UDWiki:Administration/Protections/Archive/2011 06: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
==Protection Queue== | ==Protection Queue== | ||
<!--''Place pages requiring protecting here.''--> | <!--''Place pages requiring protecting here.''--> | ||
'' | ===[[Second Battle of Krinks]]=== | ||
I thought there might be a little edit war coming on this page, due to the drama surrounding the last one. I mentioned something to DDR '''[[here]]''' about keeping an eye on it,.... and not that long after, I've noticed '''[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Second_Battle_of_Krinks&action=history it's well on it's way again]. I'd like to possably see this page protected, pending the result of '''[[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Iscariot vs Cornholioo|this case]]''', to see if a neutral third party is assigned to the task, and if so, that we could possably learn from the case, and do so for this page as well. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 15:54, 11 April 2010 (BST) | |||
==Requested Edits== | ==Requested Edits== | ||
Revision as of 14:54, 11 April 2010
This page is for the request of page protection within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to philosophical concerns, the ability to protect pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a protection from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.
Guidelines for Protection Requests
All Protection Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:
- A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility.
- A reason for protection. This should be short and to the point.
- A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.
Any protection request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.
Once the protection request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be reviewed by a member of the Sysop team, and action taken accordingly. Once action has been taken, the system operator will add a comment including a signed datestamp detailing his course of action, and the request will be moved into the Recent Actions queue, where it will remain for one week. After that week is up, it may be moved to the archive (see navigation box below). If the Protection has been granted, the system operator should place the tag {{protect}} on the page(s) that have been protected.
In the event of a system operator requesting a Protection, all the previous points will apply, excepting that a system operator other than the requestor shall review and take action on the request.
Pages in the Protection Queue may already be scheduled protections. For a list of scheduled protections, see here.
|
Protections Archive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Protection Queue
Second Battle of Krinks
I thought there might be a little edit war coming on this page, due to the drama surrounding the last one. I mentioned something to DDR here about keeping an eye on it,.... and not that long after, I've noticed it's well on it's way again. I'd like to possably see this page protected, pending the result of this case, to see if a neutral third party is assigned to the task, and if so, that we could possably learn from the case, and do so for this page as well. -Poodle of DoomM! 
T 15:54, 11 April 2010 (BST)
Requested Edits
There are no protected pages that currently require editing.
Recent Actions
Scheduled?
If not, it should be.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 20:13, 8 April 2010 (BST)
- I seem to recall that there are actually dozens of suggestions which aren't protected. Anyway, protected it. —Aichon— 21:01, 8 April 2010 (BST)
Another talk page....
Who'd of thought I would have another one of these.... -Poodle of DoomM! T 04:14, 8 April 2010 (BST)
- Protected ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 04:56, 8 April 2010 (BST)
And another one...
This one to please... -Poodle of DoomM! T 04:16, 8 April 2010 (BST)
- Protected ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 04:56, 8 April 2010 (BST)
Talk:Viva la revolution
The main group page is already protected, and has been for a while. Correct me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't the talk page be as well?--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 01:41, 6 April 2010 (BST)
- Shockingly you are wrong. Colour me surprised. This page was protected to prevent a spate of page wiping a couple of years ago and never unprotected. There's no reason for it to still be protected and certainly no reason at all for the talk page to be locked. --
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 01:59, 6 April 2010 (BST)
Nah, no reason to see talk get protected too, main was only protected cause of vandalism. --
05:44, 6 April 2010 (BST)
Protections Scheduling Queue
Protection Scheduling requests should be requested in the same general format as Deletions. Votes will occur in the same general manner, and like deletion scheduling requests will be voted on for two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. Valid votes are:
- Yea - Approval of Schedule Request
- Nay - Disapproval of Schedule Request
Note: The archive for Scheduled Protections can be found here.
