Suggestion:20081016 Useless Use for the Crucifix

20081016 Useless Use for the Crucifix

William Told 21:12, 16 October 2008 (BST)

Suggestion type
Item use, Flavor

Suggestion scope
Survivors, People who are sick of crucifix-related suggestions, Evangelists

Suggestion description
Let's take a look at the crucifix. As in real life, carrying one around on your person in UD does absolutely nothing but leave you with less room to carry other things around. It wouldn't even make a decent bludgeon. But despite the fact that it's entirely reasonable that it not have a use, the crucifix appears on the suggestions page again and again. People try to assign it mystical or divine qualities that act as anti-zombie shields, assuming that everyone will share their assumption that teh evil zmobies fear Jebus; they try to make it "inspire" survivors to perform feats they would otherwise be incapable of; they try to give it some sort of divine smiting powers; they've even tried to make it block bullets!

No more! I propose that the crucifix be used as a weapon in a manner similar to the newspaper: Attacking with a crucifix will cost 1 AP and inflict 0 damage at a 100% hit rate. The attacker will receive a message similar to, "You wave your crucifix at (target)." or "You wave your crucifix at (target) for 0 damage." The target will receive a message such as, "(attacker) waved a crucifix at you." The text may be altered to be more or less flavorful depending on Kevan's wishes. Some flavor text was considered, but I believe neutral text would result in less hate mail from Christians for Kevan to sift through. The neutral flavor also allows its use to be interpreted differently by different players.

This suggestion gives the crucifix a use while it retains its definitively useless value, discouraging future crucifix-related suggestions by filling the perceived void in its non-use. It would also be fun for anyone who wants to RP as a crazy preacher/Christian, a Christian who is clinging to their beliefs in this apocalyptic setting, or any other character who might want to wave a stick with a little man nailed to it at someone. Furthermore, people who RP as super-serious religious types or do not wish to use their crucifixes may simply abstain from waving them at people and not be affected by it.

This suggestion is not a dupe. It does not involve any spiritual/mystical/divine powers and does not affect a player's effectiveness in any way. It would simply be fun and interesting, and it might discourage people from suggesting the overused magic crucifix suggestions.

Thanks to everyone who helped flesh this out and raised good points in the discussion page.

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped. # justification ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Keep Votes

1. Author Keep--William Told 21:14, 16 October 2008 (BST)
2. Keep - Pointless, yet why not? -- Cheese 21:23, 16 October 2008 (BST)
3. Keep Frankly ridiculous. Its like zombies feeding on corpses, or having a skill thats the equivalent of body building, or ruins being harder to repair the longer they've been left. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 21:27, 16 October 2008 (BST)
4. Keep - Useless. --Midianian^{|T|T:S|C:RCS|} 21:34, 16 October 2008 (BST)
5. Keep - As above. I can't wait to RP a crazy preacher on my death cultist Linkthewindow ^Talk 21:45, 16 October 2008 (BST)
6. Keep - As someone who will probably get that crucifix waved at him a lot, I vote Keep. --Papa Moloch 21:51, 16 October 2008 (BST)
7. Keep - Waving religious items at terrifying forces/perceived threats is something that happens during apocalypses...I don't see anything wrong with including a nod to it ingame. Plus there's precedent for "useless uses," ala the newspaper update. --Jen 21:58, 16 October 2008 (BST)
8. Keep good - Sanpedro 01:09, 17 October 2008 (BST)
9. Keep - Like a newspaper, okay. --Idly Hummingbird 01:47, 17 October 2008 (BST)
10. Keep Good flavor, I like the idea. --Super Nweb 03:05, 17 October 2008 (BST)
11. Keep A well thought out idea, excellent for RP. No more crucifix spam in the suggestions page. --Silisquish 03:07, 17 October 2008 (BST)
12. Keep - Finally something I can hit people with thats more embarassing than a newspaper. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 04:33, 17 October 2008 (BST)
13. Keep – Sure, why not? ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 06:20, 17 October 2008 (BST)
14. Keep - Spam-o-fucking-licious. --WanYao 06:30, 17 October 2008 (BST)
15. Keep - Yeah, I suppose that it's not a true 'use' if it's useless. --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 06:50, 17 October 2008 (BST)
16. MWAHAHAHA... er Keep because its nuetral and its fun but not least it also means that all those nutters waving the damn thins will have less AP to shoot me with.--Honestmistake 11:07, 17 October 2008 (BST)
17. Keep - Useless flavor for a useless item.--Tansiv 18:07, 17 October 2008 (BST)
18. Keep - As Nweb. -- Galaxy125 18:52, 17 October 2008 (BST)
19. Keep - Last item with no use. - User:Whitehouse 20:36, 17 October 2008 (BST)
20. Keep/Change - Harmless enough and nice flavor. Just give the zombie side a similar item/action. Bananas, perhaps? LCpl Hicks 22:09, 17 October 2008 (BST)
21. Keep- as above. i like it --Irounds 00:03, 18 October 2008 (BST)
22. Keep- Could probably cause some login spam, but apart from that it could do no harm.--Kez0 00:11, 18 October 2008 (BST)
23. Keep - Holy shit something that the crucifix would be useful in the game and doesnt have anything to do with religious beliefs. --Lt.G Deathnut | TheStayPuftMan 00:30, 18 October 2008 (BST)
24. Keep - See know reason why this wouldnt work, perhaps they could be the kind that you can hang around you neck and the flavor text talks about a hyponosis type stare --Tjayh913 00:55, 18 October 2008 (BST)
25. Keep - Just like how candy is on Halloween, it adds to harmless fun. I don't see a problem with it. Apocalyptic doom 03:05, 18 October 2008 (BST)
26. Keep - This? Is genius. -- Atticus Rex ^{mfu pif} Δ 02:43, 19 October 2008 (BST)
27. Keep - Witty plus I think it will be funny to watch as some dying moron continually attacks with this, in the hope that it will somehow do damage.--SirArgo ^Talk 06:56, 19 October 2008 (BST)
28. Keep - That's pretty cool, actually. --Private Mark 21:33, 19 October 2008 (BST)
29. Keep - I think is a good idea, even though it is compleatly useless it will stop people complaning about it. --Michaleson ^CAPD 23:47, 19 October 2008 (BST)
30. Keep - Just like newspapers.--Kolechovski 19:16, 20 October 2008 (BST)
31. Keep - It' going to be very funny to see some players acting as crazy prophets and preaching waving a cross inside a mall or to a horde of zombies. Janjones 00:32, 21 October 2008 (BST)
32. Keep - YES! --Howard Bentley 04:59, 22 October 2008 (BST)
33. Keep- Its a decent suggestion, Finally. Legion8 04:03, 24 October 2008 (BST)
34. Keep/Change- Absolutely awesome and fun idea. Since it's harmless, let it count as a blunt weapon zeds can use, too. --Mithos Yggdrasill 17:22, 25 October 2008 (BST)
35. Keep- Sounds fun.--Studoku ^W! 21:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Kill Votes

1. Kill - If you're going to give it a use, give it a use that's at least partially useful. Otherwise we'll see the same "change the crucifix/crucifix update" suggestions regardless. If anything, I think it should have the same effect as a length of pipe, in the sense that you could jam it between door handles and keep back the zombies for a few more minutes. Otherwise, there's really no point in changing it at all. And no, it doesn't really add RP. People don't wave crucifixes at zombies in zombie movies, nor could I see someone doing so in real life. --Kikashie ^{Read the Dispatch!} 10:06, 19 October 2008 (BST)
2. Kill - Mostly as Iscariot. No special treatment. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 18:49, 22 October 2008 (BST)
3. d00m in teh Apocakypse. - I honestly do not care. Hm, Could zombies not use it? So, Why can't I try to kill people with it? Or nail it people, Perhaps their HAND? Hey, Maybe I could toss it at the zombies. Nail it to/hang it on a wall. Psst, this is largely irrelevant, This isn't a game of religion; It's about the Zombies.
   
   Attack the zombie. _■^■ 00:55, 22 October 2008 (BST)

Spam/Dupe Votes

1. Spam - There should be no use for the crucifix period. Why can you wave a crucifix at someone and not a fencing foil? Or a beer? Or a stuffed monkey? Giving this item any fucking use is empowerment to delusional fuckwits, the same people who've stifled academic and scientific progress for years. We have plenty of religious characters in the game who don't have religious symbols to wave and who can roleplay around this. No special treatment for crucifixes. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 11:28, 17 October 2008 (BST)
2. Spam - Just encourages further useless ideas for an already useless flavour item -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 11:27 19 October 2008 (BST)

   I disagree. Giving it a use (waving it at people) would prevent new players from picking one up and saying, "WTF? Why can't I use this? Maybe I should suggest a totally awesome, kickass use for it! Like, maybe you can use it to kill zombies! Of course, everyone knows zombies are afraid of crosses! You know, like in Dracula. I'm gonna do it right now without paying attention to the proper format!" --William Told 17:37, 19 October 2008 (BST)

---

Voting Rules

Current Suggestions Advice to Suggesters Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so. Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed. "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes. Advice to Voters You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated. Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote. One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion. To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam). It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion. Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found. Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.

Rules for Discussions Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20081016 Useless Use for the Crucifix). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.

Valid Votes Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit. Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page. Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions. Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks. Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied. Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion. Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied. Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}} Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.

Invalid Votes Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide. X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others. Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.

Comments Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting. Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.

All Caps Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.

VOTING EXAMPLES Keep Votes Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT) Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT) Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT) Kill Votes Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT) Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT) Spam/Dupe Votes Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)