UDWiki:Administration/Protections/Archive/2011 06: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
JimJerusalem (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
:: Allright. I just hope he gave up by now. I seriously can't tell, nor do I know what his problem is (since he was the one who updated the page on a daily base before), so the situation here is a tad bit complicated. But since I have to keep the site up to date I would ask you to remove the protection for now. If he starts trolling again... well, I don't know what we could do except for kick him? If there is a possibility to change the page-status so only I can edit it, that would be good too (but I doubt that that's possible, right?). Otherwise: I really thank you for your quick help and will come back here, if I need it again. --[[User:JimJerusalem|JimJerusalem]] 16:37, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | :: Allright. I just hope he gave up by now. I seriously can't tell, nor do I know what his problem is (since he was the one who updated the page on a daily base before), so the situation here is a tad bit complicated. But since I have to keep the site up to date I would ask you to remove the protection for now. If he starts trolling again... well, I don't know what we could do except for kick him? If there is a possibility to change the page-status so only I can edit it, that would be good too (but I doubt that that's possible, right?). Otherwise: I really thank you for your quick help and will come back here, if I need it again. --[[User:JimJerusalem|JimJerusalem]] 16:37, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::Okay, unprotected. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 01:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC) | :::Okay, unprotected. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 01:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::: Thanks a lot again for your help. Good administration, keep up the good work. :) --[[User:JimJerusalem|JimJerusalem]] 06:50, 10 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
===Owned Pages=== | ===Owned Pages=== | ||
*[[User talk:Iscariot/PD/6]] | *[[User talk:Iscariot/PD/6]] |
Revision as of 06:50, 10 February 2010
This page is for the request of page protection within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to philosophical concerns, the ability to protect pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a protection from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.
Guidelines for Protection Requests
All Protection Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:
- A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility.
- A reason for protection. This should be short and to the point.
- A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.
Any protection request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.
Once the protection request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be reviewed by a member of the Sysop team, and action taken accordingly. Once action has been taken, the system operator will add a comment including a signed datestamp detailing his course of action, and the request will be moved into the Recent Actions queue, where it will remain for one week. After that week is up, it may be moved to the archive (see navigation box below). If the Protection has been granted, the system operator should place the tag {{protect}} on the page(s) that have been protected.
In the event of a system operator requesting a Protection, all the previous points will apply, excepting that a system operator other than the requestor shall review and take action on the request.
Pages in the Protection Queue may already be scheduled protections. For a list of scheduled protections, see here.
Protections Archive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Protection Queue
Requested Edits
Place pages requiring editing here.
Recent Actions
broforce
Broforce - it is the site of my little group. Today the user User:Slaanesh started blanking it and won't stop, although I asked him directly to (we live in the same apartment). I would ask a SysOp to kindly either put the site under protection or prevent the user User: Slaanesh from blanking it. Thanks a lot in advance. --JimJerusalem 19:15, 8 February 2010 (UTC) EDIT: moved the page for own protection now to BroForce with a big F in the middle, so we still have a page to present to possible new members until this matter has been cleared. --JimJerusalem 19:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Changed the page back, protected and turned the new page back into a redirect. Will unprotect once you've sorted things out with the other guy. -- RoosterDragon 22:26, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Allright. I just hope he gave up by now. I seriously can't tell, nor do I know what his problem is (since he was the one who updated the page on a daily base before), so the situation here is a tad bit complicated. But since I have to keep the site up to date I would ask you to remove the protection for now. If he starts trolling again... well, I don't know what we could do except for kick him? If there is a possibility to change the page-status so only I can edit it, that would be good too (but I doubt that that's possible, right?). Otherwise: I really thank you for your quick help and will come back here, if I need it again. --JimJerusalem 16:37, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, unprotected. -- 01:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Allright. I just hope he gave up by now. I seriously can't tell, nor do I know what his problem is (since he was the one who updated the page on a daily base before), so the situation here is a tad bit complicated. But since I have to keep the site up to date I would ask you to remove the protection for now. If he starts trolling again... well, I don't know what we could do except for kick him? If there is a possibility to change the page-status so only I can edit it, that would be good too (but I doubt that that's possible, right?). Otherwise: I really thank you for your quick help and will come back here, if I need it again. --JimJerusalem 16:37, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot again for your help. Good administration, keep up the good work. :) --JimJerusalem 06:50, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Owned Pages
- User talk:Iscariot/PD/6
- User talk:Iscariot/PD/7
- User talk:Iscariot/PD/8
- User talk:Iscariot/PD/9
- User talk:Iscariot/PD/10
-- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 17:29, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Five and a half hours after it's been done I'll note that DDR protected this. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 06:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Archives
- UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/January-2010
- UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2010 01
- UDWiki:Administration/Move Requests/Archive/Jan 2010
- UDWiki:Administration/Protections/2010/January
- UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2010 01 - Only after the final (Dirty Fridge) case has been ruled on.
-- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 04:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Protected all but A/VB. I'll move it down once the case concludes.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 05:19, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Boxy saw fit to protect the VB archive, but not do close this entry. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 17:29, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- If it's a hard decision, the ops disappear, I moved it to the new one anyway, as is often done. -- 00:55, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Boxy saw fit to protect the VB archive, but not do close this entry. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 17:29, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Protections Scheduling Queue
Protection Scheduling requests should be requested in the same general format as Deletions. Votes will occur in the same general manner, and like deletion scheduling requests will be voted on for two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. Valid votes are:
- Yea - Approval of Schedule Request
- Nay - Disapproval of Schedule Request
Note: The archive for Scheduled Protections can be found here.