UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2008 09

e Vandal Banning Archive

2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

September 2008

User:Lemonhater and User:The Quiet One

Lemonhater (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) The_Quiet_One (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

[1] The Quiet One edited my User Page

User_talk:The_Quiet_One

I asked The Quiet One why he did it, and saw a puppet named "Lemonhater" had deleted an unrelated comment by someone else...odd.

http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Quiet_One&diff=1267038&oldid=1267036

User:Jimjameson

Jimjameson (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Messed with the Streltsy group page. Permabanned as a result. -- Cheese 09:03, 2 September 2008 (BST)

User:Soldier

Soldier (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Impersonation. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor

It's a whacky way to organize comments on his talk page. He didn't alter the content of your post so it's not vandalism. It might be good to suggest a posting guideline for the page, though. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 22:07, 2 September 2008 (BST)

Is removing my signature, thus leaving doubt as to who posted it not impersonation? He has altered my post and now it is unclear who wrote it. Surely vandalism? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 22:13, 2 September 2008 (BST)

Did you read the header? --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 22:14, 2 September 2008 (BST)

I did, ran into a conflict whilst making the following point. Precedent on A/VB clearly show that altering the heading of another, even on a talk page, for any reason, is an act of vandalism. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 22:17, 2 September 2008 (BST)

No, changing a header without good reason, make a fool of or anything that is clearly bad faith is. Otherwise I'd have to warn Grim for this. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 22:21, 2 September 2008 (BST)

Precedent case in question. Please note the ruling sysop's direct quote; "You can't edit someone else's comment. Adding that image made it seem like the original poster made that headline a link to that image.". Please note, no disclaimer for good faith or organising.

Swiers responds with "a lot of users change the headers that discussions get posted to on their talk page's. If we dug them all up, we should probably be banning several such users. What's the difference in this case?"

Ruling sysop responds with"This was reported. You dig up more cases I'll vote them Vandalism. The user didn't create that header and didn't have the right to make it redirect to a macro."

My post and header was changed to something I did not create. It creates the impression I posted in a way other than I did. Precedent backed. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 22:34, 2 September 2008 (BST)

That's not the same. The header was changed to a picture telling the user to get real friends. The change in this case is adding the (correct) name. Also, see here. Lastly, precedent isn't law, I'm not going to follow it blindly when the cases are clearly not the same. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 22:45, 2 September 2008 (BST)

I'm with Gnome on this one. Not Vandalism. No evidence of bad faith. Talk to the user rather than bringing every single insignificant injustice that you have suffered here straight away. -- Cheese 23:15, 2 September 2008 (BST)

User:Izumi Orimoto

Izumi Orimoto (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

• User:Aquatechnic blocked on the 1st.
• User:Constantina blocked just now --The Grimch ^{U! E!} 07:46, 2 September 2008 (BST)
• User:Yours Truly banned. -The Grimch ^{U! E!} 07:56, 2 September 2008 (BST)
• User:Grim's Nemesis Banned, and also doesnt realise that my nemesis position has been filled by Zaruthustra --The Grimch ^{U! E!} 08:03, 2 September 2008 (BST)

User:Skritz

Skritz (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Vandalized group page removing important data. --Sonny Corleone ^{DORIS MSD pr0n} 05:35, 1 September 2008 (BST)

Yup, Warned --The Grimch ^{U! E!} 03:02, 2 September 2008 (BST)

User:Airborne88

Airborne88 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Same reason as before. Grand spamming of the welcome newbie template on pages where the users are months, even years old and obviously inactive. Example links to get you started:

• Gabriel_Ryder contributions, The welcoming. Overall lag time: 10 months
• Wzpluis contributions, Welcome Posted twice six months ago, then vanished.
• Jamie Cantwell3's contributions, Welcoming (AHLG deleted this for some obscure reason without making this case) User has hundreds of contributions going back to April.
• Ishmael88 contributions, welcome date. Another obviously gone user. This one only three months.
• Poggg's contribution, Welcome date. Another one gone for months before welcoming.

These are just a random sample of his "welcome run" earlier today. For complete list, please check here. The Jamie one appears to have been the only deleted one by the Gnome (Checking the logs), for which i am greatly curious. --The Grimch ^{U! E!} 23:47, 31 August 2008 (BST)

Jamie Cantwell3 talk page was a A/D request. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:57, 31 August 2008 (BST)

Its still going on. He just welcomed User:Jeff_the_Baptist, who has been a member of this wiki since at least the 16th of November 2006. SWince this report has been ignored for two days i am exercising the rights granted to me under this part of A/G, specifically point 4. Warned --The Grimch ^{U! E!} 02:54, 2 September 2008 (BST)