UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Zombie slay3r/2007-03-07 Promotion

Zombie slay3r

Has been active on the wiki for 4 months, close to 2000 edits, many of which are in the suggestions (contributing and also helping to cycle) and administration areas. Shows good judgment and understanding of the workings of the wiki. Would make a good maintenance admin IMO -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 02:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for nominating me for sysop, I accept. -- 22:51, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

• Vouch - Cool guy, no drama, knows wiki code, lovely sense of humor, and helps out the community. It's, like, duh!--Lachryma^☭ 03:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
• Vouch - Altough he's in almost the same situation as Vantar in my POV, I have actually noted Zombie Slay3r voting in the Suggestions page for a while with good wits, and in some administrational issues too. Aditionally, an user that handles the suggestion pages mechanisms gets extra points from me. This is a vouch that will probably strenghten as I get to know this user more and more. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 06:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
• Vouch - I like this guy. He is definitely a good wiki contributor. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 07:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
• Third Vouch Received at 07:18, 7 March 2007. --Hubrid Nox ^{Sys WTF U! B!} 09:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
• Vouch -People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 13:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
• Against - because the nominated party has not yet accepted the nomination from what I can see. Pillsy ^FT 15:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Vouch - Now that the nominated party has accepted, his work demands that I vouch. Pillsy ^FT 09:04, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
• Vouch I like him, and his contributions--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 21:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
• Vouch Same case as Vantar. Good call, Boxy.--The Envoy 22:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
• Vouch I can not remember the last time I saw the Move Request page without a request from him Vantar 00:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
• Vouch Yeah, sure... -Certified=Insane^☭ 04:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
• Vouch Who could say no? --Cap'n Silly ^T/W/P/C 23:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• Vouch Even if he did cause me irreparable brain trauma from the shock I got when this one page I made was accidentally moved at his request... --Specialist290^♠ 00:02, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
• Vouch - As the last one, everyone above me said it all. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 15:24, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
• Vouch - Good editor, who helps out at suggestions. I like this. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 23:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
• Vouch - A distinct lack of drama. I like. --Karloth Vois ^RR 11:36, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
• Vouch - Absolutely emotionless. Perfect man for the job. --Kamden 14:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
• Vouch -- Atticus Rex ^{mfu pif} Δ 18:57, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
• Vouch - I wasn't sure about this at first, mainly because I was unaware that he was doing so much. But looking at his contributions now, I cannot deny that he has done a lot of good for the wiki. This "invisibility" is another plus because it demonstrates that he does what he does out of a genuine desire to improve the wiki, rather than for status or bragging rights. He's like the guy behind the scenes that no one notices yet is the one who really keeps things running smoothly. And I can not think of a single time where this guy was involved in any sort of drama. He's almost perfect, when you think about it. --Reaper with no name ^TJ! 16:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
• Vouch - I've have no major qualms about this user being a sysop.--Gage 09:38, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
• Vouch - aye. --Funt Solo 18:22, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
• Vouch - No question. (I'd say something here, but I'd feel repetitive - see above) --Nomader ^T•RCDC 03:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
• would make a good sysop.--Vista 10:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)