UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Automatic Bureaucrat Cycling
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Guidelines — Policy Document This page is a statement of official UDWiki Policies and Rules. See Policy Discussion for policy additions and changes. |
Administration Services — Protection. This page has been protected against editing. See the archive of recent actions or the Protections log. |
Automatic Bureaucrat Cycling
Overview
One Bureaucrat position will come up for re-election by the wiki community every 3 months, in rotation.
Any Bureaucrat who goes inactive on the wiki for 1 full month will automatically be demoted back to Sysops status, and the position put up for re-election, if a replacement is deemed necessary by the wiki community.
The proposed rule changes
Rules for starting an election.
- When a Bureaucrat resigns, or loses his status due to demotion or inactivity an election is started immediately.
- A Bureaucrat that hasn't made a single edit in one month is considered as inactive and forfeits his status as bureaucrat.
- After 3 months with no elections on a bureaucrat position, an election is called for the bureaucrat position longest without an election.
- If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 12 months, then an election is called after that period.
- The election ends after two weeks wiki time counting from the when the election is started.
- The candidate with the most votes votes wins the election.
- In the event of a tied vote the remaining bureaucrats will decide between the tied candidates.
Rules concerning candidates
- All active users with the sysops status are automatically declared candidates for any vacant Bureaucrat positions.
- Users with at least 12 edits in the 30 days before the election are considered "active" for purposes of the election
- The Bureaucrat whose position comes up for election if said election is started under rule 2 of Rules for starting an election is automatically declared a candidate.
- A candidate can retract his own candidacy at any time.
Rules concerning voting.
- All users have only one vote per bureaucrat position to be filled.
- Users vote for a candidate by signing under the preferred candidates name.
- Users may change their votes for a candidate as long as the election has not ended.
- Multiple votes at the same time will be struck.
- Sockpuppetry is considered vandalism.
Summary
This policy confirms and streamlines the majority of the march 2007 round rules as the formal rules for choosing bureaucrats, and introduces two new additions:
- One Bureaucrat position will come up for re-election by the wiki community every 3 months, in rotation.
- Any Bureaucrat who goes inactive on the wiki for 1 full month will automatically be demoted back to Sysops status, and the position put up for re-election, if a replacement is deemed necessary by the wiki community.
This policy does not affect any account that Kevan may use as a wiki admin account.
Voting Section
Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop. |
The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
For
- We need a way to replace bureaucrats as they move on -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 15:17, 8 April 2007 (BST)
- Makes the whole process less happenstance and more democratic.--Vista 15:21, 8 April 2007 (BST)
- A useful proposition.It has my vote.--Kamden 16:43, 8 April 2007 (BST)
- --Darth Sensitive W! 21:05, 8 April 2007 (BST)
- Recycling is good. --T 21:10, 8 April 2007 (BST)
- Just one question: does this mean we will have a third Bureaucrat replacing BobHammero? I think three are too many... --Matthew Fahrenheit YRC☺T☺+1 00:13, 9 April 2007 (BST)
- --Thegreathal 02:20, 9 April 2007 (BST) Ohhh yeah.
- --Hubrid Nox Sys WTF U! B! 02:23, 9 April 2007 (BST)
- Jonny12 talk . w(m)^∞ 13:26, 9 April 2007 (BST)
- --Mayor Fitting 01:42, 10 April 2007 (BST)
- JedazΣT MC ΞD GIS S! 01:01, 10 April 2007 (GMT)
- -Bullgod 02:22, 10 April 2007 (BST)
- --Pyrranha 04:22, 10 April 2007 (BST)
- I have seen a tired and annoyed 'crat, and it was not pretty. Or lovely.--Lachryma☭ 04:48, 10 April 2007 (BST)
- Just because gage voted against, I'm For this.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 06:49, 10 April 2007 (BST)
- --Funt Solo 16:08, 10 April 2007 (BST)
- I see no reason why not.--'STER-Talk-ModP! 20:36, 10 April 2007 (BST)
- Democratic fairness. --Toejam 23:52, 10 April 2007 (BST)
- --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 15:03, 11 April 2007 (BST)
- Why not? --Reaper with no name TJ! 21:24, 12 April 2007 (BST)
- Sounds good Vantar 21:07, 18 April 2007 (BST)
- --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 13:17, 20 April 2007 (BST)
- Auch aye - Cheeseman W!ASBTalk 23:17, 20 April 2007 (BST)
- Seems fairly straightforward and uncontentiousCrabappleslegalteam 01:12, 21 April 2007 (BST)
- I can't find anything I don't like about this policy --Humuhumuhumu...Ted 01:50, 21 April 2007 (BST)
Against
- I'm just here to be contrary and ornery.--Gage 06:46, 10 April 2007 (BST)
- This just seems like an explicit rule for what should be fairly obvious procedure. Another bold step down the road of bureaucratic insanity and rule creep. --ZaruthustraMod 23:21, 20 April 2007 (BST)