Suggestion:20071205 Vital Wound
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Spam! | |
This suggestion was voted as spam and closed for voting, with 2 keep, 8 kill, and 23 spam votes. |
20071205 Vital Wound
Ablesentinel 20:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Suggestion type:
Skill
Suggestion scope:
Zombie
Suggestion description:
After a zombie with this skill makes a successful kill, the victim will require 5 AP to stand up and receives a -10% Health upon doing so. Also, victim will require a FAK before Revivification is even possible. (This comes from the idea that a zombie could injure a victim's vital organs causing more damage than usual.)
Voting Section
Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user. |
The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
Keep Votes
- OMG GREAT IDEA - this is so great it deserves my keep vote, oh and wanyao knows nothing, yes everything in my universe is backwards... --/~WOOT~\ 01:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Liberal Democrat - the UK being ruled by a drunken Scot can only improve matters. --Karloth Vois RR 01:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Kill Votes
- Extremely strong Kill - the spam voters said it--CorndogheroT-S-Z 21:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- GOOD GOD PLEASE KILL ME BEFORE THIS COMES TO PASS!!! - If I wanted to play with zombies that could aim for the head, I'd go to school once in a while. Plus, why should zombies get quad-linked-long-barred-plasma-charged-ion-blasting-sniper-enabled-UBER-cannons?!??!!?!?!?!??!?!?!! Give me one reason. --Officer 123satsitx 22:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - Hell no! --Waterspark2 06:34 p.m., 5 December 2007 (EST)
- Kill - Nope. Yes, most people agree that the zombie side needs a bit of a boost, but this is too overpowered by far. Oh, and sharp one, Officer123.--SeventythreeTalk 23:36, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - Zombies are not vindictive, just hungry. ... revivifying is admittedly completely out-of-genre, but it's part of what's needed to have the game. --Pgunn 23:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - do i even have to state why?--Zach016 00:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - As others have said. Maybe have a "transfer brainrot" skill instead? That at least makes some sense, although it would be spammed into oblivion. --Ms.Panes 02:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Kill Why would zombies want to hurt zombies? --Jon Pyre 03:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Spam/Dupe Votes
- Spam - ZOMFG! You missed out the rocket launchers. (For boxy: overpowered.) --Funt Solo QT 20:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Spam - -- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 20:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Spam - Headshot is bad enough, but a new version that zombies use? This would basically make all zombies headshot at all times, even those Zked. Bad idea.--Karekmaps?! 21:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Spam - Oh lord. --Druuuuu Ocular 21:09, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Spam - Imma chargin' mah lazer!! In other words, this suggestion is RETARDED --Ryiis 21:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Spam - because this is overpowered and one-sided. Please, use Talk:Suggestions to get some feedback on an idea before bringing it here. --Pavluk A! E! 21:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Spam I hate to do it, but yes it's spam. - Pardus 21:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Dupe There have been suggestions that have watned crap to be put in the game, this suggestion is clearly a copy of the sniper rifle! --Happy doodle 22:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Spam - Holy shit! No. --The Hierophant 23:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Centaurworthy - Does this mean the victim takes those penalties as a zombie or upon revival? One way, it's retarded, the other way it's overpowered.Studoku 23:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- SPAM - I have threw main issues with this. 1. It nerfs revives to next to worthless; this would bring a revive up to 12AP with a scan, heal, AND THEN a revive. 2. This hurts zombies since everytime a survivor "dies", they become zombies. And 3. -10% HP on standing up -- as a zombie? WTF! That makes no sense for a zombie skill since survivors need to deal 5 to 6 LESS damage to gain the kill bonus XP. What's next? A gun dealing damage to a shooter? Antitribu 00:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- WTF CENTAURS- Must I say more than what the other spam voters have stated? --Darth LumisT! A! E! SR 00:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- WTFCENTAURSTOTHESECONDPOWER - There is nothing more to say. Everyone's said the reasonings behind why this suggestions is baaaadd to the boooone. --Private Mark 00:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- $P@M - Everyone's already said everything :( --TriPolar 00:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Spam City USA - But I want my portable death star/ sniper rifle!! --BlobdudeTalk TM MC 01:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- 'Spamtastical Hurr above.-- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keepwaitnoimeanspam ----Secruss|Yak|Brahnz!|CGR|PKA||EMLN|Templates|RRF|RFTM|Crap|WHOZ||MU|GN|C2008||02:09, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- HOLYCRAPMAYBEISHOULDKEEPJUSTFORCHAOSTHEORY - OH! I SHOULD MAYBE ADD SOME ITEM THAT ALLOWS YOU TO BARRICADE WITH DONKEY LASERS AND CHESS TROPHIES! --Erutan 02:35, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - Yeah Erutan hit it right on the money --Anti Gorefest5TMW!B! 03:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Duplicated SPAM! - Counter-point to all the morons screaming: it's overpowered, survivors already need to get a revive and so forth, whereas a zombie just needs to stand. Also, check the "Frequently Suggested" page before suggesting, and to avoid getting internet tough guys to flame you, use Talk:Suggestions. Glenstone 03:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Spam - Overpowered. Don't even consider a revision, as you can see here the majority of people here would not want it to be. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 05:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Can you say... Overpowered? *cough*spam*cough* ~A`Blue`JellyTME*V*I*L*? 05:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Spam - overpowered --~~~~ [talk] 09:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- +1 Spam ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 13:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)