UDWiki talk:Administration/Re-Evaluations

Administration/Re-Evaluations

I did just have one in February. I feel the need to point that out.--– Nubis ^NWO 18:14, 20 August 2009 (BST)

Sorry. Again, it was late at night and going through the user logs over and over again is difficult stuff. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:32, 23 August 2009 (BST)

And you could have just changed it yourself, you know. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:54, 23 August 2009 (BST)

Archiving REv's

i'd like to suggest that when we archive a sysop re-evaluation, that we place it under UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations/YYYY/MM/Username (where YYYY is the year using four digits, and MM the month's number using two digits, with a leading zero when needed) This way it becomes easier to identify when the re-evaluation took place without having to open the page. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 20:46, 22 August 2009 (BST)

I'm curious how you managed to fuck up the time line on my re-eval. You even put in the date of the last one but then couldn't do the math to realize it wasn't 8 months? I'm not DUE until October. --– Nubis ^NWO 22:49, 22 August 2009 (BST)

I only fixed when you were last promoted. When you are due to be re-evaluated again was not of my concern, specially when you are not due to be re-evaluated in said date, not untill all the others on due are to be re-evaluated. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 23:43, 22 August 2009 (BST)

Contribs template

Do we already have a contributions link template or something that we can add to a persons evalutation, kinda like what we do on Vandal pages? that way it would be easier to check someone contributions to see how active they are..--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks ^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 17:56, 25 August 2009 (BST)

I've been putting (Talk | Contribs) into A/PM bids lately, I could do the same here? --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:20, 31 August 2009 (BST)

Daranz?

Shouldn't Daranz have gone up for Re-evaluation first since it's been about 4 years since he was promoted? =/ -- Cheese 22:41, 27 August 2009 (BST)

Yes, technically he should actually have been up before me.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 23:00, 27 August 2009 (BST)

"Technically"? -- Cheese 23:04, 27 August 2009 (BST)

As in "Per the policy, he should be up first but DDR made a mistake and I didn't see any point in kicking up a fuss about it".--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 23:07, 27 August 2009 (BST)

Alright, I thought by technically there was a reason he was missed out. DDR got most of the promotion times wrong as well. =p I think he started at the top and worked down as opposed to the other way round. -- Cheese 23:09, 27 August 2009 (BST)

lol. rest assured you'll all get your turn ;) --xoxo 05:21, 29 August 2009 (BST)

I ctrl+f'd it all, and in between temporary demotions, evaluations, Grim's demotions and Kevan's subsequent repromotions, things got messy. It was very late too and it had been 24 hours since the policy had passed and no one had done anything about it so I worked to do it even though I was pretty drowsy. I accept that I failed pretty hard though, so sorry to everyone, particularly General. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 09:42, 29 August 2009 (BST)

Quick question. What's up with Boxy's evaluation date? It's before his promotion date. --DBHT 20:46, 3 September 2009 (BST)

Conndraka

Still waiting for official notification and for my demotion to appear on the news page. Conndraka^{TAZM CFT} 05:08, 7 September 2009 (BST)

We don't put negative stuff like demotions (precedences via also not putting failed A/PM bids) on the main page. Grow up. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 05:18, 7 September 2009 (BST)

The General

Still waiting for the promised activity.-- SA 00:26, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Ho hum, what would we have expected? I said it the day he passed the bid; he should have failed. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:32, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Lucky bitch first off the bat. Should have gone to someone who deserved to pass...lets pass a policy that these should be every month. xoxo 09:19, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

The Rooster

• Vouch - Sonny and WOOT are pretty much dead on (I can't believe I'm saying that...) However, Roosters make poor scapegoats. --WanYao 04:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

  The sad hilarity (and what makes it even funnier is that you idiots haven't realised it yet) is that you morons are idiotic drama whores and the era in which you all ruled is what made us. Look at the sysops you complain about; Bob, myself, SA. We are all a massive product of what was the worst of your shitstain of an "era" when everything had to be a drama and moronic rhetoric was the language of the hour. For example, for a year, wan, your favourite sysop was a fucking goon masquerading as an op and making idiotic decisions simply to troll everybody. Don't blame us for realising how bad and unnecessarily problematic everything was, and working to change that. If you actually wish everything was more like 2008, then hell, I'm happy you're gone. --

   

   

   

   

  04:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

  I don't have a clue what you're talking about and I don't think you do, either. Anyhow, there's nothing to see here, so I'm moving along, cheers. --WanYao 04:44, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

  Oh yeah... and it's you who seems to making drama... who trolls every single post i make... ironic, that. I guess there was something to see here, after all. Not too interesting, though... --WanYao 04:45, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

  why can't we just get along ever :( it's been months since that whole fight stuff Cyberbob  Talk  05:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

  Cause you fucking touch yourself at night nigger. Also, WANYAYO FOR SYSOPS--/~Rakuen~\^Talk I Still Love Grim 07:49, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

  Do me a favour and look through your contributions for the last 4 months and tell me how many of them I even responded too, let alone troll. No, it shouldn't take more than 20 seconds, and that isn't just because your contributions themselves are few and far between. --

   

   

   

   

  11:31, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

  that's because i haven't been around much for the last 6 months, duh. however, you have historically made a point of doing exactly what you just did above, it's almost like your religious calling, or OCD compulsion, or something... that you have the memory of a goldfish and that things that you did more than 6 months ago no longer exist in your consciousness isn't my problem. however, i must say that find it kind of funny that someone who's as big a "has been" as you like to say i am would warrant the kind of attention you (and cyberbob) heap on me. i also smirk at the fact that i was allegedly such a powerfully horrible influence on the wiki: i never really thought i wielded that much power and influence... interesting to see someone thinks otherwise. i'll take all the attention as a kind of backhanded flattery, methinkks. thanks, mate! and, in passim, it's also funny you'd lump in the same clique as sonny and WOOT, two users with whom i most decidedly do NOT associate or get along -- with even if once in a blue moon i find myself in agreement with them. whatever... anyway, you's can try to drag this out with some comment or other, but i'm done here. --WanYao 13:21, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

  Can we move some of this to the talk page? 13:25, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

  I only ever attack you when you say something utterly stupid and ignorant. There is some food for thought. --

   

   

   

   

  13:33, 20 February 2010 (UTC)