UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2008 12: Difference between revisions
Krazy Monkey (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:Politics allude me, but [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=5th_of_November/2008&diff=prev&oldid=1334024 this edit] is clear bad faith, removal of another user's signed post on a past event. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 01:35, 11 December 2008 (UTC) | :Politics allude me, but [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=5th_of_November/2008&diff=prev&oldid=1334024 this edit] is clear bad faith, removal of another user's signed post on a past event. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 01:35, 11 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Kill with fire? --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 01:40, 11 December 2008 (UTC) | ::Kill with fire? --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 01:40, 11 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::'''Vandalism''' - Warned. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 20:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
I am getting sick of Umbrella's games. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 01:34, 11 December 2008 (UTC) | I am getting sick of Umbrella's games. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 01:34, 11 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:04, 11 December 2008
Vandal Banning Archive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 2008
User:We Cell
We Cell (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Edits to the page of another group. Multiple edits, its reasons like this we need to be giving some normal users here rollback.... -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 14:06, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- Nonono I can explain. I contacted the other group and asked them to edit or delete, but the guy who did it also deleted our page, so I assumed he is just a vandal. I then found out he's the leader of the group and will not attempt to edit their page anymore; we'll just duplicate what we had to say back on our page. Thanks for understanding.--We Cell 16:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- You sell, they sell, we sell, i ban... XD... do not edit other people group pages, We Cell. Nuff said, no warning for today since i'm in a good mood today. --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 17:26, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- We Cell 19:59, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- You sell, they sell, we sell, i ban... XD... do not edit other people group pages, We Cell. Nuff said, no warning for today since i'm in a good mood today. --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 17:26, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
User:Rohanzap
Rohanzap (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
For this edit to my group page. Umbrella member, probably sent by Thadeous Gay Oakley. --Haliman - Talk 01:25, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
I don't understand the whole haliman politics happening atm, but the guy has made other vandal edits, eg these.--xoxo 01:30, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- Politics allude me, but this edit is clear bad faith, removal of another user's signed post on a past event. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:35, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
I am getting sick of Umbrella's games. --Haliman - Talk 01:34, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
User:DARKSIDEX
DARKSIDEX (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Edits to a group page that said user is not a member of. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 10:15, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
User:Haliman111
Haliman111 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Broke arbitration ruling by directly contacting me twice (in a rude manner) before the 8 weeks of no-contact were over.--Thadeous Oakley 10:28, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Arbitration Case User:Krazy Monkey (arbitrator of the case)
- You need to show bad faith in the attepmt, responding to what seems to have been provocation or not wanting to hear from someone on the wiki doesn't merit punishment on his part.--Karekmaps?! 10:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- "First of all, in order to prevent any arguments, both parties are forbidden from contacting the other on the wiki in any form for a period of 8 weeks from today. This is binding and if broken may result in vandal escalations.". I am not a wiki law expert but the above seems pretty clear to me.--Thadeous Oakley 11:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- There's a reason he said may. That reason is that we aren't bound by anything an arbiter's whim when it comes to whether or not an arbitration violation is grounds for vandal escalation. We have a higher standard here than simply breaking what amounts to a formal agreement between two users mediated by a third user. The standard of punishment requires that there is harm to someone somewhere, not just two users disliking each other enough that they refuse to communicate.--Karekmaps?! 12:44, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- To clarify; In this case to get me to rule vandalism you would need to show him to be harassing you, you haven't yet. At least not to a point where I believe involvement on our(sysop's/A/VB) part is justifiable, just ignore him.--Karekmaps?! 12:46, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Lulz. I'm actually reporting an Umbrella member for BLATANTLY editing my page. One moment... --Haliman - Talk 01:24, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- Okay Karek, I understand. Though I'd like to point out the statement by him under the vandal banning of Rohanzap on this page, another clear example of such harassing behavior.--Thadeous Oakley 19:35, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- Lulz. I'm actually reporting an Umbrella member for BLATANTLY editing my page. One moment... --Haliman - Talk 01:24, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- To clarify; In this case to get me to rule vandalism you would need to show him to be harassing you, you haven't yet. At least not to a point where I believe involvement on our(sysop's/A/VB) part is justifiable, just ignore him.--Karekmaps?! 12:46, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- There's a reason he said may. That reason is that we aren't bound by anything an arbiter's whim when it comes to whether or not an arbitration violation is grounds for vandal escalation. We have a higher standard here than simply breaking what amounts to a formal agreement between two users mediated by a third user. The standard of punishment requires that there is harm to someone somewhere, not just two users disliking each other enough that they refuse to communicate.--Karekmaps?! 12:44, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- "First of all, in order to prevent any arguments, both parties are forbidden from contacting the other on the wiki in any form for a period of 8 weeks from today. This is binding and if broken may result in vandal escalations.". I am not a wiki law expert but the above seems pretty clear to me.--Thadeous Oakley 11:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
User:Venger
Venger (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Did stuff to Sonny's userpage plus I reverted the rest of his edits also.--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens 22:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- We should keep track of these butthurt guys that vandalize sonny's userpage... have a template or somethin...--/~Rakuen~\Talk I Still Love Grim 23:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Warned -- boxy talk • teh rulz 05:54 2 December 2008 (BST)
This is just a note to say that the following users are using the same IP address and more than likely the same person, judging by their hating of Sonny:
- Venger (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
- Firetwig (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
- Firetwigzed (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
That is all. -- Cheese 21:10, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- Just wanna step in for a sec, Firetwig is a guy from the Brainstock forums... Guess he don't like sonny :/ --/~Rakuen~\Talk I Still Love Grim 00:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Venger has been permbanned as a vandal alt of Firetwig -- boxy talk • teh rulz 02:23 3 December 2008 (BST)
- So the vandal alt is banned but the main account isn't warned? LOLWUT? --Sonny Corleone DORIS MSD pr0n 21:16, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, I saw the warning had been moved to his A/VD entry, and didn't look on his talk page. Anyway, warned now -- boxy talk • teh rulz 05:23 5 December 2008 (BST)