UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2007 10

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Vandal Banning Archive

2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019


Hagnat (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Hay guys, whutz cummin on ? Listen, i am going to ban myself for a month so i can concentrate on some RL issues. Please someone take care of Suburb/History while i am out, and i hope no one misconbitate me for abusing my powers by banning someone who havent vandalized any page. Anyway, see you guys in a month. Até mais :* --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 23:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

ZOMG! ZMOB!E CONSPIRACY!!! Later haggie.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 23:52, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Sure, dump a load of instructions on my talkpage, And I'll do what I can. Can't ban you though (becasue I'm not a sysop)--SeventythreeTalk 23:50, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

There is a talk page people. Use it. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 23:54, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Damn you lousy brazilian internet providers and your lousy cisco routers. Anyway, off i go. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 23:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
fucking miserable addctive MMORPGs.....I'm hoping to escape from this prison on december The man 17:58, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Insomniac By Choice

Insomniac By Choice (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Impersonation of the man here can be clearly seen that its not his contrib page here. Not tryin to be a tattle tale but idk whats goin on with it. Sockem 04:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Not Vandalism. Insomniac was only fixing some wiki code and grammar on news that were made during the period where the page was under protection. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 10:51, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


WOOT (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

here --Sonny Corleone RRF DORIS CRF pr0n 02:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Warned --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 02:46, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


Zinker (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

added this to The Wiki Code Stealers page, and to the Crossman Defense Force page. --Barroom Hero 01:50, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

warned --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 02:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


Sigman (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Everything! Good God. Hes putting the "new message" thing on a bunch of pages with a link to his user page. The suburb pages, group pages, just about anything. I undid one of his revisions on the suburb page, but he put it back up a few minutes later. Needs to be stopped ASAP. Well, at least before it gets way out of hand. And that may be too late... heh. Just look at recent changes for proof. Now hes wiping pages. Pitneybank is gone. The horror, the horror... There goes the Feral Undead. Well, they had a good run. Uh... anyone there? Templates is gone now... Again with the blanking of the suburb page... user pages now too. Save the wiki! --Kikashie ELT 01:25, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Also impersonnation of SA--Karekmaps?! 01:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
IP Check points to Ahrimmagicks. Both accounts perma-banned. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 01:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
wwwwwwwwow... were you guys able to undo all that damage? o.O . this must be like the worlds biggest vandalism in the history of the wiki O_O The man 19:25, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes, we did managed to revert all his vandalism.. easily in fact. No, this isnt the biggest vandalism in our history. And i already moved all discussion about this case to the talk page, why did you put this comment in here ? --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 20:25, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Roland thomson

Roland thomson (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Warned. Blanked the The_Malton_Bounty_Emo_Killers and replaced the page with offensive spam directed at the group. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 23:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


Ahrimmagicks (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Impersonation--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:41, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Discussion moved to talk --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 03:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

And his recent edit to my archive.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 03:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Warned - he's had enough time, and personal requests, to work out that just copying people's pages (user and sig), and using them for his own corresponding pages is misleading, and annoying. Saying that you are User:A Helpful Little Gnome on your own user page is misleading, and impersonation -- boxytalk • 11:09 28 October 2007 (BST)


Xmxcxrxlover (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Permaban - only contirbution is a total wipe of a page -- boxytalk • 17:55 27 October 2007 (BST)


Nalikill (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Banned for a week for continuing to shit up administrative pages, A/SD and A/U in particular and bad faith restoration of a "spam gun" that had been previously deleted, as well as attempting to keep vote a copywrited image the author had requested deleted, to gum up the process some more. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 02:03, 27 October 2007 (BST)

I would like to challenge this banning. That is I would like to know if other sysops believe this ban is warranted. A week does seems a little excessive for what he did - Vantar 03:15, 27 October 2007 (BST)
Non sysop discussion moved to talk. There are rules. Please follow them
Vantar, A week is the next step on the escalation tree. Ressurecting the page was clearly bad faith and not an attempt to help the wiki, stirring up drama about it on admin pages wasnt warranted, and the keep vote on the copyrighted picture was in clear violation of his four earlier cease and desist notices. How much more do you want? --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 04:09, 27 October 2007 (BST)
The page was created before his last warning, so he can't get another warning for that. And he has a right to have a say in cases that he is directly involved with -- boxytalk • 04:19 27 October 2007 (BST)
OK, I've just seen his input on the copyrighted image case, and that'll do me -- boxytalk • 04:32 27 October 2007 (BST)
Thank you boxy, as i said on the talk page:
lets get this right out. Even if the page creation doesnt matter, and we ignore his conduct on A/U and A/SD regarding it, the fact is he futzed with the admin pages again, this time shitting on the speedydelete page regarding the removal of content, content which the copyright holder has requested be removed. There are no votes about such things when the author comes to say he/she wants it gone, it is just done. His insistence that it go to A/D for two weeks was a clear abuse of the pages keep rule and an attempt to stir up drama, and flew in the face of no fewer than four previous warnings (Two of which were bans as well, leaving no doubt how serious we were about these). On that basis alone he warranted the ban. The rest is like sauce on your sausages, it makes them more compelling, but arent really essentail to have a filling meal. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 15:27, 27 October 2007 (BST)
--The Grimch U! E! WAT! 15:31, 27 October 2007 (BST)


Nalikill (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

This edit where he is wasting everyone's time and shitting up administration pages by requesting a page in his name space for deletion but asking for it to be kept. It's all one edit, the keep vote and filing it for deletion voting.--Karekmaps?! 23:40, 23 October 2007 (BST)

Okay, I'll withdraw it. Go ahead and delete it.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  23:49, 23 October 2007 (BST)

He has been soft warned twice and banned for shitting up administration pages. He knows its wrong. He did it anyway. Im leaning towards dropping the hammer again, but ill wait for another sysop to confirm. Amd people, remember: If you have anything to say, DO IT ON THE FUCKING TALK PAGE. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 00:30, 24 October 2007 (BST)

It appears he created the page specifically to fuck with the administration on deletions (Check the page, Even though its deleted we can still peek at its contents and edit times), then posted his keep vote to keep the shit there for two weeks. He changed the vote as soon as the vandal case sprang up against him. Thats pretty much 100% bad faith right there. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 01:26, 24 October 2007 (BST)

Discussion moved to talk. where it belongs

He should have known better, and while I believe that was more of an attempt at humor then anything malicious this user history with Administration pages should have let him know that others will not be amused this kind of stuff. The rules of the deletions page clear state that by having a keep vote it page can not be speedy deleted so what should have been a quick crit 7 speedy delete would have been turned into a 2 week voting period. I would gladly have given you the 48 hour ban that is the next step of you warning ladder but as Nalikill changed his vote and I can see no evidence that there was an effort to resolve this before coming here I can issue the ban as coming immediately to A/VB without asking Nalikill about changing his vote in itself was bad faith. if someone can show evidence that Nalikill refused to cooperate or refusing to change this vote I will glad revoke my verdict and change it to vandalism but as it is now I have no choce but to rule Not Vandalism also in the future pages you make that you wished deleted should be handled on A/SD not A/D. - Vantar 03:36, 24 October 2007 (BST)
Um, i already showed how it was an intentional attempt to shit on the deletions page (Edit not made in good faith to improve the wiki, remind you of anything?). How much more do you want? Anyway, we now need a third sysop to call the tiebreaker. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 03:46, 24 October 2007 (BST)
I'm sorry; if I had known it would cause this much drama, I wouldn't have created the page. I'm trying to stay off the admin pages. I'm succeding most of the time; except to comment on the talk page when Izumi is involved. I'll refrain from poor-taste attempts at humor in the future.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  04:00, 24 October 2007 (BST)

Tiebreaker: Vandalism. 48 hours ban. Stop doing this on administration pages, Nalikill. Please.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 04:40, 24 October 2007 (BST)

Agree. Vandalism. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 11:55, 24 October 2007 (BST)


Jerry (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Page wiper. Not a newbie mistake judging by his consistent wiping and fast connection --User:Axe27/Sig 21:51, 22 October 2007 (BST)

helping to revert his vandalism--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS DORISFlag.jpg LOE ZHU | Яezzens 21:51, 22 October 2007 (BST)

Reviewing and reverting vandalism.--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 21:51, 22 October 2007 (BST) I'd just like to say, that everyone who helped revert his edits are buttheads, as those were my undo's, and you stole half of them. Thieves. :).-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 21:52, 22 October 2007 (BST)

Partial List:
[1] [2][3] [4] [5] [6] [7]  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  22:28, 22 October 2007 (BST)

What a complete blanker. From his userpage style, modus operandi, and the fact he made an edit to Mr Krabs' talkpage, I reckon he's a sockpuppet of said user. --Pavluk A! E! 22:41, 22 October 2007 (BST)

Permabanned him- Vantar 23:14, 22 October 2007 (BST)


Slappywitz (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Vandalized 5 critics page. Evidence: [8] [9] [10] I talked to him on his talk page, welcomed him, and tried to dissuade him from further vandalism.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  17:53, 21 October 2007 (BST)

Looks like a sockpuppet of banner user Madlatvian. --Pavluk A! E! 18:27, 21 October 2007 (BST)
Yep. Gone forever.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 20:47, 21 October 2007 (BST)


Winter (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

First edit was a location block... which is complex coding and makes me suspect it's an alt of someone or something.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  03:04, 20 October 2007 (BST)

Sorry, just an obsessive newbie. I was bored and poking around the wiki, I figured making location blocks was a way I could help out. I didn't mean to be suspicious or anything. --Winter 03:15, 20 October 2007 (BST)
Mea culpa. You're doing good, I'm sorry for being so paranoid.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  03:16, 20 October 2007 (BST)
Not vandalism. paranoia isnt good. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 03:17, 20 October 2007 (BST)

Grim is Retarded

Another Izumi. permad --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 02:41, 20 October 2007 (BST)


Izumi permabanned again --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 02:30, 20 October 2007 (BST)


Another Izumi. Permad--The Grimch U! E! WAT! 02:23, 20 October 2007 (BST)

Moar alts

Hey screw all of you! I'm going to keep coming back, and there's nothing you can do about it! And nice job protecting the Lockettside page, geniuses. As if that isn't WAY overstepping your power. You guys are also all breaking the rules. You can't simply ban every new user who edits the Lockettside page; Without a matching IP as proof, you have no way of knowing who you're really banning. While it was me this time, who knows how many other poor newbies you've blocked permanently without evidence. I think this is fun, and HILARIOUS!!!! I'm not even a real vandal, and you guys are getting all messed up chasing after me instead of devoting your time to something that actually matters. I can't wait to see how many pages I can get protected! ;)Jess 02:29, 20 October 2007 (BST)
Actually, i filed a protections request and Hagnat protected it. All perfectly legal. Also, i offered you a deal to stop the email and in game harrassment you told me about. It was really upsetting you, wasnt it? Well, i am sad to report that since you wont meet your end, i wont meet mine. Have a pleasant day Izumi. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 02:34, 20 October 2007 (BST)
Nah, I've learned to deal with it. I've made my terms clear; Unban me or I'll just create more alts anyway and raise hell. Seeing as I was wrongly banned to begin with, it isn't really an unreasonable request. Of course I know it will never happen, but hey, unless you feel like going to proxy.org and hand blocking every single one of those, I'm always five minutes away after a ban! ;)Grim is Retarded 02:39, 20 October 2007 (BST)
I dont think you have. Have you yet realised how retarded this crusade of yours is? We are not getting bored. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 02:42, 20 October 2007 (BST)
Bored? I find this highly amusing. Izumi? Keep'em coming.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 02:44, 20 October 2007 (BST)
The good news is that as she goes down the proxy.org list, she will eventually reach more dangerous proxy's. some that might even harm her PC. The man 12:49, 20 October 2007 (BST)


Ahrimmagicks (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Made this 'upgrade' to SA's sidebar. As if previously half-inching Engel's userpage to create his own wasn't bad enough...--Pavluk A! E! 18:42, 19 October 2007 (BST)

Alright, I'm pissed now. As if the previous impersonation wasn't enough....Is it at all possible/reasonable to have him officially barred from using/editing anything associated with me (I.E. images, templates, etc.) here and now, without dealing with Arby's? Or do I still have to go through the process?-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 20:33, 19 October 2007 (BST)
You have to go through the process, I'm sorry to say.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  20:38, 19 October 2007 (BST)
Vandalism. User warned, and i'll see what else can be made in this case. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 20:56, 19 October 2007 (BST)


last I checked, removing news from the suburb wiki page is considered vandalism. If he doesn't like the news, the too bad for him. However, I don't believe he has the right to go and delete the whole thing just because he doesn't like it. The man 10:33, 19 October 2007 (BST)

Suburb pages are not the places to make accusations of zerging. Use the talk pages for such controversial things, until such a notice can be put up in an NPOV manner, and since it relates to Fort Perryn, put it on that talk page, not the suburb page. Not Vandalism --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 11:00, 19 October 2007 (BST)
ok, thats all I need to know. thanks The man 14:51, 19 October 2007 (BST)

Mysterious Dream

Mysterious Dream (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

new user deleted a name off the DA black list, and had previously edited the lockettside page.--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS DORISFlag.jpg LOE ZHU | Яezzens 05:49, 19 October 2007 (BST)

IP Checked. and perma banned.-- Vista  +1  08:58, 19 October 2007 (BST)


MisterGame (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

For this this and this on the Second Big Bash page. A intentional attempt to put false information on the page? --WanYao 16:43, 17 October 2007 (BST)

He edited it again and was quickly converted back. Thanks Zombie slay3r! Looking through his previous contributions it seems like he vandalized the Pathetic Bill page as well and removed some images about a month ago. Thanks for reporting him WanYao! --DonTickles 22:00, 17 October 2007 (BST)

Warned --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 22:51, 17 October 2007 (BST)


Sockem (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Unofficially warned for shitting up A/VB. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 07:59, 16 October 2007 (BST)

Dragon fang

Dragon fang (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

izumi alt? made the exact same edit word for word as windgoddess below. see?--'BPTmz 04:49, 16 October 2007 (BST)

Dragon Fang is one of her pals, a fellow Lockettside Valkyrie. While he's fun to kill, he's no where near as offensive as Izumi. Unless he gave her his login, he's a real and different feller. Kiss kiss!--Sarah Silverman 05:03, 16 October 2007 (BST)
Not Izumi Case closed. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 08:04, 16 October 2007 (BST)
Discussion moved to talk page


Windgoddess (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Sockpuppet? If not, then I'll vote for Hillary Clinton!--Stephen Colbert DFA 03:31, 16 October 2007 (BST)

Looking at this contribution tells you all you need to know.--User:Axe27/Sig 03:35, 16 October 2007 (BST)
B&.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 04:16, 16 October 2007 (BST)

Cort firefighter

Cort firefighter (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Vandalism of image page. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 23:12, 15 October 2007 (BST)

Seems to be a newbie. Checking his edit history I think he tried to change the status of The Copeland Building (West Grayside) and failed miserably. He doesn't seem to know what he is doing and is having trouble signing his own name. Not vandalism and somebody probably should point him towards project mentor..-- Vista  +1  23:22, 15 October 2007 (BST)
I've seen him around a lot in-game and on the wiki in WG... In fact I think I've asked him to sig his posts ;) But I agree that he's a "good faith" newb who just doesn't know what he's doing... Cheers, and thanks for doing the tedious work of vandal banning etc., guys. :) --WanYao 12:59, 16 October 2007 (BST)

Jace Young

Jace Young (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Blanking Move Requests here. Probably another Izumi alt. --Matthew Fahrenheit YRCT+1 16:28, 15 October 2007 (BST)

Damn you and your conflictiness, also blanked Zombie Skills here.--Karekmaps?! 16:29, 15 October 2007 (BST)
Perma'd -- Vista  +1  18:05, 15 October 2007 (BST)
It's not Izumi. The IP address comes from a different place. --ZombieSlay3rSig.pngT 18:57, 15 October 2007 (BST)
Oh, I thought it was Izumi because the two words female names she seems so fond of, but nvm. Whoever she is she did made 3 edits and all of those were vandalism. --Matthew Fahrenheit YRCT+1 19:01, 15 October 2007 (BST)
That's what I thought too, but it didn't turn out that way. Izumi is a real feisty one; I wonder if she has a boyfriend? :P --ZombieSlay3rSig.pngT 20:48, 15 October 2007 (BST)
Do not feed the trolls, kkthxbbq. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 22:48, 15 October 2007 (BST)

Izumi Loves Grim Forever

Izumi Loves Grim Forever (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Awwww...Ain't that cute?Perma'd by Hagnat. --User:Axe27/Sig 03:36, 15 October 2007 (BST)

Grim Likes Men

Grim Likes Men (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Hello Izumi. Permad again. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 03:13, 15 October 2007 (BST)

Grim is a LYING Fascist Pig

Grim is a LYING Fascist Pig (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

More Izumi. Idont think she likes me. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 02:50, 15 October 2007 (BST)

When nobody was looking, The Grimch banned forty Izumi alts. That's as many as four tens. And that's terrible.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 02:54, 15 October 2007 (BST)
Actually, it was a collaborative effort. I nailed probably 14-15. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 03:13, 15 October 2007 (BST)


Noriko (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

More Izumi. Permad. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 02:35, 15 October 2007 (BST)

Grim is a Fascist Pig

Grim is a Fascist Pig (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

I love you too Izumi. Perma'd. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 02:23, 15 October 2007 (BST)

Kari Kamiya

Kari Kamiya (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

More Izumi. Permad. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 02:12, 15 October 2007 (BST)

Mimi Tachikawa

Mimi Tachikawa (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Izumi again. Permad. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 02:03, 15 October 2007 (BST)

Sora Takenouchi

Sora Takenouchi (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Permad as Izumi. And she wonders why she is banned. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 01:54, 15 October 2007 (BST)

discussion moved to talk page

Tamao Suzumi

Tamao Suzumi (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Mitsuki Koyama alt, new user, one contribution which was undoing the vandalism revert of Mitsuki Koyama. --Karekmaps?! 01:22, 15 October 2007 (BST)

Gone. Thanks for the report.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 01:24, 15 October 2007 (BST)

Mitsuki Koyama

Mitsuki Koyama (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Permabanned as alt of Izumi Orimoto/Yoko Ono Shares IP with Tuong Lu Kim. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 23:30, 14 October 2007 (BST)

Duke Garland

Duke Garland (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Edited a comment of his after it had been replied to. While this sort of thing is OK for fixing typos and the like, Duke shaved off a decent chunk of a sentence. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 11:14, 14 October 2007 (BST)

I don't see how part of sentence, that i deleted, is refered in the reply --~~~~ [talk] 11:16, 14 October 2007 (BST)
Sigh. Don't edit your posts after they've been replied to Duke, please, if only for my sanity. I'll leave it up to Grim (being the one who replied) to decide whether he was "put out" by such an edit, and no, he doesn't need to give any justification, just a yea or nay. You shouldn't have done it, simple as that. If he feels that the edit deserves a warning, that's what I'll give you. That being said, please take note of the blue admin notice just above the report space. This is minor stuff -- boxytalk • 12:05 14 October 2007 (BST)
It was nothing, but editing out or in chunks of material after someone has replied just isnt kosher. The extent of any action should be, in this case, a notice saying "Dont do it again". --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 12:44, 14 October 2007 (BST)
OK, point taken --~~~~ [talk] 13:01, 14 October 2007 (BST)

Smacks Duke upside the head, but not vandalism, don't do it again -- boxytalk • 15:35 14 October 2007 (BST)


Katie (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Suspiciously similar to SexieKatie, and first edit was to lockettside page.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  00:37, 14 October 2007 (BST)

Banned --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 01:01, 14 October 2007 (BST)
And Nalikill, dont use that template again. It doesnt work properly. I had a bitch of a time getting to edit this, and had to rewrite it. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 01:03, 14 October 2007 (BST)
For future reference, you'd use {{vndl|vandal's name}}. Not the other one.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 01:32, 14 October 2007 (BST)


Axe27 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Spamming user pages at an absurd rate. All of the following pages have similar/identical additions in the last 24 hours. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24.--Karekmaps?! 22:55, 13 October 2007 (BST)

Not Vandalism - He is trying to help out newbies by putting the wiki's general guidelines on their talk pages (i.e. good faith). Also, please use the talk pages if you have something to say. --ZombieSlay3rSig.pngT 23:04, 13 October 2007 (BST)

Disussion moved to talk page

Sexi Katie868

Proxy, sock puppet, Ban. Weeee. --Karlsbad 04:21, 13 October 2007 (BST)

Yoko Ono

Yoko Ono (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Researching one of the multiple IPs of this user establishes this as a proxy used to vandalize wikis. Under UDWiki:Administration/Policy_Discussion/proxy_use This means immediate ban. --Karlsbad 06:54, 12 October 2007 (BST)

First of all, idiot, check my contribs. No vandalism there...hmmmmmmmmm...Secondly, I'm not using a proxy, and even if I were, there's no rule against it. So unless you want to point to an ACTUAL VANDALISM from me, I suggest you back off before I report YOU.Yoko Ono 07:41, 12 October 2007 (BST)
Oh no, please let's not start the whole Proxies: Illegal or Not? argument again... --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 07:46, 12 October 2007 (BST)
The rule against using a proxy is linked to in Karlsbad's report. That said while I do confirm that edits from this IP have been reverted on other wiki's I see no support to it being a proxy. It's reverse lookup points to a dialup provider who services a rather large area. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 07:47, 12 October 2007 (BST)
Yeah...riiiight. I'm not a techno-person. If I may ask, what "suddenly" brought this up anyway? What the hell was Karlsbad just randomly looking into my IP for? Bored much? Yoko Ono 07:50, 12 October 2007 (BST)
What "suddenly" brought this up is that you "suddenly" started trolling the vandal banning page as one of your first edits to the wiki. If you go out of your way to insult and annoy people then they will, or course, check up on you for anything suspicious. I too checked your ip but left you alone as it didn't match any other users on this wiki.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 10:41, 12 October 2007 (BST)
It is Izumi, again. She edited the Lockettside page with her third edit, and then went right back to Lachryma's talk page, an individual with whom Izumi chatted somewhat frequently going by their talk pages. That, and her immediate leaping into the vandal banning page indicates its an old user coming in under another handle, as does the wording of the lockettside update, as though it is carrying on from an earlier report, and definately not how a new user would post their first report. Either way, its definately a sock intended to cause trouble, and we should punt it. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 11:53, 12 October 2007 (BST)
That wouldn't suprise me at all. I also suspect a sockpuppet. Agreed, once we have the agreement of the other sysops I would recommend a ban.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 14:02, 12 October 2007 (BST)
Enough for me. Banned as an Izumi alt. If anyone is against this, Miscontrabulation!--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 14:36, 12 October 2007 (BST)
I concur. --ZombieSlay3rSig.pngT 15:36, 12 October 2007 (BST)
Burn the witch ? --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 17:18, 12 October 2007 (BST)
More than one of the Izumi Alts used this same dial-up provider and others originated in the same geographic region. All together its more than coincidental. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 19:07, 12 October 2007 (BST)
This isn't fair, I had to use a proxy to log on at school!! I'll even give you the website I used (ninjaproxy.com). You can't just ban me without proof, and I told you why I edited the Lockettside page already! Now undo the banishing thing already!
proxys are againest the rules. end of story. try going to a public libary.--'BPTmz 03:12, 13 October 2007 (BST)
Well I'm SORRY I didn't KNOW THAT, k!?!?!? I mean, I'm not a wiki expert but all I see when I look at this page is VANDAL BANNING. Not "oops u used a proxy now lets all gang up on the newbie banning"! U guys arent supposed to witch hunt, I read som of the rules and you're supposed to think of good faith and protect the forum from being vandalized. I WAS JUST HERE DOING WOT MY GROUP LEARDER TOLD ME TOO!Sexi Katie868 03:09, 13 October 2007 (BST)
Yes, and coming here and trolling the Administration pages certainly wasn't good faith. We probably wouldn't have noticed the proxy, or cared, if you hadn't caused trouble on your first edits. A little tip as well: If you make your posts polite and readable then it does make us more willing to be lenient.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 07:42, 13 October 2007 (BST)

SERIOUSLY! I don't give a fuck whos right! Quit it now until a sysop comes on or keep it to your talk pages.--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 03:25, 13 October 2007 (BST)


Rosslessness (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Posting a humorous suggestion in the regular suggestion talk page, Mannequin. Sockem 20:46, 11 October 2007 (BST)

Not Vandalism - and that could pass as a serious suggestion. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 21:19, 11 October 2007 (BST)
In future, if i want to develop a suggestion that Could be humorouswhere should i develop it?--Rosslessness 22:02, 11 October 2007 (BST)
the talk page is made for all suggestions humorous or not. that what the talk page is for.--'BPTmz 22:05, 11 October 2007 (BST)
Cheers.--Rosslessness 22:08, 11 October 2007 (BST)


Nalikill (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Shitting up the A/VB page again despite numerous warnings to the contrary. Banned for 24 hours as a vandal escalation. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 23:00, 10 October 2007 (BST)

Wait, sorry, I'll strike it out. Forgive me.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  23:01, 10 October 2007 (BST)
Too late. Gone. Seeya tomorrow. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 23:04, 10 October 2007 (BST)
Ya i was wondering how they could post, exactly what have they done so far anyways?--Darkmagic 23:05, 10 October 2007 (BST)
I dont understand your language, good sire. Use the talk page, and proper english, if you want to discuss something else. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 23:27, 10 October 2007 (BST)


GUMBjork (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Not sure if this is vandalism, but doesn't seem to be in good faith. --Ryiis 22:49, 10 October 2007 (BST)

One of the rules for vandalism policy says "What is not vandalism...an unwanted edit to a page." The guy-theblacklabrador- can always clear it off his talk page if he wants to. I don't see any repeated incidents of this in his contributions, he just seems to do it sporadically... once every few days to different talk pages.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  22:58, 10 October 2007 (BST)
You were warned nalikill. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 23:00, 10 October 2007 (BST)
Not Vandalism Trolling user talk pages is not vandalism. It's being a jackass, but it's not vandalism. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 23:19, 10 October 2007 (BST)


Samuel_Autum (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

All Edits sourced as vandalism and/or image additions that have since been reverted. --Karlsbad 00:59, 10 October 2007 (BST)

Specific examples: here, here, and here.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  03:32, 10 October 2007 (BST)

Thanks for posting that stuff guys, I forgot. If you would like to know, that picture that was posted contained explicit (and disgusting in this case) nudity, so it had to go. --ZombieSlay3rSig.pngT 22:09, 10 October 2007 (BST)
Guys, can we please get the actions taken stated clearly (and bolded) in these reports so that sysops who come later don't have to check the logs to see if appropriate action has been taken. I've noticed it becoming a problem in cases where sysops report/warn the user themselves for a while now -- boxytalk • 10:44 11 October 2007 (BST)

Sarah Silverman

Impersonation --Pavluk A! E! 19:16, 9 October 2007 (BST)

As a member in good standing of the LNTVC, Sarah Silverman is entitled to edit the posts of vandals any way she wishes. Not Vandalism! --Stephen Colbert DFA 19:51, 9 October 2007 (BST)
Yeah come on Pavluk! That was (if I do say so myself) a funny edit of a ChillPill's marring of our group page that got him banned for 24 hours. He deserved every bit of that. Why do you even care?--Sarah Silverman 19:54, 9 October 2007 (BST)
There I made a little edit for the wiki police. Sheesh, you could have just asked ME to fix it Pavluk. What a strange hobby! If any MOD wants to ask me to futher edit, let me know. Way to drain the harmless fun out of the room Pavvy. Kiss kiss!--Sarah Silverman 20:00, 9 October 2007 (BST)
I'm not a sysop. A sysop is simply an established user with access to admin tools. I have nothing against harmless fun, had you merely posted a comment below Chill's which mocked him I'd have no problem. Had you deleted it, it would have been fine - it's your group page. Impersonation is against the rules, though. It doesn't matter if I, a sysop, or any other member of the community caught you; you shouldn't have been breaking the rules. No, I don't make a hobby of policing the wiki, I was simply looking through Special:Recentchanges for something else when I stumbled upon your group page. --Pavluk A! E! 21:14, 9 October 2007 (BST)
Well thanks for this Pavvy, really. I feel suitably chastised and will be sure to choose a more righteous path in future. If it weren't for you... why, nothing at all would have happened.--Sarah Silverman 21:32, 9 October 2007 (BST)
Except your vandalism. Anyway, glad this is all behind us. See you round, Sazzle --Pavluk A! E! 21:50, 9 October 2007 (BST)
Warned --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 20:54, 9 October 2007 (BST)
Seriously? Pfft! I don't mind the warning - but could you please elaborate on why I can't edit the post of a vandal on my own group's main page? I'd say a vandal is fair freakin' game. Second, now that I added my little This is Sarah Silverman pretending to be in front of Chill's signature which HE put there - is that kosher?--Sarah Silverman 21:01, 9 October 2007 (BST)
Because you need to treat vandals with the same respect you would treat any other. Behaviour such as yours only risks turning them into a persistent annoyance for a week or two, and its us sysops who have to clean up their mess and ban their legion of socks. The fact he has recieved a 24 hour ban means nothing. By your very same reasoning for your edits, any of my edits presently on this wiki could be treated in just the same manner, cause i was banned in november 05 during a dispute while i was new. Hagnat could also be done the same way, and i am sure there are other sysops out there who would also be penalised if we decided to go with what you want. No. Do not impersonate other users. Do not alter what they say. Do not vandalise, and we will all get along fine, and have a minimal risk of turning a once off vandal into a persistent one. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 21:24, 9 October 2007 (BST)
Oh very well then.--Sarah Silverman 21:35, 9 October 2007 (BST)
HAHA :PChill 05:07, 11 October 2007 (BST)
Well, I'm sure you actually DO have a tiny penis Chill - I'm sure no one would want to impersonate THAT. I should have defended my actions as simple assertion of the facts. Next time. --Sarah Silverman 19:07, 12 October 2007 (BST)


Kolechovski (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Submitted Suggestion:20071009 Crucifixes call God to the main suggestion system. Sigh, newbie mistake, but someone else would just do it later anyway -- boxytalk • 15:06 9 October 2007 (BST)

Yada-yada-yada. not vandalism.-- Vista  +1  16:16, 9 October 2007 (BST)
Well, I had a word in his ear about it earlier on, so hopefully he'll take heed (oh, and I just fixed the link to point to the actual user... stuffed up earlier) -- boxytalk • 16:38 9 October 2007 (BST)
I object. Suggestions rule 10 is very clear. Suggestions created entirely for the purpose of satire, insult, or comedy are considered vandalism and treated appropriately by sysops. If you want to post a joke suggestion put it on the Humorous Page.. Not might. Not can be. Is. Please review your verdict on this case. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 21:00, 9 October 2007 (BST)
It also says that it will be treated appropriately by sysops. the appropriate treatment by sysops is not giving every one that breaks the rules an automatic warning but to weigh the infraction against the good faith rule and see if it was in good faith or not and if so, if it warrants a warning. If it doesn't then it's considered not vandalism for purposes regarding the vandal banning escalation tree. While I would've been just as justified giving him a warning I gave him the benefit of the doubt and I judged it good faith. If it's the words not vandalism that bothers you, I'm perfectly willing to change my verdict to Good faith, no warning if that will help.-- Vista  +1  22:38, 9 October 2007 (BST)
That is not what the rule means. It means it will be treated as such by the sysops. Good faith has absolutely no part in it. If you are going to say good faith can undermine that specific page rule, then we need to retract each and every other warning/ban given for breaking it, since every single one could be argued to have ben made in good faith. You are doing nothing but undermine a legitimate rule that says that the suggestion is vandalism. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 22:49, 9 October 2007 (BST)
Bullshit. That is exactly what that rule means. Good faith is the ground rule from which all other rules flow. Each and every rule has that principle as a basis. This whole wiki is founded on that spirit of Good faith. To claim otherwise is to go against the entire history and culture of this wiki. And it's silly to claim that we either have to retract all warnings or always give them with this rule as we've got no troubles deciding on if it's Good or Bad faith for all other rule breaking. Each and every other rule is subject to good faith and they still manage to function just as well. It's always been inappropriate behavior to warn somebody for a good faith edit so I won't start now.-- Vista  +1  02:22, 10 October 2007 (BST)
Then you have undermined the word and intent of the rule. It is now meaningless. You are setting a precident for ignoring the rule, and we cant touch any violators of it now. The rule says such edits ARE vandalism. Good faith? Bad faith? they dont come into play. It has been defined as vandalism by a 2/3rds vote on the suggestions page and has been enforced as such for a very lonjg time. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 05:41, 10 October 2007 (BST)
If I may but in I made the same mistake he did and got warned. Guess what? I leaarned from it. If he gets that warning struck I want one of mine struck >:( Sockem 05:46, 10 October 2007 (BST)
Sure, ill strike it tomorrow if you can provide the vandal report, and may as well remove the rule as well. Actually, on second thought, screw that. This is misconduct material. Filing my complaint now. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 06:21, 10 October 2007 (BST)


Vandr (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Suggestion:20071009_Golden_Shower, which is obviously meant as a humorous suggestion. Making report under Rule 10.--Karekmaps?! 12:35, 9 October 2007 (BST)

Warned. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 13:05, 9 October 2007 (BST)

Moderator Man

Moderator Man (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Numerous vandalisms in his contributions. --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 05:06, 9 October 2007 (BST)

Permabanned. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 05:56, 9 October 2007 (BST)

Chinese Nigger

Chinese Nigger (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

It continues. --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 02:38, 9 October 2007 (BST)

P' banned. --ZombieSlay3rSig.pngT 02:40, 9 October 2007 (BST)

Shitty Wok

Shitty Wok (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Vandalizing Karlsbad's user page, most like a continuation of below. --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 02:32, 9 October 2007 (BST)

P' banned. --ZombieSlay3rSig.pngT 02:40, 9 October 2007 (BST)

Tuong Lu Kim

Tuong Lu Kim (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

2 vandal edits on this page. Tempting the douche to do something, because it's funny. --Karlsbad 02:16, 9 October 2007 (BST)

Andria Rose

Andria Rose (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

[11] here. someone should delete the pic as well, but thats for another page.--'BPTmz 00:03, 9 October 2007 (BST)

I've put the image up for Speedy Deletion. --Pavluk A! E! 00:09, 9 October 2007 (BST)
has also uploaded many criteria 2 images, although im not sure if this is vandalism.--'BPTmz 00:20, 9 October 2007 (BST)
One sec while i check contribs. Ive blocked her for 2 hours while i do so. That is indisputably vandalism. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 00:32, 9 October 2007 (BST)
Permabanned and all image spam deleted --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 00:37, 9 October 2007 (BST)


PsychoLychee (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Vandalism of a userpage. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 22:34, 8 October 2007 (BST)

Warned --Karlsbad 01:23, 9 October 2007 (BST)


Chill (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Vandalisation of the Late Night Crew page,Sarah Silverman's and Jimmy Kimmel's User pages.Chill 22:18, 8 October 2007 (BST)

He beat me to the report. Please dispatch this self-professed vandal. --Stephen Colbert DFA 22:27, 8 October 2007 (BST)
Banned for 24 hours. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 22:30, 8 October 2007 (BST)

Uchiha Madara

Uchiha Madara (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Consistent Vandal of the Ridleybank page. In fact, all of his edits on his contributions are in bad faith. --User:Axe27/Sig 01:49, 8 October 2007 (BST)

And Impersonation. One sec while i check the contribs for myself. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 01:50, 8 October 2007 (BST)
Actually, theres quite a lot of vandalism in there. Cant find anything contributive so i am gonna perma. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 01:54, 8 October 2007 (BST)
Hmm...Surgeon General beat you to a warning. Ask him. --User:Axe27/Sig 01:55, 8 October 2007 (BST)
I was gonna assume good faith, but I trust Grim's judgment. --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 01:58, 8 October 2007 (BST)
The Surgeon General is not a sysop, though he is more than welcome to ask a user to keep from vandalising if he wishes. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 02:01, 8 October 2007 (BST)
just to clarify. what was the result of this case? i dont see a verdict.--'BPTmz 21:47, 8 October 2007 (BST)
Perma banned by Grim. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 22:22, 8 October 2007 (BST)


Elson (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Derogatory edit to User subpage. Someone slap him on the hand. --User:Axe27/Sig 22:12, 6 October 2007 (BST)

* hagnat points to the first administration notice box --22:22, 6 October 2007 (BST)


Nalikill (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Unofficially warned for a second time for back seat sysopping. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 21:03, 5 October 2007 (BST)

Discussion moved to talk page


GUMBjork (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

This edit, and the page creation itself. Looks leik vandalism to me.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 11:34, 5 October 2007 (BST)

Vandalism - User warned. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 13:03, 5 October 2007 (BST)
Discussion moved to talk page

Snowstorm Angel

Snowstorm Angel (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Izumi sockpuppet? Has the same page design as her Tangerine one. Also the name is in keeping with a lot of the others. --Pavluk A! E! 10:41, 4 October 2007 (BST)

Checkuser confirms. Permabanned --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 10:44, 4 October 2007 (BST)
Why does she choose names like that?  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  20:59, 5 October 2007 (BST)

Sunset Wind

Sunset Wind (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

ANOTHER izumi alt.--Darkmagic 03:20, 2 October 2007 (BST)

Banned by Hagnat. --ZombieSlay3rSig.pngT 03:59, 2 October 2007 (BST)

Cloud Storm

another izumi alt that the ban hammer missed.--'BPTmz 02:18, 2 October 2007 (BST)

for proof read her comment under the frost angel report on this page.--'BPTmz 02:20, 2 October 2007 (BST)
Was blocked yesterday. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 02:22, 2 October 2007 (BST)
ah. wasnt put as an izumi alt on the vandal data page, someone might want to fix that.--'BPTmz 02:23, 2 October 2007 (BST)
Done thanks. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 02:25, 2 October 2007 (BST)


DanceDanceRevolution (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

For editing the page of Finis Valorum here, here, and here. For some reason, he believes that one needs permission to release the ID of a character. --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 01:07, 2 October 2007 (BST)

Warned --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 01:21, 2 October 2007 (BST)


Nalikill (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Unofficially warned for "backseat modding" and "feeding trolls" in this page. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 13:31, 1 October 2007 (BST)

discussion moved to talk page

Star Rose

Star Rose (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Izumi strikes again.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  02:44, 1 October 2007 (BST)

I wish i was a mod so i could ban are little Sock puppet mistriss--Darkmagic 02:47, 1 October 2007 (BST)
i wish i could run the wiki with my iron fist, then i would ban all these pesky users who cant follow a simple request from the administration. And vandal alt banned, btw --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 02:51, 1 October 2007 (BST)
I believe this is probably the 21st vandal account Izumi has created. Damn, obvisously being banned 21 times doesn't quite get the message across,let me state it: You are not welcome. --User:Axe27/Sig 05:03, 1 October 2007 (BST)
How bout less feeding of the troll, kay? Kay. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 13:47, 1 October 2007 (BST)

Frost Angel

Frost Angel (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Sock pupper of izumi, the comment on my talk page seems to show that.--Darkmagic 02:09, 1 October 2007 (BST) [12] Confirmed.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  02:09, 1 October 2007 (BST) Another vandal account. Cloud Storm (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  02:15, 1 October 2007 (BST) Its not vandalism, its my own group's page. You have no right to touch it whether I'm banned or not, buddy. So paws off! Cloud Storm 02:17, 1 October 2007 (BST)

We get to ban two sock puppets, can wikimedia or whoever owns the wiki do anything?--Darkmagic 02:19, 1 October 2007 (BST)
I wouldnt ban you izumi, since i am trying to figure a way to allow you to remain in the wiki. But seeing that you are creating so many accounts, i can't left you go unpunished. Please, do not create more accounts. Please, do not come back. It doesnt take half a brain to realize you are not welcome here anymore. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 02:21, 1 October 2007 (BST)
Don't forget Cloud Storm, and- if he hasn't been banned already- autumn wind, please.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  02:23, 1 October 2007 (BST)
She dosn't care anymore.--Darkmagic 02:24, 1 October 2007 (BST)
Dang, can we even keep count any more of how many alts izumi's had banned?  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  02:26, 1 October 2007 (BST)

Izumi alt's banned. Please stop editing this page for frivolous stuff. And thank you, nali, for teaching me how to do my job. AGAIN. Why dont you run for SysOp, i am sure people are eager to vouch you. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 02:30, 1 October 2007 (BST)

I would aupport her lol.--Darkmagic 02:30, 1 October 2007 (BST)
If you're referring to me, I'm a guy, sorry. XD.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  02:31, 1 October 2007 (BST)


Darkmagic (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

This edit to the MERCENARY ELITE group page, also this revision to an edit made by the page owner. As this old case. --Karekmaps?! 02:00, 1 October 2007 (BST)
There, MY groups templates and I never got a reason why they had them, all i'v been trying to do is get a explenation as to why they used them without permission, all i need is that and i will give permission ot use my groups templates.

Vandalism. Page ownership violation. Dorkmagic, the correct procedure is ask questions first, act later, and even then you would had no rights to edit other users group pages. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 02:15, 1 October 2007 (BST)

I asked fucking twice, and all he did was delete it, so after a while i decided to take "MY" groups tempaltes off, they didnt reply so i took action.--Darkmagic 02:18, 1 October 2007 (BST)

Autumn Wind

Autumn Wind (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) pretty sure it's another izumi alt.could a mod run a checkuser? --'BPTmz 00:35, 1 October 2007 (BST)

scratch that. she just confirmed it herself.[[13]]--'BPTmz 00:45, 1 October 2007 (BST)
woot im important--Darkmagic 00:42, 1 October 2007 (BST)

Can't you do an IP ban?--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 00:43, 1 October 2007 (BST)

Just wanted to point out that despite my numerous bans for being a "sockpuppet of a banned user" I haven't actually VANDALIZED the wiki once since that fateful night my main was perma'd. And yet, as I speak, mass vandals are getting away with warnings. You'd think you mods could prioritize a bit better. ;)

Autumn Wind 00:47, 1 October 2007 (BST)

Actually I'm pretty sure this might be considered vandalism, I don't think banned users can own pages. Anyway, undone now.--Karekmaps?! 00:54, 1 October 2007 (BST)
read the rules izumi.creating another username when you have already been banned is considered vandalism. you are breaking the rules. now go away or i shall taunt you a second time.--'BPTmz 00:58, 1 October 2007 (BST)
Nah, its still my page, banned or not. Ownership still applies. And BP, if you'd take the time to read the email I sent you, you'd know that I stopped caring about the wiki rules after Boxy told me to "fuck off" in response to my ban appeal. Autumn Wind 01:05, 1 October 2007 (BST)
It was "yes, piss off forever", and it was in reply to you asking if we were "basically telling me to 'piss off forever'". And that was after half a dozen alts had already been banned, so don't go pretending that you ever respected the rules -- boxytalk • 10:07 1 October 2007 (BST)
Also, Frost Angel is her. I think.--Karekmaps?! 02:09, 1 October 2007 (BST)