Suggestion:20080706 snipers: Difference between revisions
({{Spam|0|0|17}}) |
m (Protected "Suggestion:20080706 snipers" [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 09:54, 10 July 2010
Spam! | |
This suggestion was voted as spam and closed for voting, with 0 keep, 0 kill, and 17 spam votes. |
20080706 snipers
Brandwood32 15:04, 6 July 2008 (BST)
Suggestion type
Sniper as a weapon
Suggestion scope
Humans
Suggestion description
this could be used in the same way as binoculars but used in any building not just a "tall" building and used for survivors to protect themselves without having to go out side and getting infected, grabbed etc. obviously new characters would have a 5% hit rate and it would be useless for them but if they were in say for example a mall which has lots of experienced players they could do a lot of damage with the sniper protecting the new comers inside the building. the sniper could be useless at ground level to represent how hard it is to focus when the zombies are all around you moving at such a short range. the damage it could cause could be 12-15 and there could be a zombie hunter bonus for example a 5% chance that it would kill the zombie and they would need to spend 10AP to stand. Wow there are some twats on the internet who go over the top on this kind of thing, dont over react its a bloody game and id like to thank the few people who weren't too rude about it. Also if you look im sure you'll find theres nothing wrong with my typing so why dont you *lurn 2 read*?
--Brandwood32 19:07, 6 July 2008 (BST)
Voting Section
Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user. |
The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
Keep Votes
Kill Votes
Spam/Dupe Votes
- Spam - Incomplete. Presents almost no statistics, and where they are they are insanely overpowered. Sniping has been done to death. Lurk the suggestions development page, read the fucking articles about what you should and should not do, and then maybe make a suggestion if you come up with a genuinely good idea. This was not one of those ideas. This falls under the heading of abysmally retarded, and even then the term falls far short of how stupid it is. Congratulations, you have necessitated the invention of a new word to describe how stupid it is. Discussion on that matter is now open. Also, im not happy about fixing your fucking page for you. Follow instructions, its not hard, even for one as... intellectually vacant... as yourself. In other news, id gladly dupe this, but sadly its so vague i havent the foggiest idea what it is and we cant dupe for vague resemblance, which is all this steaming mound of bovine dung bears to anything. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 15:30, 6 July 2008 (BST)
- Spam - Most. Atrocious. and Incomplete. Suggestion. Evar. MAISE. There is my nomination for the new word. --WanYao 15:34, 6 July 2008 (BST)
- grim is an ass/spam - you dont need to do things like that, we already know you are better than the rest of us. --Scotw 15:36, 6 July 2008 (BST)
- Spam/Dupe - Been suggested alot of times. Try reading the Frequently Suggested, and the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots before suggesting next time. --Officer Dick Trickle 15:37, 6 July 2008 (BST)
- Spam – Incomplete, over-suggested, unbalanced... need I go on? ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 15:39, 6 July 2008 (BST)
- Dupe/Spam/Retarded - As Grim but with more vitriol. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 15:38, 6 July 2008 (BST)
- VITRIOL: Vapid Incomplete Totally Retarded Idiotic Overpowered Laughable.--WanYao 15:42, 6 July 2008 (BST) Non-author RE struck. Billy Club Thorton T! RR 22:30, 6 July 2008 (BST)
- Dupe/Spam/Retarded/Why Was This Suggested - Jesus Christ. There are several problems with this: English, you don't type it well. I had to resist the urge to correct everything for you. Secondly, as Dick Trickle suggested, read those pages. Thirdly, this suggestion is woefully incomplete, and would need to be incredible well worded and thought out to even be considered by the general population of the UDWiki. Finally, it is overpowered, as it negates the barricades, and that is one hell of a big no-no. Just... Think more, read more, and "lurn 2 tipe." Please.--drawde DORIS•RR•RRF•RI! 15:48, 6 July 2008 (BST)
- Plus, he didn't sign it either. --Officer Dick Trickle 15:50, 6 July 2008 (BST) Non-author RE struck. Billy Club Thorton T! RR 22:30, 6 July 2008 (BST)
- Spam - I can't vote keep on something that the author didn't even vote keep on.--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens 15:59, 6 July 2008 (BST)
- Spam - Incomplete. It's unfortunate that a lot of people have joined Grim_s in being terribly and inappropriately rude, but the suggestion is still too vague to be considered, even were it not a frequently considered (and rejected) idea. --Pgunn 16:48, 6 July 2008 (BST)
- Spam - As Grim but in an infinitely nicer way. -- Cheese 17:37, 6 July 2008 (BST)
- Spam - not only so vauge as to be impossible to vote on, but sniping is the WORST form "protection" survivors could ever have. It would be one of the best zombie buffs ever if people were encouraged to waste AP and encumbrance on the a special weapon used to "kill" zombies outside. They should instead spend AP stopping the zombies from coming in (which "killing" them does NOT do), reviving people, healing, and (the only crucuil reason to ever kill a zombie) kicking out the zombies that are INSIDE. Swiers 17:43, 6 July 2008 (BST)
- Spam - VITRIOL. --TriPolarClicky! 18:02, 6 July 2008 (BST)
- Spam - As above, below, and a few that I'm not even going to mention. Billy Club Thorton T! RR 19:09, 6 July 2008 (BST)
- Spam - As grim, minus the insults. If everyone is going to take the time to read and vote on your suggestion, you should take the time to look over the suggestions advice, read the frequently suggested ones, type in a coherent way (c'mon, you could have at least started your sentences with capital letters) so it doesn't sound like one big run-on sentence (like this vote does), and format your suggestion properly. --PdeqTalk* 20:49, 6 July 2008 (BST)
- Spam - While I have nothing against the suggester, this suggestion is totally game-breaking and unworkable. Please, look at this page and this page to understand why sniper/gun ideas get such a bad reaction. --Sir Bob Fortune RR 21:42, 6 July 2008 (BST)
- Spam - as above. -- LABIA on the INTERNET Dunell Hills Corpseman #24 - |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| TMG 21:44, 6 July 2008 (BST)
- Spam - Hey if we keep this up we get 50 spam votes by christmas. --Pvt human 23:01, 6 July 2008 (BST)