UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

Once a year, all sitting sysops will come up for re-evaluation by the community. The idea of this re-evaluation is to ensure that each sysop still has the trust of the community, which is vital for a sysop to have. This will give the community a chance to voice their opinions about how the sysops have been doing, and re-affirm or decline their trusted user status.

The idea of a sysop being a trusted user is a part of the guidelines for the general conduct of a sysop. The guidelines for the re-evaluation is the same as for being promoted to a sysop (which is reposted below), but with a few minor changes in wording.

Guidelines for System Operator Re-Evaluations

Once a year, on Urban Dead's birthday (July 3rd), all sysops will be subject to a community discussion. Sysops may also put themselves up for re-evaluation at any time (see below). All users are asked to comment on each candidate in question, ask questions of the candidate, and discuss the candidate's suitability for continuing to be a System Operator. This is not a vote. It is instead merely a request for comments from the wiki community. This will continue for two weeks, as all users get a chance to air their opinions on the candidate.

Once the two weeks are up, the Bureaucrats will review the community discussion and make a decision for each candidate based upon it. The user will be notified of the status of their re-evaluation, and will be retained in their position should it appear that the community is willing to continue to accept them as a System Operator. In the event that the decision is negative, then the sysop will be demoted back to regular user status, where after a month's time, the user can re-submit themself for promotion.

Before users voice their opinions on the candidate who wishes to continue their System Operator status, the following guidelines should be reviewed by the user:

General User Guidelines for System Operator Re-Evaluations

Before voicing their opinion on a candidate's re-evaluation bid, a user should consider some of the following questions:

  • Has the candidate spent significant time within the community as a sysop?
We define this as the candidate having made at least one edit in the past 3 months. It is recommended that a user look over the the sysop activity check and last 500 edits to determine the level of activity of the candidate.
Note: The Truly Inactive Sysops policy dictates that a sysop who hasn't made an edit within four months is automatically demoted. Therefore, for a sysop to be re-evaluated, they need to have made an edit before that time-frame is up.
  • Has the candidate maintained significant activity within the community?
We define this as at least 50 edits under the candidate's name since their last re-evaluation. It is recommended that a user look over the candidate's last 50 edits in order to get a feel for the activity of a candidate.
Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history used to be periodically purged on this wiki.
  • Has the candidate expressed interest in maintaining the community?
We define this as clear evidence that the candidate is already performing maintenance tasks and continuing taking a leadership role on the wiki.
  • Has the candidate expressed a desire to continue to be a System Operator?
We define this simply as indicating in the candidate's request their desire to continue to maintain the position.
  • Is there an indication of trust in the candidate.
We define this as a minimum of three other users (preferably users with at least 200 edits under their name and at least one System Operator), willing to vouch for the candidate's suitability for the role.

If a candidate is highly exemplary in one guideline, a certain level of flexibility should be extended to the other guidelines. Other guidelines for qualifications may be used, these are just a few suggested things to consider before a user voices their opinion.

Re-Evaluations still open for discussion

Axe Hack

I'm kicking my Re-evalualtions early by a month and a half as to not interfere with the next 'Crat Eletions. So make your opinions, UDWiki. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 14:00, 30 April 2012 (BST)

  • Vouch - One of the few remaining ops who still does something. -- Spiderzed█ 14:53, 30 April 2012 (BST)
  • Axe Hack seems pretty solid. Lots of contributions and very helpful. Very good work recently when stopping bots. Also good at telling the other sysops to ban IPs. ;) --Shortround }.{ My Contributions 15:06, 30 April 2012 (BST)
  • Voooouch me Likey his mom a long time.--User:Sexualharrison15:52, 30 April 2012
  • Vouch/Weak Vouch - Axe is pretty strong in janitorial duties blocking bots and archiving admin pages but the issue I've had/have is with some indecisive moments in drama sections. I saw too many "I'm an involved party" comments or "this is vandalism but not vandalism" comments or just waiting until a case is closed or close to being closed before weighing in. Be BOLD, Axe. Other than that keep doing what you're doing. ~Vsig.png 18:50, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
    Well excuse me for having to hit and run edit these days. >_< --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 18:54, 30 April 2012 (BST)
    Its understandable. I'm the last person to expect any one of you to be glued to the wiki. It just comes off as indecisivness at times. E-peen up! Make those edits count! ~Vsig.png 18:58, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Vouch - If for nothing else the social experiment of trying to force a mental prolapse on him before the year ends through an excessive workload. Axe 4 RG & ZL mod also. Let's fuck him up! ~ Kempy “YaketyYak” | ◆◆◆ | CAPD | 19:12, 30 April 2012 (BST)
    Axe Hack for President 2012!--Shortround }.{ My Contributions 19:14, 30 April 2012 (BST)
    • I support this effort on the grounds of me doing less work. Can he be my Mayoral secretary as well? The last one ran off with Mis. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 15:01, 2 May 2012 (BST)
    Ha. If I was RG and ZL mods, I would be pushing for reform, like say, timesatmps are a must. By the time that happens, I am expecting a mass revolt to strip me of said powers. xD --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 21:24, 2 May 2012 (BST)
  • Vouch --AORDMOPRI ! T 20:32, 30 April 2012 (BST)
  • Vouch - He's a great janitor, helpful, and always involved in community events. When it comes to A/VB and A/M cases that aren't open and shut he's clumsy at best and rarely if ever taking an outspoken position. I hope I misunderstood any crat intentions, because then he would be seriously overestimating himself. -- Cat Pic.png Thadeous Oakley Talk 21:13, 30 April 2012 (BST)
    do i detect a hint of jealously?--User:Sexualharrison00:43, 1 May 2012
    do i detect massive quantities of idiocy? -- Cat Pic.png Thadeous Oakley Talk 14:04, 1 May 2012 (BST)
    no i'm right. the work axe does is at least helpful in running this dump. you did absolutely nothing as sysop, zero. you are a massive failure in everything. why do you even come around any more? you don't even play UD? is it for all the great friends you have here? all the respect that other users give you? or the fact you are so lonely that you would rather put up with our abuse than be alone. you fucking loser.--User:Sexualharrison14:16, 1 May 2012
    Hahaha, are you really accusing me of not having a life? Says the guy who spends his time here banning spambots and pretending to be funny with giving them dumb names? Awesome! -- Cat Pic.png Thadeous Oakley Talk 15:20, 1 May 2012 (BST)
    I think Thad was a good op. Definitely by far not the worst we've had on here by a long shot DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 00:40, 2 May 2012 (BST)
    @thad i get bored at work.. sorry for being helpful. and I've spent less than a year on that in the six years I've been here. and DDR you are right. there have been worse but none less loathed than thad.--User:Sexualharrison05:06, 2 May 2012
  • Couch - 'nuff said. -- Cheese 01:03, 1 May 2012 (BST)
  • Vouch - He's everyone's favourite Hack!  CrunchyCake  T  Breakfast Club 01:21, 1 May 2012 (BST)
  • Vouch/Weak Vouch - As Vapor. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 03:13, 1 May 2012 (BST)
  • Vouch        03:50, 1 May 2012 (BST)
  • Desu - Because somebody needs to be racist--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS DORISFlag.jpg LOE ZHU | Яezzens 20:36, 1 May 2012 (BST)
  • Desu desu - us asians have to stick together :P -- †  talk ? f.u. 07:20, 2 May 2012 (BST)
  • Couch – Why don't you have a seat? ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 14:59, 2 May 2012 (BST)
  • Vouch -Hibernaculum 17:22, 8 May 2012 (BST)

Re-Evaluations still needing to be processed

There are currently no Re-Evaluations to be processed.

Recent Re-evaluations

Archived Evaluations


Re-Evaluations Scheduling

User Position Last Contribution Seat Available
A Helpful Little Gnome (Contribs) Bureaucrat 2021-10-29 2021-12-01
DanceDanceRevolution (Contribs) Bureaucrat 2021-10-28 2021-12-01
Rosslessness (Contribs) Sysop 2024-06-10 N/A
Stelar (Contribs) Sysop 2021-10-29 N/A

Total Sysops: 4 (excluding Kevan, LeakyBocks and Urbandead)

Last updated at: 03:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations&oldid=2000692"