20090825 Critical Miss
Johnny Yossarian 01:54, 25 August 2009 (BST)
Suggestion type
balance change
Suggestion scope
Humans without HtH Combat
Suggestion description
At the moment, survivors outnumber zombies by a pretty big margin, and only heavy planning and organization can overcome even a few inexperienced survivors with fire axes. To balance this, my suggestion is to add a factor of uncertainty to attacking with melee weapons (or fists)- a 3 percent chance to critically miss and damage yourself in the process.
One must assume that, in combat, novices will try moves they think will work, things they've seen out of action movies, generally stupid stuff: Only after the proper training will they be able to hit properly, and more importantly, not injure themselves. Until you take Hand to Hand Combat, there is a three percent chance that you will miss and injure yourself 1-3 damage (chosen by a random roll). This could (admittedly slightly) limit human character zerging and help the zombies a little bit.
As for Axe Proficiency: I think that knowing how to use an axe =/= knowing how to kill with an axe. My solution is to keep the accuracy, add the crit. miss chance, and be done with it.
Flavor text: Swinging your weapon a bit too hard, you miss and throw out your shoulder for x damage.
You miss, in the process your arm bends akwardly for x damage.
etc.
Note: I'm not too sure about the percentages; if its too high, or too small, just tell me. Thanks.
Voting Section
Voting Rules
|
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
- # justification ~~~~
Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.
|
The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.
|
Keep Votes
- Keep- Author keep. Remove the strike and this comment when you sign your vote. Cyberbob Talk 04:02, 25 August 2009 (BST)
- Me likes --DOWN WITH THE 'CRATS!!! | Join Nod!!! 08:05, 25 August 2009 (BST)
- Keep - The % should be lower, but I can live with it. User:Armpit_Odor/sig 21:42, 27 August 2009 (BST)
Kill Votes
- Kill - While I appreciate the sentiment, making early game harder for either side probably isn't the way to do it. We should focus on zombie buffs, rather than survivor nerfs. Besides, 3% is still a very high chance, seeing that you don't only swing once and leave it be. And especially if you can't hit due to low accuracy, you'll swing even more, meaning the chance to hurt yourself increases exponentially. RinKou 02:49, 25 August 2009 (BST)
- Kill - Needless self-injury. Survivor success rates are already tinkered with to try and keep balance, or something. --Bob Boberton TF / DW 03:52, 25 August 2009 (BST)
- Kill/neutral I'm not big on the idea, but it sounds intresting... needs soem work though... try DS. --Gat 04:19, 25 August 2009 (BST)
- You doomed yourself with your "note". If YOUR not sure about the percentages, why should we, as the voters, be? You can still pull this before any spam votes show up and take it to Discussion.--Pesatyel 04:25, 25 August 2009 (BST)
- Kill - As above--Orange Talk 04:27, 25 August 2009 (BST)
- KIll Don't screw with newbies.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 11:09, 25 August 2009 (BST)
- Kill - As above. -- Cheese 21:13, 25 August 2009 (BST)
- Kill - The idea did have some merit, but the others have made some good points. Nemesis645 21:33, 25 August 2009 (BST)
- Kill Last time I checked, survivors hadn't won a single fight against zombies; all this suggestion does is hurt newbies for no reason, and it didn't even have the chance to be put to sleep quietly in Developing Suggestions. Lelouch vi Britannia is helping make Ridleybank green_ and gives Achievements 22:34, 25 August 2009 (BST)
- Kill or Change Look, I like the base idea that survivors can really screw up when hauling an axe around, but 3% is way WAY to high. You can hurt yourself by missing your mark or being careless/tired (I have a scar to prove it) but you aren't going to take 2 or 3 damage from throwing a shoulder, it hurts but it's not bad 1 damage for stuff like that. Please for the love of kevan take this to Developing suggestions, it has potential, just not where it is now. -Devorac 08:06, 26 August 2009 (BST)
- kill Not fun. --WanYao 10:21, 26 August 2009 (BST)
- As Above. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 10:26, 26 August 2009 (BST)
- Kill As Yonnua Koponen --TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 11:56, 26 August 2009 (BST)
- KILL No. --Sonofagun18 17:44, 28 August 2009 (BST)
- Kill Not necessary and would be more of an annoyance to survivors rather than a boost to zambahz, contrary to what the suggestion implies. --Papa Johnny 18:16, 28 August 2009 (BST)
Spam/Dupe Votes
- Spam - not fun. --Funt Solo QT 22:38, 27 August 2009 (BST)
- Spam - I fail to see how throwing out your back when trying to swing a fireaxe at a zombie is `fun´.--Degree7 05:34, 28 August 2009 (BST)
Voting Rules
|
Advice to Suggesters
- Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so.
- Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed.
- "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes.
Advice to Voters
- You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated.
- Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote.
- One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion.
- To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam).
- It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion.
- Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found.
- Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.
|
Rules for Discussions
Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20090825 Critical Miss). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.
|
Valid Votes
- Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit.
- Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page.
- Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions.
- Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
- Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied.
- Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion.
- Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied.
- Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}}
- Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
|
Invalid Votes
- Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide.
- X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others.
- Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.
|
Comments
- Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting.
- Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.
|
All Caps
Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.
|
VOTING EXAMPLES
Keep Votes
- Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
- Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT)
Kill Votes
- Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
- Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
- Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)
- Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)
Spam/Dupe Votes
- Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
- Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)
|