UDWiki:Administration/De-Escalations/Archive/2013: Difference between revisions
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
#No one's here anyway, just the ghosts. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 04:58, 14 February 2013 (UTC) | #No one's here anyway, just the ghosts. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 04:58, 14 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
#[[UDWiki:Administration/De-Escalations/Archive/2011#User:Izumi_Orimoto|I was the one to bring up the last appeal.]] --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">█ </span>]]</span>''' 06:42, 14 February 2013 (UTC) | #[[UDWiki:Administration/De-Escalations/Archive/2011#User:Izumi_Orimoto|I was the one to bring up the last appeal.]] --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">█ </span>]]</span>''' 06:42, 14 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
#'''for''' not sure a perma ban was ever warranted. --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 12:01, 14 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
====Against (unban Izumi)==== | ====Against (unban Izumi)==== |
Revision as of 12:01, 14 February 2013
De-Escalation Archive | ||||||
|
De-Escalation Queue
Pending De-Escalations
Izumi Orimoto
Izumi Orimoto (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop. |
The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
A lot of that was red tape-letter of the law bullshit that shouldn't have happened, most of those old farts who didn't know how to follow the spirit of the wiki (and instead went witht he letter) are gone (and a big player in permaing her was Grim and we see what happened there) so lets just fucking get this 5 year old shit done with. Unban her because for the longest time she really just wanted to be able to contribute to her groups wiki page.
Seriously, a lot of things were just noob mistakes that were handed out punishments instead of talking with her. She and I and she was completely willing to work with me years ago until a few others decided to ignore what I was doing and just mete out punishment. It's been five years, it's not like she was ever here to disrupt the wiki. Lets let it go, neh?--SA 00:27, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- It was never my intention to violate any rules while posting here. If unbanned, I pledge to study up on the terms of this wiki and avoid breaching any rules in the future. Kitakaze 00:39, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
For (unban Izumi)
- For. I was against it last time but fuck it. What's the worst that could happen? >.> ~ 02:54, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Obviously I'm game. Also, worst happens is we reban her and I look like a tard for trusting her to not be spiteful after all this time.--SA 03:03, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Unban the Cunt -- Invite her to the facebook discussion group--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens 04:13, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Despite the fact that she's lying above (it's pretty trivial to point to dozens of times that she intentionally violated the rules), I'm actually okay with her being un-perma'd. Yes, as I said in her last appeal, she's earned her perma dozens of times over, but she's also demonstrated that she can keep a low profile on the wiki and play nice with others if she's generally left alone, and though I may think that she's earned a perma, I also think most of that came after she had received it, so I'm willing to consider giving her a chance. That said, I honestly don't expect that she'll be able to keep her nose clean and remain un-perma'd for long, given her proclivity for being a drama queen (which doesn't appear to have dissipated, given her most recent contributions), but I'm definitely up for giving her a shot this time around. —Aichon— 04:54, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- No one's here anyway, just the ghosts. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 04:58, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- I was the one to bring up the last appeal. -- Spiderzed█ 06:42, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- for not sure a perma ban was ever warranted. --Honestmistake 12:01, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Against (unban Izumi)
- Against - Diamonds are forever. --VVV RPMBG 09:49, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- She's never been short of promises, but has never followed through. Despite claims to the contrary, she earned a perma all by herself -- boxy 09:56, 14 February 2013 (BST)
Recent Actions
Kirsty cotton
Kirsty cotton (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Unbanned after IRC request. -- Spiderzed█ 23:10, 11 February 2013 (UTC)