UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/February-2010

From The Urban Dead Wiki
< UDWiki:Administration‎ | Deletions‎ | Archive
Revision as of 02:21, 2 March 2010 by DanceDanceRevolution (talk | contribs) (Protected "UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/February-2010" [edit=sysop:move=sysop])
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
Deletions Archive
2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2014 Jan-Jun Jul-Dec
Years 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020


The BlakenGard

Crit 1, Crit 7 being only an author edit, and judging from the most recent history, this is just going to sit here for "a year or two" before anything happens to it. -Poodle of DoomM! Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.T 15:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

  1. Delete -Poodle of DoomM! Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.T 15:38, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
  2. Speedy --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 17:14, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
  3. Speedy -- Adward  20:48, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
  4. Speedy I assume the request if for the talk page as well? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 20:52, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
    Yes,... for the talk page as well.... For future reference, should I be requesting the two at the same time, seperatly, or ignore it under the assumption that the mods would already do both? -Poodle of DoomM! Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.T 21:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
    The latter. We delete talks aswell. Or we are supposed to, we often forget :( -- 23:39, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
    Thanks for the info... would it be easier to set something up like the template in the User Hub that automatically links to the article, and it's talk page,... hopefully in attempt to avoid this in the future? -Poodle of DoomM! Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.T 00:05, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
  5. speedy delete --WanYao 06:13, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
  6. Speedy Delete --Maverick Talk - OBR Praise Knowledge! 404 06:18, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Deleted Speedily. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 09:39, 25 February 2010 (UTC)


Red rev net/awards

Crit. 1 I do believe.... -Poodle of DoomM! Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.T 04:20, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

  1. Speedy Delete -Poodle of DoomM! Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.T 04:20, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
  2. speed demon delete --WanYao 06:14, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
  3. Speedy Delete --Maverick Talk - OBR Praise Knowledge! 404 06:18, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
  4. Speedy Delete This makes four speedy votes, and the page meets the criterion. Consider using A/SD next time.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 06:22, 25 February 2010 (UTC)


New user template

moved from A/SD --

02:07, 11 February 2010 (UTC) off topic, serves no purpose, deletion workaround. The user is asking why the original page was deleted on this page, which I have answered on his talk page. --

00:08, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

  1. Keep - You must supply the original deletion case for this to qualify as a deletion workaround. -- To know the face of God is to know madness....Praise knowledge! Mischief! Mayhem! The Rogues Gallery!. <== DDR Approved Editor 00:29, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
    If being a crit 1 and 2 isn't enough for you, then I'll happily move it to A/D. -- 02:07, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
    Stop being annoying. -- Cheese 07:33, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
    Being annoying means paying a price, and if it's having us demonstrate how much of an idiot he can be 'for teh lulz', then I'm more than happy to abide by the rules to show him to the community for what he really is. -- 07:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
    Yes, because asking for some proof rather than taking your word for something is 'for teh lulz'. I remember Nubis expecting people to except its word for things like this as well. -- To know the face of God is to know madness....Praise knowledge! Mischief! Mayhem! The Rogues Gallery!. <== DDR Approved Editor 01:22, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
    And you'd be 100% right, except this falls under 3 seperate crits and not just one. And so your obvious attempt to halt established processes are displayed. -- 01:57, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
    Then why waste the time making a claim that you didn't back up? You claimed that it was a deletion workaround, the criteria demands you provide the link to the previous case. The onus is on you to provide proof for your assertion. Don't claim it unless you can prove it, I have enough of that with the followers of the nailed god. -- To know the face of God is to know madness....Praise knowledge! Mischief! Mayhem! The Rogues Gallery!. <== DDR Approved Editor 05:35, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
    Don't even bother arguing with me if you can't even address the argument; it was still crit 1 and 2, dumbarse, and I can only assume your lack of good reasoning behind why those aren't legit in any way just proves I'm right. And besides, don't cry about this topic with me further because I complied with everything you brought upon this case by taking it to A/D duly and if you come out looking like a dumbfuck it's your fault, not mine. -- 07:39, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
    Perhaps you could point me to where I claimed that this wasn't crits 1 and 2? Didn't think you could. Try not to put words into the mouths of others. I still don't see where you are getting this notion of an argument from, I stated that you must supply a link to the previous deletion case for it to qualify as a deletion workaround. This is a fact as demonstrated in the speedy deletion criteria. Everything else you seem to be coming up with is from your own imagination as I have made no other comments on this case. -- To know the face of God is to know madness....Praise knowledge! Mischief! Mayhem! The Rogues Gallery!. <== DDR Approved Editor 08:35, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
    Regarding your first sentence (which was all I read): egg-fucking-xactly. So they were still eligible to rightfully be speedy deleted, but fucking around the system for your own enjoyment is just part of your bad-faith paradise isn't it? Logic holds no value in those walls. -- 09:03, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
  2. Speedy Delete - as a crit 1, 2 and 6. -- 02:07, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
  3. Speedy - 2,6. Also, technically, a 1.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 16:07, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
  4. speedy - SD Criteria 1--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 04:29, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
  5. Delete - Just to clear up any potential confusion or drama, since I found DDR's explanation to be lacking, here is the relevant conversation. You'll see that the author of New user template now has all the info he needed from the old page. So it would appear that he doesn't want/need the current page around anymore and it has no use. Oh, also, here is the original deletion case--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 12:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
  6. speedy --WanYao 04:20, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
  7. Speedy Delete Cyberbob  Talk  09:14, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Deleted --~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 04:52, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Full Alert

Moved from A/SD --

09:29, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Full Alert claims to be a survivor strategy page but contains no strategic information, or indeed any useful information at all. It is not only useless, but off-topic and therefore a crit 2. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 00:38, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

  1. Keep - Stupidity of the page aside, it's not a speedy deletion candidate. I've re-arranged the page [1] so it isn't classified as a survivor strategy but a glossary entry. -- 23:39, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
  2. Keep On the sad day that 404 go inactive, its good to know that there are survivors out there willing to step up. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 09:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
  3. Keep Maybe not a survivor or zombie strategy page, but still a page worth keeping. Maybe a move to the lexicon or other more appropriate namespace? --Maverick Talk - OBR Praise Knowledge! 404 10:25, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
  4. Delete – Call it what you will, but tell me this if you can: from the page, what does "going on Full Alert" mean? You can't, because nowhere on that utterly pointless page is anything about what a "Full Alert" is described.ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 00:05, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
  5. Delete - This page is like Conndraka, it has no redeeming features. -- To know the face of God is to know madness....Praise knowledge! Mischief! Mayhem! The Rogues Gallery!. <== DDR Approved Editor 08:57, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
  6. Delete - Utterly retarded excuse for an article. --Papa Moloch 17:52, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
  7. Eat - omnomnomnomnom? They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 18:23, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
  8. Delete - Glossary page for a term no-one ever intends to look up, ever.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 20:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
  9. Delete - as Iscariot. Linkthewindow  Talk  10:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  10. Delete - Yonnua has persuaded me with the precise wording of his vote justification.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 15:09, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Deleted Cyberbob  Talk  15:52, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphans

Orphaned page. Delete it, or don't. It's linked now.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 19:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

And the same for these:

--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 19:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

  1. Keep All --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 19:19, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
  2. Delete All. I am the anti-Iscariot. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 20:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
  3. Delete All -- 22:47, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
  4. Delete Most, Keep Some - Keep MCOM, The Hunger, and Wolfen. Looks like they at least tried. —Aichon— 01:48, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
  5. Keep MCOM, Delete the rest.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 01:53, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
  6. keep as aich.-- Big Cat 02:10, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
  7. Delete All -Poodle of DoomM! Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.T 02:11, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
  8. Keep the ones that would otherwise be deleted, delete the ones that would otherwise be kept. xoxo 03:41, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
  9. Delete All - I miss criterion 12. --ZsL 05:33, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
  10. Delete All - Scant content. Hell, none of them even had a discussion page; I don't mean an active discussion page--I mean it doesn't exist! These groups obviously never even got off the ground! --Maverick Talk - OBR Praise Knowledge! 404 06:27, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
  11. Delete All Cyberbob  Talk  03:24, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
  12. Keep All - I am the Anti-Rosslessness. Also, putting orphans on here to link them is the most retarded thing to do, ever. Next time let me know and I'll give them a page in my userspace to be linked to, a kind of nature reserve for endangered pages. -- To know the face of God is to know madness....Praise knowledge! Mischief! Mayhem! The Rogues Gallery!. <== DDR Approved Editor 08:56, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
  13. Keep - I'm not comfortable with the idea of deleting a whole bunch of unrelated pages. If you can't be bothered to explain or vote on them individually, I can't be bothered to sift through them to see if deletion is merited.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 15:12, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Well, that was a bit of a nightmare to count.

All of these pages will be deleted on a vote of 4 keeps and 9 deletes, the following three pages which had different counts:

  • MCOM which had 6 keeps and 7 deletes will be deleted.
  • The Hunger and Wolfen had 6 keeps and 7 deletes, and will be deleted.

Note that Jed's vote was counted. If I've counted this wrong, Just say so here or make a request at A/U. --

02:54, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Kill A Zed

Gonna give this a go... Bad formatting, off topic, and poor spelling/grammar. Crit 2-ish. Only link is from here, I'd deal with it being moved to userspace at User:Freakazoit/Kill A Zed, but otherwise I'd want it deleted.

  1. Delete -- 00:01, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
  2. Move --~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 02:44, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
    Do we have any policy on this? Like, if there are three moves and no keeps, the page is moved?--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 18:48, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
    No, it's full time, but if there are mostly Moves, move it.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 16:45, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
    Typically it behaves the same as Merge I believe. -- 02:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
  3. Move, move, move!--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 11:32, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
  4. Move - Yep.-- Adward  15:15, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
  5. Move They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 23:27, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
  6. Delete. Oh dear god this is awful. Blitz dat muthafucka. Chief Seagull talk 12:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
  7. Merge into the userspace. --ZsL 16:35, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
  8. Move --Maverick Talk - OBR Praise Knowledge! 404 07:10, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
  9. Delete -- You're bang on with the reasons to delete it. It's just...god awful. As in, really bad. Chex 05:15, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
  10. Delete - Horrible. Cyberbob  Talk  03:24, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
  11. Delete with extreme prejudice-Normally I'd say just move it, but the content is so terrible it should be removed from the wiki forever.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 14:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
  12. Delete--Big Cat 14:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
  13. Delete with fire. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 00:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Deleted --

08:07, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/February-2010&oldid=1669125"