Latest revision as of 17:58, 26 June 2024

Obtaining Historical Status

A policy is in place which outlines the method to attain historical status.

Groups must no longer actively contribute to the game.
A nomination should be made on Category talk:Historical Groups.
Voting will last for exactly two weeks following nomination. To be successful, a group must be approved by 2/3 of eligible voters to pass. A minimum of 15 votes must be cast for the vote to be valid. The only allowable votes are Yes and No.
Groups that pass will be added to the category as described below.
Groups must allow a week to pass between nominations.
Groups must allow 4 months in between when the group disbands and when they can be nominated for Historical Status. (Note: Only for Malton-based groups)

Nominations for Historical Status

When nominating a group, please add a note to Template:Wiki News and add {{HistoricalGroupVoting}} to the top of the group's page. Also, please add {{HistoricalVotingRules}} under the group's application for historical status.

New Nominations

Place new nominations for voting here.

Recent Nominations

Militant Order of Barhah

The MOB defined Barhah Fundamentalism for Malton, putting into sharp focus the philosophy of always-dead, migratory, horde-focused zombies. While the MOB reigned, zombies and death cultists everywhere had to reconsider or sheepishly justify their necro-religious beliefs. The MOB maintained multiple effective strike teams for years. For years, zombie activity in Malton consisted primarily of a deep red Ridleybank and an uncontrollable wrecking ball in the form of the MOB. It was like a nonstop, all-seasons Mall Tour or Big Bash. Survivors could not stop it, so they resorted to fleeing in terror and picking up the mess left behind. Jorm, The Prophet of Barhah, is personally notable for:

Being Mayor of Malton from 2010 to today, following the Misanthropy/Revenant administration fulfilling their campaign promise to betray the electorate by handing the keys to the city to Jorm.
Hosting the IRC server that was a longtime favorite for UD live chat.
Hosting barhah.com, the forum that was a longtime favorite for zombie groups.
Making Nexus War, which was more than a little popular. The spiritual successor, Nexus Clash, is still entirely alive.
Working for WikiMedia, where you may have seen him asking for donations.

The Prophet of Barhah himself once made the case for his horde in an arbitration case over the MOB redirect. In his trademarked steel wool and whiskey style, he addressed another group that hoped to be known as "the mob":

Your group consists of less than 20 and has done *nothing*; my group is over 70 and has *smashed suburbs*. We are the MOB; you are the "Malton Mob."

Hagnat further noted:

They are larger. They are famous. They have Zombies. They have Jorm.

I submit the MOB for your consideration. --VVV^RPMBG 07:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Yes

Yes - Author vote. --VVV^RPMBG 07:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Yes - Easily one of the most notable zombie groups to have ever shambled the streets of Malton. —Aich on— 21:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Yes - One of the most significant zombie groups in the game's history. -- Spiderzed ▋ 04:37, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Yes Jorm Made me do it. Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 18:36, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Yes - I have played Urban Dead for almost 20 years, and have been part of MOB for almost as long (19 years, give or take). No zombie group has been as impactful as MOB, and perhaps no zombie group ever will. Liche (talk) 19:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
I guess so. ^ Has this game been around for nearly 20 years? Ah, well. That can't be. (Really?) -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 04:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Yes DANCEDANCEREVO LUTION 07:37, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
yes - i was told there would be chum. hajen (talk) 15:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Yes Clayton Carmine (talk) 15:30, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

No

With voting finished, MOB hasn't passed the minimum 15 votes to be made historical. That said, you can change historical voting policy (which doesn't have minimum vote requirements). -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 17:57, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

East Becktown Defenders

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:

# comments ~~~~
or
# ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a moderator.

The only valid voting sections are Yes and No. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

The East Becktown Defenders officially disbanded on May 1st, 2020, which makes them eligible for Historical Group status. The EBD had been active since 2016, and included dozens of members, including both veterans and entire newbies. They maintained good relationships with survivor groups (including, but not limited to the DHPD, SoC, Knights Templar and the DEM) and zombie groups (specifically the Daubeney Resident Zombies next door, and of course our favourite frenemies in the RRF). Aside from regular survivor-style operations, they also brought a fun, no-pressure approach to the game, along with wiki-tools (like the automatic SitRep on their group page) and weird events (like the EBD StatParty). The group decided not to fade away like many others, but officially disbanded after exactly 4 years of activity.

Yes

Yes - PB&J 13:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes - Clayton Carmine (talk) 13:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes - MicoolTNT 13:57, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes - stelar ^{Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge} 14:00, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes - Roddy Winters (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes - Matt Langley (talk) 18:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes - Tarkenton (talk) 20:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes - Bob Moncrief ^EBD•W! 23:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes - Simcoe 07:00, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes - Yo Ris (talk) 07:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes - RaiNo 10:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes - Frank Burn (talk) 13:46, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes - DoXBr (talk) 14:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes - Richardskull16 (talk) 09:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes - The Malton Globetrotters turbodunk the ayes! --【ⅎooɹd ǝʌɐɥ ᴉ sʇɐoƃ sʍoʅʚ ⅎǝᴉɹɔuoɯ uǝɹɐʞ】 ☉ ☉ |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 00:58, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes - Benigno ^{SSZ RCC} 16:57, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

No

I was going to go with “Who?” but apparently we’ve spoken. As they did not fix their page in the entire 4 years they spent as a group, I cannot in good conscience vote for this group to be historical. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 16:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
From what I see is a run-of-the-mill survivor group engaged in standard survivor play of maintaining a particular area. It was not innovative (like MCM or 404 were), it didn't have a distinctive style (like for example B.A.R. or ULC would have), nor was it involved in significant events (like Escape or c4NT were). -- Spiderzed ▋ 20:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
As Spiderzed. Groups that had some members, did some things, and had a central pitch of being "well liked" didn't classify as historical when Urban Dead was bigger. I don't believe that should change for groups that existed during UD's long tail. DANCEDANCEREVO LUTION 05:55, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
As Spiderzed. --Papa John Schnatter (talk) 17:25, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

With voting well and truly finished, the East Becktown Defenders have become a historical group. DANCEDANCEREVO LUTION 07:53, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Previous Discussions

There are 3 archives for this page.

General Discussion

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

Voting Succeeded

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

Voting Failed

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 #Groups must no longer actively contribute to the game.
 #A nomination should be made on [[Category talk:Historical Groups]].
-#Within two weeks of a nomination, the group must be approved by 2/3 of the voters, with a minimum of 15 voters for a nomination to pass. The only allowable votes are '''Yea''' and '''Nay'''.
+#Voting will last for exactly two weeks following nomination. To be successful, a group must be approved by 2/3 of eligible voters to pass. A minimum of 15 votes must be cast for the vote to be valid. The only allowable votes are '''Yes''' and '''No'''.
 #Groups that pass will be added to the category as described below.
 #Groups must allow a week to pass between nominations.
+#Groups must allow 4 months in between when the group disbands and when they can be nominated for Historical Status. (Note: Only for [[Malton]]-based groups)
 |}
 <br clear=both />
 =Nominations for Historical Status=
-When nominating a group, please add a note to [[Template:Wiki News]] and add {{CodeInline|<nowiki>{{HistoricalGroupVoting}}</nowiki>}} to the top of the group's page.
+When nominating a group, please add a note to [[Template:Wiki News]] and add {{CodeInline|<nowiki>{{HistoricalGroupVoting}}</nowiki>}} to the top of the group's page. Also, please add {{CodeInline|<nowiki>{{HistoricalVotingRules}}</nowiki>}} under the group's application for historical status.
-==New Nominations==
+=New Nominations=
+''Place new nominations for voting here.''
-===[[Assylum]]===
+=Recent Nominations=
-nominating for ''historical wiki group''. Many users from this group ended up becoming sysops and strong contributors for this wiki. During the existance of this group, the antics of their members lead to drama (heh) and somehow helped improve the rules that guide us all. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User_talk:Hagnat|[talk]]] [[wcdz|[wcdz]]]</sup> 16:20, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''Aye''' - for some reasons i thought we were deleting 'historical group', but we are rather deleting 'confimed groups'. Therefore, Assylum should have a chance to acchive historical status --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User_talk:Hagnat|[talk]]] [[wcdz|[wcdz]]]</sup> 16:20, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
-#Aye--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 16:40, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' Shouldn't be mixed in with historical groups that actually did stuff in game beyond a little radio spam. --[[User:Johnny Bass|Papa Johnny]] 22:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''Yes''' - No idea who these guys are, but they sound like total geniuses. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 22:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
-#<s>'''Yea''' -Sheep vote From what I have read about them they seem to be Historical enough.--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 23:14, 16 November 2009 (UTC)</s>
-#:'''Nay''' - I agree with later voters. (e.g Aichon) --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 23:57, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''Nay''' - I haven't seen any evidence of in-game activity of historical significance. I do admit that their wiki shenanigans are somewhat humorous, but wiki actions have nothing to do with historical status. I'd love to vote yay, since I also know a few of the group members, but I can't. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 23:42, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
-#:You can and you should. If this passes, ''a whole month of me being nice!'' What more could you want?--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 11:59, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
-#::A free Tibet, a supreme stuffed crust pizza, a new computer, another four hours of sleep, and a Rhodesian ridgeback puppy, off the top of my head. I'll compile a list for you later of other things I want. Besides, you've always been nothing but nice to me, and I get a laugh out of you being mean to others. :) {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:28, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
-#:::But...but... <font size=20>:(</font>--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 20:40, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
-#::::<3 u! {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 21:05, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - As Johnny, Aichon and Iscariot. This nomination should just be removed. --[[User:The Hierophant|Papa Moloch]] 23:46, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - Who?{{User:Zombie Lord/sig2}} <tt>00:56 17 November 2009(BST)</tt>
-#'''Nay''' - Aichon said it best.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 08:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No'''  Was there another group with the same name? [[User:Asheets|Asheets]] 21:15, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' The nominator can't even spell "achieve" correctly. And the group has nothing to prove it's importance on its wiki or in game. {{User:Criminally Insane/supastampbiatch}} 22:58, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
-#:Uh, har? Nothing to prove its importance on the wiki? We are the wiki. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 01:15, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - The group was a notoriously massive spam-fest, but they didn't really have any in-game activity that I can recall.  --{{User:Zombie slay3r/Signature}} 23:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''Nay''' - Wiki activity may or may not supplement a group's viability as a historical group. But I've never even heard of this group, let alone know of anything historical/unique that they did in-game. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 06:27, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - Lack of in-game achievements. [[User:Garum|Garum]] 08:39, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - do i even need to justify this? --[[User:Duke Garland|<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>]] [[User:Duke Garland/BHW|<nowiki>[</nowiki>]][[User talk:Duke Garland|talk]][[Signature Race|<nowiki>]</nowiki>]] 18:42, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No'''. I have never heard of them, and I have been here a LONG time --[[User:Roland|Roland]] 00:32, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
-This is an invalid nomination, the policy specifically states groups that no longer contribute to the game, this means they must have at some point contributed to the game. Note, the game, not a game resource, RG mods are not applicable for historical status, Assylum isn't either. This is Hagnat's bad faith attempt to shore up a category he created against policy as a vanity exercise. This nomination needs removing for these reasons. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 16:25, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
+==[[Militant Order of Barhah]]==
-:We spammed a bunch of shit on the radios with Ghetto Cow support.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 16:39, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
+The MOB defined [[Barhah#Controversy and Fundamentalis|Barhah Fundamentalism]] for Malton, putting into sharp focus the philosophy of always-dead, migratory, horde-focused zombies. While the MOB reigned, zombies and death cultists everywhere had to reconsider or sheepishly justify their necro-religious beliefs. The MOB maintained multiple effective strike teams for years. For years, zombie activity in Malton consisted primarily of a deep red Ridleybank and an uncontrollable wrecking ball in the form of the MOB. It was like a nonstop, all-seasons Mall Tour or Big Bash. Survivors could not stop it, so they resorted to [[River Tactics|fleeing in terror and picking up the mess left behind]]. Jorm, The Prophet of Barhah, is personally notable for:
-::Hehehe. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 22:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
+*Being [[Mayor]] of Malton from 2010 to today, following the Misanthropy/Revenant administration fulfilling their campaign promise to betray the electorate by handing the keys to the city to Jorm.
-:::ALSO LOL ASSUMING BAD FAITH. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 23:04, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
+*Hosting the IRC server that was a longtime favorite for UD live chat.
-:''"you accused another user of pure bad faith.... you could get someone perma-banned pulling shit like that".'' - Just to put what you just said in perspective.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 22:56, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
+*Hosting [[Unofficial UD Forums#Barhah.com|barhah.com]], the forum that was a longtime favorite for zombie groups.
-::The difference? I'm not requesting the power to vote and ban people based on my opinion. I'll wait for you to respond before mentioning this on you promotion bid. I'm nice like that. Also, given more than one person has pointed out that this group is ineligible for historical, given I had Hagnat's vanity category removed earlier, why has the sysop team not stepped in to remove this ineligible shit from clogging up the system? Or do I need to nominate ex-old-BS-RG-Mods as the next 'historical' group to illustrate how this nomination abuses the system? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 02:10, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
+*Making [[:Category:Related Games#Inspired by Urban Dead|Nexus War]], which was more than a little popular. The spiritual successor, [https://www.nexusclash.com/ Nexus Clash], is still entirely alive.
-:::Do it. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 06:18, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
+*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jorm Working for WikiMedia], where you may have seen him asking for donations.
-:::I never said this was an eligible group. I was just saying that you shouldn't accuse Hagnat of bad faith when you got so aggressive with me about it.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 15:38, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
+The Prophet of Barhah himself once made the case for his horde in [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Militant Order of Barhah vs Malton Mob|an arbitration case over the MOB redirect]]. In his trademarked steel wool and whiskey style, he addressed another group that hoped to be known as "the mob":
-::::Did you not pay attention? The difference is that your jumping to conclusions behaviour could land a innocent user with a ban because you're chomping at the bit to get the power to ban people on this wiki. I am not. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 23:38, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
+ Your group consists of less than 20 and has done *nothing*; my group is over 70 and has *smashed suburbs*. We are the MOB; you are the "Malton Mob."
-:::::Say whaaaat? I have no intention of accusing people of voting in abd faith, as you have. I pointed out that loads of the clauses in your PD were about punishing people you don't like.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 15:59, 18 November 2009 (UTC)  NO
+Hagnat further noted:
+ They are larger. They are famous. They have Zombies. They have Jorm.
+I submit the MOB for your consideration. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 07:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
-===[[The Church Of The Beyonder]]===
+=== Yes ===
-<small>Nomination added by [[User:Paedobear]] at 05:09, 15 November 2009</small>
+# '''Yes''' - Author vote. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 07:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' - Easily one of the most notable zombie groups to have ever shambled the streets of Malton. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 21:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' - One of the most significant zombie groups in the game's history. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 04:37, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' Jorm Made me do it. [[User:Rosslessness|<span style="color: MidnightBlue ">R</span><span style="color: Navy">o</span><span style="color: DarkBlue">s</span><span style="color: MediumBlue">s</span><span style="color: RoyalBlue"></span>]][[User_Talk:Rosslessness|<span style="color: RoyalBlue">l</span><span style="color: CornflowerBlue">e</span><span style="color: SkyBlue">s</span><span style="color: LightskyBlue">s</span>]][[User_Talk:Rosslessness/Quiz|<span style="color: LightBlue">n</span><span style="color: PowderBlue">e</span>]][[Monroeville Many|<span style="color: PaleTurquoise">s</span>]][[The Great Suburb Group Massacre|<span style="color: PaleTurquoise">s</span>]]<sup>[[Location Page Building Toolkit|<span style="color: DarkRed">Want a Location Image?]] </span> </sup>  18:36, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' - I have played Urban Dead for almost 20 years, and have been part of MOB for almost as long (19 years, give or take).  No zombie group has been as impactful as MOB, and perhaps no zombie group ever will. [[User:Liche|Liche]] ([[User talk:Liche|talk]]) 19:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
+#'''I guess so.''' ^ Has this game been around for nearly 20 years? Ah, well. That can't be. (Really?) --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 04:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
+#'''Yes''' {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 07:37, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
+#'''yes''' - i was told there would be chum. [[User:Hajen|hajen]] ([[User talk:Hajen|talk]]) 15:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
+#'''Yes''' [[User:Clayton Carmine|Clayton Carmine]] ([[User talk:Clayton Carmine|talk]]) 15:30, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
-#'''Against''' - Allied with [[TZH]], a quick shout to the [[PKA]] should kill this. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 11:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
+=== No ===
-#'''No''' - Who? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 11:59, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - Bad. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 12:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' Another example of why historical voting is fail. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 12:16, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#:Dunno... I'd consider it a better example if this trashball actually ''passed''. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 12:50, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#::Because its a populartiy contest, and this example shows that people don't understand what "historical" even means. Note the complete lack of justification for the nomination. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 14:41, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''Spam''' - Lack of justification makes this worthless. Because no one will know you otherwise.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 15:30, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - Never heard of them. --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 12:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - I've never heard of you and you don't appear to have contributed significantly to the game, even in your own suburb of Dulston, but your wiki page is amusing. Have fun with MW2!--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 13:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - You've got to be fucking kidding me... --[[User:The Hierophant|Papa Moloch]] 13:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - Never heard of you folks. --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 13:33, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - Haven't heard of you and i'm currently in Dulston. {{User:Rorybob/Sig}}14:32, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - Not historical if no one knows them. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 16:20, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''Nay''' - As Haliman111. --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 17:09, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - [[User:Hibernaculum|Hibernaculum]] 19:33, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - Had a zombie and a survivor go through Dulston. Never heard of you on either. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 20:44, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - who you --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 20:55, 15 November 2009 (BST)
-#'''Who?''' - The total lack of description and justification isn't helping... --{{User:DT/Signature}} 20:58, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No fucking way''' - Never heard of you.--{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 21:08, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' -Who? --{{User:Kelly_U/sig}} 23:14, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''Triple no''' who the fuck are you guys?----[[User:Sexualharrison|Sexualharrison]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] [[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]] 01:18, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''Who????''' - In other words: fuck no. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 02:24, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''Lolwut?''' --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 02:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''Who?''' This is the last time I follow a link on Sexualharrison's talk page.--[[User:XxFear ItselfxX|The Argonauts]] 03:23, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' --30 members? Maybe if they zerged. {{User:Criminally Insane/supastampbiatch}} 10:49, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' Barely 18 months old... [[User:Asheets|Asheets]] 15:46, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''Yes''' Although apparantly Urbandead is serious buisness...--[[User:Paedobear|Paedobear]] 18:49, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' Never heard of them. --[[User:Johnny Bass|Papa Johnny]] 22:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''What''' - No. (as above) --[[User:Macampos|Private Mark]] 01:36, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - I've never heard of them. The fact that they're allied to or connected to Team Zombie Hardcore is their only claim to fame. And if you piggyback a group that doesn't matter and hasn't ever made a lasting impression on the game and that's the biggest thing you're known for, then you aren't even remotely a candidate for a historical group. --{{User:Goribus/Sig}} 02:53, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - Who?{{User:Zombie Lord/sig2}} <tt>07:48 17 November 2009(BST)</tt>
-#'''No''' - Although Vida Guerra's ass is banging, I have never heard of this group - including a vast amount of others.  --{{User:Zombie slay3r/Signature}} 23:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - Never heard of 'em. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 06:24, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
-#'''No''' - Again, I have never heard of them or seen one of them in Malton--[[User:Roland|Roland]] 00:34, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
-==Recent Nominations==
+With voting finished, MOB hasn't passed the minimum 15 votes to be made historical. That said, you can [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion|change historical voting policy]] (which doesn't have minimum vote requirements). --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 17:57, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
-*[[Category_talk:Historical_Groups/SucceededArchive#Flowers_of_Disease|Flowers of Disease]] - '''Succeeded'''
-*[[Category_talk:Historical_Groups/FailedArchive#Detulux_Inc|Detulux Inc]] - '''Failed'''
+==[[East Becktown Defenders]]==
+{{HistoricalVotingRules}}
+The East Becktown Defenders officially disbanded on [[EBD/Epitaph|May 1st, 2020]], which makes them eligible for Historical Group status.
+The EBD had been active since 2016, and included dozens of members, including both veterans and entire newbies. They maintained good relationships with survivor groups (including, but not limited to the DHPD, SoC, Knights Templar and the DEM) and zombie groups (specifically the Daubeney Resident Zombies next door, and of course our favourite frenemies in the RRF).
+Aside from regular survivor-style operations, they also brought a fun, no-pressure approach to the game, along with [[East_Becktown_Defenders/Tools|wiki-tools]] (like the automatic SitRep on their group page) and weird events (like the [[EBD_Stat_Party_2016|EBD StatParty]]).
+The group decided not to fade away like many others, but officially disbanded after exactly 4 years of activity.
+=== Yes ===
+# '''Yes''' -  {{User:Peralta/Signature}} 13:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' - [[User:Clayton Carmine|Clayton Carmine]] ([[User talk:Clayton Carmine|talk]]) 13:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' - [[User:MicoolTNT|MicoolTNT]] 13:57, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' - {{User:Stelar/sig}} 14:00, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' - [[User:Roddy Winters|Roddy Winters]] ([[User talk:Roddy Winters|talk]]) 17:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' - [[User:Matt Langley|Matt Langley]] ([[User talk:Matt Langley|talk]]) 18:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' - [[User:Tarkenton|Tarkenton]] ([[User talk:Tarkenton|talk]]) 20:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' - {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 23:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' - [[User:Simcoe|Simcoe]] 07:00, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' - [[User:Yo Ris|Yo Ris]] ([[User talk:Yo Ris|talk]]) 07:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' - [[User:RaiNo|RaiNo]] 10:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' - [[User:Frank Burn|Frank Burn]] ([[User talk:Frank Burn|talk]]) 13:46, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' -  [[User:DoXBr|DoXBr]] ([[User talk:DoXBr|talk]]) 14:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' - [[User:Richardskull16|Richardskull16]] ([[User talk:Richardskull16|talk]]) 09:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' - The Malton Globetrotters turbodunk the ayes! --{{User:Dragonshardz/dragonshardz}} {{Goonsig|Dragonshardz}} 00:58, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
+# '''Yes''' - {{User:Benigno/sig}} 16:57, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
+=== No ===
+#I was going to go with “Who?” but [[Talk:East_Becktown_Defenders#Your_page|apparently we’ve spoken]]. As they did not fix their page in the entire 4 years they spent as a group, I cannot in good conscience vote for this group to be historical. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} {{Goonsig|Revenant}} 16:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
+#From what I see is a run-of-the-mill survivor group engaged in standard survivor play of maintaining a particular area. It was not innovative (like MCM or 404 were), it didn't have a distinctive style (like for example B.A.R. or ULC would have), nor was it involved in significant events (like Escape or c4NT were). --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 20:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
+#As Spiderzed. Groups that had some members, did some things, and had a central pitch of being "well liked" didn't classify as historical when Urban Dead was bigger. I don't believe that should change for groups that existed during UD's [[Survivor-Zombie_Imbalance#7|long tail]]. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 05:55, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
+#As Spiderzed. --[[User:Papa John Schnatter|Papa John Schnatter]] ([[User talk:Papa John Schnatter|talk]]) 17:25, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
+With voting well and truly finished, the East Becktown Defenders have become a '''historical group'''. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 07:53, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
 =Previous Discussions=
@@ Line 103: / Line 91: @@
 ==Voting Failed==
 {{ArchiveNoticeSmall|ArchiveName=FailedArchive}}
-=Historical Groups Use Discussion=

Category talk:Historical Groups: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 17:58, 26 June 2024

Contents

Obtaining Historical Status

Nominations for Historical Status

New Nominations

Recent Nominations

Militant Order of Barhah

Yes

No

East Becktown Defenders

Yes

No

Previous Discussions

General Discussion

Voting Succeeded

Voting Failed

Navigation menu

Page actions

Page actions

Personal tools

General

Search

Resources

Wiki

Toolbox