escape - Failed

Previous Discussions

There are 3 archives for this page.

General Discussion

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

Voting Succeeded

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

Voting Failed

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.