UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Katthew/2011-07-08 Promotion

Administration » Sysop Archives » Katthew » 2011-07-08 Promotion

This page is an archive of Katthew's Promotions candidacy, which was unsuccessful. If you wish to speak with this candidate, please use their Talk page.

Katthew

• Katthew (talk | contribs | UDWiki contribs | vndl data)

If we were going to Goonrush this, this is how it would be done. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 23:01, 8 July 2011 (BST)

Katthew was robbed in her original term. She obvious is an exemplary candidate in many respects and has demonstrated her leadership capabilities quite effectively. I say that it is time for her to serve out the full term she was elected for and continue to provide what the UD community needs: a strong female figure in a position of power. It should be no surpsie that the UDWiki is widely considered a circle-jerk, what with all the sysops being male… ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 23:10, 8 July 2011 (BST)

• Vouch – Katthew for Wiki Domination! ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 23:12, 8 July 2011 (BST)
• Abstain - Katthew has probably done more for UD as a whole than most people who have played the game, roping in over 2000 unsuspecting saps players and helping build a wider community. I have no knowledge of her abilities as a sysop, however.--Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 23:13, 8 July 2011 (BST)
• Against - No contribs in over a month. And that is just the surface look. -- Spiderzed█ 23:39, 8 July 2011 (BST)
• Against. In before tl:goonsig. As spidey pretty much and to an extent Yon. I think she even at some point said she would never accept/never had interest in op'ing this dump. ~ _{23:59, 8 July 2011 (UTC)}
• Vouch - I like her style and since so many of her ideas were incorporated into the game and she displays the capacity to make this wiki better I don't think there's another option unless you're tainted by bias. Also, if she can lead and organize a group as large as The Dead helping to straighten this wiki up would be child's play. The fact that she's going to elicit rage tears from certain Sysops is really just a bonus. Albeit an incredibly nice one. -- Goribus 00:42, 9 July 2011 (BST)
• Vouch - Katthew has bigger balls than me. And I do not have small balls. 00:43, 9 July 2011 (BST)
• Against - don't dislike Katthew, and she definitely has a place on this wiki. Just not really sure it's as an op. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 02:58, 9 July 2011 (BST)
• Against - Not active enough, and there is only one inactive person I would vote for and thats Hagnat!--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks ^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 04:11, 9 July 2011 (BST)
  • U can herp my derp --hagnat 19:32, 9 July 2011 (BST)
• Against as anime --User:Sexualharrison14:12, 9 July 2011 (bst)
• Against Too controversial, would likely prove to be a distraction for the wiki. --WilliamC 14:44, 9 July 2011 (BST)
• Against Inactive, pretty much never heard of her. --Crystal Roselle 16:26, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

  ^irony--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks ^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 18:30, 9 July 2011 (BST)

  C'mon, haven't you seen all those hundreds of edits? To her own userpage, sure, but gosh darn golly gee whiz she's active!!!!! --カシュー, ザ ゾンビ クィーン (ビープ ビープ) @ 04:08, 10 July 2011 (BST)

  Except one thing, I'm not running for sysop. Go back to your the Dead members and cry about it. --Crystal Roselle 7:44, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

• Against - I hate joke bids, so I'll cut to the chase: she's almost entirely unqualified for the position (her only qualification is that she's been around for awhile). I have no issues with her as a person, and actually enjoy reading quite a few of her comments, but in terms of being a sysop, no. Just no. —Aichon— 23:45, 10 July 2011 (BST)

  She was one of the original set. I think that more or less makes any points about her being qualified to do the job less reasonable. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 07:50, 11 July 2011 (BST)

  With a tonne of rules and precedents to come into place since them I'm definite that it's still a legitimate stance to take, though I don't think that personally. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 09:00, 11 July 2011 (BST)

  I don't see how her being part of the original set of sysops changes anything I said about her being unqualified. She lacks significant activity, hasn't shown a prior interest in maintaining the wiki anytime recently, and has yet to display a desire to be a sysop, despite her bid being up for quite awhile. If any of that seems less reasonable because she was part of the original sysop team, please let me know why. Otherwise, as I said, her only qualification is that she's been around for a long time. —Aichon— 09:33, 11 July 2011 (BST)

  Sorry, what? I need to "display a desire" to be a sysop? Could you please point me to the section in the vast, voluminous, endless book of worthless rules that says that I'm required to do this? Or is this one of those rules that's hidden in the top-secret No Girls Allowed section of the He-Man Woman Haters clubhouse? Because if not popping a big ol' stiffy over the prospect of becoming a sysop is grounds for disqualification, then y'all best be prepared that I'm going to ruin every fucking vote on this page until you assholes are singing and dancing and posting youtube videos about how much you want it. --カシュー, ザ ゾンビ クィーン (ビープ ビープ) @ 15:20, 11 July 2011 (BST)

  It's the 15th line of this very page, and please tell me you're bullshitting with all this woman bullshit. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 15:30, 11 July 2011 (BST)

  "Note that if a person is nominated by another user, the candidate in question should note their acceptance of the nomination." Despite the shitty grammar used there, it seems to say that all I need to do is accept the nomination - which I have. Do I have to write a fucking sonnet about it? I was nominated, I didn't say "fuck this noise", end of story. I shouldn't need to start cheerleading the fucking position, which seems to be what people are asking me to do. Oh, and seriously, Goddamn, your patriarchal tone is wearing a bit fucking thin. Sorry if your perfect life as a member of the privileged majority is being disrupted by occasional reminders that some of us aren't straight white men. --カシュー, ザ ゾンビ クィーン (ビープ ビープ) @ 15:45, 11 July 2011 (BST)

  I'm not taking sides on the first bit, I was just telling you where it was. And I do enjoy my penis now you mention it. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 15:52, 11 July 2011 (BST)

  Well that's good, because I doubt anyone else ever will. --カシュー, ザ ゾンビ クィーン (ビープ ビープ) @ 15:57, 11 July 2011 (BST)

  lold -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 16:00, 11 July 2011 (BST)

  Prior to the comment you made two hours ago, you had never once "noted" your acceptance of the position on this page, which is how you indicate your desire to be a sysop. Generally, I'd treat that as inactivity on the part of the candidate, but since you had replied elsewhere on the bid, I was treating it as apathy and a lack of interest. I'm happy to concede that point if you are indeed interested in having the position (I still agree with the old sentiment that you have to be messed up in the head to accept a nomination), but at the time of my initial comment, you hadn't yet indicated any interest in the position here. —Aichon— 17:18, 11 July 2011 (BST)

  One would normally assume that as she was posting in her nomination thread and hadn't said "Hell no!" that she was okay with it, so I don't see your argument at all. --Fjorn 18:17, 11 July 2011 (BST)

  I've already conceded the point. Any further bickering over it is pointless. —Aichon— 18:48, 11 July 2011 (BST)

• Vouch - just as qualified as the fucking stooges already running this piece of shit wiki 04:03, 11 July 2011 (BST)
• Vouch - Just seemed appropriate. --Lucero ^{Talk U!}
• Vouch - She is a better poster (editor?) than 99% of this wiki. Also, considering that sysops are supposed to be Trusted Users™, she most definitely qualifies. --DT^PK 04:27, 11 July 2011 (BST)
• Against - She's too confrontational.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 19:59, 11 July 2011 (BST)
• Vouch - im scared of being called a misogynist --Karloth Vois ^¯\(°_o)/¯ 01:06, 12 July 2011 (BST)
• Vouch - Sounds like fun! If she's as good at the wiki as she is at the game, e.g., making it better while destroying it at the same time, this should be good!--Akbar 02:03, 12 July 2011 (BST)
• Vouch - She should shake things up in a good way. Dissatisfaction with the wiki = desire to improve it. --Penguinpyro 19:35, 12 July 2011 (BST)
• Against - She is extremely rude, confrontational, and seems to think that everyone's against her because she's female, instead of because of her behavior. --^A_O^R_D^M_O^P_R^I _! ^T 21:46, 12 July 2011 (BST)
• Vouch - Is there a point in maintaining a status quo with respect to how this wiki is organized or even having an active wiki when the game itself hasn't been updated in nearly a year? --Uroguy^TMZ 00:35, 13 July 2011 (BST)
• Against - Ok, it is amazing, or at least I believe so, stupid as I am... Do you really want a person who insults anyone who does not agree with 'her' to be a sysop? Did you ask 'her' why does 'she' want to be a sysop and what would 'she' do as a sysop? You are aware 'she' is leading a group that has a goal to destroy the game this Wiki is dedicated to, right? And they are quite successful. Just do the math, how many players did we lose during the last 3-4 months? The third time they will do it. There won't be enough people who actually like this game to stop them. Bah... I typed much more, but deleted it. It would just cause additional drama and there is no need for that. Vote for 'her' and enjoy the results!--Johncleese 01:03, 13 July 2011 (BST)

  Whether you like Katthew or not, the number of players in the game increased when the dead came back (and moreso than just their own membership).--Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 01:42, 13 July 2011 (BST)

  • Actually not true Yonnua, once you subtract out the throw-away and zerg accounts. -Fallout11 11:41, 19 July 2011 (BST)

• Against - Nothing against her personally, but the exchange with Aichon above leads me to think that is not what we need in behavior from a sysop. --Zod Rhombus 20:26, 13 July 2011 (BST)
• Against - i tend to dislike/distrust people who argues that everybody is out to get them because they are part of a minority --hagnat 21:11, 13 July 2011 (BST)

  Some credit where credit is due. I *do* like katthew for what she has done for the game. But i simply can't trust her with them buttons and power to ban people and delete things in the wiki --hagnat 23:35, 15 July 2011 (BST)

• Against - As trustworthy and credible as a used condom--Rapture 05:13, 15 July 2011 (BST)

  I've never heard this particular idiom before, do tell me how a used condom lacks credibility and cannot be trusted, even though clearly it has managed to do the job it was created to do without fail, and is also an inanimate object incapable of speaking, let alone lying. --カシュー, ザ ゾンビ クィーン (ビープ ビープ) @ 22:45, 15 July 2011 (BST)

• Only contributes to the admin area for shit'n'giggles -- boxy 15:49, 15 July 2011 (BST)
• Vouch Nobody told me there'd be days like these. -- ™ & © Amazing, INC. All rights reserved. Replying constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service. 01:19, 19 July 2011 (BST)

  What, that's two (or three) votes I've been on opposite sides of Amazing? AND sided with Aichon for once? WTF?? Take THAT, 2006 wiki! --Zod Rhombus 23:59, 21 July 2011 (BST)

  You and I agree with each other all the time. Just not on the wiki. >_> —Aichon— 00:40, 22 July 2011 (BST)

• Against - Imminently untrustworthy. -Fallout11 11:39, 19 July 2011 (BST)
• Vouch - It's time to end the old boys club. You sexist fucks.--The Walking Dude 11:44, 19 July 2011 (BST)
• Against - Oh sweet Jesus, I haven't played UD in years, I come back to it, I browse the wiki for shits and giggles, and OH LOOK IT'S THIS AGAIN. It's like nobody ever remembers anything. Sure, let's make a known, banned-for-good-reason troll a sysop. What could possibly go wrong? It'll be just like the early days, only with fewer players! Second verse, same as the first... Slicer 15:57, 19 July 2011 (BST)

  Don't worry, nobody's forgotten.--Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 17:15, 19 July 2011 (BST)

  Forgot what?--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks ^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 18:03, 19 July 2011 (BST)

  You better not be meatpuppeting again, Yon. Fuckin bastard.--The Walking Dude 18:07, 19 July 2011 (BST)

• Against I think the team can go without a mentally challenged person as Katthew. Gotta solve those allmenarepigs issues first.-- Thadeous Oakley Talk 14:15, 23 July 2011 (BST)

  Knows how to use wiki code properly though. (This snarky comment works best if you've read the edit history) --Rosslessness 14:23, 23 July 2011 (BST)

  WIKI CODE POLICE HANDS IN THE AIR! After 3 years I still mess up on occasion, please don't go rough on me. While on the subject officer, is there any way how I view changes in the edit history in red again? -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 15:19, 23 July 2011 (BST)

  Nope. Pretty sure it's something to do with the CSS. -- Cheese 15:42, 23 July 2011 (BST)

  Change your skin settings from preferences. ~ _{22:54, 23 July 2011 (UTC)}

• Against - She sucks, but doesn't swallow, and i'm tired of that shit. Also she would totally be PMSing every other day, and want us to tell her she's pretty all the time. --Jerusalem 03:17, 28 July 2011 (BST)

After discussion with Rev, its been decided you don't have community support and the bid has been cycled as Unsuccessful. Thanks. --Rosslessness 08:32, 28 July 2011 (BST)

It's cool, I've gotten a lot of good ammo to use later on from the fucking outrageously sexist reactions of some (ie, most) of the sheltered and shitty little nerds on this wiki who are apparently threatened by the idea of a woman who isn't going to suck their cock just like in one of their special animes. Keep on exercising that privilege, you brave little nerds. --カシュー, ザ ゾンビ クィーン (ビープ ビープ) @ 21:58, 30 July 2011 (BST)

it has nothing to do with you being a women (which i still doubt) it's more of how much of a bitch you act like. deal with it. on a more positive note you have been nominated for several grimmies congratulations--User:Sexualharrison22:41, 30 July 2011 (bst)