UDWiki:Administration/Protections/Archive/2011 06: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
(→‎Requested Edits: UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration Guidelines)
Line 29: Line 29:


<!--''Place pages requiring editing here.''-->
<!--''Place pages requiring editing here.''-->
''Place pages requiring editing here.''
* [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration Guidelines]] - a couple of minor typos need correcting (these are discussed on the [[UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration Guidelines|talk page]]). kthnxbye <span style="font-family: Segoe Print, sans-serif;text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.4em">[[User:Chief Seagull|<span style="color: green;">Chief Seagull</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Chief Seagull|<small>(talk)</small>]]</span> 12:22, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


==Recent Actions==
==Recent Actions==

Revision as of 12:22, 22 January 2010

Template:Moderationnav

This page is for the request of page protection within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to philosophical concerns, the ability to protect pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a protection from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.

Guidelines for Protection Requests

All Protection Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:

  • A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility.
  • A reason for protection. This should be short and to the point.
  • A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.

Any protection request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.

Once the protection request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be reviewed by a member of the Sysop team, and action taken accordingly. Once action has been taken, the system operator will add a comment including a signed datestamp detailing his course of action, and the request will be moved into the Recent Actions queue, where it will remain for one week. After that week is up, it may be moved to the archive (see navigation box below). If the Protection has been granted, the system operator should place the tag {{protect}} on the page(s) that have been protected.

In the event of a system operator requesting a Protection, all the previous points will apply, excepting that a system operator other than the requestor shall review and take action on the request.

Pages in the Protection Queue may already be scheduled protections. For a list of scheduled protections, see here.

Protections Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019



Protection Queue

Place pages requiring protection here.

Requested Edits

Recent Actions

December's Archive

This page is just here to look pretty now. -Poodle of DoomM! Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.T 00:51, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Done. -- 00:54, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

A/VD

Under the Formalisation heading, where it says, "This applies to all entires as of 12 January 2010," entires should be entries instead. Also, how about "must include a link" instead of "are now to be formalised with a link"? Seems less awkward. Aichon 15:20, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Data, not A/VD. :P --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:32, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Another reason I shouldn't wiki around with no sleep. Yonnua is correct, of course. Aichon 22:55, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Fixed --

23:33, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

A/DE

Done as per the other Admin redirects. --

13:10, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Image:Banner Illuminati2.JPG

Due to some sort of upload-war I've temporarily protected it to the original authors' version before the conflict broke out. he's specified that he doesn't want Hal messing with it as of now, a discussion here as to how and why the dispute has happened could help me understand what's going on. --

13:06, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Hey sorry I did not realize that our image template page was being monitored, It was a friendly joking war, we are teammates and hunting buds but as a group we are having trouble coming to a consensus on a group image.. sorry for the misunderstanding I am sure it did appear unfriendly to outside eyes and I appreciate the speed at which you intervened. I just want to also make sure that you know Hal did nothing wrong he is a great guy and he loves cheese. ;) thanks again and sorry for the misunderstanding Divs 14:10, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

I also proposed a solution on Divs' talk page :) --Haliman - Talk 22:29, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Okay cool. Unprotected then. --

23:35, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Minor note: I deleted the old revisions and let the author re-upload to prevent uninformed reverts. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 02:04, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Also, do not protect it at this time. We're in the middle of deciding which to use. --Haliman - Talk 02:05, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Policies

I'm sure UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Better Vandal Data and UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/English Administration are both scheduled, you know I'd do it myself but I really don't have the time right now nor will I in the coming few days... Obviously the former (or the relevant parts) will need to be put in Approved and the necessary changes made before this queue can be completed, etc. --

13:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Sigh. Done myself :/ thanks, other ops -- 11:11, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

The Following Talk Page

I would appreciate it if [this] could be protected. -Poodle of DoomM! Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.T 17:40, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Yeah done. -- 02:15, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

This Withdrawn Policy

I see no need to make an entirely new page for what will be the exact same policy. Please unprotect so the three days of discussion can start and I can actually take it to voting this time.-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 15:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Also, remove it from withdrawn. It's going to be put to voting this time in some way, shape, or form.-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 15:15, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
COME ON YOU LAZY BASTARDS GET THIS SHIT DONE.-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 15:19, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
DONE MOTHER BITCHES We're coming to get you, Barbara 16:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
NO YOU DUMB BITCH, YOU FORGOT THE TALK PAGE!--Umbrella-White.pngThadeous OakleyUmbrella-White.png 16:17, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
>_>
<_<
Prove it!
We're coming to get you, Barbara 16:52, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
I lold-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 17:46, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

UDWiki:Administration/Bureaucrat Promotions/December 2009

This thing and its corresponding talk page require protection. --ZsL 00:34, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Done. -- 00:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

The Following Talk Page...

I would like to see this this protected if possable please. -Poodle of DoomM! Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.T 00:44, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Done. -- 00:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Zombie Lord vs Bob Boberton

Scheduled. Although it should be left for a little while for comments, I don't think there's really any need, seeing as all involved parties know about the ruling. Protect as and when you feel it's right.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:22, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

I was waiting for ZL to concur but since he's expressed he knows about it I've done it. -- 02:59, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Recruitment talk archives

Linkthewindow  Talk  10:32, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Done.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 02:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Protections Scheduling Queue

Protection Scheduling requests should be requested in the same general format as Deletions. Votes will occur in the same general manner, and like deletion scheduling requests will be voted on for two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. Valid votes are:

  • Yea - Approval of Schedule Request
  • Nay - Disapproval of Schedule Request

Note: The archive for Scheduled Protections can be found here.