UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Deathnut/2007-09-08 Promotion

Administration » Sysop Archives » Deathnut » 2007-09-08 Promotion

This page is an archive of Deathnut's Promotions candidacy, which was unsuccessful. If you wish to speak with this candidate, please use their Talk page.

Deathnut

Well here I go again. It's been over a year since my last attempt to become a sysop here. My edit record going well over 2000. I've been working on small things around the wiki reciently and actually working on forums. I currently am a lead admin on an adult website so I wont place a link.here is a link to some of the things I am responsible for before others have done some changes to it My projects archive

• Against - Haven't really heard of you, to be honest. --Cyberbob ^{DORIS CGR U!} 10:56, 8 September 2007 (BST)
• Vouch- Did some good work for McZeds, and the wiki generally.--The-Not-So-Late Stuartbman The Third ^{MBE OBE} 11:42, 8 September 2007 (BST)
• Against - Strangely enough, I remember you by name. While you created McZeds together with User:Amazing (a good thing, altough I can't say that it's a good or a bad thing for other users), you try to pass a promotion bid once every year based mostly on your past contributions (and being largely inactive between tries). You need to be more active, and contribute in a more public, uninterested way before you ask for a promotion. Can't trust you with the tools. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 14:18, 8 September 2007 (BST)

This user did not create McZed's, it was created by Amazing with a little input from me and then it was ran by Atari Techno. As far as I know, Deathnut has made a pic for the carbon-copy "New" McZed's. --Zod Rhombus 17:55, 15 September 2007 (BST)

• Vouch- I'll have a go at vouching for the guy. I think he should get his voting period. Nalikill 14:54, 8 September 2007 (BST)
• Against - Not terribly active at all. -- Atticus Rex ^{mfu pif} Δ 16:19, 8 September 2007 (BST)
• Against - Not active enough for my tastes. --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 16:27, 8 September 2007 (BST)
• Abstain - Why, hello there. Who are you, again?--Thari ^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 17:01, 8 September 2007 (BST)
• Against - Hugely inactive. I have made more contributions in the last week than you have in the last eighteen months. --The Grimch ^U! 17:20, 8 September 2007 (BST)
• Abstain - if only you were more active i would have nothing against your promotion. But i can see you voting in Amazing's promotion in your 500 more recent edits, which shows you have more than 2000 edits but in a 2 years period --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 19:05, 8 September 2007 (BST)

Attention: Anyone voting after this comment... the above guidelines for promotion nomination was altered AFTER this bid was cast. Under the previous guidelines, this is still a valid promotion bid. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 19:27, 8 September 2007 (BST)

• Against - no --~~~~ [Talk] 20:43, 8 September 2007 (BST)
• Against - Come back when you come on regularly.--Karek^maps?! 00:58, 9 September 2007 (BST)
• Against - Not actve enough. Come back with >10 edits a day. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 04:02, 9 September 2007 (BST)
• Against - Why would I vouch for you? Because you're the co-leader of the RAF and only done things here that only relates to the RAF? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 04:05, 9 September 2007 (BST)
• Against - You need more activity - Vantar 04:14, 9 September 2007 (BST)
• Abstain - Good work, but greater activity (edits/day) would be better. --^T 15:31, 11 September 2007 (BST)
• Abstain - Unfortunately, I don't recognize your name. Except now, from this page. --Barbecue Barbecue 15:21, 13 September 2007 (BST)
• Abstain - As Hagnat --Ryiis 18:52, 13 September 2007 (BST)
• Agaisnt - Who the hell are you? --User:Axe27/Sig 05:25, 14 September 2007 (BST)
• Vouch - Just to get this bid out of limbo. It's abviously a dud and this way the bureaucrats are able to process this bid in two weeks instead that it stays up for weeks without anybody being able to do something about it.-- Vista  +1  17:34, 15 September 2007 (BST)
• Against - You've done nothing for the wiki besides RAF and even then you're barely here. Wait another six months and be active. You come and go as you please, contributing little. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS CRF pr0n} 17:32, 15 September 2007 (BST)
• Against - I would have to go with the "not active enough" reason.--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 17:53, 15 September 2007 (BST)
• Against - I don't believe you actively contribute enough.--Vow 20:45, 17 September 2007 (BST)