User talk:Darth Sensitive

You have new marriages (diff to penultimate divorce).

Things Best Forgotten This User talk page has an archive.

Drama Llama The Llama is watching you.

Darth for Mod! Trust the power of the Dark Side Elect Darth Sensitive a mod. The force is strong with him! Then suck up while you can!

Hammero for Bureaucrat! …for a better tomorrow! Vote Bob Hammero for Bureaucrat in 2006. Vote today! Vote tomorrow! Then show your support!

Project Welcome Member Need help? Just ask.

Grammar This user or group supports the use of proper grammar and spelling on the Wiki.

Saint Isidore Is Watching Have you checked your spelling?

Hi, and welcome to my talk page. If you want to leave me a message, or have a conversation, just stick in a new section, and we can debate/talk/argue/chat about it here. If you could, stick new stuff at the bottom.

Congratulations

It's all your fault now... Go power mad, its fun!!!--Vista 21:38, 1 April 2007 (BST)

Upper Left Corner

If you could do the sub pages for me mate that would be fantastic and much appreciated. Pillsy 11:01, 6 July 2006 (BST)

• Thanks for doing it. Pillsy 13:22, 13 July 2006 (BST)

Arbitration

Actually, i won't want you too. Nothing personal really, just that I don't know you, and i guess Cyberbob doesn't too. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^{YRC | T | W!} 01:41, 16 July 2006 (BST)

The Barh Family

Sorry for taking like a week to reply. Didn't even notice your comment. Didn't get that from CSI though. I was watching repeats of the X-Files and Mulder and Skully were searching for the Gospel of Mary Magdalene. While searching they would pottery, which like a vinyl record, had sound recorded into it. When played it would make the dead rise. They then trace it and find that it was recorded by Lazarus's aunt when Jesus made him rise from the dead. I saw this and thought "Wow! That would be awesome in UD." So that's where I got it from. Sonny Corleone ^WTF 21:23, 18 July 2006 (BST)

Ban_Reptileus

vote against if you feel like you said on the discussion page--Gage 03:14, 20 July 2006 (BST)

Did you even look?

Or were you merely being "funny" when you voted kill? –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 15:22, 23 July 2006 (BST)

Welcome to our Wiki

{{Welcomenewbie}} --Sonny Corleone ^{WTF RRF ASS CoL} 20:11, 26 July 2006 (BST)

Yeah...I was bored. So I'm welcoming people who were never welcomed. Sonny Corleone ^{WTF RRF ASS CoL} 20:21, 26 July 2006 (BST)

Lexicon

Yeah, I'll do some work on it. If all goes well, I'll have two articles done by Friday. Have you talked to anyone else? X1M43 02:02, 27 July 2006 (BST)

I don't know if I will have some time to actually work on the Lexicon, but I'll try.--ShadowScope 05:22, 27 July 2006 (BST)

Yeah I'll go and help finish it off. And please get a new signiture, the pac-man one isn't really working IMO. - Jedaz 07:15, 27 July 2006 (BST)

Guess I'll finish an article or two. Agent Heroic 21:48, 27 July 2006 (BST)

Sure thing, I'll see what I can do juicebarjoseph 22:45, 27 July 2006 (BST)

I'll se what I can do. In a couple of days.--William Raker 08:37, 28 July 2006 (BST)

I'm putting up an MPD article, breaking the whole "don't cite self" and "one article per round" rules - but frankly, I don't think anyone should care. I hope no one minds - I'll take it down if you want. Agent Heroic 08:41, 28 July 2006 (BST)

Sure..I can finish a couple this weekend. I'll try not to step on anyones toes.. - Nicks 21:31, 28 July 2006 (BST)

Now I'm not sure I should add these!! You did a fantastic job of pulling the whole thing together!! Great work on that wrap-up!! - Nicks 15:08, 31 July 2006 (BST)

3 articles left. I don't think I can work on another - my head still hurts from writing the MPD one. Agent Heroic 22:14, 31 July 2006 (BST)

PacMan

My poor, dearly departed sig. They were all jealous, so they made up junk about him "looking bad". They were just jealous that they didn't think of it first. --•...•...@. (DS) 04:25, 27 July 2006 (BST)

I weep for your pacman sig.*sniff*--Pharo212 ^TJ! 23:24, 27 August 2006 (BST)

Your signature

As it is, it is very annoying. Yourt signature needs to at least contain your name. If you make it a template you will have to manually put it into the suggestion page or any other tempate. Your signature needs to link to your user page.--Gage^CFT 23:42, 26 July 2006 (BST)

My god, it's burning my eyes! –Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 00:52, 27 July 2006 (BST)

you need to have your name displayed on your signature. --Gage^CFT 00:55, 27 July 2006 (BST)

That too, but it's fucking ugly! It sticks out like a sore thumb, and it distracts you from the rest of the text as you're reading. –Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 00:58, 27 July 2006 (BST)

agreed--Gage^CFT 01:10, 27 July 2006 (BST)

I'll display my name just like Cyberbob... oh, wait... nevermind. But it's fixed. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 04:26, 27 July 2006 (BST)

Jesus Christ, man, Why the fuck are you making my eyes bleed? Get rid of that signature. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 02:51, 27 July 2006 (BST)

Please change your signature. Just please.--ShadowScope 05:22, 27 July 2006 (BST)

Just a brief example

To help you understand why

DO NOT LOOK AT THIS BUNCH OF TEXT THAT IS BLINKING AND SHIT

your signature is making the Internet cry. :P –Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 02:56, 27 July 2006 (BST)

Learn from your past

It seems you didnt understand a lesson or two you should have in the past. Please, remove the image from your sign. --hagnat ^mod 04:12, 19 August 2006 (BST)

I DID leave you a message about your sign. --hagnat ^mod 03:08, 21 August 2006 (BST)

Moved from M/SD

Perhaps you understand now why Sonny wants that policy implemented? –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 06:24, 31 July 2006 (BST)

I understood completely, but I don't like the way that he chose to try and implement it. Had he been less harsh towards those who created without the waiting period and had added a new crit. for here I would have kept. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 06:27, 31 July 2006 (BST)

Less harsh being no vandalism charge? Also: while not specifically mentioned, I think it was implied that there would be a new criterion required. That being said, I'd have no major qualms with that revision. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 06:39, 31 July 2006 (BST)

At least not on the first shot. Give him a talk page, non VB connected warning, then send him to VB if he persists. If it gets revised, I think it should add the criteria, like in my policy under discussion.--Darth Sensitive ^W! 06:44, 31 July 2006 (BST)

As I said, I'd have no major qualms with it. I just wish people would read the policies in place before taking action. Do you know what I did on my first day here? I read every policy. That's right, every single fucking policy we had. For the first few weeks I kept double-checking that I was doing stuff right, and I followed the examples of moderators and long term contributors when the rules seemed ambiguous. Most of the people who would get treated "harshly" are impatient or lazy. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 06:43, 2 August 2006 (BST)

I read what I could find - this place can be a bit of a mess. I've gotten better since then though. But you're a good example of what everyone should be... even if they can't meet your standard. You're abrasive, but one of the best mods and contributors here. But we can hope that the lazy/impatient people learn from their mistakes. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 06:55, 2 August 2006 (BST)

Liked your edit

of my talk page... btw....

FU ;)

Conndraka^{mod TCFT} 20:09, 31 July 2006 (BST)

Help

How do I put a menu on top? like yours, with the main, talk, sandbox, etc. Please help --Gold Blade 17:34, 1 August 2006 (BST)

Eh?

Why are you categorising things as "Flagboxes" when they are clearly not? –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 10:09, 3 August 2006 (BST)

They aren't only flagboxes that use {{Flagbox}}, but I'm going for all the 250 px ones that fit nicely on the side of the page. Anything in there that doesn't belong is my own dumb mistake. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 15:54, 3 August 2006 (BST)

So that's what you were doing. I'll add a description to the category to indicate that. (If you haven't already, that is.) –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 11:19, 5 August 2006 (BST)

Eh...

sorry for being a wikinoob ;) --DJSMITH^CDF 18:53, 3 August 2006 (BST)

if you'll notice, i changed it from Dunnel Hills to Pitneybank in my template --DJSMITH^CDF 19:20, 3 August 2006 (BST)

Sorry about that...

Sorry about the policy discussion mistake. I removed my comment from the front. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by EMAG TRESNI (talk • contribs) .

Thank you

You are the man Darth! I would have never known about the whole {{tl|template}} thing if not for you. Thanks a million! --Paradox244 ^{W! TJ!} 16:23, 5 August 2006 (BST)

Your Policy Thingy

My only concern is groups that don't utilize the wiki that often. Also, some groups are pretty small and their numbers fluctuate and may not even have any members, but they are still valid groups. Take The Last Poets for instance, I restarted this groups after months, maybe a year of inactivity. That history would have been lost with a policy like this.Satandisc 06:04, 11 August 2006 (BST)

Template Request

Also, you seem like the template king!! Can you make one for this?

	Strip Generator
	Create Your Own Comic!!

Thanks! Satandisc 06:47, 11 August 2006 (BST)

Arbitration (Bob Hammero v. God)

Would you be willing to serve on my case? See M/A. Thanks. –Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 07:01, 14 August 2006 (BST)

Additional junk Drama Llama-ed to death by the comment tags--Darth Sensitive ^W! 07:48, 14 August 2006 (BST)

The Lord God intended nothing beyond the accomplished humor, and issues his consent to delete the previous comment and/or this one at your whim. -- (The Lord God) † ^Pray 07:54, 14 August 2006 (BST)

The Lord hopes the "commentary" section is open to him. If not, please move or remove this. The Lord God edited his own text area which was created for him to voice his opinions. There was no reply to it, rather the other user had his own space to place his opinions. Also, the Lord God was not the only one to edit his comments, and one of the cited edits linked was actually made before the other user had even made his statement. Other than this, the Lord God has no further comment. -- (The Lord God) † ^Pray 18:32, 15 August 2006 (BST)

It wasn't, but it's OK that you put this here, it's fixed. You aren't in trouble for it, but it is bad form. Rest assured, I took a good look at the edit history for the page. But I would like to ask you to refrain from doing it again. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 18:50, 15 August 2006 (BST)

Arbitration commentary

Thanks for arbitrating. I assume you won't mind a little friendly feedback:

• Ignore each other for a week - Gladly.
• Act civilly towards him for three weeks afterwards - I already intended to.
• No required apology - Good. There is ample disagreement over whether or not that is an acceptable arbitration ruling anyway.
• One apology post allowed this week - Fine, but I certainly hope that you're being honest that it's optional.
• Post three good things - Frankly, this is very much like being made to apologize, and goes too far into the "you're a toddler" analogy.
• No warnings - Hooray.
• Warnings may be assessed in a month - Warnings for justifiable offenses will be posted on M/VB before a month is up. Warnings won't be given for things that are brought up in a month that wouldn't be accepted on M/VB. Why is this even here? You can't warn someone for something that isn't a warn-able offense, and moderators aren't required to enforce arbitrator rulings, since there is no process for becoming an arbitrator.
• Meet back in a month to discuss things - That will be difficult, since the Arbitration page is archived shortly after cases end. I'm also not sure about why you have that requirement, since we really aren't toddlers, you know.

–Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 19:19, 15 August 2006 (BST)

No problem with the commentary. Completely optional to apologize. I don't care if you don't - I think things might be better if you all did. I hoped that you two would actually take it seriously and see the good side of the other person. Think of it as a misguided attempt to inject some levity into a minor war that was brewing. And on the "in a month" thing... I screwed up. I've misread the stuff on VB and VD. I don't get to do that... it's gone. And we can revisit in a month - it's not hard to add extra stuff to the archive later. I really think that the two of you need to kill the tension, which is basically what I was arbitrating. So - I just want to confirm my faith in people's characters in a month. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 19:38, 15 August 2006 (BST)

You might wanna check your email. –Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 20:06, 15 August 2006 (BST)

Arbitration Question

You have inspired the Lord's divine creativity. The Lord God asks your opinion on weather or not this would be an allowable template for him to place on his userpage:

	I'm Black!?
	This kettle recieved a call from the pot.

As you can see it is not specific, but the Lord thought it best to run this past you first. Bless you. -- (The Lord God) † ^Pray 18:00, 16 August 2006 (BST)

It isn't the best idea. I wouldn't do it until you can ask him if he would mind. Even then, it wouldn't be reccomended. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 18:43, 16 August 2006 (BST)

Interesting. -- (The Lord God) † ^Pray 19:01, 16 August 2006 (BST)

This template is in reference to Darth Sensitive using the term "pot calling the kettle black" on the arbitration page and nothing else. The Lord God knows of no other meaning. Anyway, the Lord forgot his original question: Can The Lord God vote "keep" on a speedy delete report made by the other user involved in this case? It is based on merit of the case and not who reported it. -- (The Lord God) † ^Pray 20:53, 16 August 2006 (BST)

I know it is, he knows it is. But it falls under the "baiting clause" of the verdict. But yes, you can vote on the SD case. You aren't restricted from existing on the wiki. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 21:31, 16 August 2006 (BST)

Darth: given the circumstances that inspired the creation of that template, I'd like to say that I don't find it particularly amusing. Surely if you balked at what my signature change could have meant, you will notice that template is obviously baiting? –Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 19:31, 16 August 2006 (BST)

Oh - I see it. I don't nessecarily disagree with it, but it is baiting. If he sticks it on his page, feel free to take him to M/VB. I told him to run it by you at the end of the week if he felt it was worth it. I hope that by then he won't feel the need to. Maybe I'm overly optimistic. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 19:55, 16 August 2006 (BST)

Thanks

Thanks for the heads up and not being hissy about it either. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by WolfgangLuciferMclain (talk • contribs) .

Cookie!

Thank you! Damn that vandal knew how to mess with the wiki. Fortunately I also know quite well. :-) --Brizth ^{M T} 03:51, 18 August 2006 (BST)

SoaP

Nice sig. I want it. I'll steal it.--Thari ^T/C/TJ! 04:46, 18 August 2006 (BST)

That has to be the worst premise for a movie, ever.--Gage • ASS 07:50, 18 August 2006 (BST)

SNAKES ON A PLANE!!!!!!!! -Twinge

We seem to have just one article left on the Lexicon. Oh yeah, your new profile is absolutely freaking hilariously cool. Bravo! Agent Heroic 21:20, 18 August 2006 (BST)

Template:Karaoke

Good morning gentlezambah. I saw your karaoke template and instantly fell in love with it. So I would humbly ask your permission, zram anh zambah barfarmar zah anarhar, if I could use it on my user page. Thank you --Grognor, member of the Broadway Zombies 01:52, 19 August 2006 (BST)

Pardon?

"Barely used != unused"

And plenty of precedent for stretching the meaning of "unused" on M/SD. If we followed the rules to the exact letter, half the shit that needs to be deleted couldn't be.

Fix the rules so that they cover "underused" like the Redirect criteria. But don't bend them until they break. -DS

I agree that the rules need to be fixed. Badly. We're in the process of rewriting some of them, so we'll get to the Speedy Deletions rules soon hopefully. But I didn't break any rules, since it isn't required that we list the criteria, and the page was valid under criterion 1 anyway. So what's your point here? -BH

However, it is traditional to do so. But the point is that 10 doesn't apply as written. However, 1 does. -DS

"criterion 1 applied"

So let's stop our conversation there.

Ok. -DS

But that's no fun. ;) -BH

Go flame The Devil or something. That would be enyouable. -DS

"created by a vandal isn't currently a valid criteria"

But a shitload of precedent for deleting vandal made pages without even going through Speedy Deletions. I won't name names, because I'd like to see my comrades left alone instead of harassed, but it happens.

I'm not in the mood to dig through the past to stir up trouble. I'm not filing a misconduct case this time. But there's a difference than things created by adbots/PQN/3pwv and this. -DS

Really? Let's look at Amazgod and compare him to, say, 3pwv. Flagrant disregard for wiki policies? Check. Creation of alt accounts to circumvent bans? Check. Hated by almost everyone? Check. Obvious hatred and taunting directed at moderators? Check. Creation of inflammatory content? Check. Vandalism of pages? Check. Impersonation of other users? Check. Hmm. They look similar to me. Amazing was just slightly more intelligent. -BH

His contributions weren't all outright horrible. You think it's worth creating a criteria just for stuff like this? -DS

"because I'm sick of seeing Speedy Deletion being abused"

Abused? How?

Using it on things that don't belong. -DS

Except that it did belong…. -BH

That's true, 'nother point for you. -DS

"and people consequently sent to misconduct"

Show me a single case of misconduct over Speedy Deletions. Wait, I'll do one for you: Amazing deleting an image that someone else uploaded during the single day that he was wrongfully a moderator. Hang on, that was never nominated, so it doesn't count. Never mind. You were saying?

Point. However, hagnat's early deletion earned him a warning for a not dissimilar case. -DS

Somewhat similar, but not very. Hagnat deleted a page that was "obviously" going to be deleted (which is true, but was still not allowed), not one that was already listed on Speedy Deletions (by the way, you will also notice that I was the moderator to rule against Hagnat). I didn't even delete the page, you know, I just nominated it. Why aren't you arguing with Nubis? -BH

I did see that you did it. I didn't intend to start an argument, nubis isn't involved because he didn't get involved. He posted and left. :) (I think he wins this round). I didn't handle this well, sorry. But to me, at least, it seems like not listing a criteria is taking a shortcut the same way hagnat did. -DS

"Just validate things correctly in the future and things will work better."

I did validate things correctly. Criterion bloody 1. What more do you want? Half the pages that show up there are not listed with a criterion, and half the deletion notices on those pages don't give one either. We look at the pages and decide if they fit anything or not. Jeez. –Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 02:02, 21 August 2006 (BST)

I don't want to create trouble. Noone is going to miscontribation. But in the future, it would be nice if you justified the reason clearly in your text when nominating. 90% of the ones in the past month do have a criteria listed with the nomination or deletion. Please do be more careful in the future. Oh, and the meet back in a month thing for arbitration is canceled. Hope you don't mind. The edit God/Amazing complained about was questionable, but won't be acted upon. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 02:27, 21 August 2006 (BST)

I almost always do. Nubis had just deleted another page I nominated, so I was pretty sure that he would see that one, take a quick look and see what it fell under, and get rid of it too. Which is what happened. I'm glad to know you won't be reporting me to Vandal Banning over mentioning God (as I am doing here as well). By the way, I'm almost positive that you owe me a cookie or something over whether or not he was really Amazing. :D –Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 03:51, 21 August 2006 (BST)

I think you normally handle things well. I don't agree with the way that you handled this, but how you did it worked. Sorry again for blowing this up to more than it was supposed to be. And you ain't getting no stinking cookie for this. I will allow you to buy your own Fig Newtons though. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 03:31, 22 August 2006 (BST)

Allow me to say...

...That you deserve a medal. For this edit. A really, big, shiny medal. I don't have one on me at the moment though. >_< –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 15:09, 27 August 2006 (BST)

I always accept cookies! --Darth Sensitive ^C•T•W! 15:26, 27 August 2006 (BST)

	A FREE COOKIE
	Xoid has given Darth Sensitive a cookie for being a most amusing bloke.

Also because you threatened to huff a kitten unless I gave you one. Now will you please let fluffy go? ;) –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 15:34, 27 August 2006 (BST)

As you may or may not know, my zombie EATS KITTENS! But Fluffy will live... for now. --Darth Sensitive ^C•T•W! 15:35, 27 August 2006 (BST)

Templatation

{{Nosubst}}. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 15:51, 27 August 2006 (BST)

Huh? Totally confused. --Darth Sensitive ^C•T•W! 16:02, 27 August 2006 (BST)

Notice how your signature is not showing up as {{User:Darth Sensitive/Sig}}? Change your "nickname" under preferences to {{Nosubst|User:Darth Sensitive/Sig}}, and you can sign with your nifty template again. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 16:18, 27 August 2006 (BST)

Fixed? --Darth Sensitive ^W! 17:03, 27 August 2006 (BST)

YES! --Darth Sensitive ^W! 17:03, 27 August 2006 (BST)

Spread the word, brother. Spread the word. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 17:24, 27 August 2006 (BST)

If you elect me as Bureaucrat, I promise* that your signature will never break again.

*Promise not guaranteed.

–Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 21:06, 27 August 2006 (BST)

I hope you're aware that you just created a monster with your template! :::evil grin::: But I was seconds away from doing it when I saw your message. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 21:08, 27 August 2006 (BST)

That's awesome. I look forward to your campaign. :D –Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 21:11, 27 August 2006 (BST)

Another user on campaign? I can see lots of gold in my future.--Thari ^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 21:24, 27 August 2006 (BST)

Gold is always nice! --Darth Sensitive ^W! 22:07, 27 August 2006 (BST)

I'll display your template and sig link if you display mine Bob - Give yourself to the dark side! --Darth Sensitive ^W! 22:07, 27 August 2006 (BST)

I accept your exchange of gold-laden baskets! –Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 22:19, 27 August 2006 (BST)

Wait wait, shouldn't that have been the Darth side? ;-D –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 05:22, 28 August 2006 (BST)

I'm wrestling with this same problem, and for whatever reason {{Nosubst}} hasn't fixed the problem. When I save, it stick a SUBST: in there anyway? Any suggestions? -- Atticus Rex ^{mfu pif} Δ 10:47, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Crap. Never mind. I just read the template and it's supposed to do that. Plus I see that it really is working after all. Thanks for having this up when I came to ask your advice about it. -- Atticus Rex ^{mfu pif} Δ 10:51, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Kizombie Template

I noticed there is a template for the zombie codes but not kizombie. Could you make one?--Pharo212 ^TJ! 21:55, 29 August 2006 (BST)

I'm hoping you'll reconsider.

I can list a few contributions for you.

1.)Defused a fued with Amazing after he attacked me for knowing scinfaxi. He was hateful and insulting the entire time, but I responded calmly and reasonably.

2.)Helped rally the vote against the anti-hate speech policy. I did so respectfully and with the best intrests of the wiki at heart. I even supported bob's bid for bureaucrat afterwards.

3.) I will vote for you. Actually, I'm kidding on this one. I'll vote for you regardless of your voucher of me because i think you'll be a good mod.Jjames 04:00, 30 August 2006 (BST)

The Basket

	Gold in the Basket
	Max Grivas sees the basket as half full not half empty. He wants to fix it.

--Max Grivas ^{JG,T,Max4Mod,F!} 04:55, 31 August 2006 (BST)

I already vouched silly! --Darth Sensitive ^W! 21:14, 31 August 2006 (BST)

New Groups

I'm wiriting up something concerning newly created groups and I was wondering if you would like to contribute or add something. I know that you had suggested the new policy for Historical Groups, and since you had such a clear idea on that, could tell me what you think.

User_talk:Bango_Skank#Category:Groups/Stubs

Thanks! - Bango Skank ^{T W! M!} 23:09, 1 September 2006 (BST)

Vitriol?

You mean the message i left them? Well, they accused uf of zerging and now im just having fun with this whole RP zombie vs. Humans thing, and they seem aggrated (only fuels the fire) ill tone it down a bit. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mayor Fitting (talk • contribs) .

Promoted

Now get out there and make us proud or somethin'. Now for the standard boilerplate response: Be sure to read M/G if you haven't already, and familiarise yourself with any aspect of the rules before you go moderating on them. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 05:30, 8 September 2006 (BST)

'grats.--Thari ^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 05:35, 8 September 2006 (BST)

Congratulations, and welcome to the moderator team! Read all the guidelines, and feel free to ask if you have questions. Now start doing stuff. ;) –Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 05:42, 8 September 2006 (BST)

Yeah, you better block 10 guys for next week without any Misconbitration case or you can start waving your hands as you're kicked outta here! </joke>. Congrats pal, nice people is going to take over the Wiki! That, unless what Bob said on my modship bid is true =S. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 06:28, 8 September 2006 (BST)

Nice one, Darth. Cyberbob  Talk  06:50, 8 September 2006 (BST)

Buh-wah-ha ha-ha HA.... HA! Congrats. Conndraka^{mod T CFT} 10:23, 8 September 2006 (BST)

Congrats man! --Paradox244 ^{W! TJ!} 20:51, 8 September 2006 (BST)

Ah, the conspiracy have forseen your promotion a long time ago. You should meet us at Shadowy Street, 42, and claim your place among us now. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 21:23, 8 September 2006 (BST)

I've been watching and waiting for a while... --Darth Sensitive ^W! 21:55, 8 September 2006 (BST)

Remember, now that you have joined the Rulers, always keep our core values in mind: crush the lesser ones beneath your boots, and always swear your loyalty to the Team first. –Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 22:50, 8 September 2006 (BST)

The Death Star merely awaits the command of my lords the bureaucrats. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 22:53, 8 September 2006 (BST)

Bureaucrat. Technically there is a possibility that I won't be promoted. :P Now crush some non-sysops! When your mere presence makes newbies cry, then you have achieved your rightful place. –Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 23:05, 8 September 2006 (BST)

Kevan counts. And I find your lack of faith in yourself disturbing. :::Force choke::: --Darth Sensitive ^W! 01:06, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Be careful

I was just going over a few things and I noticed that in speed deletions you deleted the The Mongolian Horde page. It's been restored now, but they are an active group. I suggest you check if a group is really criterion 12 by checking the stats page yourself before you go and delete their page. Just a friendly warning before anything happens to you. - Jedaz - 19:08/11/11/2024 10:36, 15 September 2006 (BST)

A formal request

BAN HIS FUCKING PROXY.--Thari ^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 02:11, 24 September 2006 (BST)

Cyberbob--Thari ^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 02:26, 24 September 2006 (BST)

Darth_Sensit%D1%96ve. That's not you, ban him.--Thari ^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 02:29, 24 September 2006 (BST)

Handled. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 02:33, 24 September 2006 (BST)

Yep, I saw it. Nice work. On a different topic: Are you offended by vulgar language? --Thari ^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 02:39, 24 September 2006 (BST)

Doesn't offend me, but it's something that I would rather not see on my talk page. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 02:42, 24 September 2006 (BST)

Now what the fuck is going on here? Can't I leave you two for a minute!--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 02:40, 24 September 2006 (BST)

I know nothing! *wink* M/VB *wink*.--Thari ^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 02:42, 24 September 2006 (BST)

Ah, I see, it's too big. 4770 deleted edits.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 02:44, 24 September 2006 (BST)

Huh?

you deleted M/VB!!!--Gage 03:07, 24 September 2006 (BST)

Lets go on a Witch Hunt. I want a good old fashioned witch hunt. --CaptainM 04:45, 24 September 2006 (BST)

You deleted your talk page too! God Darth, slow down on the deletions.--Gage 05:01, 24 September 2006 (BST)

Nope - deleted the talk page/redirect of a vandal with the name the same except for a funky character that looked the same. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 05:06, 24 September 2006 (BST)

Nice one Darth!

	A FREE COOKIE
	Xoid has given Darth Sensitive a cookie for deleting Xoid's favourite page.

–Xoid ^S•T•FU! 06:13, 24 September 2006 (BST)

Editing my comments?

Why remove the blink tags? And, also, you should have reverted it properly.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 23:13, 29 September 2006 (BST)

Precedent and common sense say so. And I didn't realize a revert would work. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 23:26, 29 September 2006 (BST)

You could at least put it back to normal size then.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 23:29, 29 September 2006 (BST)

Vandalism in progress, guys.--Thari ^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 23:30, 29 September 2006 (BST)

Not going to mess with your vote proper. But blink tags need to die a painful death. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 23:33, 29 September 2006 (BST)

Can you stop deleting actual pages?

You annihilated MrAushvitz's talk page's history by deleting Talk:Mr. Shity without paying attention. Get your shit together or leave vandalism reversion to someone who knows what they're doing. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 04:50, 30 September 2006 (BST)

Just because

	Feel the Love
	This user is a Mod, and is loved for their efforts towards fighting stupidity.

Conndraka^{mod T CFT} 14:32, 9 October 2006 (BST)

Thanks

...for the comment. I'm fairly new to this wiki, just trying to do my part, so any constructive crit or suggestions you may have are always welcome. Atticus Rex ^{A M P} 02:17, 16 October 2006 (BST)

Took your advice, and a tip from your own user page. Thanks again! --Atticus Rex ^{AMP ' T} 06:06, 16 October 2006 (BST)

DHPD reorganizations

Hey Darth, the reorgs on the DHPD pages left a bunch of double redirects. Mind if I jump in and repair?--Atticus Rex ^{AMP ' T} 17:16, 25 October 2006 (BST)

What's your thought on misspelling redirects: better to leave them alone or trace them back and fix all the misspelled links to them? -- Atticus Rex ^{AMP ' T} 23:48, 25 October 2006 (BST)

Look at this

Check out the edits made by User:Saxguy831 to the various DHPD pages. Is that legit?--Gage 06:15, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

...and this

New page Scripts. Is this kosher? I would sure appreciate your opinion. -- Atticus Rex ^{mfu pif} Δ 06:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Never mind. Gage saw it too. -- Atticus Rex ^{mfu pif} Δ 06:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Actually, Gage saw that you saw.--Gage 06:58, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Sigs?

I was going to PM you on the board, but you haven't logged in for a couple weeks. I was wondering if you could help me with getting one of the bars that many of the command staff have in their signatures. They say something like "DHPD Command Staff-badassmom" for example. I came across one of your very old threads that said that you would make them if you were asked. So... can you help me? --The Surgeon General 00:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

New Lexicon

You haven't edited in a few weeks, so I hope you're still here...even though the first Lexicon wasn't perfect, I thought the end result even if not quite complete was still really good. I want to do another. You made some great contributions to the last one--please discuss this here.--'STER-Talk-Mod^P! 02:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Note to self - stopped fixing old lexicon at Underground Labs...

Just a quick reminder; DEF articles are due this Friday.--'STER-Talk-Mod^P! 01:15, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh snap, right. Thanks for the catch.--'STER-Talk-Mod^P! 03:02, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry, I'll make sure my entries don't get too tied down on character narrative. --Pariah01 16:53, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Mod Strike

Eh. Thought I should point it out.--J Muller 04:53, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Moderators and Sysops, or the necessity to be moderate for once

Darth, I saw your support for Jon Pyre's policy, and your willingness as a Mod (or should I say Sysop?) to sacrifice your free speech in order to become better (Or should I say a real Mod?). May I direct you here? I'm looking for unbiased guy's input before I bring such a monster to Policy Discussion. Use the discussion page of that same page to say whatever you want, and if you can make any gramatic corrections that you see fit on the text, by all means do it, as I'm terrible writing in English. Thanks! --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 23:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

He sure is nice and willing to take part in discussion. Yeah sure, the first paragraph might've been a bit toasty. Understandably, I was a bit pissed when he insulted me, my friends and my integrity. But still it got removed as flaming. Nevermind the fact that his numerous diatribes on the page contain more bile in their first sentence than my single paragraph did. Of course I then remove the offending paragraph in the hopes he will actually read it this time, but he considers that to be more flaming. Read it if you care to, don't if you do not. Just bear in mind that this is the guy trying to make out like we are the fascists.

He also seems quite content to start a discussion in one place and then remove my comments on the basis of their being off-topic. Effectively leaving me unable to reply to his scathing, yet incorrect criticism. –Xoid ^M•T•FU! 15:41, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I saw your comments, don't nessecarily agree with them. But I asked him to restore them and consider them. And I know I'm not included in the fascist stuff. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 22:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

X:00 - "not a group you put in your profile"

I noticed you registered on the X:00 user page as being one of the folks who attacks at 0:00, but have X:00 in your character profile. It's not much use having X:00 in the profile, unless you really DON'T want folks to know when you are gonna attack- which is sort of against the whole point of X:00! --Swiers ^X:00 00:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm. Thought I read somewhere on the page to keep it at X:00 when not getting ready to go so that it might help publicize the group. He's definitely not at a place that it will be any use, but I can change if you think so. --Darth Sensitive Sith Lord•C•T•W! 04:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, that's a possible way to do it- I suggested that for folks who were worried about "giving away to much info"- which it seems very few people are. It doesn't really matter, I guess, as long as its set to the appropriate time for a decent amount of time before and after you plan to attack. I find it hard to log on early and change my profile, so I just leave it set at 0:00. If anybody tries to view 0:00 (or any similar group) it re-directs them to X:00 anyhow. Just something to consider. --Swiers ^X:00 17:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

The James Earl Jones Awards

	JEJ Nomination
	Darth Sensitive has been nominated to win the Best administration team Member Award.

	JEJ Winner
	Darth Sensitive has won the Best administration team Member Award.

Christmas Tree Dead Pool II

	"There's STILL No Santa Claus?!?!"
	This user has entered the Christmas Tree Dead Pool II

Your entry has been struck as the day (but not all the trees) has expired. You may make a new entry. --S.Wiers^ctdp_NTmap^x:oo 00:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Ditto the above --S.Wiers^ctdp_NTmap^x:oo 01:11, 26 March 2007 (BST)

Necro-Cartographer

	NT Mappers
	This user helps to maintain or update the NT Status Map.

Re: Historical Groups

N.P. I forget which votes are "yes" and "no" only and which allow abstention comments (i.e. sysop bids). I had gone in intending to provide a yes vote, but the zerge allegations put them in a different, and less impressed light for me.--The Envoy 13:31, 26 March 2007 (BST)

My Sig

You asked me to fix my signiature, which was over 50 kb. Therefore, I fixed it. It's only 37kB now. --Xtralife ^{| T·SCA·FLT |} 01:56, 27 March 2007 (BST)

Congratulations!

The Sith are taking over the Republic! --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 21:41, 1 April 2007 (BST)

DHPD

Hey! I just wanted you to know, as it seems that you administer that page, that the Journal:DHPD/Archive is getting really long. It's, in fact, the longest page on the entire wiki. Could you break it into some smaller pieces? --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 03:38, 3 April 2007 (BST)

Flames

You seriously don't have to worry about my susceptibility to drama - there's nobody who I really dislike around anymore, and even if there was, I just don't have the energy for it. If someone were to attack me, I'd either ignore them or attempt to make them be reasonable. --Cyberbob ^{Sys U!} 04:22, 12 May 2007 (BST)

Promotions

Could you have a look at cyberbobs re-promotion bid, please? I'm undecided, although tending to demotion due to the indication that he's left the wiki, but can still see community support for his contribution. I will support your decision either way, seeing as you seem much more impartial on this matter -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 14:39, 28 May 2007 (BST)

Lexicon?

Hello I'm just going around checking the Lexicons current status and am wondering if you are still interested in working on it. If you do not want to work on the Lexicon anymore could you please either move down to Alternates or dropped out players. - Vantar 20:42, 3 June 2007 (BST)

Offre de recrutement

Bonjour, Zyll of the G.I.F.D. suggested that you might be interested in a francophone support group I'm trying to set up, the 1SEG. Please contact me if you have any suggestions or if one of your survivor characters wants to join (though I must confess to being a bit concerned about M. LeDoux - unless I've misunderstood things, he seems a bit "trigger-happy" ;) ). Merci, --Dan Everyman 21:47, 26 August 2007 (BST)

Demotions

Can you check A/DM The preceding signed comment was added by boxy (talk • contribs) at 11:54 30 August 2007 (BST)

Inactivity

You don't need to apologize for that at all =). I would still vote you a Bureaucrat if the opportunity arises. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 04:38, 15 September 2007 (BST)

Unprotect Suggestions/30th-Dec-2006 so I can remove all the content. We're deleting every single page, remember? --Jerry 21:51, 22 October 2007 (BST)

Help with putting things up for voting

Hi sorry to be a bopther, but i need help, i submitted a suggestion that is "suicide by firearms V2" and many thought thatit was a good idea so how do iput it up for voting`???. thanks. --Worthog117 17:37, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

My 2¢

I read your recent demotion request and I would hope that you would reconsider. I agree with your opinion of the current status of moderation vs Sysops, and I would like it if you could help us bring class back to the wiki, with the administration being trusted users who help shepherd new wiki users along and foster good edits rather than snipe at them. --Akule ^{School's in session.} 14:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Lexicon Revival

Hey Im checking in to see if you would be interested in finally finishing the Lexicon. When I returned to UD after a long absence and I saw that the Lexicon was not done yet and I think we should try to finish it off and give it a fitting end.--Slowwber 19:04, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Open Discussion regarding ParserFunctions extension

Since you've shown interest in this subject in the past, I thought I'd let you know that I've started an Open Discussion regarding Arguments for-and-against the ParserFunctions extension. I'd appreciate any constructive comments you might be able to provide there. Thanks! --Morgan Blair 06:42, 17 May 2008 (BST)

Hi

It's nice to see a user from before my time, come and return to the wiki (I mean without having a dummy spit after 5 edits and leaving again). I hope you stay longer. Welcome back. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 14:13, 14 July 2009 (BST)

Thanks. When I'm semi active it goes into downtime but it'll be back in my sig soon. Hope you stay around more- you know you love the drama ;) D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 18:43, 14 July 2009 (BST)