Search results

__NOTOC__{{Shortcut|[[A/SA]]}}{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs}} ...the exception of the [[UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct/Archive|Misconduct archives]], which remain to be done.

:For the archive of general misconduct discussions, check the below archives. ==Individual Archives Reorganized==

...honestly think, cf, that making a heading of LOLZ and following it with 3 sysop warnings changes the tone of it at ''all''? Someone's hit pathetic lows =p ...e replied to your case against him, at 18:36, 24 October 2008 (BST) Cheese ruled vandalism, then at 02:20, 25 October 2008 (BST), 8 hours after the ruling h

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Boxy|2008-12-21 Misconduct|M|2008|Ruled Not}} ...e nature of the case (evident in a split decision) and the fact that Nubis ruled based on a "larger case", boxy was premature in issuing a warning.--{{User:

This is a discussion over the various administrative archives that pertain to sysops specifically and how we can try to get at least some The various archives suffer from a number of shared problems. Among them are:

...em going through the proper channels, then it is appropriate that they are ruled against on A/M, and if they make a habit of hampering other users use of th :well, you are the sysop with access to the misconduct archives... you can remove these trackers... it would be a start already. --[[User:H

...ugh I asked him directly to (we live in the same apartment). I would ask a SysOp to kindly either put the site under protection or prevent the user [[User: ===Archives===

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Boxy|2009-09-11 Misconduct|M|2009|Ruled Not}} .... By the wording of the policy a user could be warned on any pages where a sysop could demonstrate they had received the warning. Perhaps if the community t

*In the case that the parties don't agree on an Arbitrator, an uninvolved Sysop may nominate one. *There's a Sysop's review at the end of the ruling, just in case, and to apply any warns/ban

...sop Archives Breadcrumbs|DanceDanceRevolution|2011-05-29 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled}} ...([[Special:Log/block|log]]). Similar to this [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Spiderzed/2011-05-04 Misconduct|case]]. It was for a minute before I unbloc

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|BobHammero|2006-07-23 Misconduct|M|2006|Ruled Not}}

...le's Commissar Hagnat]] ^{[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]} 15:50, 31 December 2008 (UTC) ...le's Commissar Hagnat]] ^{[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]} 16:11, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Vantar|2007-11-16 Misconduct|M|2007|Ruled Not}} ...y out of the [[UDWiki:Administration/Move_Requests#Automatic_Sysop_Cycling|archives]] so it could be opened up for voting - despite the fact that it had been u

...sop Archives Breadcrumbs|DanceDanceRevolution|2009-11-14 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled Not}} ...escalation (that could lead to a user being banned incorrectly) because a sysop (and I quote DDR's edit summary) feels ''"like an asshole"'' in any way goo

===misonduct archives=== ...'s Commissar Hagnat]] ^{[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] - [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]} 16:04, 28 May 2008 (BST)

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Boxy|2007-12-07 Misconduct|M|2007|Ruled}} ...ning] him without either a chance at defense or input from the rest of the Sysop team.

...sop Archives Breadcrumbs|DanceDanceRevolution|2010-03-12 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled Not}} ...igger", the sysop DDR voted Vandalism. In the case against Misanthropy the sysop DDR voted not vandalism. This is a clear case of misconduct because instead

...o we need to say "successful" next to, e.g., [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Boxy|each of Boxy's promotions]]? {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 18:12, 13 March :::When 'crats ask for a demotion, it's oftentimes, but not always, to sysop. The majority will certainly be to user, however. If you have any suggestio

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Boxy|2009-11-15 Misconduct|M|2009|Ruled Not}} ...mate, and will most likely follow with an A/VB case of your own if this is ruled Not Misconduct. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:23,

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Boxy|2008-04-07 Misconduct|M|2008|Ruled Not}} '''Not misconduct'''. The ruling was with the power of a sysop. The comment was hardly out of bounds. And reporting a vandal case isn't a

...sop Archives Breadcrumbs|DanceDanceRevolution|2009-06-03 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled Not}} ...permaban vote, which means they have read the case to some extent, and not ruled. For that, you may say that you ruling is no longer out of line. But you ba

...sop Archives Breadcrumbs|DanceDanceRevolution|2009-11-29 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled Not}}

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Spiderzed|2011-05-04 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled}} :::Is good, I can only think of one other sysop to ever actually note their own misconduct and he was one of the original f

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Zombie slay3r|2007-09-19 Misconduct|M|2007|Ruled Not}} TO ANYBODY WHO IS NOT A SYSOP OR A DIRECT PARTICIPANT, USE THE TALK PAGE. ANY NON-RELEVANT COMMENT WILL B

::::Except it was kept there by sysop decision, and no voting was supposed to have been made on it. I notice none ...So, a sysop ruled no voting and it was staying there until he got another sysop's opinion. Then there's the fact that he "changed the text alittle bit", wh

...t this wouldn't be misconduct (obvs). Just because the submitter is a crat/sysop/prominant user (cbf looking up what it was at the time) doesn't mean cheese ...e this as a member it would be a VandalBan case but since he did this as a sysop it is Miscontribution.

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Spiderzed|2011-10-07 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled}} ...General|The General]] <sup>[[User Talk:The General|T]] [[Special:ListUsers/sysop|<span title="System Operator">Sys</span>]] [[Project_UnWelcome|<span title=

...sop Archives Breadcrumbs|DanceDanceRevolution|2009-12-16 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled Not}}

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Swiers|2009-09-09 Demotion|DM|2009|Inactivity}} I'd like to suggest that we let swiers demotion to be ruled through his re-evalatuion. Demotion through inactivity main goal is to remo

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Rosslessness|2011-05-02 Misconduct|M|Ruled|2011}}

===[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives|Sysop Archives]] courtesy message=== .... As such, there shouldn't be any interruption to your use of the existing archives, nor should any links break. Once a particular archive gets migrated to the

## if it's hard to find when a case was created/dismissed/ruled, use the first/last data available ...le's Commissar Hagnat]] ^{[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]} 00:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Boxy|2009-02-06 Misconduct|M|2009|Ruled Not}} ...dom member of the community complaining about about it. It was posted by a sysop that decided he wanted to ban him over it and then did so. If some random s

<pre>===[[User:Sysop]]=== ...eems to have deleted [[Example page|Bad Page]], but I can't find it in the Archives of either the Deletion or Speedy Deletion pages. The [[Special:Log|Logs]] s

...d mutilated it when they did. –[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] <sup>[[Special:Listusers/sysop|M]]•[[User talk:Xoid|T]]•<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://urba ...st current claims it seems that J3D's A/VD doesn't actually match the A/VB Archives. At least one inconsistency is that he was escalated at least twice in [[UD

...t of vandalism as the Guidelines state. Anyways I still want to hear other Sysop's POV on the issue before any ruling is made. --{{User:Matthewfarenheit/Sig ...[[UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct#Example of Misconduct Proceedings|This Sysop]] he was trying to be helpful but he went about part of it the wrong way. -

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Boxy|2008-06-06 Misconduct|M|2008|Ruled Not}} ...'s Commissar Hagnat]] ^{[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] - [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]} 19:49, 5 June 2008 (BST)

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Boxy|2009-10-09 Misconduct|M|2009|Ruled Not}} ...lly, Boxy should've deleted it, there's nothing in the rules sayign that a sysop MUST delete it. He could have chosen not to post there at all, or even to v

...hit that's cropped up. I personally have nothing against The Dead and as a sysop, I'm a bit hurt at being singled out just because I'm part of the bad guys. ...not matter squat to them. They are pretty much not going to care who is a sysop either. If an issue gets them involved enough that they feel enough need to

:::So that would mean every sysop who has touched A/VD would be demoted. Brilliant. --{{User:A Helpful Little ::::Every sysop whose touching of A/VD Iscariot disagrees with. Let's not paint him to be s

...gether which no longer serves a purpose, now that we have the [[A/SA|Sysop Archives]] coming together. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 22:47, 18 March 2013 (UTC) *[[:Category:Cases Ruled Misconduct]]

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Vista|2007-10-11 Misconduct|M|2007|Ruled Not}} ...negative, closed the door to an appropriate and proper ruling by any other sysop, and from this is where the misconduct stems.

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Aichon|2010-06-06 Misconduct|M|Ruled|2010}} I'm not one to jump the gun on sysop misconduct cases and the only reason I'm enforcing this over a ban so small

*Removed the no confidence vote stuff. This is a "sysop only" policy now. By not adding a no confidence section it cuts the bureauc ...le's Commissar Hagnat]] ^{[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]} 00:27, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

...ent he finds in the archives. Note that due to the nature of links to A/VB archives especially, some links may link to the wrong subsection of an archive page ...ased largely on A/VB archive precedent. ''(I've gone through the 2008-2020 archives so far; may try to go through the long 2006-2007 ones at a later point. —

...ponsible for keeping track of your history as the sysops are; In case of a sysop wrongly punishing you due to an outdated history, he might not be punished :I've just remembered that it was ruled [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Ban

...nt real life issue, so i won't be able to exercise my dictatorial job as a sysop function --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User_talk:Hagna ::: but if you want to, you can give me my sysop powers back and i'll try to work things out --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commis

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Rosslessness|2010-03-12 Misconduct|M|Ruled Not|2010}} ...is has more to do with personal dislike for Woot and favoritism for fellow sysop than outright racism. However, instead of simply giving Misanthropy a warni

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Spiderzed|2011-07-09 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled Not}} ...lanked or deleted (and I'm pretty sure it's deleted and not blanked). As a Sysop Spiderzed should know this, but went ahead and did things his way regardles

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Axe Hack|2011-02-03 Promotion|PM|2011|Successful}} Since [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Axe Hack/2010-10-14 Promotion|his last bid]], he has strongly shaped up in

:::It's official in the sense that 3 from a sysop can equal a vandal escalation. And considering not one of the actions that ::I just worked through all of the archives, and I didn't see any cases of Nallan getting V/B'd for it. :/ --<font face

...that involve sysop actions (deletion/moving etc.) where any ''dissenting'' sysop can weigh in? Almost all sysops are listed as arbitrators and they should b ...ink this will come up that often if at all,'' but I also want to avoid one sysop saying no, another one doing it anyway and a misconduct case to come up one

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Linkthewindow|2009-02-13 Promotion|PM|2009|Successful}} ...erforms a lot of maintenance tasks. Either way, I think he would be a good sysop and this nomination has been a long time coming. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig

...sop Archives Breadcrumbs|DanceDanceRevolution|2010-10-19 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled}}

...sop Archives Breadcrumbs|DanceDanceRevolution|2009-11-12 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled}} DDR is a sysop and is more than capable of understanding the process of scheduling deletio

...] seems to have deleted [[Bin]] and [[Test]], but I can't find them in the Archives of either the Deletion or Speedy Deletion pages. The [[Special:Log/delete|L ...letions according to policy. Therefore these were inappropriate deletions. Sysop has previously been [[UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct/Archive/Krazy_Monkey

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Boxy|2007-04-30 Misconduct|M|2007|Ruled Not}}

...sop Archives Breadcrumbs|DanceDanceRevolution|2009-11-30 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled}} ...he conclusion of this case, we shall accept at this point in time that any sysop must take the forged data as fact. [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?tit

...General|The General]] <sup>[[User Talk:The General|T]] [[Special:ListUsers/sysop|<span title="System Operator">Sys</span>]] [[Project_UnWelcome|<span title= ...issue before, is less than 90 days after his [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Misanthropy/2011-07-08 Promotion|promotion]], occurred on the main page, an

...liations, which while I do not think negatively affects his abilities of a sysop but does set the stage for personal bias. I am open to other suggestions ho ...d to tone down my "gang affiliations" and present myself as a new unbiased sysop. However, I completely understand his lack of trust. I would hope that my l

===[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Hagnat/2009-12-25 Promotion|UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Hagnat (4)]]== #'''Keep''' - close to vandalism but until ruled on it must be kept. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:54, 26 December

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Rosslessness|2011-05-06 Misconduct|M|Ruled Not|2011}} ...n the moral and legal high ground. but then again, corruption is sort of a sysop and crat hobby on this wiki, and whenever the goons show up tribalism goes

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Spiderzed|2011-05-06 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled Not}} ...n the moral and legal high ground. but then again, corruption is sort of a sysop and crat hobby on this wiki, and whenever the goons show up tribalism goes

...sop Archives Breadcrumbs|DanceDanceRevolution|2011-05-06 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled Not}} ...n the moral and legal high ground. but then again, corruption is sort of a sysop and crat hobby on this wiki, and whenever the goons show up tribalism goes

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Boxy|2011-05-06 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled Not}} ...n the moral and legal high ground. but then again, corruption is sort of a sysop and crat hobby on this wiki, and whenever the goons show up tribalism goes

...p Archives Breadcrumbs|A Helpful Little Gnome|2008-09-30 Misconduct|M|2008|Ruled Not}} As deletions are a sysop only power this is a misconduct rather than a vandalism case.

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Krazy Monkey|2006-08-08 Promotion|PM|2006|Unsuccessful}} ...uspicion. No, I don't care that you ruled in their favour, I care that you ruled in their favour without supplying logic beyond "the rules say so", which le

...hile like the guy personally, it seems he has trouble taking his role as a sysop more serious. The former example was handled on his talk page, but looks li ...rk, at least not me. This is about you not taking your responsibility as a sysop serious enough. (<don't take that personal). I have disagreed with you abou

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Rosslessness|2010-04-15 Bureaucrat Promotion|BP|2010}} ...disposal. As for attitude Have a look at my own votes on pretty much every sysop bid, or the projects I'm currently running. Basically I try to encourage mo

==Archives== Archives for this page are '''[[Category talk:Suggestions/Archives|here]]'''

...ponsible for keeping track of your history as the sysops are; In case of a sysop wrongly punishing you due to an outdated history, he might not be punished ::It's been ruled as vandalism. Thus anyone as a good editor can technically revert the vanda

...ponsible for keeping track of your history as the sysops are; In case of a sysop wrongly punishing you due to an outdated history, he might not be punished ...nned vandal and the other stuff). And if the infiltrator turns out to be a sysop that votes Not Vandalism here then that's just too sick for words. My guess

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Vapor|2011-01-05 Promotion|PM|2011|Successful}} ...eral months reviewing policy. Getting to know the wiki, the users, and the sysop team. As far as personal qualification, I'm a Database admin for the compan

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Axe Hack|2011-11-23 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled Not}} ...y merit a single escalation, as has always been the case on UDwiki. If the sysop team wanted to stretch the rules, they could have treated each case as a se

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Spiderzed|2011-11-23 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled Not}} ...y merit a single escalation, as has always been the case on UDwiki. If the sysop team wanted to stretch the rules, they could have treated each case as a se

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Seventythree|2008-02-27 Promotion|PM|2008|Successful}} ...ability to be impartial will be of great help when it comes to performing sysop duties. I don't want to get too involved in Vandal Banning at the start tho

:::::Become a sysop -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 04:21, 30 March 2011 (BST) ::::::[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Suicidalangel/2010-06-07 Demotion|Self-requested perma-ban in June 2010]].

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Zaruthustra|2006-04-12 Misconduct|M|2006|Ruled Not}}

...which is defined as ''If a user leaves a sysop a note '''on their (i.e the sysop's) talk page''' requesting deletion of a page that falls under Crit 7'' - w ...asked elsewhere, it should be given that leeway. Curbing the ability for a sysop to do what's asked of them without it going through the increasing levels o

...clearly interested. You know, ''serving the wiki community'', like being a sysop is supposed to be about. :) {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 22:27, 31 March 2011 (BST ...ant|chucks colossal shitties]], then creates [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Grim s/2010-07-05 Promotion|drama across multiple admin pages]] just incase

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Generaloberst|2012-03-14 Promotion|PM|2012|Unsuccessful}} ...trality], activity and my general knowledge. This wiki needs my input as a sysop. [[User:Generaloberst|Generaloberst]] 23:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Karek|2008-01-06 Promotion|PM|2008|Successful}} ...a solid member of the community, and I really do think you easily deserve SysOp status. I can't see any reason why not. --{{User:Dux Ducis/sig}} 07:49, 6 J

...f passed. At the moment the rule is enforced whenever and however whatever sysop that does so feels like, which ends up in some fairly disgusting displays o ...If this fails I will be bringing a Misconduct case against each and every sysop who issues any form of warning - soft or otherwise - to people for posting

...his talk page specifically threatens misconduct against any member of the sysop team who contacts him, which btw is against standards as it was determined ...rent in being a sysop, I will only accept current or former members of the sysop team as an arbitrator. [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]]

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|J3D|2008-07-13 Promotion|PM|2008|Unsuccessful}} ...becoming a more useful community member. My main motivations to becoming a sysop <strike>is to get my hands on the ban hammer!</strike> are to become more i

...t added, but I think that expressing our opinions on the wiki's owner as a Sysop may have some value. --[[User:Starplatinum|Starplatinum]] 07:47, 15 May 200 ...ssue. In any event Trust should not be a requirement for the majority of a sysop duties!--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 09:32, 15 May 2008 (BST)

:Done. Aren't you a sysop now, Karek? {{User:Swiers/Sig}} 19:42, 22 January 2008 (UTC) :No he didn't, I just [[#Crit_1_3|ruled]] and forgot to remove the template <small>-- [[User:Boxy|boxy]] <sup>[[Use

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Spiderzed|2012-09-12 Misconduct|M|2012|Ruled}} ...y to see user deleted content in response to a refused undeletion request. Sysop tools don't exist for the purpose of using them to help pick on and humilia

...up as arbitrator and i promise to perma-ban fishboy! Hmm.... think i just ruled myself out ;) --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 17:16, 12 September 20 ...to be the arbitrator in this matter. He's impartial and it's his wiki. He ruled on the [[UDWiki:Copyrights|policy]] that people choose to not follow, and s

...y merit a single escalation, as has always been the case on UDwiki. If the sysop team wanted to stretch the rules, they could have treated each case as a se ...the escalation system and no reason to do so. Likewise, the above case was ruled a ToS violation, and still there was no permaban. '''Revenant''' gives a fi

...:Hmmm - that's a separate argument, I think. Would you instead consider a sysop vote to be more reasonable? That question also to WanYao. --<span style="f ...rse, there are so many problems with that, too. Just the power to demote a sysop being the hands of 2 -- or 3 -- people is scary. The power to promote is on

...pell my way out of a paper bag. feel free to rename, move what ever u want sysop guy--{{User:Sexualharrison/sig}}<small>05:08, 28 June 2011 (bst)</small> ...m/akule misconduct case that put him and conn at odds for liek a year plus(ruled like wikigate). Even j3d's promotions bid where one of the 'crats said he d

...the wiki in order to prove a point. His action was an obvious abuse of his Sysop status despite any intentions he may had. --{{User:Matthewfarenheit/Signatu ...here, is he doing his job! There is nowhere in the guidelines that says a sysop can't do his job while serving ban-time, even if they are serving ban for m

...late, then it could just as much be an issue with the template as with any sysop. So while I agree that all sysops should be aware of the guidelines, I'm ju ...can be very prudish when it comes to porn images) that it isn't porno one sysop should be allowed to come through and delete it anyway. Undelete, let the i

...gee claim because CheckUser doesn't seem to be working for me. Can another Sysop confirm? For the time being, please don't continue to edit the page Matahas .... Normally we don't rule on this kind of stuff at all because it's not the sysop's job to rule on grey areas created by interpreting the danger zones, but h

::hm yase. sa is the wimp. ddr you are the bravest sysop evar~ {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 11:59, 29 November 2009 (UTC) ...statement consisting of "hm yase. sa is the wimp. ddr you are the bravest sysop evar~" is being serious, you need to learn more about the internet!--[[User

...t. Iscariot versus Boxy#Final Act: Arbitrator's ruling|The Arbies has been ruled upon]], can we get this reverted and unprotected, please <small>-- [[User:B ...le's Commissar Hagnat]] ^{[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]} 12:29, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

...rbob> That thing's had more votes on it than almost every other one in the archives'' ...a proposal. Deciding in such a manner would be an act of moderation, as a sysop he should be enforcing the will of the community, which in this case is cle

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Krazy Monkey|2008-02-11 Promotion|PM|2008|Successful}} ...y that you'll get an unbiased opinion from me over an issue. If I become a sysop, I'd stick to what I'm doing just now and help out on Speedy Deletions/Dele

:omg sysop bias jsut becuase he dosen't liek sirargo --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span sty ::::::lmao, just saw you unironically agree with Bob's joke about sysop bias. I'm not even close to being the "immature" one here - or anywhere els

...y merit a single escalation, as has always been the case on UDwiki. If the sysop team wanted to stretch the rules, they could have treated each case as a se ...the escalation system and no reason to do so. Likewise, the above case was ruled a ToS violation, and still there was no permaban. '''Revenant''' gives a fi

...ndal Data'' and protect it so only sops can edit it after vandal cases are ruled on. It would make a hell lot easier to see how many times a user was brough ...wo warnings - all im supposed to get is a 24h ban. That is noted because a sysop can be banned for a period of time different than the one specified in his

::Except that [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/A Helpful Little Gnome/2008-09-30 Misconduct|he]] [[UDWiki:Administration/S ...s ok to request off site deletions but more if it's ok to overrule another sysop without first going through the proper steps ''and'' to ignore the result o

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|BobHammero|2006-07-18 Misconduct|M|2006|Ruled Not}} :I should note that The Generals punishment for his actions arose because he ruled that an edit against him and another was vandalism and acted accordingly. I

...do this one a few times, so I can tell you now that his one's not getting ruled as vandalism. I personally don't believe it to be, strike or no strike, as ...n cases - and even when edits are reverted, the case isn't over until it's ruled on. 2/9 sysops ruling isn't really enough to close a case. {{User:Misanthro

...ow unbiased he is. The most worthless pile of shit ever to pretend to be a sysop. That's saying something.--[[User:The Walking Dude|The Walking Dude]] 07:19 # [[User:J3D|J3D]] - lost his sysop powers because of checkuser abuse --<small>[[User:Hagnat|hagnat]]</small> 0

...duct for doing what any user can do, and not abusing anything regarding my sysop abilities, and reporting what i feel are violations. And cyberbob should be ...Nali's not in a position to judge it as vandalism or not, as they're not a sysop. Even there, they say "accidentally", which means, doesn't it, that there

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|J3D|2008-12-17 Misconduct|M|2008|Ruled}} ...ing to this is a pathetic low even for you. Expressing his opinion isn't a sysop ability and we're not mods and ...radda radda radda. --{{User:Nubis/sig}}

...ponsible for keeping track of your history as the sysops are; In case of a sysop wrongly punishing you due to an outdated history, he might not be punished :::::No idea, really. It's very unlikely it was anyone on the sysop team as you originally thought. It definitely wasn't me. ~[[Image:Vsig.png|

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Aichon|2013-02-21 Misconduct|M|2013|Ruled Not}} ...evouring the wiki, there is honestly very little happening and very little sysop workload. Any vandalism could have been quickly repaired and the alts bann

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Karek|2013-02-21 Misconduct|M|2013|Ruled Not}} ...evouring the wiki, there is honestly very little happening and very little sysop workload. Any vandalism could have been quickly repaired and the alts bann

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Spiderzed|2013-02-21 Misconduct|M|2013|Ruled Not}} ...evouring the wiki, there is honestly very little happening and very little sysop workload. Any vandalism could have been quickly repaired and the alts bann

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Rosslessness|2013-02-21 Misconduct|M|2013|Ruled Not}} ...evouring the wiki, there is honestly very little happening and very little sysop workload. Any vandalism could have been quickly repaired and the alts bann

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Boxy|2013-02-21 Misconduct|M|2013|Ruled Not}} ...evouring the wiki, there is honestly very little happening and very little sysop workload. Any vandalism could have been quickly repaired and the alts bann

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Yonnua Koponen|2013-02-21 Misconduct|M|2013|Ruled Not}} ...evouring the wiki, there is honestly very little happening and very little sysop workload. Any vandalism could have been quickly repaired and the alts bann

...tly what Conndraka has said he will do is a gross abuse of his powers as a SysOp. That's the problem, I find the name bothering, I also find the racial slur ...e. Regardless of who it is aimed at, the name is vulgar and offensive. You ruled not vandalism only to give shit to Conndraka, rather than look at the words

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|A Helpful Little Gnome|2007-11-05 Promotion|PM|2007|Unsuccessfu ...see in him. He makes a good user, but i do not believe he will make a good sysop without a radical personality shift. --[[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Pr

...sp of the administration proceedures. I don't know anyone who has become a SysOp with at least 800 edits. It would cut down the number of rejected candidate {{Quote|[[Wikipedia:Jimmy Wales]]| I just wanted to say that becoming a sysop is *not a big deal*.

...ponsible for keeping track of your history as the sysops are; In case of a sysop wrongly punishing you due to an outdated history, he might not be punished This is not something that can be ruled with Vandalism. Making a page that belongs/belonged to another group, with

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|J3D|2008-11-04 Promotion|PM|2008|Successful}} ...t to know anymore i suggest you read over my [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/J3D/2008-07-13 Promotion|old bid]], i went into a few lengthly speels there

...e is not a member of this group so, no, he has NO RIGHT to edit it. Will a sysop please rule on this??? ...ah. Perhaps just asking him instead of calling him a jackass? Anyway, is a sysop going to do something about this before it gets archived? {{User:Linkthewin

You ask a sysop direct, you send someone to the offical IRC channel.... and you still have I need clarification by another sysop on [[:Image:BONERTAG.JPG|this image]]. I'm all for paint-drawn penises, but

'''Sysop''' - Speedily Deleted--''[[User:Gage|Gage]]'' 02:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC) ===[[Survey Archives]]===

...o all the people you named. Also, if this is the most use you can do as a sysop, I suggest you examine your status and consider stepping down. --<span styl ...'s Commissar Hagnat]] ^{[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] - [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]} 14:06, 28 May 2008 (BST)

...ponsible for keeping track of your history as the sysops are; In case of a sysop wrongly punishing you due to an outdated history, he might not be punished ...t was at the top of my screen (telling me to e-mail you since you were the sysop who banned me, i guess), otherwise, i would have accepted the ban & not exp

Then there was a whole succession of sysop posts on that page over Katthew being de-escalated when there were no recor #One month must have passed since the edit that was ruled vandalism

...ping new users out, repairing accidental stuff and just generaly perfoming sysop stuff.--{{User:Seventythree/Sig}} 09:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC) ...gh these A/VB cases are obviously ridiculous and will stand as such in the archives so I'm done here for now. --[[User:Riseabove|Riseabove]] 03:47, 28 February

...eem to follow the spirit of policy -- because there was no wilful abuse of sysop powers going down. But on the other hand... it really made a mess... Good l ...or ordinary users. A minor hiccup, brought on by only discussing it in the sysop discussion area :-/ <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</sp

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Boxy|2009-06-09 Misconduct|M|2009|Ruled}} ...ooks because no one was around to witness it. Boxy, abused his powers as a sysop to remove groups from historical status. --[[User:Saromu|Sonny Corleone]] <

...y merit a single escalation, as has always been the case on UDwiki. If the sysop team wanted to stretch the rules, they could have treated each case as a se ...the escalation system and no reason to do so. Likewise, the above case was ruled a ToS violation, and still there was no permaban. '''Revenant''' gives a fi

...le's Commissar Hagnat]] ^{[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]} 17:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC) ...to stop you short of arbitration. The A/VB case in question was simple and ruled incorrectly, flame/A/VB bait or not, this group is entitled to have this pa

...s been [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_01#Sexylegsread|ruled vandalism in the past]], so chances are a case exploiting a loophole would ...[[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_02#WOOT|Spamming]] was ruled vandalism last month. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 03:04, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

...le's Commissar Hagnat]] ^{[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]} 12:27, 9 January 2009 (UTC) ...groups could say whatever they wanted on their subpages. Shouldn't that be ruled vandalism then, since it was clearly edits to a group page that said user w

:Also [[The sysop who deletes this article will be cursed to die in 11 days|this page]]. --[[ ...lor:Blue">Random</span>]][[UDWiki:Administration|<span style="color:Green">SysOp?</span>]]</sup></small></s> - <small>Vandalism struck, actually posted by [

...ly, the fact he addressed TZH has zero to do with anything- would you have ruled not vandalism if they weren't mentioned, despite the fact that his intent w ...didn't do vandalism in [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Prohibit Sysop Fraud|this]] because he didn't specifically mention Boxy's name? --{{User:D

..., say, what Cyberbob has done on A/DM before [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Linkthewindow/2009-11-24 Demotion|here]]. ...was the last time any of you ever really took a look through the Demotion archives? And would a single image really be ''that'' annoying? Use your heads and s

...a majority of their edits have come from the same IP. This is a breach of sysop trust, yada yada, but not technically a problem if the power of multiple ac ...ent people with the access to the one account, Nubis has been in breach of sysop conduct by allowing other unqualified users use his account. --{{User:Dance

==Archives== [[Category talk:Suggestions/Archives|Archives]]

...with punishing that person or liked them just as little as the person who ruled on the case, sometimes even because they brought up the arb case.--<small>[ ...Sysop involvement in arbitrator you don't agree with. Is it Conndraka as a Sysop offering his services as an Arbitrator? Is it Sysops having to process arbi

...le's Commissar Hagnat]] ^{[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]} 01:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC) ...re on the 6th of jan..why is this happening? I, for one, blame the current sysop team ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

...erful job. We will only gain something with this policy in the advent of a sysop who antagonize with any of them be promoted to crat; --{{User:Hagnat/sig}} ...st accusations of there not being a consensus available for such things as sysop promotions. --<span style="font-size:90%">[[User:Funt Solo|Funt Solo]]</spa

...I feel like my talk page is growing too long. This is the first of my talk archives not defined by set timespans.''' ...at you removed a sysops ruling. Could you please leave a note that said Op ruled one way or another? I thought I was seeing things when I suddenly noticed H

...riable width (a %) rather then a fixed width (currently 600px). But only a Sysop can do that at the moment since the template is protected. - <span style="f ...t is normal users wouldn't be able to update current news. And I doubt any sysop is going to want to edit for people.--{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 2

...le's Commissar Hagnat]] ^{[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]} 02:46, 21 December 2008 (UTC) ...does not mean when the requested was entered, it's when the the protecting sysop looks at the A/P page. But good luck in trying to rewrite the language I kn

This is the archive for [[UDWiki:Administration/Discussion|Sysop Discussion]]. ...d by the tending sysop can only be placed on the deletion queue by another sysop. This is in order to prevent meat puppeting deletions or vandalism by proxy

:Ninety days is a long time to not do anything. I figure even if a sysop was busy in their personal life, they could spare five minutes come on and :Anything that a sysop can do, in which a normal user cannot or should not. Such as ruling on Vand

...i_talk:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Community_Sysop_Demotion|Community Sysop Demotion policy]]. The rule in question is impersonation. You can see that ...usions"? Which conclusions did he want people to draw, and shouldn't he, a sysop, know these rules better than anyone? --{{User:Akule/sig}} 22:45, 21 July 2

::::If by "harmless fun" you mean how the Sysop's overall reputation is being spoiled by actions such as this, I clap my ha ...see someone coming back through the proper channels after a permaban, with Sysop's sponsorship. This would be a true way to express a change in the administ

...our oppinion, and there's still your talk page's custom title. It has been ruled that it is against the policy and I personally agree with the ruling. Proba ...is so that people can inform a sysop of a vandal that needs banning. If a sysop is already aware of the vandal and has already banned them, there's no real

...ou have something to say" guideline repeatedly. Remember: Unless you are a sysop you cannot rule on any administrative cases. --[[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] < ...ck the bottom of this page for an example of a blatantly unfair case being ruled against me despite no crime being committed. Case in point. --[[User:Grim_s

...continuation of [[#Sterling Wolf Sucks|this guys work]] (and others in the archives) -- [[User:Boxy|boxy]] <sup>[[User_talk:boxy|T]] [[Location Nuts|Nuts]] [ht ...on, are my eyes working correctly? Did you just see that same thing being ruled not vandalism and then being reported a second time 3 minutes later? This i

Just blank the pages, leave a note on a sysop page so they are a scheduled deletion. Then we can destroy them without a p ...le's userpages as Crit 6 (even though recreations of this nature have been ruled legal in the past)? Dream on. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 10:35, 21 April 2010

Sure, I'll support you to be a sysop -- [[User:Rick Best|Rick Best]] 11:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC) ...times the charm, your promotion bid has been successful and you are now a sysop. Congrats - [[User:Vantar|Vantar]] 10:58, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Seventythree/2008-02-27 Promotion|Although I agree, let's not get ahead of ...complaining about not listening to the will of the people BS. Now as each sysop looks at the case they can make their own opinion and likely share the same

...our oppinion, and there's still your talk page's custom title. It has been ruled that it is against the policy and I personally agree with the ruling. Proba ...is so that people can inform a sysop of a vandal that needs banning. If a sysop is already aware of the vandal and has already banned them, there's no real

...our oppinion, and there's still your talk page's custom title. It has been ruled that it is against the policy and I personally agree with the ruling. Proba ...is so that people can inform a sysop of a vandal that needs banning. If a sysop is already aware of the vandal and has already banned them, there's no real

:A bid is still filed in the archives even if it doesn't get three vouches, you know. You're being incredibly nai ...w that I was talking TO bob but not about BOB. Didn't realize that indents ruled over content.--[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggesti

...our oppinion, and there's still your talk page's custom title. It has been ruled that it is against the policy and I personally agree with the ruling. Proba ...is so that people can inform a sysop of a vandal that needs banning. If a sysop is already aware of the vandal and has already banned them, there's no real

...rrent state when the protections request is reviewed. There is no abuse of sysop powers here. Go start an arbitration case disputing Boxy's edit, until that ::::::::::And of course, you interpret it wrong. It depends on BOTH. If a sysop feels it's in the communities best interest to do something differently tha

::while an arbitration on this case (if one is ever created) is not ruled, i think it would be better to keep J3d comments in [[Dakerstown]]. If the ...e; but if that edit is reverted, I'll leave it like that until I can get a sysop or another user to confirm for me that it's not vandalism to make the edit

...page limit is reached or bordered parts of this page will dissappear into archives, not by choice but by necessity for it to still be useable.''</small></font ...ss' page, I'm not really leaving, just thinking heavily lately on dropping sysop duties. I'll elaborate more when its time. ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapo

...its not even an implication its an outright statement that not doing as a sysop asks is Bad Faith, hence vandalism and hence worthy of a ban! I objected to ...port I am allowed to continue further discussion on the main page with any sysop on the case and the user accused of vandalism. Are we making up rules and t

...ad#Administration|vandalism]]. --<small>—The preceding [[Special:Listusers/sysop|signed]] comment was added by [[User:Hagnat|Hagnat]] ([[User talk:Hagnat|ta ...make me regret this decision. --<small>—The preceding [[Special:Listusers/sysop|signed]] comment was added by [[User:Hagnat|Hagnat]] ([[User talk:Hagnat|ta

...m. And MisterGame, pure class on your part. You really show what being a sysop is all about. So, in an effort to make you feel better about yourselves, I ...iki talk:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2011 04#User:Sykic|^{Non sysop comment moved to talk page}]]

#::Well obviously that's how it works around here now, it's so nice of the sysop izumi voters showing me the way so I could make the right vote finally. --< ...ation being defused, Boxy came in and ruled it vandalism without any other sysop input. It's not surprising however, since [[User_talk:Boxy/Moderation/2007#

...ponsible for keeping track of your history as the sysops are; In case of a sysop wrongly punishing you due to an outdated history, he might not be punished ...General|The General]] <sup>[[User Talk:The General|T]] [[Special:ListUsers/sysop|<span title="System Operator">Sys</span>]] [[Project_UnWelcome|<span title=

Kooks still needs a sysop vouch, unless you're vouching for him. {{User:Nalikill/Sig}} 23:41, 1 Janua ...ned for talk page comment editing? I was looking for a case of that in the archives and must have missed it. - [[User:Vantar|Vantar]] 07:24, 17 December 2007 (

:Something similar came up during [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/J3D/2008-11-04 Promotion|'''J3D's promotion.''']] I believe Boxy phrased it ...u contact Link since he (seemingly) ruled in [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/The General/2009-08-20 Re-Evaluation|The General]]'s successful re-evaluati

For removing the sysop and bureaucrat status of every other sysop to prevent a ruling against him in another case <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span ...ince banned himself. I suggest the scale of this abuse deserves removal of sysop status altogether <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span

:I ruled, you're not gonna like it.--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="M ...the one option left and with Grim being less active I seem to be the only Sysop left who will actually speak out against the popular clique.--<small>[[User

...ponsible for keeping track of your history as the sysops are; In case of a sysop wrongly punishing you due to an outdated history, he might not be punished ...ting out annoying sigs like yours, from their own page, that has ever been ruled vandalism. Go fetch one, please, or stop asserting that you have precedent.

:::It's not the using of them, it's that they now link to the sysop teams' pages so as to provide an instant contact list. {{User:Misanthropy/S :::::Third-newest sysop here. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 04:54, 9 June 2010 (BST)

**Double warning for two separate vandal cases ruled at the same time. ...eyBones.2C_User:Killbottom.2C_and_User:Kid_sinister|discussion with Ruling SysOp.]]04:10, 11 May 2008 (BST)

I can't help but notice that discussion was cycled to archives pretty much immediately after I typed it. I think I annoyed someone --[[Use ...lso be removed the same way as Sysops are. A user can be a Moderator and a Sysop at the same time.

...'s Commissar Hagnat]] ^{[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] - [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]} 22:53, 29 May 2008 (BST) ...'s Commissar Hagnat]] ^{[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] - [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]} 23:37, 29 May 2008 (BST)

{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Amazing|2006-04-07 Misconduct|M|2006|Ruled}}

...like to point out that there are still a number of cases which need to be ruled upon. Well thats all I'm going to bother you about this topic any more. I'l :::No, it was all very pertinent. But the moderator had already ruled it not vandalism, so any further discussion should be held on someone's tal

== Archives == ...two worlds...the Outer World, out on the streets. The zombies have always ruled out here, since day one. Then there's the Inner World, the interiors of bui

...or Crit 5s, but so far in 2010 (and based on my quick skimming through the archives), just one shy of half the Crit 5s have been submitted by sysops, and if we ...our ideals but also the practical application to the extended powers of a sysop: if it doesn't harm anybody, it's barely used and it removes red tape, then

...So_you_want_to_be_a_sysop%3F|Aichon,]] [[Help:The NOT so secret diary of a sysop|Ross and DDR]]. Good luck.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 09:54, 13 Congratulations (NAME). Now prove how terrible thad is as a sysop. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:56, 13 April 2011 (BST)

...ages' ban is ridiculous as it prevents participation in policy debates and sysop and crat elections. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 20:54, 12 April 2010 (BS ...s ago. If you let me know which image(s) in particular I'll check my image archives and see if I can use the original file names to find out for you. -- {{User

...ponsible for keeping track of your history as the sysops are; In case of a sysop wrongly punishing you due to an outdated history, they might not be punishe I'd like the sysop team's thoughts on how we will designate Pisket's account. I don't think it

...It met the initial criteria, it had 3 speedy deletes, and there was a 2nd sysop/Crat that would have deleted them himself. The only keep votes weren't base :::::::If there's a sysop around the page could get canned right away and it'd be within the rules, s

It have been now 2.5 months since [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Axe Hack/2010-10-14 Promotion|your last bid]]. I think you have strongly sh ...tion marks. I'm sure Ross and DDR will be by soon to drop links to the two sysop guides, though I'm sure you've already read them. Welcome on board, bro. {{

...ack of experience at sysop tasks (well, that would be becasue you're not a sysop) failing to get involved in drama (that's actualy a good point. I noticed s ::From what Vista tells me and what I can see, a sysop is just an uber janitor. I clean up stuff, fix things and try to help out.

::Heh, well Grim is the most controversial sysop these days. Yeah, I was a former witch, I try to keep it on the low down th ...'re up for execution. I was going to write a bit about you becoming a non-sysop, but I wasn't on the wiki at the time so I don't know how that went down.

...impersonating" a nonexistant user in your friend's page... that may not be ruled as bad faith, or start some drama like "oh no, but my friend allowed me, it [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Matthewfarenheit/2007-06-02 Promotion|Congratulations]] on your promotion -

...ber. Also i can't remember if that loophole was closed...i'll go check the archives.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:44, 29 May 2008 (BST) ...arbitrator and it seems that Jon took him to A/M over the issue and it was ruled non-misconduct. Anyone know if the hole was patched? While i'm here i might

...e at some point in the future. It's not like I would do something bad with Sysop status =P. --{{User:Matthewfarenheit/Signature}} 16:36, 2 June 2007 (BST) ...oil is terrain, and terrain is path... my path towards [[Special:Listusers/sysop|enlightment]]. --{{User:Matthewfarenheit/Signature}} 20:41, 2 June 2007 (BS

...aybe two or three entries is stupid; how about archiving in quarter-yearly archives? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:45, 16 January 2010 (UTC) ...ust take some ballpark estimations and say that half the cases on A/VB are ruled Vandalism and that half of those people will come back later and request a

...e a change to get my morning coffee... well congrats and long live the new sysop. ...rpose is to let people learn about wiki editing and etc. Learning how your sysop powers work qualifies under that as well, If somebody gives you troubles ju

...does not seem to be any question here. Either you didn't read the case and ruled which is essentially the same as if you did read the case and just decided It seems clear that the wiki community values your contribution as sysop. Do you want to remain in the position? If so, confirmation of your status

...page gets too big templates start breaking, so stuff needs to get moved to archives. Or something like that. --{{User:Pdeq/sig}} 08:07, 7 May 2008 (BST) ...lly considering people have had problems with that rule in the past but no sysop removed it.--<small>[[User:Karek|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">

::::Oh no, he probably is just an average guy. I say we nominate him for sysop.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 22:11, 24 July 2010 (BST) .../Archive/2010 06#User:Misanthropy|Here]] and [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Saromu/2010-06-08 Promotion|here]] would be your precedent. {{User:Misanthr

...re from the time of the [[CoL]]. Once the biggest fire fighter group. They ruled Barhahville until they slipped out of existence. If you never heard of them ...finitely. Sad to see them go. –[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] <sup>[[Special:Listusers/sysop|M]]•[[User talk:Xoid|T]]•<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://urba

...e to take a dare, I'll make a bet with you. Now, you've made a pretty good sysop, boy, but give a layman his due. I bet a [[:Template:Golden Fiddle|fiddle o ...ir preference in their vote. I could see how it might be beneficial when a sysop drops after receiving some votes but man that would be a real pain in the a

...usands of users every day(this user statement coming from the Taipei Times archives). Someone in Taiwan coulda bumped into the Urban Dead site by accident and ...uld a user learn that this was inapproriate without digging through the VB Archives? --[[User:Max Grivas|Max Grivas]] <sup>[[Josephine's Generals|JG]],[[User t

...moved off Tapton's listing, I do not see anything in the historical groups archives, not even in the pre-voting era. I also see nothing in the suburb group li ...ey are. As for salutations, HI!!!!! When can we suck you back into being a sysop? I need you and DDR back. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 03:06, 27 August 2012 (

Since I wasn't sure if you had seen [[User:Aichon/Other/So you want to be a sysop?|this]] yet and I was fishing for comments or suggestions. Plus, I figure t ...r Schwan". On the topic of what you'd have to do, I already tried to get a sysop consensus on banning, but nobody else paid me any attention. Take it to [[A

Hello, I am the Don of all Malton. Well, more like Chudleyton but all will be ruled by the Don and Cosa Nostra. :) We are small obviously but want to have alli ...for "users" who don't exist, they qualify as a scheduled deletion, and any sysop can delete them on sight. I'll hit the ones that clearly weren't touched af

::::Hm, thought you were referring to sysop actions. I think that most people should probably not be allowed to remove ::::Hm, thought you were referring to sysop actions. I think that most people should probably not be allowed to remove