UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/ARE

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Simple.

Modify the re-evaluations guidelines to have one every 6 months for a System Operator instead of 8.

I'd much rather it be four, but everyone won't like it because that's too constant. On the other hand, 8 is much too long of a time span for a bad 'op to stay in power once he gets promoted/passes his revaluation bid.

We don't have a clause for interim evaluations or any other policy bound way of getting rid of a bad 'op, so I feel a shortening of the time span is a decent idea.

DISCUSS.

Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
  • # comments ~~~~
    or
  • # ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop.

The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

For

  1. hurrrr-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 04:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
  2. durrrr Nothing to be done! 05:04, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
  3. gurrrr —Aichon— 05:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
  4. burrrr --Bob Boberton TF / DW Littlemudkipsig.gif 05:56, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
  5. )c-c-c-combo breaker! -- Emot-argh.gif 06:22, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
  6. For.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 16:00, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
  7. LETTERurrrrrrrr AM I COOL YET Cyberbob  Talk  05:54, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    No, you're not-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 08:02, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    Fuck I just realised that that is exactly the kind of joke jed makes Cyberbob  Talk  09:30, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    8B -- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 10:02, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
  8. I approve of this policy. --Umbrella-White.pngThadeous OakleyUmbrella-White.png 10:14, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
  9. According to SA, I'm a cunt, but I'll still go For.-- Adward  12:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
  10. For --Michalesonbadge.pngTCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 19:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
  11. furrrr --Haliman - Talk 20:42, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
  12. Yes. -- THELORDGUNSLINGER 22:02, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
  13. -- 02:13, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Against

  1. Eight months is fine. Linkthewindow  Talk  05:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    You're a cunt.-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 08:02, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    Don't mind me. I'm just raging against the bandwagon. Linkthewindow  Talk  08:10, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    Which is why you're a cunt. :( -- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 09:07, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
  2. We haven't even had one 8 month term yet. Unneeded change -- boxy talk • teh rulz 09:57 10 January 2010 (BST)
  3. I thought the 8 month term was recently voted in? Why not wait till at least the end of a term? I see no drastic reason for change --C Whitty 14:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
  4. fuck you SA!----Starofdavid2.pngSexualharrisonStarofdavid2.png Boobs.gif 20:50, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
  5. As Box. =/ This is silly since we havent even hit eight months yet. -- Cheese 22:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    So what you're saying is you'd rather wait until we do have a bad 'op let in? k-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 22:33, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
  6. nay, because im a dick Ripf22 03:40, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
  7. Nay, because the person who brought the policy just wants to vote on getting rid of people more often. How about a policy on voting to get rid of SA every week? I'd be for that. --Funt Solo QT Scotland flag.JPG 05:30, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Policy_Discussion/ARE&oldid=1641912"