UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2013 Q4

Template:A/VBsub

December 2013

User:Grim s

• Grim s (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Self-request
Action taken	perma'd

Now that Revs gone, Id appreciate if you could delete my talk page, protect it and my user page, and then re-perma me as I intended. The Grimch 13:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

First, are you sure? Second, please go respond regarding additional pages in your userspace. Once those are both handled, we'll process this accordingly. I actually am sorry to see you go. We never talked much, but the few times you made your presence known, it always made things more interesting. —Aichon— 19:50, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

I was sure the first time. my (very limited) presence since then has been solely due to Revs influence. that no longer applies. Ive asked nicely, if thats not enough then Im sure I can easily manage to get myself permad the regular way. The Grimch 21:16, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Done. If you wish to be unbanned, you know how to reach us. Bob Moncrief ^EBD•W! 21:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

User:MisterGame

• MisterGame (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandalism
Action taken	Warned

MisterGame edited Revs signed statement, in the admin section no less. String him up by his thumbs. The Grimch 23:28, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Clear impersonation is clear. Vandalism. No outstanding judgements, so a warning is in order. Bob Moncrief ^EBD•W! 01:54, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism - I missed that a case had been opened when I reverted the changes yesterday, but now that I see one has, it's open and shut. —Aichon— 15:14, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Clear-cut vandalism. And with that (and Rev's pending demotion) a majority is already there, so I will carry the warning out. -- Spiderzed▋ 18:03, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

User:LinaMorgan

• LinaMorgan (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandalism
Action taken	Warned

Changed Template:Phextermination to a "zerg alert" template, effectively vandalising multiple group pages by claiming they zerg -- boxy 22:12, 9 October 2013 (BST)

Vandalism - I always try to give newbies the benefit of the doubt, but I can't imagine a scenario where this user was trying to do something constructive, especially given their other edits. Either they were trying to create a template for inclusion on the pages of people they thought were zergers, or they were directly trying to accuse users of that template of zerging. Either way, they were planning to put content on people's pages that those people clearly wouldn't want to have there. A warning seems merited. —Aichon— 22:35, 9 October 2013 (BST)

Vandalism. It is technically a three-edit vandal, but I don't think a perma is merited yet, as it might as well be an honest newb mistake. -- Spiderzed▋ 23:05, 9 October 2013 (BST)

Vandalism. The edits to the "War" pages seem to have been taking a moderately non-NPOV page and making it strongly non-NPOV in the other direction. Bob Moncrief ^EBD•W! 03:00, 10 October 2013 (BST)

Judged as vandalism. Warned on talk page. Bob Moncrief ^EBD•W! 05:30, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Archives

e Vandal Banning Archive

2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020