Category talk:Historical Groups: Difference between revisions
Raven Corvus (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
(→Yes) |
||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
# They'll be back. Maybe not as Red Rum but still. No one quits UD for good. Everyone returns :P {{User:Mazu/sig}} 16:31, 9 April 2012 (BST) | # They'll be back. Maybe not as Red Rum but still. No one quits UD for good. Everyone returns :P {{User:Mazu/sig}} 16:31, 9 April 2012 (BST) | ||
# Yes, yes and yes again. Red Rum was always fun to hunt and it was always a pleasure to be killed by them. Sorry to see you disband. --[[User:Raven Corvus|Raven Corvus]] 19:56, 9 April 2012 (BST) | # Yes, yes and yes again. Red Rum was always fun to hunt and it was always a pleasure to be killed by them. Sorry to see you disband. --[[User:Raven Corvus|Raven Corvus]] 19:56, 9 April 2012 (BST) | ||
# Most notable PK group i've run into.--~ [[Image:MDD_Logo.png|20px|link=MDD]]''' [[User:Zach016|Zach016]] <sup>[[Department of Health and Human Services|D.H.H.S.]]</sup> 17:45, 10 April 2012 (BST) | |||
====No==== | ====No==== |
Revision as of 16:45, 10 April 2012
Obtaining Historical Status
A policy is in place which outlines the method to attain historical status.
|
Nominations for Historical Status
When nominating a group, please add a note to Template:Wiki News and add {{HistoricalGroupVoting}} to the top of the group's page. Also, please add {{HistoricalVotingRules}} under the group's application for historical status.
New Nominations
Red Rum
Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a moderator. |
The only valid voting sections are Yes and No. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
Once the biggest ever group of murderers in this game, I had a lot of fun with these guys when we were shooting people and each other (I genuinely didn't expect to get shot by my own team quite so much, but it always made me laugh). Probably our most impressive stuff was when 10-30 of us would show up at once and kill everyone we could see, but my particularly favourite bits were the stupid things we did, like our Tea Party in the Blackmore Building. We combat revived the RRF holding the place, barricaded it up and then, when people started turning up proclaiming it was back in survivor hands, we shot them too. Hurray!
Here's some of the stuff we did below, but there was also a lot of cool stuff with other groups, whether we helped organise it (like the St. Valentine's Cherubs) or just turned up to have some fun (too many PKA events to list!). Thanks for all the good times! --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 13:18, 6 April 2012 (BST)
Cool Events: Tommy Gun | Creedystock | The Great Military Biscuit War | Battle Royale | Siege of Jerusalem | Dia De Los Muertos | Red Ranch | Hunting Season | Big Red Vasectomy Tour
Spinoff Stuff: Flat Earth Society | ¯\(°_o)/¯ | The Daily Ruminations | PANCAKE | Scour the Earth |
Lord Curton's Gentlemen's Hunting Club
Yes
- Y'arrr - cheers to Beardo, Strata, DevilAsh, Revenant, Dancing Banana, Suburban Ed, GioV, Cypher, Goribus, Amber, Vis, binlaggin, Vandr, phozil, dipcup, shad, Genie, bluefish, turk and no doubt a whole load more people I've forgotten for all the awesome times! :D --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 13:24, 6 April 2012 (BST)
- While their impact on the game as a whole may be perhaps up for discussion, they seemed to be a successful PK group back in the day. Well known by the public at large, while maintaining a style of their own that set them apart from the pack. Decent enough, so a yes. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 13:47, 6 April 2012 (BST)
- my first Pker group. ah the wanderers. this makes me sad.--User:Sexualharrison13:53, 6 April 2012
- Absolutely. I thank all of the guys that contributed (you know who you are) and disagree inherently with Thad, but don't want to poke too much fun out of him in case he bans me again. Much love to everyone, I have really enjoyed rolling with the biggest PKing group in UD for the past seven or eight (good lord, that long?) years. --Ash | T | яя | 14:09, 6 April 2012 (BST)
- makeitsomakeitsomakeitso 14:11, 6 April 2012 (BST)
- What the hell? I go inactive for a few months and you guys go dead? Not cool. But your group was cool. And DEFINITELY historical. —Aichon— 14:52, 6 April 2012 (BST)
- :( Karl forgot me--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens 16:22, 6 April 2012 (BST)
- Red Rum was for a very long time the very biggest PKer group - and that continuously, while most PKer groups tend to fade away as fast as they rise. If you even consider to vote "no", your perception is seriously weird. -- Spiderzed█ 16:29, 6 April 2012 (BST)
- $50 says Skynet shows up to vote no on this. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 16:45, 6 April 2012 (BST)
- It seems you're still as active as ever.. A bit plan hindering on my hunt for a certain imposter masquarading around as me, but you can make it up to me if you leave this Death Cultist here with an infection next time. ;) --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 07:25, 7 April 2012 (BST)
- YES! Asheets 16:59, 6 April 2012 (BST)
- Piling in. These guys were before my time, but it's obvious they made a major contribution to the art of PKing. ~~ Chief Seagull ~~ talk 20:00, 6 April 2012 (BST)
- --RadicalWhig 03:18, 7 April 2012 (BST)
- Assuming that this is not another of their 'pranks', they should be passed into history without question. One of the game's defining groups. --Papa Moloch 04:01, 7 April 2012 (BST)
- Uhm, yeah. Even if they are still active I think that predating this one then adding it when they're gone is appropriate. There's only about 4 or 5 groups I'd say that for too. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 11:41, 7 April 2012 (BST)
- --Mallrat TSI TKS CTD 11:43, 7 April 2012 (BST)
- This pack of lunatics unleashed a species of tongue-in-cheek madness that endlessly delighted everyone with a sense of humor and an appreciation for fine wine, and endlessly pissed off everyone who took the game too seriously. They are one of the few reasons this category exists. Bravo, Karl and company. Come visit me, or I shall cry. --Paddy DignamIS DEAD 18:20, 7 April 2012 (BST)
- The single most infamous PKer group in all of Malton. I don't care who you are or how new you are to the meta-game, you have heard of Red Rum. And most of you at some point have either joined us or been shot by us. Oh and Axe, I've been false flagging for awhile. I'm in Ed's Peasant Militia, I just didn't want to spoil the surprise for you lot. I've also been tagging up as 'Wanderer' for revives. I told the Militia I wasn't going to tag up until Red Rum it was put up for Historical. Go ahead and check my profile again. -- Goribus 19:19, 7 April 2012 (BST)
- Helped set the gold standard of murderous malefactors. -- Albert Schwan Saturday, 7 April 2012
- DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:32, 8 April 2012 (BST)
- Really goes without saying. --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 04:49, 9 April 2012 (BST)
- Aww, it's a shame Red Rum is disbanding. Thanks Karl and the gang for all the laughs. -- --Kooks 10:56, 9 April 2012 (BST)
- They'll be back. Maybe not as Red Rum but still. No one quits UD for good. Everyone returns :P 16:31, 9 April 2012 (BST)
- Yes, yes and yes again. Red Rum was always fun to hunt and it was always a pleasure to be killed by them. Sorry to see you disband. --Raven Corvus 19:56, 9 April 2012 (BST)
- Most notable PK group i've run into.--~ Zach016 D.H.H.S. 17:45, 10 April 2012 (BST)
No
- Nay - Criteria states: "1. Groups must no longer actively contribute to the game." I assume you guys are still together in game? Do you still want to edit the Red Rum page? If so, then you'll have to wait to get included as a Historical Group. Recall that The Dead had to make a new page, rather than reopen the old one. Now, if Red Rum basically says: "Yeah, we're done." Then I will be willing to change my vote. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 22:03, 6 April 2012 (BST)
- Nah, we're done. We had a vote on it on the forums and everything. --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 01:14, 7 April 2012 (BST)
- How long ago was it? DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 08:10, 7 April 2012 (BST)
- The thread to wind up Red Rum started in December 2011 - it's definitely not a snap decision! --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 10:35, 7 April 2012 (BST)
- Yep, Red Rum has been planning this since December. The official announcement was on April 1st actually. Which everyone seems to have taken as a prank. Justasplanned.png -- Goribus 19:08, 7 April 2012 (BST)
- The thread to wind up Red Rum started in December 2011 - it's definitely not a snap decision! --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 10:35, 7 April 2012 (BST)
- How long ago was it? DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 08:10, 7 April 2012 (BST)
- Nah, we're done. We had a vote on it on the forums and everything. --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 01:14, 7 April 2012 (BST)
Recent Nominations
- Channel 4 News Team - Successful
Previous Discussions
There are 3 archives for this page.
General Discussion
Things Best Forgotten | |
This Category talk page has an archive. |
Voting Succeeded
Things Best Forgotten | |
This Category talk page has an archive. |
Voting Failed
Things Best Forgotten | |
This Category talk page has an archive. |
Historical Groups Use Discussion
just a question why and how did the roftwood assault force become historical?--User:Sexualharrison04:16, 23 June 2011 (bst)
- here's the vote. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 05:45, 23 June 2011 (BST)
- man did it squeak by. must have been when i was inactive for a few months.--User:Sexualharrison06:06, 23 June 2011 (bst)