UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Boxy/2011-03-24 Re-Evaluation

Administration » Sysop Archives » Boxy » 2011-03-24 Re-Evaluation

User:Boxy

• boxy (talk | contribs | UDWiki contribs | vndl data)

Yeah, tell me what you think, I can't get enough of that shit.

My reelection platform. "So many jackasses, so little time."

-- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 12:44 24 March 2011 (BST)

• vouch - -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 13:03, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
• Give him a rank higher than bureaucrat. And someone push through a policy that says boxy is never to go through another re-election. -- †  talk ? f.u. 13:16, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
• vouch i agree. i think boxy should replace keven as our lord and god.--
  
  bitch 13:18 24 March 2011 (UTC)
• Weak Vouch - Since his voluntary demotion, his activity has overall dropped, but he still does good work in areas as A/PD. -- Spiderzed▋ 14:36, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

  Strong Vouch - Wouldn't have promoted Thad if he had still been crat. -- Spiderzed▋ 18:49, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

• Against - As one of said jackasses, I disapprove. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 15:00, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

  wow who didn't see that coming. and i thought he called you a dumbass? way to stay neutral and judge someone on all of the good works they have done on here for years. can't wait for your revaluation asshole.--

  

  bitch 15:05 24 March 2011 (UTC)

  Is it just me, or do I have a stalker? -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 15:22, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

  Your lack of reference to injokes of history disappoints me. Greatly. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 18:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

  ? Can I have a hint? -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 18:38, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

  Arsehole. The word of choice was "arsehole". Precision, people! -- Spiderzed▋ 18:49, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

  Since people seem to get so terribly upset by the fact that I dared to go Against on Boxy I'll explain something. My "vote" was a small wink to the fact that Boxy has never really gotten along with me. I don't mind Boxy staying on, and it was pretty clear from the start he would breeze through this. As a sidenote it's pretty ridiculous to see how people immediately jump on top of me for such a simple thing. Boxy is a big boy, I doubt that he really needs such a fierce defense. Knowing Boxy he really doesn't give shit about this, but if he did, then I'm sure he's capable and rather did reply himself rather letting you do it for him. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 14:26, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

  It's not really about defending boxy at all. It's more their disapproval of someone remaining against simply because of self admitted personal reasons. An against is an implication that you don't want him on the team. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 14:36, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

  Like I said, it wasn't really all too serious. I don't find the immediate outcry necessary. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 14:55, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

  try leading by example, you wanted to be a sysop so badly. well start acting like one--

  

  bitch 15:32 25 March 2011 (UTC)

• vouch - as a new and inexperienced sysop I look up to boxy and his experience here. Would love to see him stick around.~ _{15:18, 24 March 2011}
• vouch - Always and ever, Boxy consistently is willing to discuss why he makes the decisions he makes and I've never really had much issue with him beyond the occasional and extremely rare lapse in judgement that he's always been willing to correct once he's realized it. He's what sysops should aspire to be well, him or Vista. --Karek^maps?! 15:33, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
• Vouch - Supreme Lord of the wiki.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 15:38, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
• Vouch - No words need be said. -- Cheese 17:06, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
• Vouch. When I break my own rules, I do so because it needs to be done. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 18:18, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

  ZOMG, Ross voting on a RE. To the A/M-mobile! -- Spiderzed▋ 18:19, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

  It needs to be done? I dunno, but Boxy seems to sit pretty well when it comes to vouches already. Unless you're worried about my all-powerful all-defying against of course. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 18:44, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

  The rarity of the vouch implies its value. It's nothing to do with our people's opinions. All of which I deeply value. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 20:31, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

• Vouch - Obviously.--
  
  | T | BALLS! | 18:46 24 March 2011(UTC)
• Vouch - This wiki needs more Box--^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 20:24, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
• Vouch - --^A_O^R_D^M_O^P_R^I _! ^T 21:53, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
• Vouch - puts up with a lot and works hard. --Karloth Vois ^¯\(°_o)/¯ 22:30, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
• Vouch - As KV. -MHSstaff 22:49, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
• Amazingly Strong Vouch - As Spiderzed, because Thad is an idiot. --Ash  ^{|  T  |  яя  |} 13:33, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
• Vouch - I still demand that Boxy gets reelected as 'crat. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 15:34, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
• Vouch - He's always been willing to clearly explain his reasoning. Haven't agreed with every decision I've read, but have always been satisfied that he was doing his due diligence.--FT 15:41, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
• Vouch Asheets 16:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
• Vouch Boxy will always be a permasysop here on this wiki as long as he wants to stay... really no reason to vouch for him only for the reason to call Thad a faggot.--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks ^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 17:21, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
• Thad is a faggot - therefore, i vouch for boxy --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 20:25, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
• Against - I despise people that come after me alphabetically (yes, I despise almost all of you, with AHLG being the notable exception). If it weren't for that single failing, I would approve. —Aichon— 19:31, 27 March 2011 (BST)
• VOUCH 'CAUSE ALTHOUGH BOXXY IS PRICK SOMETIMES HE IS TEH GOOD GUY.--If my name was MisterGame AKA Thadeous Oakley, I would be a massive flaming faggot. >:| 23:25, 28 March 2011 (BST)

  Is the missing comma supposed to go before, or after the "SOMETIMES"? -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 02:16 29 March 2011 (BST)

  what is this comma witchery you speak of--If my name was MisterGame AKA Thadeous Oakley, I would be a massive flaming faggot. >:| 02:21, 29 March 2011 (BST)

One week discussion of Boxy's re-evaluation has closed. The Bureaucrats will make their decision shortly. ~ _{06:19, 31 March 2011}

There isn't much to be said here, Boxy's a goodun and will keep his seat for another term. Successful. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 02:27, 1 April 2011 (BST)