User talk:Boxy

Main Talk • Locations • Suggest • Signature • Templates Navigation • Playpen POV Sug • Image Archive Please read first! Don't worry about keeping to the relevant sections, just add new subjects at the top, I'll move 'em around when I get to it. New Stuff March 2012 Remember me? Because I remember you and will be very sad if you've forgotten me. --Mikalos209 02:54, 7 March 2012 (UTC) February 2012 yer sliping (diff | hist) . . UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Bots‎; 03:54 . . (+93) . . Boxy (Talk | contribs) (→Slambuts: ) YOINK!--User:Sexualharrison12:08, 28 February 2012 (bst) Just because I didn't change the edit summary, doesn't mean I didn't yoink it, but good, regardless . Getting bored yet, tilting at windmills? -- boxy 12:19, 28 February 2012 (BST) 156 people like this comment. i've been playing this game for over 5 years. you tell me. also Don Quixote can kiss my arse!--User:Sexualharrison12:48, 28 February 2012 (bst) -- boxy 19:35, 28 February 2012 (BST) --User:Sexualharrison19:45, 28 February 2012 (bst) (diff | hist) . . UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Bots‎; 04:40 . . (+91) . . Boxy (Talk | contribs) (→Scamboxs: ) --User:Sexualharrison12:19, 29 February 2012 (bst) Congrats, after 3 months of trying, you finally got one through! Time to stop, and be bask in the greatness of your glorious victory? -- boxy 00:30, 1 March 2012 (BST) i will only accept unconditional surrender--User:Sexualharrison04:02, 1 March 2012 (bst) and the torch is Passed--User:Sexualharrison13:02, 6 March 2012 Get shorty! -- boxy 01:56, 7 March 2012 (BST) Spiderzed Re-ev. Yes? --Rosslessness 09:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Sure, why not -- boxy 10:39, 26 February 2012 (BST) Don't do it, Boxy. It's a conspiracy to replace you for Spiderzed in the next 'Crat elections. ;) --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 10:44, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Oh no the crats will end up doing stuff on time! ;) DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Im sure thad will find some way to complain. --Rosslessness 13:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC) I'll misconduct you for not reflecting properly on Bad Attitude Kirsty's valid counter-points. All four of you. -- Spiderzed█ 21:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC) January 2012 Deletions So are you going to delete that stuff from Harrison's page? --Dhavid Grohl 03:03, 22 February 2012 (UTC) Dude, if Boxy hasn't deleted it by now, perhaps you need to look up the definition of "sarcasm". --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 03:15, 22 February 2012 (UTC) Yeah, cause you really needed to wait for him not to do it to realise it was sarcasm. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:02, 22 February 2012 (UTC) Grohl, I already said on the A/VB page. No one is going to do it, you might as well just do it yourself. Seriously. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:02, 22 February 2012 (UTC) No. That was just my way of telling harrison to STFU. I'll change back anything that needs doing, if you can tell me which bits he messed with -- boxy 07:09, 22 February 2012 (BST) 1337 people dislike this comment. didn't work--User:Sexualharrison18:38, 22 February 2012 (bst) Rev Re-ev thoughts? --Rosslessness 11:53, 22 January 2012 (UTC) I could go either way. The long periods of inactivity are a worry. Perhaps he needs some wiki-drama to inspire some contributions? -- boxy 02:01, 24 January 2012 (BST) Well I say yes, with a word of caution that he needs to be active occasionally. --Rosslessness 17:25, 24 January 2012 (UTC) Two weeks instead of one, because he showed up at the last minute? Or just plain incompetence on your parts? Christ, do tell me if I need to put up my policy for extending RE's again. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 23:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) If something as small as a week(or a few extra days even) has had an impact on the communities input simply because Revenant has shown intent to stay then they're probably right for waiting. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 19:45, 29 January 2012 (UTC) Forgive me for expressing a position and asking for confirmation from my fellow crat. I could just push them both through now as passed and maybe thad could come up with a policy about that instead. --Rosslessness 21:44, 29 January 2012 (UTC) Oh, and box, general appears to be a yes as well. Care to confirm? --Rosslessness 21:44, 29 January 2012 (UTC) HEY HE GOT FRENZ TO COME AT THE LAST MINUTE HE MUST BE WORTH KEEPING DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 03:47, 30 January 2012 (UTC) I enjoyed the above comment. Although I'd of spelt it Minit. --Rosslessness 12:38, 30 January 2012 (UTC) Thats a week without objection, I'll go do it. --Rosslessness 17:14, 31 January 2012 (UTC) Thanks, Ross. Sorry about that -- boxy 11:10, 5 February 2012 (BST) Some of us do have other concerns, you know. No need to get your panties in a bunch — although I'm always happy to help. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 12:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC) Karek Obvious decision, is obvious. Unless you object for pointless reasons I'll cycle it in the morning as successful. --Rosslessness 18:53, 17 January 2012 (UTC) He is obviously too much of a threat to our positions of supreme power. Demote him at will... with extreme prejudice! -- boxy 13:02, 18 January 2012 (BST) What's this? I'M TELLING EVERYONE. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 18:51, 18 January 2012 (UTC) December 2011 pinata My changes on the Pinata are not self-promotion. They are fact, just like the Red Rum statistic is fact. If it is not true, that is one thing, find someone with more recorded and I'll agree with you. But if it is true, then you should leave it. --Krazyxman 01:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC) If you want to make a claim like that and have it stick, you'll need to provide evidence/proof to be displayed next to the claim. If you cannot provide such proof, it is highly unlikely it will remain on the page. Also, don't make the page Krazyxman, it will be deleted, all your info has to go on your user page. sorry. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:34, 12 December 2011 (UTC) I have the proof already on my user page which I now linked to instead of the other link. I was unaware of that possibility but now it is fixed. --Krazyxman 02:00, 12 December 2011 (UTC) It's not a very interesting fact, and not really noteworthy enough to be on the main page. One guy, who's created 14 pinatas? And it's not proof that you are the "pinata master", it's just evidence that you're the only one who's bothered to collect the screenshots. Red rum were the first group to do it in any coordinated manner, which makes much more of an impact than one guy, and his reviver -- boxy 05:48, 12 December 2011 (BST) The fact that I have done over 50 is a noteworthy statistic, but I have only started keeping track of them recently as I have said many times before. I have no reason to lie, have been playing the game a while now and have many people, both survivor and zed alike who can testify to my presence and actions in the game. Also, I have no reviver, and while the original intent behind Los Diablos was to utilizing the Pinata as a team strategy, I do not have any active players with which to utilize this opportunity with, and have been operating solo for quite a long time now and I don't even play any alts. --KRaZyXmAn 17:49, 22 February 2012 (UTC) November 2011 Really? I leave this place for what feels like eons and you're STILL HERE. I am beginning to think that you are in fact, sir, a robot pretending to be a person/zombie/wiki admin. --Maverick Talk - OBR 404 08:58, 15 November 2011 (UTC) Banbot -- boxy 05:10, 1 December 2011 (BST) Splambits NEVER!--User:Sexualharrison15:17, 8 November 2011 (bst) 50,206 people like this comment. It's only funny when you can sneak it in without anyone noticing -- boxy 06:10, 10 November 2011 (BST) I am soooo thumbs-upping Harrison's comment. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 06:20, 10 November 2011 (UTC) --User:Sexualharrison02:03, 1 December 2011 (bst) 1337 people dislike this comment. -- boxy 05:10, 1 December 2011 (BST) dunna care boychick --User:Sexualharrison05:16, 1 December 2011 (bst) Come back when you manage to slip one by me -- boxy 09:52, 1 December 2011 (BST) i did, and past the general. suck it!--User:Sexualharrison06:17, 9 December 2011 (bst) Oooooh outdoing the general that's tough to do! DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 08:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC) ZOWNK! (diff | hist) . . UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Bots‎; 13:57 . . (+1,382) . . The General (Talk | contribs) (→Spamcox: ) --User:Sexualharrison18:15, 14 December 2011 (bst) TO THE DEATH! (diff | hist) . . UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Bots‎; 13:20 . . (+457) . . The General (Talk | contribs) (→Spambµtz: ) --User:Sexualharrison18:19, 15 December 2011 (bst) Don't make me come over there -- boxy 00:02, 16 December 2011 (BST) at least i'm consistent--User:Sexualharrison03:20, 24 December 2011 (bst) I think predictable is the word you're looking for -- boxy 13:50, 24 December 2011 (BST) no if everyone just put "spambots" in the summary you wouldn't notice it right away. fooking cunt!--User:Sexualharrison15:29, 24 December 2011 (bst) Are you kidding? I only have to see your name in the edit history, and I know it'll have been changed. Why, why do you do it, Mr Anderson? -- boxy 11:51, 25 December 2011 (BST) caz i haz 2.--User:Sexualharrison13:42, 25 December 2011 (bst) September 2011 Arbies The time has come for you to answer questions. Please proceed to arbitration and answer the questions under your header. Your silence may be rewarded with sweet and bitter cakes. Proceed now before the inquisition.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 12:51, 4 October 2011 (BST) RHO Just a heads-up that from Saturday on, he is due for an activity warning by a crat. -- Spiderzed█ 21:44, 22 September 2011 (BST) A/RE Vapor looks like a Keep. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 21:30, 7 September 2011 (BST) We'll take a chance, eh -- boxy 21:47, 8 September 2011 (BST) Demotion Whenever you can please. :) --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 10:46, 1 September 2011 (BST) FFS Revenant hasn't edited in over a week, just do it already.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 10:49, 2 September 2011 (BST) Oh, we're in a hurry now, are we, after a two weeks lead up? A day or two shouldn't matter after all that -- boxy 11:19, 2 September 2011 (BST) I was totally going to snipe this but RL has been crazy. At least I got to do Thad! ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 01:33, 5 September 2011 (BST) Stuff I really should archive August 2011 Crat Its all yours again. Help yourself to whatever is in the fridge. --"Workshed" 21:34, 29 August 2011 (BST) Curious When did everyone here get so touchy that they couldn't separate a point from the person making it? Even at the worst of back in the day it wasn't that bad. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 11:05, 29 August 2011 (BST) Oh, I dunno. There's just less trolling/humour used lately, and the community is smaller, is all -- boxy 12:05, 29 August 2011 (BST) You know it's a real shame we're losing that one there. I certainly will miss his witty repertoire, the way he systematically decimates a point with his seamless logic, the unarguable confidence in the purity of his conviction. Oh what a loss of the weighty input he brought to the wiki on a daily basis, however will we cope in the absence of his discerning glare? Where ever will we find someone so willing to jump into the fray, the endless confusion, and help bring something better from the refuse heap as he? --Karekmaps 2.0?! 15:32, 29 August 2011 (BST) people dont agree with me must be cause they are biased ablobloo -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 04:25, 30 August 2011 (BST) This should go back on the page. I don't think it is confusing at all (obviously, because I think I'm originally the one who started putting the current time on elections), if you do, perhaps you should find some way to make it clearer, rather than removing it all together. It is a useful piece of information that saves people from having to find out the server time some other way, to tell when a vote is over -- boxy 21:30, 29 August 2011 (BST) I don't know that I can agree with that assessment looking at the results since it's been implemented. It's the only significant thing that changed to cause people to mistakenly vote up to a week past the "deadline"(which before it used to just be the day not x absurd hour). As a user who made that mistake himself unintentionally I can at least verify it is extremely easy to do. Also we really shouldn't be setting essentially random server times for vote ends anyway so the whole thing really probably shouldn't exist, it doesn't bring anything positive to the system other than a date of completion. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 21:57, 29 August 2011 (BST) Actually, the people voting after the deadline happened because people started linking promo bids on various forums, and people turned up ages later trying to vote.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:43, 29 August 2011 (BST) I failed at voting abloobloo -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 04:25, 30 August 2011 (BST) Someone forgot how I work when it comes to undiscussable status quo. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 09:24, 31 August 2011 (BST) YO scott-directed Blade Runner sequel. Thoughts? -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 05:56, 21 August 2011 (BST) Please, oh please, don't let him make it into an Aliens vs. Predator vs. Replicants! Personally, I don't see that anything needs adding to the original (well, not the original... but the cut where he went back and rejiggered it, esp. the end), and I'm not sure that such film noir would sell any better these days, than the original did. Seems like cashing in on a classic name, yet again. I hope it's done properly, for the sake of name, but wont be expecting much. Cynical, eh ;) -- boxy 06:55, 21 August 2011 (BST) I agree. I think it has more potential than other unnecessary remakes but yeah... -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 10:56, 21 August 2011 (BST) Remake or sequel? 'Cause I'm pretty sure it was a book first. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 12:29, 21 August 2011 (BST) Crap, don't know why I said remake. It's a sequel, but is set in the same universe with no real ties to the first one (no harrison ford, etc). So I dunno hey. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 13:50, 21 August 2011 (BST) I'd be expecting a prequel, probably amongst the c-beams, near the tannhauser gate. A sequel about the coming replicant revolution/human rights movement wouldn't fit with the theme of the blade runner being pseudo-anti-hero character, pushing the profession to the clearly evil, IMO. Any other sequel would be just more of the same, with little to no hope of living up to the standard of the original for existing fans. I don't like sequels and prequels much. Good ones are rare... and if a good one is made, it just encourages the dollars to be kept pumping in until they start making shockers. Case in point, Alien --> Aliens = great... then it starts going off the track until they end up with that bastardised AvP bullshite. Artists should know when their work is complete, and not be tempted by the bankers and accountants to make a quick buck by cheapening their masterpieces with knock offs -- boxy 15:16, 21 August 2011 (BST) ^Send this man to Hollywood! -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 00:51, 22 August 2011 (BST) Humourous suggestions change I cycled your Suggestions Policy Change as successful but I wasn't 100% certain of the changes needed to these cycling instructions. It's just a matter of removing one category and adding another, right? When voting closes, which template is added? {{rejected}}? ~ 08:43, 14 August 2011 (UTC) There is no need to close voting once a suggestion has been moved to the humourous section. Other than the ones deemed to be vandalism, they've always been left open indefinitely. Actually, we could probably look at re-opening those suggestions too, and removing the {{notfunny}} template -- boxy 09:49, 14 August 2011 (BST) Ugh there's like 30 of them. Also it was discussed during voting that this policy change wouldn't retroactively negate past escalations. Reopening them now would open a can of worms in that regard I think. So other than the change you made, is there anything else to update on Cycling Instructions? ~ 17:53, 14 August 2011 (UTC) July 2011 Protections Question, Ive just implemented a semi protection for an hour on spiderzeds talk page. Im assuming I record this fact on A/P A/VB and the page in question? --Rosslessness 23:10, 19 July 2011 (BST) Yep, best to do so -- boxy 23:27, 19 July 2011 (BST) Cheers, I dont think I've looked at the semi protection policy since the wiki upgrade was implemented. I'll look at possible uses this week. --Rosslessness 23:29, 19 July 2011 (BST) Looks like you're going to have someone to test it out on ;) -- boxy 23:37, 19 July 2011 (BST) June 2011 Congratulations! You're apparently quite good at dying. ;P --Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 20:08, 30 June 2011 (BST) It is what the undead do... walk headlong into shotgun fire -- boxy 13:51, 1 July 2011 (BST) BTW, I see secret paite, who is above me on the list (dognammit!), dragged you, kicking and screaming, out of the mall today :D -- boxy 13:53, 1 July 2011 (BST) Most likely. I've been getting killed a fair bit since the suburb was reclaimed, since alot of the old PKers are back. Good to see that you guys are back in force as well. It just wouldn't be Treweeke without you.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 14:56, 1 July 2011 (BST) May 2011 A Challenge Hello, Mr. Boxhurr. I, Ryu, the greatest warrior, would like to challenge you to a duel. In fighting games. You have a choice of Super Street Fighter 2 Super Turbo, Street Fighter 3: Third Strike, Street Fighter Alpha 2 or 3 or, if you happen to have a 360, Super Street Fighter 4. If you are interested then I will give you the details on how we will play them.--||||||||||||||||||||||||| 15:25, 27 May 2011 (BST) Boxy! What is best in life? To drive others to the edit conflict screen, crush spambots and hear the lamentations of fellow ops! Feel free to claim credit for one of the two new bots, if you care. -- Spiderzed█ 13:40, 12 May 2011 (BST) I waz waiting for you to do the reporting , good work -- boxy 14:09, 12 May 2011 (BST) Orphaned images File:Normalzomb.png which you uploaded is currently unused and is subject to deletion if it is older than two weeks. If you wish to ensure that it remains on this wiki then you will need to ensure that it is included in at least one page on this wiki..--Thegeneralbot 22:43, 5 May 2011 (BST) I saved this one. :D --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 22:57, 5 May 2011 (BST) Excellent, I'd better save the other one in case I want to return my user page -- boxy 23:35, 5 May 2011 (BST) File:My smelly friend.png which you uploaded is currently unused and is subject to deletion if it is older than two weeks. If you wish to ensure that it remains on this wiki then you will need to ensure that it is included in at least one page on this wiki..--Thegeneralbot 22:43, 5 May 2011 (BST) Nice pic For a second there (until I looked at it) I thought it was going to be the Flame Warriors one. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 01:46, 4 May 2011 (BST) No one's accused me of being a net nanny, so far -- boxy 02:09, 4 May 2011 (BST) Sorry, didn't even see the talk page rules, just clicked the + tab. JSYK, with the update we now have __NONEWSECTIONLINK__ if you want to use it. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 04:10, 4 May 2011 (BST) Thanks. It's never really worried me too much, but it may help -- boxy 10:06, 5 May 2011 (BST) April 2011 Bot Banning I think removing the reports would be the easier scenario, but unfortunately, I think we need to, unless a normal user one day gets caught in the net and we need to make sure they aren't improperly banned. Iirc, a bot reported recently hadn't actually vandalised yet, and had only just been created, so if this happens again (except a sysop does it, and it isn't actually a bot) it could be helpful. The way i see it, it's better if we have to put in extra work than if somebody accidentally gets banned. So, I too share your view of a report-free Utopia, but, alas, I don't see it happening... :( --Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 17:46, 25 April 2011 (BST) What information does logging the ban on the bots page, for a day or so, add? Most of those bots show no contributions once their pages have been deleted. Regular users have no way of knowing what any of them created. BTW, what is this section ([[{{TALKPAGENAME}}#Donkey|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]] of your sig for? -- boxy 13:19, 26 April 2011 (BST) I largely agree. Personally I think the documentation is a tad stupid, but I can see the reasoning behind it. And the link in my sig lets me jump to the talk page of any page my sig is on, which is helpful on admin pages, etc.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 19:35, 30 April 2011 (BST) I believe the theory was that people are more likely to see the report if it's on an admin page; you can't put to block log on your watch list, so it's more likely to get missed.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 20:30, 30 April 2011 (BST) It's getting pretty hard to miss. More often than not, it's at the top of recent changes -- boxy 03:43, 1 May 2011 (BST) Yes, but that's only if you log on shortly after the bot was banned.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 10:11, 1 May 2011 (BST) User_talk:Boxy. Predicting the future sine 2006. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 13:38, 5 May 2011 (BST) Sig Problems Boxy? Maybe I'm daft but your sig looks the same as it always has to me. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 13:57, 21 April 2011 (BST) I don't use a templated sig, so my old ones didn't change, but I can't seem to get the code I was using to work as a sig now, only a bare basic sig... ie. -- boxy 14:34, 21 April 2011 (BST) Is the treat signature as wikitext box marked? --Karekmaps 2.0?! 14:57, 21 April 2011 (BST) i take it this has somthing to do with the update? b/c my sig is broke also. the code is too long? guess i'm back to templated sigs. :P ---- bitch  15:08, 21 April 2011 (BST) It looks fine to me. What browser are you using? ~ 15:11, 21 April 2011 no whats going on is where you enter code for your sig the text box is smaller.. so if you have a bunch of code. you are fucked. like boxy and I... I can only enter about half of it now. and the small date/time thing does not work with template sigs.---- bitch  15:16, 21 April 2011 (BST) Oh I see. Well you can have a templated sig but subst it. For example here is preferences: {{subst:User:Vapor/sig}} <sub>{{subst:LOCALTIME}}, {{subst:LOCALDAY}} {{subst:LOCALMONTHNAME}} {{subst:LOCALYEAR}}</sub>. So the code for my sig is stored on User:Vapor/sig but when I sign, the code is subst'd and the template isn't called. ~ 15:30, 21 April 2011 Same as Vapor and mine is unaffected. Looks like that's how it has to be done now.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 15:32, 21 April 2011 (BST) oh i think i just thought of a way around it.---- bitch  15:42, 21 April 2011 (BST) fixed i just added the time code stuff to my sig code with <small></small>. and left the image stuff as a template. great now I get to keep the look i wanted. remeber this is how I wanted it in the first place.. win!---- bitch 15:47, 21 April 2011 One of the new features is an option to limit the size of sigs; evidently the default is less than we are used to. I suspect that it'll be easier to template the sigs than to get Kevan to change it.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 17:11, 21 April 2011 (BST) Testies -- boxy 00:38, 22 April 2011 Just to butt-in but is it against the rules to incorporate the time stamp into your sig? or would that be wiki breaking?--Arthur Dent BIN LADEN IS DEAD!!!!! 14:11, 22 April 2011 (BST) As long as you always sign with ~~~ instead of ~~~~ (inserting just the sig without the timestamp, thus avoiding double time stamps), it should work splendid. Not sure if it would work properly with templated sigs, though. -- Spiderzed█ 14:25, 22 April 2011 (BST) Yeah ran into a problem with the new sig limits, has anyone told kevan?, because it is very easy to bypass it with templated sigs--Arthur Dent BIN LADEN IS DEAD!!!!! 14:35, 22 April 2011 (BST) We haven't told Kevan yet because we're still finding out what all is broken and what we can just fix ourselves. Discussion is happening at UDWiki_talk:Administration/Discussion#Wiki_update_FAQs. In the case of signature length, I think the default value of 255 characters is being used in Default.php. Kevan needs to change &MaxSigChars to something other than 255 Ideally it would be whichever number was used before. ~ 14:53, 22 April 2011 yeah i bypassed with a combo of the two. and sign with ~~~--   bitch 14:58, 22 April 2011 Sweet, but can someone check it out for obvious coding defects? --Arthur Dent BIN LADEN IS DEAD!!!!! 16:44, 23 April 2011 Your sig is bound to cause trouble by not closing the bolding tags. If you want a bolded timestamp, you are going to need to subst your sig so that all tags can be closed. -- Spiderzed█ 16:50, 23 April 2011 (BST) Fixed for you, but if you want bold timestamp than as spider said, you'll have to subst it using magic words and three tilde signing. ~ 16:54, 23 April 2011 or just have two bold groupings --Arthur Dent BIN LADEN IS DEAD!!!!! 20:20, 23 April 2011 '-.- -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 00:11, 24 April 2011 (BST) SIG PROBLEMS BRO Honestly probably best if everyone just shuts up and gives him the week. Although, it is pretty fun to watch. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 19:09, 20 April 2011 (BST) Meh. If they don't get the responce they're after, they'll just push harder -- boxy March 2011 thanks i stole a lot from you to make my sig. The preceding signed comment was added by bitch 17:26 27 March 2011 (UTC) even bettah! -- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 17:29 27 March 2011 (UTC) Heh :) I remember fooling Vista with a similar one, years ago. He thought that I'd been forgetting to sign all over the wiki -- boxy talk • teh rulz 03:05 28 March 2011 (BST) i miss that guy. -- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 15:01 30 March 2011 (UTC) Harh! Yes! ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 01:57, 31 March 2011 (BST) A/RE Looks like you're up, followed shortly by RHO and then Mis. Good luck to you, sir (not that I think you need it). ~ 05:35, 24 March 2011 Karloth I just thought I'd come here and point out that all of Karloth's VD is pretty much non-harmful editing and thus a perfect example of what a lot of us spent years getting on Izzy for reporting as vandalism. I don't feel like bringing it up in the A/VB drama but I did think you'd appreciate and be able to see the similarities in how he was escalated and why so many of the admin team frequently clashed with Iscariot for reporting based on strict letter. It's a good example of why Judgement and Spirit is still part of the enforcement rules and what happens when they're removed. --Karekmaps?! 04:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC) Yeah, but that judgement cuts both ways. I appreciate the arguement in the case of his editing of the PK page. But the rest (other than the humourous suggestions one) seem to be the fault of his friends. Perhaps he should choose different ones to mess with, ones who wont report him to A/VB for the lolz. If a third party had reported him for either of the last two, I would have said, "meh, not vandalism, they do that shit". But when the participants themselves go out of their way to make us make a decision... we have to. The thing that forces it over the line for me, then, is the reason behind the "mock" vandalism... it goes from being done for laughs between friends, to being about making drama -- boxy talk • teh rulz 07:13 23 March 2011 (BST) I understand that but, there was a time where we would escalate the person actually vandalizing A/VB. Specifically the reporter and not the person obviously not doing anything wrong. It's sorta like saying it's bad faith by association doing it this way. --Karekmaps?! 05:16, 24 March 2011 (UTC) The problem is that the smart arses (and yeah, that includes Karloth, and everyone who reports him) are doing this to "promote anarchy" (or some other similar "non-conformist" form of kewl). I appreciate it as an ingame roleplaying tool, and to an extent in their wiki contributions. But that's an intergroup or interpersonal interaction thing. Once it gets brought into the admin area, especially by page owners, we've got to say enough, and treat them like everyone else -- boxy talk • teh rulz 13:03 24 March 2011 (BST) Yes but in cases where it's not the page owners having a tromp about admin pages? I could understand escalating both users in cases like the Karloth one, the justification makes sense and while I would avoid it as much as possible personally in favor of targeting the person who escalates it too far it certainly does make sense. --Karekmaps?! 15:30, 24 March 2011 (UTC) Anarchy has it's downsides. But in this case, it all came out in the wash. Perhaps they have a point -- boxy talk • teh rulz 11:55 26 March 2011 (BST) A/VD Just thought I'd provide this if someone felt up to linking my warning as I've noticed is done in many cases now. Here's the link for mine linkee. --Karekmaps?! 23:26, 7 March 2011 (UTC) Mmmm, Nubis breaks the deadlock. Nice -- boxy talk • teh rulz 12:30 8 March 2011 (BST) I kinda had this(bid) coming as a response. It's really kinda fitting considering. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 04:22, 27 April 2011 (BST) siggie ? how do i make my time stamp small?--User:Sexualharrison 03:23, 5 March 2011 (UTC) You can't do it with templated signatures. In my preferences => User profile => Nickname I have: <small>-- <span style="text-shadow: #bbb 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em">[[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> {{subst:LOCALTIME}} {{subst:LOCALDAY}} {{subst:LOCALMONTHNAME}} {{subst:LOCALYEAR}} (BST)</span></small> ,and I also have the "Raw signatures (without automatic link)" checkbox ticked. Then I sign with 3 tildes (~~~) -- boxy talk • teh rulz 04:52 5 March 2011 (BST) that figures. i finally took the time to figure out how to that. this is the code i'm working with. when i tried adding stuff at the bottom it go all wonky. <small><div style="display: inline-block; height: 14px; width: 18px; overflow: hidden; vertical-align: text-bottom;">[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="position: absolute; display: block; font-size: 0px; height: 14px; width: 18px;"> </span>]][[Image:Boobs.sh.siggie.gif|18px]]</div> [[User talk:Sexualharrison|bitch]]</small>--User:Sexualharrison 05:03, 5 March 2011 (UTC) finely figured it out. i just have to take off one of these ~ when I sign and the code works now. thanks for the help.--User:Sexualharrison Good oh.... to bad it didn't work here though :P -- boxy talk • teh rulz 12:30 8 March 2011 (BST) yes it did.-- bitch 05:31 24 March 2011 (UTC) February 2011 My template I was venturing into the idea of making a RP template that was similar to the danger report system of auto update and multiple location support...lol bear with me its gonna take lots of work, just starting to get it going —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bjornkarl (talk • contribs) 01:42, March 1, 2011. image ark yo, can u do me a favor and add the image that were in my image ark in yours ? --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 12:37, 18 February 2011 (UTC) Shouldn't you hav thought of that before you went delete crazy FOR LOLS LOL LOL -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 12:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC) You indeed should have... but anyway... is this the one you wanted the content saving from? -- boxy talk • teh rulz 13:13 18 February 2011 (BST) it was the only thing worth salvaging, and i kind of forgot about that --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 13:17, 18 February 2011 (UTC) You mean, you forgot to not be a fucking retard? Shocked to stone -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 13:27, 18 February 2011 (UTC) it looks like ur starting to offend me somehow... but i forgive u * pats DDR in the head * --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 13:35, 18 February 2011 (UTC) There's probably plenty in there, that was worth saving. Anyway, all gone now. Death is whimsical, today -- boxy talk • teh rulz 13:33 18 February 2011 (BST) thank you for saving these boxy --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 13:35, 18 February 2011 (UTC) Give the guy a chance In all honesty, I reckon it was far more my fault that the case exploded out of proportion than anybody else's. If you give Thad space and let him have a chance, I'm sure he'll end up proving himself to you.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 10:40, 14 February 2011 (UTC) Yeah, sure... pretty much the first thing the arsehole does, is post up an A/VB case, and then when a couple of sysops disagree, he decides to fill the page with whine. And it's not like I didn't see it coming. Fuck him, he's had years to impress me, and he's given nothing, unlike the rest of you who are occasional arses -- boxy talk • teh rulz 10:45 14 February 2011 (BST) Fair enough, but I think you'll be surprised if you just give him some space.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 10:47, 14 February 2011 (UTC) don't you mean rope?----sexualharrison ¯\()/¯ 17:39, 27 February 2011 (UTC) Did I impressed you boxxy?--If my name was MisterGame AKA Thadeous Oakley, I would be a massive flaming faggot. >:| 23:17, 28 March 2011 (BST) Some of your mood swings were pretty impressive -- boxy talk • teh rulz 02:09 29 March 2011 (BST) Probationary Sys-Op I had hoped that you'd see it on Ross' talk and save me the trouble of having the same discussion in multiple places. But it has been sitting there for some days now, so I better bring it here: User_talk:Rosslessness#Probationary_Sys-Op Your thoughts on that as someone who's been a crat for ages? Think that it would be a worthwhile policy suggestion? -- Spiderzed▋ 14:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC) I answered over there -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:35 13 February 2011 (BST) January 2011 Wat? Where? As you wanted to know where. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 13:04, 31 January 2011 (UTC) Email? I haz sent -- boxy talk • teh rulz 13:53 31 January 2011 (BST) I haz replied --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 14:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC) http://iamscott.net/1296507220982.html --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 20:56, 31 January 2011 (UTC) black-power hairy-head nice revertings... who is that guy? does that happen often? --  ▧  : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 09:00, 30 January 2011 (UTC) Just our resident nazi troll. Ignore him ;) -- boxy talk • teh rulz 09:09 30 January 2011 (BST) broke teh rulz Juz read teh rulz How can I delete my wiki alt? --  ▧  : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 13:57, 25 January 2011 (UTC) As long as you don't use it to avoid wiki consequences for your main account, you're not really braking any rulz -- boxy talk • teh rulz 14:10 25 January 2011 (BST) If you really have no use for the account any more, though, you can get it deleted by posting it to A/SD. It is best to do this with the actual account in question though (rather than with your main account) so that sysops know that you're not just getting someone else's page deleted -- boxy talk • teh rulz 14:14 25 January 2011 (BST) Thanks. In that case will just keep it, but won't use it. Deleting it may mess up any contributions that ac made. Perhaps. Thanks. --  ▧  : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 14:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC) OK, looks like you decided to nuke it anyway. It won't affect the contributions you made with the account, because we don't/can't actually delete the account (you can still log in with it), just delete the user page for it -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:21 26 January 2011 (BST) Sig Your signature looks awesome. :D --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 10:41, 21 January 2011 (UTC) I is awesome at code stealin' :P -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:21 26 January 2011 (BST) December 2010 Question u recently blocked my rommate with the username nexus and i assure u nexus is not a alt of me we just share a pc can u please unban him he would never vandalise wiki on purpose can u send me somthin of wut ur planning to do thanks--Zombieman 11 22:00, 19 December 2010 (UTC) It's probably the fact you do everything so similar. Like the fact you don't capitalize I's , or use any punctuation, or the fact you both seem to miss the "g" of words like "thinking" or "something". Oh, and editing as User:Survivor 2.0 isn't helping things at all. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 22:29, 19 December 2010 (UTC) Which isn't against the rules (to my knowledge) since the alt in question is neither committing vandalism, voting illegally, nor evading a ban as Zombieman has only been warned, not actually banned. Unless I am missing something. Which is like totally possible!-MHSstaff 23:06, 19 December 2010 (UTC) I'm not judging the usefulness of this, merely questioning the claim that these (now 3) accounts are between two roommates. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 23:13, 19 December 2010 (UTC) You just threw up a AVB case. What vandalism has Survivor 2 actually committed? How is this different from the Lois/Lois's alt case? This is drifting toward borderline checkuser abuse...-MHSstaff 23:16, 19 December 2010 (UTC) It's using a second sock to try to establish that the first sock (which was used improperly) was a real person, which is just as bad. 23:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC) Fair enough. -MHSstaff 23:20, 19 December 2010 (UTC) Yeah. Mis explains more eloquently than I could. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 23:29, 19 December 2010 (UTC) lolroomate. Haven't heard that one before -- boxy talk • teh rulz 07:01 20 December 2010 (BST) Boxy is a cunt mate dont worry about 'im aye he is jus a masive cunt ant he hatez every cunt on the planet plus he's fat--CyberRead240 15:51, 27 December 2010 (UTC) October 2010 Guide That was actually me circa age 12, and tbh it's more unfunny puerile Uncyclo refs than anything else. I'll probably put delete tags on it though--Mtumbe Ngoube 03:26, 21 October 2010 (BST) sucks you're stepping down you have been a voice of reason for longer than i care to remember. good luck with whatever you are doing. ciao buddy.----sexualharrison ¯\()/¯ 18:31, 4 October 2010 (BST) If you would just confirm your demotion request, we'll kick of a fresh crat election and get you demoted to sop. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 14:36, 3 October 2010 (BST) Wow... you are one of the few sane voices here and the place will not be the same without you.... congrats on your Escape! --Honestmistake 00:54, 5 October 2010 (BST) He'll be back! You all know it. :D -- LEMON #1 01:53, 5 October 2010 (BST) Yeah don't worry, boxy's my alt, just a bit busy, that's all. You're also my alt as well, DDR, you just don't know it yet. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 03:02, 5 October 2010 (BST) Ffffff. I've been telling people that i've been a long time victim of nightly inception. Now I have the proof! -- LEMON #1 04:35, 5 October 2010 (BST) *Salutes Boxy* --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 03:12, 5 October 2010 (BST) September 2010 I came up with an Idea, but need your input I thought it would be cool if we had a wiki User of the Month Competition. Now, this would probably have to be run by Sysops, so, I'm Asking for your input here. And dont worry, I've asked the other Sysops too. Cheers, -Dezonus- (talk) 14:55, 2 October 2010 (BST) chile Hey man, do you remember a year and a half ago you showed me a link on IRC about that news report of the small rainfall in chile which knocked out power for 60,000 or so people? I've been googling it but I can't find it : ( do you have it hidden away somewhere, or remember what site it was from? Super thanks if you can help me out :D -- LEMON #1 15:19, 19 September 2010 (BST) This probably isn't the link I had at the time, but I just googled up the story, "Tiny Drizzle Wreaks Havoc In Desert City", about Iquique being damaged by a rainfall of 0.2mm (their yearly average is 0.6mm) :D -- boxy talk • teh rulz 14:39 20 September 2010 (BST) My numbers were a bit out, but that's the one! My god, it's one of the funniest things I've ever read. Thanks heaps. -- LEMON #1 14:54, 20 September 2010 (BST) Archives Location Editing Locations talk archive: Suggestions Suggestion talk archive: Moderation Moderation talk archive Editing teh Wiki Editing talk archive: General Talk General talk archive: