UDWiki:Administration/Bureaucrat Promotions: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
# I'm going to vote for myself. Why the fuck not? --{{User:Nubis/sig}} 20:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC) | # I'm going to vote for myself. Why the fuck not? --{{User:Nubis/sig}} 20:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
#: we did had a bit about voting for self should be considered poor form, and that sysops should vote in any other whom they think could do the work right... and i cant remind any sysop ever voting for self based on this principle... but poor form is not against the rules, so nevermind. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 21:18, 20 November 2008 (UTC) | #: we did had a bit about voting for self should be considered poor form, and that sysops should vote in any other whom they think could do the work right... and i cant remind any sysop ever voting for self based on this principle... but poor form is not against the rules, so nevermind. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 21:18, 20 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
# Same as Wan Yao. Change we can believe in. --{{User:Mighty Agrippa/Sig}} 01:30, 21 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
====[[User:Swiers]]==== | ====[[User:Swiers]]==== |
Revision as of 01:30, 21 November 2008
This page is for the election of Bureaucrats.
Rules
Rules for starting an election.
- When a Bureaucrat resigns, or loses his status due to demotion or inactivity an election is started immediately.
- A Bureaucrat that hasn't made a single edit in one month is considered as inactive and forfeits his status as bureaucrat.
- After 3 months with no elections on a bureaucrat position, an election is called for the bureaucrat position longest without an election.
- If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 12 months, then an election is called after that period.
- The election ends after two weeks wiki time counting from the when the election is started.
- The candidate with the most votes wins the election.
- In the event of a tied vote the remaining bureaucrats will decide between the tied candidates.
Rules concerning candidates
- All active users with the sysops status are automatically declared candidates for any vacant Bureaucrat positions.
- Users with at least 12 edits in the 30 days before the election are considered "active" for purposes of the election.
- The Bureaucrat whose position comes up for election if said election is started under rule 2 of Rules for starting an election is automatically declared a candidate.
- A candidate can retract his own candidacy at any time.
Rules concerning voting.
- All users have only one vote per bureaucrat position to be filled.
- Users vote for a candidate by signing under the preferred candidates name.
- Users may change their votes for a candidate as long as the election has not ended.
- Multiple votes at the same time will be struck.
- Sockpuppetry is considered vandalism.
Election Space
The next round of bureaucrat promotions is scheduled to start in January of 2009.
A Helpful Little Gnome has demoted himself in the fallout from the last sysop promotion, therefore one position is to be filled by one of the below.
The election will end at 11:30, 4 December.
The current time (depending on caching issues) is 14:29, 23 December.
Eligible Candidates
User:Boxy
- all hail Boxy By far the best candidate at this time(cos everyone else i would vote for is likely to withdraw) --Honestmistake 11:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- boxy über alles --Midianian Big Brother Diary Room: [511,20] 11:58, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Because I don't know how active Karek is going to be over the next few months. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 13:16, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Ditto if Karek is going to be around more than i'll change my vote.----Sexualharrison 14:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Since I'm apparently the worst 'crat ever, lets balance it out with someone who knows what he's doing. -- Cheese 16:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Dunno if you even want it, mate, but you're far and away the best candidate for the job. -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 16:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yup You were always a good 'crat for when there was a lot of drama. You have good experience in the job as well.--SirArgo Talk 17:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Four More Years! As above.--Drawde Talk To Me! DORIS Яed Яum Defend Ridleybonk! I know Nothing! 21:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Aye - boxy should be default crat on udwiki... --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 21:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Don't close the box on this situation. Vouch for Boxy! --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 21:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Aye Anyone but me or Karek. or is that Karek and I hmmmm Conndrakamod TAZM CFT 21:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
User:Hagnat
- Anything less would be uncivilized--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens 19:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yay haggy! --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 20:08, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yes please. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 21:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
User:J3D
- becoz he is teh best, from a neutral perspective DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 13:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- crawl into a hole and die plox --HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS 13:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- because I want to be asked to do something unsavoury. Also, he is epic.--CyberRead240 14:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
User:Karek
- --DonTickles 12:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yep. --Janus Abernathy 13:16, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Because I'm torn between you and Nubis, I go for the one I know more.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 21:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
User:Nubis
- cuz evil is funner --WanYao 11:56, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- all seriousness aside... ;P in spite of our differences, i trust nubis a lot more than a lot of other recent crats. etc... and, i feel like voting for someone different from the usual batch. --WanYao 11:58, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- for the horde --HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS 12:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- I'm going to vote for myself. Why the fuck not? --– Nubis NWO 20:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- we did had a bit about voting for self should be considered poor form, and that sysops should vote in any other whom they think could do the work right... and i cant remind any sysop ever voting for self based on this principle... but poor form is not against the rules, so nevermind. --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 21:18, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Same as Wan Yao. Change we can believe in. --#XX - Jack Sparta TMG 01:30, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
User:Swiers
- Yes, I know he'll withdraw shortly. Asheets 16:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- From what I've seen, I think he's the best candidate. --Pestolence(talk) 22:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
User:The General
Ineligible Candidates
Withdrawn Candidates
User:Zombie slay3r
I don't think I'm up for the job right now, and I didn't get any votes in the first place. :( --ZsL 22:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
User:Conndraka
well because... you know...Conndrakamod TAZM CFT 21:50, 20 November 2008 (UTC)