UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations

Shortcut:
A/RE

Once a year, all sitting sysops will come up for re-evaluation by the community. The idea of this re-evaluation is to ensure that each sysop still has the trust of the community, which is vital for a sysop to have. This will give the community a chance to voice their opinions about how the sysops have been doing, and re-affirm or decline their trusted user status.

The idea of a sysop being a trusted user is a part of the guidelines for the general conduct of a sysop. The guidelines for the re-evaluation is the same as for being promoted to a sysop (which is reposted below), but with a few minor changes in wording.

Guidelines for System Operator Re-Evaluations

Once a year, on Urban Dead's birthday (July 3rd), all sysops will be subject to a community discussion. Sysops may also put themselves up for re-evaluation at any time (see below). All users are asked to comment on each candidate in question, ask questions of the candidate, and discuss the candidate's suitability for continuing to be a System Operator. This is not a vote. It is instead merely a request for comments from the wiki community. This will continue for two weeks, as all users get a chance to air their opinions on the candidate.

Once the two weeks are up, the Bureaucrats will review the community discussion and make a decision for each candidate based upon it. The user will be notified of the status of their re-evaluation, and will be retained in their position should it appear that the community is willing to continue to accept them as a System Operator. In the event that the decision is negative, then the sysop will be demoted back to regular user status, where after a month's time, the user can re-submit themself for promotion.

Before users voice their opinions on the candidate who wishes to continue their System Operator status, the following guidelines should be reviewed by the user:

General User Guidelines for System Operator Re-Evaluations

Before voicing their opinion on a candidate's re-evaluation bid, a user should consider some of the following questions:

• Has the candidate spent significant time within the community as a sysop?

We define this as the candidate having made at least one edit in the past 3 months. It is recommended that a user look over the the sysop activity check and last 500 edits to determine the level of activity of the candidate.

Note: The Truly Inactive Sysops policy dictates that a sysop who hasn't made an edit within four months is automatically demoted. Therefore, for a sysop to be re-evaluated, they need to have made an edit before that time-frame is up.

• Has the candidate maintained significant activity within the community?

We define this as at least 50 edits under the candidate's name since their last re-evaluation. It is recommended that a user look over the candidate's last 50 edits in order to get a feel for the activity of a candidate.

Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history used to be periodically purged on this wiki.

• Has the candidate expressed interest in maintaining the community?

We define this as clear evidence that the candidate is already performing maintenance tasks and continuing taking a leadership role on the wiki.

• Has the candidate expressed a desire to continue to be a System Operator?

We define this simply as indicating in the candidate's request their desire to continue to maintain the position.

• Is there an indication of trust in the candidate.

We define this as a minimum of three other users (preferably users with at least 200 edits under their name and at least one System Operator), willing to vouch for the candidate's suitability for the role.

If a candidate is highly exemplary in one guideline, a certain level of flexibility should be extended to the other guidelines. Other guidelines for qualifications may be used, these are just a few suggested things to consider before a user voices their opinion.

Re-Evaluations still open for discussion

Misanthropy

• Misanthropy (talk | contribs | UDWiki contribs | logs1 | logs2 | vndl data | sysop archive)

It's already overdue for a day, so it's time to kick it off. -- Spiderzed█ 20:47, 29 March 2012 (BST)

• Abstain - He is exactly one week out from demotion due to inactivity already, making re-eval mostly null. If he comes back before the week and wants to keep buttons I'll say yea or nay. I wonder if he planned it this way? I mean what are the odds. ~ _{21:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC)}

  Inactivity or not, RE needs to be held timely. Coincidence that it happens a week before forced demotion would occur. -- Spiderzed█ 21:15, 29 March 2012 (BST)

  Precise timing on A/RE has never been an issue in the past. It's usually willy-nilly to be honest. But that's not what I really meant. Whatever I say here will be null in one week's time. I can sing Misanthropy's praises or complain how he is never here any more and in a week, it won't really matter. ~ _{21:42, 29 March 2012 (UTC)}

  ^This. Wait a week. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 23:16, 29 March 2012 (BST)

• I'm going to be honest, I don't think I've ever seen Misanthropy make an edit. He seems to have been quite active and helpful in the past, but if he isn't going to be here I don't know if he should be on the team... --Shortround }.{ My Contributions 21:35, 29 March 2012 (BST)
• voouchie he has done lots for this wiki. and when he does make edits they are dooseys. and again shortround you have only been here for 3 months. sigh.--User:Sexualharrison23:03, 29 March 2012
• Vouch - Would be a good mentor for the nazi! --THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks ^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 01:19, 30 March 2012 (BST)
• against - I have a lot of respect for misanthopy after all that's passed but my anus is still as tight as ever and inactivity to this degree still can't be vouched for by me, even though I liked him when he's around. Sorry, mis D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 07:49, 30 March 2012 (BST)

  Oh really?

"TWO FINGERED SALUTE" Cornholioo knows best.

User:Generaloberst/s 13:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

• Luckily for me, Corn had very thin fingers. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:30, 31 March 2012 (BST)

Lmfao User:Generaloberst/s 13:49, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

• against - Inactive. It's also pretty dumb to vandalize a group page in the position of sysop. User:Generaloberst/s 13:38, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Remind me when this happened. 13:24, 3 April 2012 (BST)
    • When the Wotan's Templar page got deleted and you made a new one in a different jacket. User:Generaloberst/s 18:45, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
      • Read what you just said. 14:37, 4 April 2012 (BST)
• Against - If he's going to be demoted for inactivity in a week anyway, might as well just get it done with. -- Cheese 16:15, 31 March 2012 (BST)
• Against. That guy's a fucking dick. 13:24, 3 April 2012 (BST)
• Question - How active do you see yourself on UDWiki if we are to keep you as SysOps? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 13:27, 3 April 2012 (BST)
  • About as active as Oberst's sex life. 13:28, 3 April 2012 (BST)
    • Question 2 - Do you even want the buttons? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 13:29, 3 April 2012 (BST)
    • You heard the man Axe Hack, you should in steat ask that question to Mis' mom. Hehehe. Childish.. but lets say no one is perfect. User:Generaloberst/s 18:45, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
      • Nobody asked you. Learn to keep your mouth shut sometimes. Maybe people will like you more. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 13:42, 4 April 2012 (BST)
        • They won't. 14:37, 4 April 2012 (BST)
          • Do I care? User:Generaloberst/s 23:21, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
            • Yeeeeeeeeeeup --Karloth Vois ^¯\(°_o)/¯ 12:53, 6 April 2012 (BST)
• Question - if you want to be demoted (as you say) why don't you ban a random person for fun? Start with me! User:Generaloberst/s 18:45, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Does that count as a self-request? --^A_O^R_D^M_O^P_R^I _! ^T 21:24, 3 April 2012 (BST)
    • Yes ;) User:Generaloberst/s 23:21, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
• Against As Misanthropy. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 09:41, 6 April 2012 (BST)
• Vouch KEEP HIM TRAPPED HERE KTHX --Karloth Vois ^¯\(°_o)/¯ 12:52, 6 April 2012 (BST)

One week is up, demote him already, and remember to use gas. User:Generaloberst/s 14:23, 7 April 2012 (BST)

shut up D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:33, 8 April 2012 (BST)

Or what? User:Generaloberst/s 8:35, 8 April 2012 (BST)

Re-Evaluations still needing to be processed

There are currently no Re-Evaluations to be processed.

Recent Re-evaluations

There have been no recent re-evaluations

Archived Evaluations

• Complete list of Re-Evaluations Requests
• Successful Re-Evaluations Candidacies
• Unsuccessful Re-Evaluations Candidacies

Re-Evaluations Scheduling

User	Position	Last Contribution	Seat Available
A Helpful Little Gnome (Contribs)	Bureaucrat	2021-10-29	2021-12-01
DanceDanceRevolution (Contribs)	Bureaucrat	2021-10-28	2021-12-01
Rosslessness (Contribs)	Sysop	2024-06-10	N/A
Stelar (Contribs)	Sysop	2021-10-29	N/A

Total Sysops: 4 (excluding Kevan, LeakyBocks and Urbandead)

Last updated at: 03:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)