User:DanceDanceRevolution/sandpit/quotepit: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(25 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{S|'''YES''' - speaking on behalf of the Rolt Heights Vigilante Patrol, Imperium of Man was one of our allies for a time, they were also an ally and member of the Dulston Alliance, they assisted with two defences of RHVP's HQ during zed insurgents and Garviel put some quite lucid comments and advice forward on the Dulston Alliance forums. I think as a group they had an impact, even if that impact resulted in the "Imperium must die" campaign and BTW their were many allies involved in that cafuffle and I would say it was a close run thing, but the DORIS bunch got a kickin' by many estimations. TBH that fire fight was largely won from the DA perspective because the majority of anti PK'er groups NE of Malton decided to attend to have a free for all, happily for IOM this was also the same time and place for their showdown. Anyhow it's historical now and therefore should be voted in that way.}} - Winner of the award for outstanding failure in the field of signing your vote is... anonymous! --[[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 01:38, 26 July 2008 (BST) | |||
---- | |||
==fail a/m== | |||
{{CallOut|I volunteer to be Arbitatortot. I am unbiased because I think both groups are full of faggots. I will not choose one faggot over another for I hate both you. I will, however, decide which faggot is less wrong and choose that one as the winner of the case. I would then prescribe the correct solution to solve this faggotry that ails your two groups.|[[User:Saromu|Sonny]] demanding to be [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Umbrella Biohazard Containment Service vs Umbrella Corporation|arbitrator]] to the [[UBCS]] and [[Umbrella Corporation]].}} | |||
===[[User:Boxy|Boxy]]=== | |||
[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Stop_Making_Stupid_Policies&curid=87216&diff=1177183&oldid=1177167 Closed this policy] prematurely, stating that it was "humorous" - despite my stated intent that I fully intended to have it get passed (or failed) and thus warned and/or banned as a result.<br />I am, and was, serious as a heart attack.<br />And come on: you know that a misconduct case is the logical - nay, ''required'' - next step in this entire farce. The past week has shown that the community is perfectly willing to throw up stupid misconduct cases, so adding one of my own is par for the course.--[[User:Jorm|Jorm]] 06:31, 5 June 2008 (BST) | |||
:"serious as a heart attack". Uhm, no: no, you're not. Heart attacks can kill: you're just being vaguely irritating. Try "serious as a zit", and you're pretty much there. --<span style="font-size:90%">[[User:Funt Solo|Funt Solo]]</span> <sup style="font-size:70%">[[Mod_Conspiracy|QT]]</sup> [[Image:Scotland flag.JPG|18px]] 14:14, 5 June 2008 (BST) | |||
---- | |||
{{CallOut|''Secondly, your report referred to a single zombie attacking a single building. Frankly, for an entire suburb, that isn't newsworthy (unless the zombie is 10 stories high and shits exploding unicorns).''|Funt Solo, explaining some newbie why his suburb news report was reverted. The newbie promptly replied with "People like you make wikis die". Class.}} | |||
==hagnat's 'english'== | |||
*"Kyle can cure AIDS with a hand on his back" | |||
*'''Vouch''' - DDR did a good job when he had sysop powers in the past. I still dont understand why he demoted self, but it doesnt matter... he cares for the wiki and will not abuse his powers, so there is no reason not to give him sysop powers again --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User_talk:Hagnat|[talk]]] [[wcdz|[wcdz]]]</sup> 21:30, 16 May 2009 (BST) | |||
:Captain Obvious says DDR never had sysop powers <tt>:P</tt> {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 03:26, 17 May 2009 (BST) | |||
::I must be smoking the same stuff that Hagnat is..because I could have sworn...[[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[AZM]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 06:46, 17 May 2009 (BST) | |||
:::Wow man, that was some crasy shit... ''* passes the joint to conn *'' i could even sworn that he was a crat one day... but i might be mistaking DDR with Gnome... anyway, both guys are goood, mkay? --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User_talk:Hagnat|[talk]]] [[wcdz|[wcdz]]]</sup> 02:34, 18 May 2009 (BST) | |||
==Sonny== | |||
[14:01] <@DanceDanceRevolution> i'm not arguing anything | |||
[14:01] <@DanceDanceRevolution> i'm just saying, in relation to deletions | |||
[14:01] <&Sonny> I don't care enough. Boxy removed a shitload of my groups from historical | |||
[14:01] <&Sonny> That's all I care about | |||
[14:01] <&Sonny> Everything I've touched has turned to gold, at least in my tenure | |||
[14:02] <&Sonny> I'm not letting some buttfucking faggot take it away because he's a faggot that likes dick up his ass | |||
[14:02] <&Sonny> shit's not how I roll | |||
==grim== | |||
[20:55] <&boxy> is grim aus? | |||
[20:55] <~DanceDanceRevolution> yeah dude | |||
[20:55] <~DanceDanceRevolution> sydney, i think | |||
[20:55] <&SA> No idea he was | |||
[20:56] <~DanceDanceRevolution> yeah | |||
[20:56] <&boxy> no... NOOOoo | |||
{{CallOut|I never watched the garbage man roll down my street and thought: "Wow, I'd like that job".|Zombie Lord, on his unaccepted A/PM bid}} | |||
==A/PM== | |||
===lol grim #2 bid=== | |||
*'''Against''' - Get the fuck out you lifeless diseased afterbirth. Seriously - how have you managed to avoid suicide this long? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:43, 12 July 2010 (BST) | |||
*'''Vouch''' I've heard of you Grim! Also, Why do you got to be a HUGE JERK to everyone cyberbob? Jesus Shut up dude everyone's getting tired of you ranting. I should take you to VB for your Abusive Comments you raging jerkaholic.--{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 05:45, 13 July 2010 (BST) | |||
*:You vouch Grim and then take a swipe at me for being a HUGE JERK? I don't think you know anything about Grim beyond the fact that he exists (I don't think I need to explain why that is a dumb basis on which to vouch someone for sysophood). {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:51, 13 July 2010 (BST) | |||
*::Well you don't have to cuss the poor guy out. If you don't like him, put'against' and leave it at that. He probabley has gone and commited suicide now. Jeez...--{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 06:03, 13 July 2010 (BST) | |||
*:::"Poor guy", lol. Grim's posting is such that any sympathy for his shitty existence IRL is quickly wiped out by his self-righteous tirades of LOOK AT ME I CAN WRITE LOTS OF WORDS AREN'T I GOOD AT ARGUING. As far as suicide goes, I certainly hope so but somehow I doubt it. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:08, 13 July 2010 (BST) | |||
===lol sa bid=== | |||
*'''Question''' What do you think you could bring to the team? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 13:10, 5 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
*:I'm active. Ba da pish!--[[¯\(°_o)/¯|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> ¯\(°_o)/</span>]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkTurquoise">¯</span>]] 13:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
*::I found that unfunny. '''Against''' --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
*:::<nowiki>:(</nowiki> --[[¯\(°_o)/¯|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> ¯\(°_o)/</span>]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkTurquoise">¯</span>]] 23:32, 5 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
===[[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/WOOT (2)|lol woot 90%+ support?]]=== | |||
Despite overwhelming popularity and support, I am inclined to '''Deny''' your request. Sorry, but you are such a model user we can't risk having you on the team making us admins look bad. Come back in a month or thirty. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 22:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I WILL SEE YOU IN MISCONDUCT ONCE I FEEL BETTER, THAT WAY WHATEVER I COME UP WITH TO SAY DOESN'T SOUND LIKE UTTER BULLSHIT, WHEN IT MIGHT BE.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 01:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
:: :| I had overwhelming support... you said it yourself. I don't see why I shouldn't be SysOps...--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 02:31, 11 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
{{ | ==why us crats are renegade== | ||
{{Quote|DCC| | |||
Why do you fuckheads keep re-electing these assholes to Crat positions when all you do is bitch about them doing their one and ONLY 'Crat job? Either shut the fuck up and vote them out or shut the fuck up. But nooooooooo Bob and Nubis would be too controversial as Crats. Coming from the 2 people Nubis wanted to promote it's amusing to say the least.}} | |||
It turned out DCC was just talking about himself (Nubis) the whole time. weird | |||
==well that'll show ya== | |||
===[[User:Nallan]]=== | |||
{{ | {{vndl|Nallan}} {{verdict|Vandalism|Warned}} | ||
{{ | |||
---- | For uploading the pornographic image [[Image:2cola100.jpeg]]. As not all the sysops have actually seen it, I only expect those who did to rule accordingly. It may have already been deleted but Nallan's intentions were clear and he should be warned as such. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|Chartreuse}}-- 15:12, 4 September 2009 (BST) | ||
{{ | :I think it would be a better idea to upload a copy to give those sysops who haven't seen it an opportunity to make up their own minds on it, rather than having to just take it on faith. =/ We've had these "pr0n images" discussions before and most of the time they usually are judged not to be. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 15:17, 4 September 2009 (BST) | ||
::Fair call. Problem is I don't have it, I would assume only Nallan has a copy. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|Chartreuse}}-- 15:49, 4 September 2009 (BST) | |||
:::<small>discussion and where to find this image moved to talk by overzealous sysop --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:44, 5 September 2009 (BST)</small> | |||
::Google "coke bottle inserted in girl" or "bottle-in-ass". Those should give you an idea.--{{User:Nubis/sig}} 19:32, 6 September 2009 (BST) | |||
'''Warned''' <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 04:27 5 September 2009 (BST)</small> |
Latest revision as of 06:53, 1 February 2020
Iscariot said: |
I invite you to explain why you are obeying these rules constitutes a difference with Cheese's rules explains the difference between what you're saying and precedence's example. |
YES - speaking on behalf of the Rolt Heights Vigilante Patrol, Imperium of Man was one of our allies for a time, they were also an ally and member of the Dulston Alliance, they assisted with two defences of RHVP's HQ during zed insurgents and Garviel put some quite lucid comments and advice forward on the Dulston Alliance forums. I think as a group they had an impact, even if that impact resulted in the "Imperium must die" campaign and BTW their were many allies involved in that cafuffle and I would say it was a close run thing, but the DORIS bunch got a kickin' by many estimations. TBH that fire fight was largely won from the DA perspective because the majority of anti PK'er groups NE of Malton decided to attend to have a free for all, happily for IOM this was also the same time and place for their showdown. Anyhow it's historical now and therefore should be voted in that way. - Winner of the award for outstanding failure in the field of signing your vote is... anonymous! --The Grimch U! E! 01:38, 26 July 2008 (BST)
fail a/m
I volunteer to be Arbitatortot. I am unbiased because I think both groups are full of faggots. I will not choose one faggot over another for I hate both you. I will, however, decide which faggot is less wrong and choose that one as the winner of the case. I would then prescribe the correct solution to solve this faggotry that ails your two groups.
- -- Sonny demanding to be arbitrator to the UBCS and Umbrella Corporation.
Boxy
Closed this policy prematurely, stating that it was "humorous" - despite my stated intent that I fully intended to have it get passed (or failed) and thus warned and/or banned as a result.
I am, and was, serious as a heart attack.
And come on: you know that a misconduct case is the logical - nay, required - next step in this entire farce. The past week has shown that the community is perfectly willing to throw up stupid misconduct cases, so adding one of my own is par for the course.--Jorm 06:31, 5 June 2008 (BST)
- "serious as a heart attack". Uhm, no: no, you're not. Heart attacks can kill: you're just being vaguely irritating. Try "serious as a zit", and you're pretty much there. --Funt Solo QT 14:14, 5 June 2008 (BST)
Secondly, your report referred to a single zombie attacking a single building. Frankly, for an entire suburb, that isn't newsworthy (unless the zombie is 10 stories high and shits exploding unicorns).
- -- Funt Solo, explaining some newbie why his suburb news report was reverted. The newbie promptly replied with "People like you make wikis die". Class.
hagnat's 'english'
- "Kyle can cure AIDS with a hand on his back"
- Vouch - DDR did a good job when he had sysop powers in the past. I still dont understand why he demoted self, but it doesnt matter... he cares for the wiki and will not abuse his powers, so there is no reason not to give him sysop powers again --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 21:30, 16 May 2009 (BST)
- Captain Obvious says DDR never had sysop powers :P Linkthewindow Talk 03:26, 17 May 2009 (BST)
- I must be smoking the same stuff that Hagnat is..because I could have sworn...Conndrakamod TAZM CFT 06:46, 17 May 2009 (BST)
- Wow man, that was some crasy shit... * passes the joint to conn * i could even sworn that he was a crat one day... but i might be mistaking DDR with Gnome... anyway, both guys are goood, mkay? --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 02:34, 18 May 2009 (BST)
- I must be smoking the same stuff that Hagnat is..because I could have sworn...Conndrakamod TAZM CFT 06:46, 17 May 2009 (BST)
Sonny
[14:01] <@DanceDanceRevolution> i'm not arguing anything
[14:01] <@DanceDanceRevolution> i'm just saying, in relation to deletions
[14:01] <&Sonny> I don't care enough. Boxy removed a shitload of my groups from historical
[14:01] <&Sonny> That's all I care about
[14:01] <&Sonny> Everything I've touched has turned to gold, at least in my tenure
[14:02] <&Sonny> I'm not letting some buttfucking faggot take it away because he's a faggot that likes dick up his ass
[14:02] <&Sonny> shit's not how I roll
grim
[20:55] <&boxy> is grim aus?
[20:55] <~DanceDanceRevolution> yeah dude
[20:55] <~DanceDanceRevolution> sydney, i think
[20:55] <&SA> No idea he was
[20:56] <~DanceDanceRevolution> yeah
[20:56] <&boxy> no... NOOOoo
I never watched the garbage man roll down my street and thought: "Wow, I'd like that job".
- -- Zombie Lord, on his unaccepted A/PM bid
A/PM
lol grim #2 bid
- Against - Get the fuck out you lifeless diseased afterbirth. Seriously - how have you managed to avoid suicide this long? Cyberbob Talk 12:43, 12 July 2010 (BST)
- Vouch I've heard of you Grim! Also, Why do you got to be a HUGE JERK to everyone cyberbob? Jesus Shut up dude everyone's getting tired of you ranting. I should take you to VB for your Abusive Comments you raging jerkaholic.-- Jerrel tlk (82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!). 05:45, 13 July 2010 (BST)
- You vouch Grim and then take a swipe at me for being a HUGE JERK? I don't think you know anything about Grim beyond the fact that he exists (I don't think I need to explain why that is a dumb basis on which to vouch someone for sysophood). Cyberbob Talk 05:51, 13 July 2010 (BST)
- Well you don't have to cuss the poor guy out. If you don't like him, put'against' and leave it at that. He probabley has gone and commited suicide now. Jeez...-- Jerrel tlk (82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!). 06:03, 13 July 2010 (BST)
- "Poor guy", lol. Grim's posting is such that any sympathy for his shitty existence IRL is quickly wiped out by his self-righteous tirades of LOOK AT ME I CAN WRITE LOTS OF WORDS AREN'T I GOOD AT ARGUING. As far as suicide goes, I certainly hope so but somehow I doubt it. Cyberbob Talk 06:08, 13 July 2010 (BST)
- Well you don't have to cuss the poor guy out. If you don't like him, put'against' and leave it at that. He probabley has gone and commited suicide now. Jeez...-- Jerrel tlk (82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!). 06:03, 13 July 2010 (BST)
- You vouch Grim and then take a swipe at me for being a HUGE JERK? I don't think you know anything about Grim beyond the fact that he exists (I don't think I need to explain why that is a dumb basis on which to vouch someone for sysophood). Cyberbob Talk 05:51, 13 July 2010 (BST)
lol sa bid
- Question What do you think you could bring to the team? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 13:10, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
lol woot 90%+ support?
Despite overwhelming popularity and support, I am inclined to Deny your request. Sorry, but you are such a model user we can't risk having you on the team making us admins look bad. Come back in a month or thirty. --
22:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- I WILL SEE YOU IN MISCONDUCT ONCE I FEEL BETTER, THAT WAY WHATEVER I COME UP WITH TO SAY DOESN'T SOUND LIKE UTTER BULLSHIT, WHEN IT MIGHT BE.-- SA 01:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- :| I had overwhelming support... you said it yourself. I don't see why I shouldn't be SysOps...--/~Rakuen~\Talk I Still Love Grim 02:31, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
why us crats are renegade
DCC said: |
Why do you fuckheads keep re-electing these assholes to Crat positions when all you do is bitch about them doing their one and ONLY 'Crat job? Either shut the fuck up and vote them out or shut the fuck up. But nooooooooo Bob and Nubis would be too controversial as Crats. Coming from the 2 people Nubis wanted to promote it's amusing to say the least. |
It turned out DCC was just talking about himself (Nubis) the whole time. weird
well that'll show ya
User:Nallan
Nallan (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Verdict | Vandalism |
---|---|
Action taken | Warned |
For uploading the pornographic image File:2cola100.jpeg. As not all the sysops have actually seen it, I only expect those who did to rule accordingly. It may have already been deleted but Nallan's intentions were clear and he should be warned as such. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 15:12, 4 September 2009 (BST)
- I think it would be a better idea to upload a copy to give those sysops who haven't seen it an opportunity to make up their own minds on it, rather than having to just take it on faith. =/ We've had these "pr0n images" discussions before and most of the time they usually are judged not to be. -- Cheese 15:17, 4 September 2009 (BST)