User talk:Giles Sednik/List of Wiki Puritans

Conndraka Discussion

God forbid he might not have thought I was committing Misconduct when the only action I took that involved sysop abilities (note: making A/VB cases does not use sysop abilities, might want to write that one down) was the closing of a case that had gone uncommented on for literally hours with other sysops making edits in that time. Cyberbob Talk 23:41, 25 August 2009 (BST)

Okie. You were out of control. I don't know maybe July was just a bad month for you. Anyways you've been better since the misconduct case and I appreciate that. But for now I'm more interested in what conndraka has to say. We can have it out later.--_GANG Giles Sednik_CAPD 01:32, 26 August 2009 (BST)

What a joke. You're question on Conndraka's A/RE bid was so petty, personal and irrelevant that I'm almost offended. It was the most petty attack at a sysop's actions that I've ever seen, even for Conndraka. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 05:29, 26 August 2009 (BST)

God knows I may become added to your 'list' after this. But after reading the filth you've written about Conndraka (90% of which isn't true, Bob couldn't use rhetorical language to save his life and Conndraka isn't better than you thought), I couldn't care less. You've just diluted the purpose of the page to make 'cases' against users that don't even matter. It doesn't even have attack-page value anymore. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 05:37, 26 August 2009 (BST)

dude how could you not want on this awesome list i mean its in his userspace and everything. get with the bandwagon of people giles disagrees with! --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW}

05:39, 26 August 2009 (BST)

I've had the luck of disagreeing with Giles a lot of times, and never having the fear of being put on such a list. One can only hope it stays that way, unless I actually do behave like a puritan, and then it's fair game. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:00, 26 August 2009 (BST)

"fear?" no it is a good thing to be on the list, its basically being a rebel and getting recognized for it - all the popular people are doing it dontchaknow --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW}

06:02, 26 August 2009 (BST)

He will only put people that he feels are "unpopular" (meaning with the intensely vocal minority we've seen going around recently) on the list. I would guess that he thinks you're "popular" with that crowd. I'm so sorry... :(
How do you know I can't use rhetoric btw? I don't think I've ever even tried to on the wiki. Cyberbob Talk 08:31, 26 August 2009 (BST)

Gawd. Man I can't figure you out DDR. You flame the bejeezus out of Conndraka on his reevaluation, and then blow me up for being critical of him. I have a negative impression on something and I'm giving the guy a chance to respond. ... "personal and irrelevant ... most petty attack ...ever!" ... Really? I give up. And Boberton, you are THIS CLOSE to me taking you off the freaking list. Don't make me do it!--_GANG Giles Sednik_CAPD 15:58, 26 August 2009 (BST)

NO MY POPULARITY --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW}

16:01, 26 August 2009 (BST)

That's because it isn't about blasting Conndraka, it's about passively (ie. through a "worthy question") criticising a sysop for petty and non-existant reasons and practically demanding he "explain himself". It is, as Bob said, unreal. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 04:47, 27 August 2009 (BST)

Nothing passive about it. I presented him with a challenge and asked him to explain himself, as you noted.--_GANG Giles Sednik_CAPD 00:31, 30 August 2009 (BST)

One of the most personal, petty and idiotic challenges I've seen on an admin bid. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:08, 30 August 2009 (BST)

Okay, just for the sake of advancing the conversation, (since you are just repeating yourself) I'll go ahead and say that my challenge may be idiotic and petty. Afterall, those are subjective terms. But personal? Most certainly not, unless Cyberbob is his mother. I called him to task on his positions. You, my friend, called him a "a goddamn idiot". That actually is a personal attack, objectively. Kindly dismount your high horse and let me know what's really bothering you.--_GANG Giles Sednik_CAPD 08:42, 30 August 2009 (BST)

Get the shit out of your ears and listen up: I have no high horse and I don't give a shit about what you think of my "vote" because at leased it was based on a long-standing tally of events and not just some reactionary nonsense that's been lasting a month. Maybe if you were totally serious about getting a conclusion about Conndraka you would be delving into the past archives to see him and Bob's relationship that lasted longer than just since when Bob became an op, and be looking at some important cases of the past and analysing Conn's opinions and rulings of them. Stop filtering your case studies from within this month and you might actually achieve a respectable result, and then I won't be angered when I see it on an A/RE bid with an expectation of someone to seriously address it. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 09:14, 30 August 2009 (BST)

It seems you didn't hear my question at all, so I'll simplify it and try again. What about my "attack" was personal?--_GANG Giles Sednik_CAPD 16:28, 30 August 2009 (BST)

General Puritans Discussion

You should link to the archive pages, giles. Your links will point to nothing once the current archive is cicled. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 21:04, 12 August 2009 (BST)

Ah, I didn't know that it was possible to link to the archive pages before it was archived. I was planning on waiting for the archiving to happen and then switching the links. DO you know a shortcut I can use?--_GANG Giles Sednik_CAPD 01:19, 13 August 2009 (BST)

I think he's talking about the "2009_08" type of pages that some of the admin pages use to make archiving easier, but A/D isn't one of them. When the deletions in question are archived they will be put on this page - which doesn't exist yet. Cyberbob Talk 01:27, 13 August 2009 (BST)

Yeah, i just realized my own mistake after i made this comment here. Now I find it odd that deletions, being the high traffic page that it is, still didnt fell for the same scheme we are using in a/vb. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 03:01, 13 August 2009 (BST)

I remember suggesting exactly that for it a couple of weeks ago... someone made a good point in rebuttal but I forget who and where it was. Cyberbob Talk 07:01, 13 August 2009 (BST)

How'd I go down flaming? Wait, how am I even on this list? --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 07:22, 13 August 2009 (BST)

For the cardinal sin of daring to vote delete, I think. Cyberbob Talk 07:24, 13 August 2009 (BST)

because obviously i was bawling about how boobies are bad and definitely not being pretending to be a "puritan" for kicks at all or anything --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW}

07:27, 13 August 2009 (BST)

i didn't think i could make it any more obvious than when i pulled a bullcrap "It's not whether I think it's porn," but apparently i fooled giles and presumably AHLG as well. oh and let's not forget that i'm also guilty of voting before the bandwagon rolled on in hurrhurr --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW}

07:38, 13 August 2009 (BST)

Soo, you admit freely to the charges of daring to vote and pulling obvious bullcrap. Therefore I have no choice but to find you GUILTY AS CHARGED!!! Your sentence is to remain on this list indefinitely. And you, cyberbob, have admitted to religious favoritism and collusion. I find you to be the ringleader and hereby sentence you to permanent puritan status. May you carry the stigma of religious zealotry around with you.--_GANG Giles Sednik_CAPD 17:09, 13 August 2009 (BST)

HOORAY I'M ON A LIST SOMEWHERE THAT MUST MEAN I'M POPULAR --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW}

17:39, 13 August 2009 (BST)

Oh no you don't. I won't stand by and watch you put a positive spin on the Grand old List of Puritans. This is supposed to be your punishment damn it!--_GANG Giles Sednik_CAPD 23:35, 13 August 2009 (BST)

what do you mean "positive spin" this is the no spin zone and reality has a known liberal bias therefore the list is inherently positive Q.E.D. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW}

00:29, 14 August 2009 (BST)

Also bob, boxy, grim, cheese and wan for crimes against humanity.--x o x o 00:39, 14 August 2009 (BST)

Okay I'll start a crimes against humanity list, it'll be easier. Bob is using his no spin zone logic to make my head spin.--_GANG Giles Sednik_CAPD 07:44, 14 August 2009 (BST)

Welcome-Welcome-Welcome to the NO SPIN ZONE, so non-spinning you might just get dizzy and vomit! hey i wonder what it would feel like if the earth's core suddenly just froze in place and everyone went flying --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW}

09:58, 14 August 2009 (BST)

fyi meant the cyber bob not the erton bob.--x o x o 04:32, 27 August 2009 (BST)

Hey, I like boobs just as much as everybody, it's that there's waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too many cock jokes on ALiM. =p -- C h e e s e 22:22, 25 August 2009 (BST)

but they're funnnnny....--x o x o 04:32, 27 August 2009 (BST)

The funniest thing on the page :D -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 09:44 30 August 2009 (BST)

What about the nav bar?? x o x o 09:56, 30 August 2009 (BST)

lulz

almost as funny as urban pussys --DOWN WITH THE 'CRATS!!! | Join Nod!!! 06:15, 26 August 2009 (BST)

don't be a dick to giles Cyberbob Talk 08:28, 26 August 2009 (BST)

no i thought it was mildly amusing --Imthatguy is on the wiki looking at ur pagez 18:36, 19 October 2009 (BST)

DCC

A bit behind the times on this, but I don't think you "get" DCC. If you did you would realize that he isn't a Puritan, but just a troll. Big difference. Nice page though. You put a lot of work into it.--– Nubis ^NWO 13:19, 26 August 2009 (BST)

retroospect

it's actually funny when you look back at Conndraka as a sysop, you can hardly believe he was ever one at all. Every misconduct case I look at from before my time as op had him vote Not Misconduct except one. And even then I disgreed with the case. You look at his talk page archives and they are people just complaining to him about pages and shit he's deleted or protected without any warning or without going through red tape. Amazing. --