Suggestion:20071205 Vital Wound

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Nospam.gif Spam!
This suggestion was voted as spam and closed for voting, with 2 keep, 8 kill, and 23 spam votes.



Suggestion Navigation
Suggestion Portal
Current SuggestionsSuggestions up for VotingClothes Suggestions
Cycling SuggestionsPeer ReviewedUndecidedPeer RejectedHumorous
Suggestion AdviceTopics to Avoid and WhyHelp, Developing and Editing


20071205 Vital Wound

Ablesentinel 20:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Suggestion type:
Skill

Suggestion scope:
Zombie

Suggestion description:
After a zombie with this skill makes a successful kill, the victim will require 5 AP to stand up and receives a -10% Health upon doing so. Also, victim will require a FAK before Revivification is even possible. (This comes from the idea that a zombie could injure a victim's vital organs causing more damage than usual.)

Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
# justification ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.


Keep Votes

  1. OMG GREAT IDEA - this is so great it deserves my keep vote, oh and wanyao knows nothing, yes everything in my universe is backwards... --/~WOOT~\ 01:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  2. Liberal Democrat - the UK being ruled by a drunken Scot can only improve matters. --Karloth Vois RR 01:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Kill Votes

  1. Extremely strong Kill - the spam voters said it--CorndogheroT-S-Z 21:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  2. GOOD GOD PLEASE KILL ME BEFORE THIS COMES TO PASS!!! - If I wanted to play with zombies that could aim for the head, I'd go to school once in a while. Plus, why should zombies get quad-linked-long-barred-plasma-charged-ion-blasting-sniper-enabled-UBER-cannons?!??!!?!?!?!??!?!?!! Give me one reason. --Officer 123satsitx 22:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  3. Kill - Hell no! --Waterspark2 06:34 p.m., 5 December 2007 (EST)
  4. Kill - Nope. Yes, most people agree that the zombie side needs a bit of a boost, but this is too overpowered by far. Oh, and sharp one, Officer123.--SeventythreeTalk 23:36, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  5. Kill - Zombies are not vindictive, just hungry. ... revivifying is admittedly completely out-of-genre, but it's part of what's needed to have the game. --Pgunn 23:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  6. Kill - do i even have to state why?--Zach016 00:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  7. Kill - As others have said. Maybe have a "transfer brainrot" skill instead? That at least makes some sense, although it would be spammed into oblivion. --Ms.Panes 02:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  8. Kill Why would zombies want to hurt zombies? --Jon Pyre 03:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Spam/Dupe Votes

  1. Spam - ZOMFG! You missed out the rocket launchers. (For boxy: overpowered.) --Funt Solo QT Scotland flag.JPG 20:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  2. Spam - -- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 20:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  3. Spam - Headshot is bad enough, but a new version that zombies use? This would basically make all zombies headshot at all times, even those Zked. Bad idea.--Karekmaps?! 21:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  4. Spam - Oh lord. --Druuuuu Ocular 21:09, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  5. Spam - Imma chargin' mah lazer!! In other words, this suggestion is RETARDED --Ryiis 21:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  6. Spam - because this is overpowered and one-sided. Please, use Talk:Suggestions to get some feedback on an idea before bringing it here. --Pavluk A! E! 21:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  7. Spam I hate to do it, but yes it's spam. - Pardus 21:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  8. Dupe There have been suggestions that have watned crap to be put in the game, this suggestion is clearly a copy of the sniper rifle! --Happy doodle 22:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  9. Spam - Holy shit! No. --The Hierophant 23:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  10. Centaurworthy - Does this mean the victim takes those penalties as a zombie or upon revival? One way, it's retarded, the other way it's overpowered.Studoku 23:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  11. SPAM - I have threw main issues with this. 1. It nerfs revives to next to worthless; this would bring a revive up to 12AP with a scan, heal, AND THEN a revive. 2. This hurts zombies since everytime a survivor "dies", they become zombies. And 3. -10% HP on standing up -- as a zombie? WTF! That makes no sense for a zombie skill since survivors need to deal 5 to 6 LESS damage to gain the kill bonus XP. What's next? A gun dealing damage to a shooter? Antitribu 00:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  12. WTF CENTAURS- Must I say more than what the other spam voters have stated? --Darth LumisT! A! E! SR 00:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  13. WTFCENTAURSTOTHESECONDPOWER - There is nothing more to say. Everyone's said the reasonings behind why this suggestions is baaaadd to the boooone. --Private Mark 00:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  14. $P@M - Everyone's already said everything :( --TriPolar 00:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  15. Spam City USA - But I want my portable death star/ sniper rifle!! --BlobdudeTalk TM MC 01:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  16. 'Spamtastical Hurr above.--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  17. Keepwaitnoimeanspam ----Secruss|Yak|Brahnz!|CGR|PKA|800px-Flag of the United States.svg.png|EMLN|Templates|RRF|RFTM|Crap|WHOZ|Evil3.gif|MU|GN|C2008|Chippy.gif|02:09, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  18. HOLYCRAPMAYBEISHOULDKEEPJUSTFORCHAOSTHEORY - OH! I SHOULD MAYBE ADD SOME ITEM THAT ALLOWS YOU TO BARRICADE WITH DONKEY LASERS AND CHESS TROPHIES! --Erutan 02:35, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  19. Kill - Yeah Erutan hit it right on the money --Bring The Pain!Anti Gorefest5Fight The Pain!TMW!B! 03:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  20. Duplicated SPAM! - Counter-point to all the morons screaming: it's overpowered, survivors already need to get a revive and so forth, whereas a zombie just needs to stand. Also, check the "Frequently Suggested" page before suggesting, and to avoid getting internet tough guys to flame you, use Talk:Suggestions. Glenstone 03:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  21. Spam - Overpowered. Don't even consider a revision, as you can see here the majority of people here would not want it to be. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 05:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  22. Can you say... Overpowered? *cough*spam*cough* ~A`Blue`JellyTME*V*I*L*? 05:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  23. Spam - overpowered --~~~~ [talk] 09:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  24. +1 Spam ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 13:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)