UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2012 03
This page is for the request of speedy page deletions within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to concerns about loss of data, the ability to delete pages is restricted to the system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a deletion from the sysops. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.
In a restricted set of circumstances, system operators may delete pages without full consultation of the wiki community. This is usually restricted to pages that do not seem to have any legitimate information or function within the wiki, or for pages that have been created by mistake and are requested to be deleted by the author. In these circumstances, a Speedy Deletion may take place, allowing system operators to quickly remove these pages from the wiki.
Guidelines for Speedy Deletion Requests
All Deletion Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:
- A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility.
- A reason for deletion. This should be short and to the point.
- A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding
~~~~to the end of your request.
Further, you should place {{speedydelete}} at the top of the page you are nominating for speedy deletion.
Any deletion request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.
Once the speedy deletion request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be reviewed by a member of the moderation team, and action taken accordingly. Once action has been taken, the request will be moved into the Archive, and the system operator shall add a signed datestamp to the archived request.
A Speedy Deletion may be circumvented by a single vote of Keep under the request. If this occurs, the system operator shall move the Speedy Deletion request to the Deletion Request Queue, where the normal rules for Deletion of the page shall apply. Further, a user may choose to move a request from the Speedy Deletion queue to the Deletion Request Queue should they feel that the deletion may attract controversy within the wiki community, but do not wish to cast a Keep vote for the request. Should either of these circumstances occur, the deletion candidate should remain in the Deletion Request Queue until the alloted two weeks is up.
In the event of a sysop requesting Speedy Deletion, all the previous points will apply, excepting that a system operator other than the requester shall review and take action on the request.
Speedy Deletion Eligibility
To be eligible for a Speedy Deletion Request, the page must fall under at least one of the following criteria:
- No Content: The page contains no more than a line or two of content that cannot clearly be expanded, consists of random or incoherent content, or is duplicated elsewhere to no purpose.
- Off-Topic: The page is a clearly off-topic page.
- Unused Redirect: The page is an unused or underused (ie, only 1-2 pages using the link) redirect.
- Empty Category: The page is a Category page that has no entries within it.
- Missed Talk Page: The page is a Talk: Page from a previous deletion request that has not been deleted with the request (please note the relevant deletion request if this is so)
- As of 19 May 2010, Crit 5 is now a scheduled deletion.
- Deletion Workaround: The page is a duplicate of a page that has been deleted from a previous deletion request (please note the relevant deletion request if this is so). A page that fits this criterion is immediately qualified for deletion without requiring it be nominated on the 'Speedy Deletions' page. Recreating a page that fits this criterion will get you a polite message to stop doing so. Any further infractions of this nature will qualify as vandalism and will be treated as such. Note that criterion 6 does not apply when the page has been restored through Undeletions.
- Author Edit Only: The page has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author, and has been edited only by its author. Note that edits by adbots or vandals and reverts caused by them do not count.
- User Page: The page is a User subpage that has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author.
- Personal Page (Prefix Rule): The page is named after a user without the "User:" or "Journal:" prefixes and its content has been moved to the appropriate User or Journal page. Includes pages that should be User subpages, ie. in-game characters.
- As of 2011, August 29, Crit 9 is now a scheduled deletion.
- Unused Template: The page is a template that has existed for at least one week and is currently unused within the wiki.
- Non-existent User Page: The page is a User: page for a user that doesn't exist, and any content on the page has been moved to the appropriate User: or Journal: page.
- As of 20 June 2009, Crit 11 is now a scheduled deletion.
Defunct group page: The page is a non-historical group page, it is over two months old, it has not had an update in a month, and is not on the stats page. Such pages will remain in the queue for 5 days to determine their defunct status has been correctly identified. Due to the large number of pages that fit into this criterion, please {{speedydelete12}} on the pages to ensure that they are categorized differently from normal speedy deletion requests.- As of 2007, September 16, this is no longer a valid criterion.
- Missed sub-page: The page is a sub-page from a previous deletion request that has not been deleted with the request, and that serves no individual purpose (please note the relevant deletion request).
A page may also fall under a scheduled deletion and should be posted here if it is missed by the sysops.
Speedy Deletion Queue
There are currently no pages in the queue
Served Speedy Deletions
Index.php
Crit 1/2, obviously spam/irrelevant garbage. -- Rahrah has a signature that won't become obsolete. 18:11, 27 March 2012 (BST)
- This goes out to you and every other spambot reporting maniac. Stop reporting spambots on this page! We have a Bot Report page, you know.
--•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 18:59, 27 March 2012 (BST)
- I should probably learn to read. -- Rahrah has a signature that won't become obsolete. 19:16, 27 March 2012 (BST)
- Seriously, I'd suggest not snapping at anyone willing to help with this problem, whether they do it at the right page or not. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 00:01, 28 March 2012 (BST)
- As DDR. Seriously, get a fucking grip. The guy was trying to help. --Papa Moloch 00:15, 28 March 2012 (BST)
- I meant this as a joke, but then again, I suppose it is my fault for forgetting emotions and sarcastic remarks can't be viewed properly through text. :/ But seriously, bot banning is helpful. Especially with those quick links for an IP check. Seriously, though, SysOps-that-are-too-lazy-to-manually-block-IPs, block those IPs. Less IPs for the bots to re-use. Sure, IPs are pretty much limitless, but at least we'll be able to lessen the amounts of bots that pop on this wiki if we were to manually block those IPs to prevent them bots from constantly reusing them. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 05:05, 28 March 2012 (BST)
File:Ribcage.png
C7 -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 11:37, 27 March 2012 (BST)
StrahanCastle336
Test page posted by what is probably a spambot. Fits in to the same category as the previous entry below. ~~ Chief Seagull ~~ talk 15:38, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
NicholsonCrider153
Page made by User:NicholsonCrider153. Crit 1, while posting here I'd bet on it being a spambot seeing as it has the extremely suspicious tendancy to make a userpage in the main space before duplicating it into his own userspace straight after it, just like all current bots. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 07:12, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Done by Boxy.--Shortround }.{ My Contributions 14:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
User_talk:Nancywong691kzko
In contravention of Item 2: Waaaaaay Off Topic
I have seen a few of these lately being created.-- ƦedeyeϧyϮ MDK | NW 20:41 12 March 2012 (UTC+2)
- Dude. Speedy Deletions is the wrong place for this. UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Bots, on the other hand...We SysOps will get to these bots when we get to them (which is usually no longer then 2 or 3 hours). Thanks, and have a nice day, mate. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 20:21, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Bot has been added to reports, blocked, and the page deleted.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 10:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Army Control Corps/Hall of Fame
We badly botched up how we planned to present some of our group's archival info, we're gonna redo it entirely. Medora 10:59, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Army_Control_Corps/Hall_of_Fame_First_generation
As above. Bad botch-up, will redo. Medora 10:59, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Army_Control_Corps/Hall_of_Fame_Second_generation
As above. Bad botch-up, will redo. Medora 10:59, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Army_Control_Corps/Hall_of_Fame_Third_generation
As above. Bad botch-up, will redo. Medora 10:59, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
[[1]]
crit 1, crit 7 -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 12:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Archives
|
Speedy Deletions Archive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
