UDWiki:Administration/De-Escalations/Archive/2010
|
De-Escalation Archive | ||||||
|
De-Escalation Queue
Pending De-Escalations
There are currently no pending de-escalation requests in the queue.
Recent Actions
Yonnua Koponen
Yonnua Koponen (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:13, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 |
EATEN |
15:15, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
User:Misanthropy (2)
Misanthropy (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Been over a month, wasn't really paying attention. :( 23:26, 20 September 2010 (BST)
- Forgot you still had one. Now, be a good boy and don't smash anybody else's mobilo tower. >:( --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:38, 20 September 2010 (BST)
- I can't promise anything. 23:43, 20 September 2010 (BST)
- I can't promise anything.
Railroaded Revenant
I still contend that my conviction was extremely fucking shady (and I'm not the only one), but apparently the current administration team only makes use of actual precedent when it suits their interests. So, here I am, bowing to the prevailing political winds, at least until such a time as the climate may change. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 12:47, 26 August 2010 (BST)
- Done.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 12:53, 26 August 2010 (BST)
- using Karke's qq as a testimony to how wrong we are isn't the best way to go about it, trust me. -- LEMON #1 07:38, 27 August 2010 (BST)
Thadeous Oakley (4)
And again. Finally clean record, yay. --
Thadeous Oakley 17:11, 22 August 2010 (BST)
- Welcome to the land of the free.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 17:15, 22 August 2010 (BST)
User:Aichon
- Contributions - 645 contributions since then
- Vandal Data - Been over a month
Eligible by crit 1. —Aichon— 05:43, 10 July 2010 (BST)
|
EATEN |
19:23, 10 July 2010 (BST)Thadeous Oakley (3)
Strike 3! --Thadeous Oakley 12:27, 3 July 2010 (BST)
- Oh, and I have much more then 250 edits, almost 500, so only count the last 250 since 8 april. I'll leave the remaining edits count for strike 4. --
Thadeous Oakley 12:34, 3 July 2010 (BST)
- Not sure exactly what you're asking for, but the 250 edit counter starts over with each striking of vandal data. Says so in the rules at the top. That said, all done! —Aichon— 20:01, 3 July 2010 (BST)
- D: --Thadeous Oakley 22:47, 3 July 2010 (BST)
- D: --
- Not sure exactly what you're asking for, but the 250 edit counter starts over with each striking of vandal data. Says so in the rules at the top. That said, all done! —Aichon— 20:01, 3 July 2010 (BST)
User:Misanthropy
Strike this pointless dickery plz. 02:52, 24 April 2010 (BST)
- It's been a month already?? ;D Ummm could the ruling op on this just hold off, in 20 minutes i'm going to change the entire A/DE archive system to yearly archives as was discussed on the talk page. It shouldn't detriment Mis's a/vd entry anyway since he's already lodged his request on the date so the further month count starts from the 24th (see below conversation, tired and cant articulate properly) -- 06:44, 24 April 2010 (BST)
- Kay-o I've done it now =] -- 07:08, 24 April 2010 (BST)
Stricken -- boxy talk • teh rulz 12:59 24 April 2010 (BST)
Thadeous Oakley (2)
De-escalate me plz. Thanks in advance! --Thadeous Oakley 22:24, 8 April 2010 (BST)
- Processed. —Aichon— 05:51, 9 April 2010 (BST)
- Thanks again. Ya sure about re-arranging my record non-chronologically though? --Thadeous Oakley 07:08, 9 April 2010 (BST)
- They're sorted so that the ones that have been struck are listed together, that way it's easier to see where you are in the escalation process. I believe it's standard for A/VD, though I may be mistaken since I'm new around here. See these entries for other examples: User:Imthatguy, User:Iscariot, User:Sexylegsread. —Aichon— 08:38, 9 April 2010 (BST)
- Quoting mine isn't the way to go as it's so wrong it's comical. Persistent sysop incompetence has rendered mine this way. A/VD records should be in chronological order as they are an historical list of escalations of each user. Sysops are expected to be competent enough to be able to read a user's entry completely and understand the applicable policies rather than having every entry made idiot-proof. --
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 12:27, 9 April 2010 (BST) - Damnit, when you asked about odd sysop tips, I forgot to tell you. Never mention Iscariots A/VD. Ever. -- 13:28, 9 April 2010 (BST)
- The only thing worse than mentioning my A/VD is omitting an apostrophe :P -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 13:49, 9 April 2010 (BST)
- =O -- 14:03, 9 April 2010 (BST)
- Some things are probably best learned through the pain of personal experience. ;) —Aichon— 15:24, 9 April 2010 (BST)
- The only thing worse than mentioning my A/VD is omitting an apostrophe :P --
- Quoting mine isn't the way to go as it's so wrong it's comical. Persistent sysop incompetence has rendered mine this way. A/VD records should be in chronological order as they are an historical list of escalations of each user. Sysops are expected to be competent enough to be able to read a user's entry completely and understand the applicable policies rather than having every entry made idiot-proof. --
- They're sorted so that the ones that have been struck are listed together, that way it's easier to see where you are in the escalation process. I believe it's standard for A/VD, though I may be mistaken since I'm new around here. See these entries for other examples: User:Imthatguy, User:Iscariot, User:Sexylegsread. —Aichon— 08:38, 9 April 2010 (BST)
- Thanks again. Ya sure about re-arranging my record non-chronologically though? --
User:DanceDanceRevolution (2)
Hey, here for one last piece of atonement for my naughties. I've made 250+ edits since my last A/DE request just below this one. While I'll admit I was actually struck two days later, it was rather casually agreed (somewhere) that the one month, now A/DE has been created, should start from when the user requests it (now it's officially lodged somewhere) rather than when a sysop gets to strike it, I always thought that was the fair way to go. I think it might be here, although I'm very tired and just shuffling around the wiki randomly at the moment so it might actually be more decisively written somewhere else.
Either way, I'll let the acting op decide. It'll probs take two days anyway ;D --
15:37, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- A calender month between requests seems fair to me. Your last record has been...
|
EATEN |
17:48, 20 March 2010 (UTC)User:DanceDanceRevolution
May I please have a striking on the ban I received in November 2009. My last infraction was 6th January and my edits are enough, etc. --
14:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Two day long bump. -- 04:19, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- You may have to try a sysop talk page.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 07:17, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Struck. Do I need to link to this request from the strike or something? Cyberbob Talk 07:49, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Thadeous Oakley
- My contributions. 250 edits in the last month. You know the drill. --Thadeous Oakley 17:47, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Done, but please read the rules and add an A/VD link to make it a bit easier for us next time. -- 23:42, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Will do. --Thadeous Oakley 10:00, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Will do. --
User:Drawde
Rightio, since noones made use of this yet, I'll deflower this virgin Admin page. I'm more then ready to de-escalated, having made a crap load of shitty awesome edits to this wiki, and over a month has passed.
-- Adward 22:52, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
You're still about ten or fifteen edits off of the magic number. Go un-merge some grouped locations or categorise some stuff that's not categorised and come back in like an hour. 22:56, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
