UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/2011 06

Shortcut:
A/D

This page is for the request of page deletions within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to concerns about loss of data, the ability to delete pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a deletion from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.

Guidelines for Deletion Requests

All Deletion Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:

• A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility. Note that Category and Image links need a colon at the front to turn them into links (ie [[:Category:Category]] and [[:Image:Image.jpg]]).
• A reason for deletion. This should be short and to the point.
• A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.

In addition to placing a request on this page, please place the {{delete}} tag on the top of the page that is being recommended for deletion. Please make sure that the original content remains on the page, so that others can judge whether the page is worthy of deletion.

Any deletion request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.

Once the deletion request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be voted on for a period of two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. At the conclusion of this two weeks, the appropriate action will be taken by a system operator, and at the end of that day the request will be moved into the Archive.

Certain types of pages may be better being scheduled for deletion in order to reduce the amount of red tape and stop this page getting too cluttered. To lodge a request for scheduled deletions, go to UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling.

Deletion of pages that match a certain criteria may be better serviced by a request for a Speedy Deletion. Speedy Deletions are for removal of pages that are clearly of no value to the wiki, and do not incur the two week voting requirement. Speedy Deletion requests can be lodged at UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.

Speedy Deletion Eligibility

To be eligible for a Speedy Deletion Request, the page must fall under at least one of the following criteria:

1. No Content: The page contains no more than a line or two of content that cannot clearly be expanded, consists of random or incoherent content, or is duplicated elsewhere to no purpose.
2. Off-Topic: The page is a clearly off-topic page.
3. Unused Redirect: The page is an unused or underused (ie, only 1-2 pages using the link) redirect.
4. Empty Category: The page is a Category page that has no entries within it.
5. Missed Talk Page: The page is a Talk: Page from a previous deletion request that has not been deleted with the request (please note the relevant deletion request if this is so)

   As of 19 May 2010, Crit 5 is now a scheduled deletion.

6. Deletion Workaround: The page is a duplicate of a page that has been deleted from a previous deletion request (please note the relevant deletion request if this is so). A page that fits this criterion is immediately qualified for deletion without requiring it be nominated on the 'Speedy Deletions' page. Recreating a page that fits this criterion will get you a polite message to stop doing so. Any further infractions of this nature will qualify as vandalism and will be treated as such. Note that criterion 6 does not apply when the page has been restored through Undeletions.
7. Author Edit Only: The page has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author, and has been edited only by its author. Note that edits by adbots or vandals and reverts caused by them do not count.
8. User Page: The page is a User subpage that has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author.
9. Personal Page (Prefix Rule): The page is named after a user without the "User:" or "Journal:" prefixes and its content has been moved to the appropriate User or Journal page. Includes pages that should be User subpages, ie. in-game characters.

   As of 2011, August 29, Crit 9 is now a scheduled deletion.

10. Unused Template: The page is a template that has existed for at least one week and is currently unused within the wiki.
11. Non-existent User Page: The page is a User: page for a user that doesn't exist, and any content on the page has been moved to the appropriate User: or Journal: page.

    As of 20 June 2009, Crit 11 is now a scheduled deletion.

12. Defunct group page: The page is a non-historical group page, it is over two months old, it has not had an update in a month, and is not on the stats page. Such pages will remain in the queue for 5 days to determine their defunct status has been correctly identified. Due to the large number of pages that fit into this criterion, please {{speedydelete12}} on the pages to ensure that they are categorized differently from normal speedy deletion requests.

    As of 2007, September 16, this is no longer a valid criterion.

13. Missed sub-page: The page is a sub-page from a previous deletion request that has not been deleted with the request, and that serves no individual purpose (please note the relevant deletion request).

A page may also fall under a scheduled deletion and should be posted here if it is missed by the sysops.

Guidelines for Voting on Deletion Requests

• One vote per user.
• Voting should take place underneath the request, and each vote should be started with a # with no empty lines inbetween votes.
• There are four vote types:
  • Delete. For agreement with the deletion request
  • Merge. For indication that the content on the page should be merged with another page (includes an implicit Delete).
  • Speedy Delete. For indication that the page meets one of the Speedy Deletions Criteria (includes an implicit Delete).
  • Keep. For disagreement with the deletion request.

• The specific vote keyword should be bolded within the lodged vote. Any relevant comments are also allowed, but these should not be bolded.
• At least one Delete vote must be entered by the deadline in order for a page to be deleted. System operators may not use their own vote after the deadline to delete a page.
• If more Delete votes are entered than Keep votes, the page will be deleted. In any other circumstance, the page is kept.
• If 3 Speedy Deletes are lodged, and there are no Keep Votes, the page will be deleted as per Speedy Deletions.

Deletion Queue

501st U.S. Army Battalion

http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/501st_U.S._Army_Battalion/Blood_Red_Cross http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/501st_U.S._Army_Battalion/The_Shadow http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/501st_U.S._Army_Battalion/Operation_Safehouse http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/501st_U.S._Army_Battalion/Trinity_Directorate_of_Sergeants http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/501st_U.S._Army_Battalion/The_Mass these sites i request deleted since im not gonna use them anymore--—The preceding unsigned comment was added by MBjarno (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.

1. Keep - Why should these pages be deleted? Do you have any evidence that you're the page creator?--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 13:04, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Keep - These pages served to showcase an old group prior to your editing them; Trying to revive the group doesn't make the pages yours. If you'd like, we can (easily) revert them to how you first found them. --VVV ^RPGMBCWS 16:48, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Keep - Unless MBjarno can explain his reasons for requesting deletion. ~ 17:11, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

If you guys wanna keep it as museum pages, it's fine, but seriously nobody watches them, two of the original three who made it don't play and the last one is rarely in, the group is clearly dead and i want to revive it, what is the reason to keep it? it was free to take an i was a former member so i thought i could revive the group without opposition, there is no need for the mentioned pages and nobody watches them, but it's your decision

Men of action

One-man group from 2008, never took off. --VVV ^RPGMBCWS 23:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

1. Delete (don't forget the talk page) - --VVV ^RPGMBCWS 23:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Delete -- LEMON #1 00:40, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete -Estacado^Talk 00:44, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Delete --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
5. Delete ~ 17:12, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

UD Project

This is a really cool idea to record the history of urban dead. Unfortunately no one ever contributed to it, and the website it links to is nonexistent. Kind of a shame really.

1. Delete - Nothing going on here.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 15:00, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Delete - could've been good, but alas it was not to be. ~~ Chief Seagull ~~ ^talk 15:16, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 20:48, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Delete - bummer -- LEMON #1 05:01, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
5. Delete--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 17:42, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
6. Move Move it to a section under my namespace would you? -Estacado^Talk 00:44, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

   No. Do it yourself. -- LEMON #1 01:23, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

   Wasn't it you who once told me that it was easier for the Mods to do it, because they could do it with a click of a button? -Estacado^Talk 22:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

   You seem to be failing to realise there is absolutely no reason why we should be moving it into your userspace when it's a community page deletion candidate. Copy it there. Also, the way you said it seemed to indicate that you felt we had some sort of obligation to follow your request/order, of which we have absolutely none, since your request here to have it moved is actually just a vote and it's being outnumbered by deletes 5:1. -- LEMON #1 00:10, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

   I've always wondered this. If you copy a page that is up for deletion to your userspace, and the page eventually gets deleted, will your copied page be subject to on-site speedy-delete as a deletion work-around (Crit. 6)? -MHSstaff 22:23, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

   Nope, arking in userspaces is fine, I think the main concern is that we don't want these incomplete or redundant pages in the mainspace. -- LEMON #1 00:10, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

   I think if the original is a crit 7, then it's still elligible for Crit 6, but I'm not certain.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 00:05, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

   It implies that they would be deleted, but both precedent and the 'a userspace belongs to the user rule' say otherwise. Perhaps we should have a vote, and amend it to clarify? --VVV ^RPGMBCWS 01:25, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

7. Delete - I don't see this going anywhere anytime soon. MHSstaff 22:24, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Dunell_Hills_Police_Department/Department_of_Internal_Affairs/UDTRoster

Out of date UDTool list, now supplanted by an automatically generated list stored elsewhere. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 12:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

1. Delete - As Above. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 12:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Delete -- Spiderzed▋ 12:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete -- Linkthewindow  Talk  14:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Delete. G F J 15:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
5. Delete -- LEMON #1 01:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
6. Delete Bandwagon --Thadeous Oakley 10:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
7. Delete --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 14:04, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
8. Delete. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 20:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
9. Delete ~ 21:05, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Dunell_Hills_Police_Department/Department_of_Internal_Affairs/UDTRoster2

Out of date UDTool list, now supplanted by an automatically generated list stored elsewhere. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 12:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

1. Delete - As Above. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 12:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Delete -- Spiderzed▋ 12:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete -- Linkthewindow  Talk  14:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Delete. G F J 15:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
5. Delete -- LEMON #1 01:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
6. Delete Bandwagon --Thadeous Oakley 10:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
7. Delete --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 14:04, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
8. Delete. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 20:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
9. Delete ~ 21:05, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Dunell_Hills_Police_Department/Most_Wanted/UDTList

Out of date UDTool list, now supplanted by an automatically generated list stored elsewhere. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 12:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

1. Delete - As Above. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 12:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Delete -- Spiderzed▋ 12:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete -- Linkthewindow  Talk  14:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Delete. G F J 15:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
5. Delete -- LEMON #1 01:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
6. Delete Bandwagon --Thadeous Oakley 10:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
7. Delete --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 14:04, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
8. Delete --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 20:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
9. Delete ~ 21:05, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Two Zombies Ultimate Attack Force

Another relic that probably never took off. Just news for three weeks, and that was it. Also, never categorized until right now, and the only link to it comes from Yon's orphanage clearing efforts. -- Spiderzed▋ 11:14, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

1. Delete - as above. -- Spiderzed▋ 11:14, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Delete Keep - but weak. It's got a bit of content, still orphaned and a nonexistent. Too much content for a crit 1, which is really it's only saving grace. -- Linkthewindow  Talk  14:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete. G F J 15:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Keep - whaaaat? I really like this, I like the header and the style. The only two reasons I see this should be deleted is cause it's orphaned and crit 12. crit 12 no longer exists etc, and while orphaned can sometimes be a reason... I just dig this page, even though its not really useful (what group page is?) It lasted 3 years before, I wouldn't mind keeping it around now :'( -- LEMON #1 01:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
5. Keep - The concept is hilarious plus the banner and style has this cute, retro, old-skool feel. Worth keeping around IMO. -MHSstaff 03:42, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
6. Keep - Lengthy page on a group of more than one person. --VVV ^RPGMBCWS 05:26, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
7. Keep Like the page. --Thadeous Oakley 10:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
8. Keep - Nice find. I'd love to stumble on to something like this with the random page button.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 14:51, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
9. Keep --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 20:50, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
10. Keep ~ 21:05, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Recent Actions

Roftwood_Retake_Campain

Looks like a leftover campaign from the days of yore that never got off the ground. Only linked to the creator's talk page.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 03:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

1. Delete - As above.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 03:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Marinade overnight, coat lightly in durum wheat flour and shallow fry. 03:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete -- LEMON #1 11:40, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Delete (don't forget the talk page) - For the record, the days of yore are August 2007 and before. But yeah, this is still pretty old, and was set up for an non-notable event. --VVV ^RPGMBCWS 08:51, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
5. Delete --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:51, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
6. Delete -- Spiderzed▋ 12:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
7. Delete -- Linkthewindow  Talk  14:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
8. Delete. G F J 15:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
9. Delete Bandwagon --Thadeous Oakley 10:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
10. Delete ~ 21:05, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleted --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 00:03, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Bill stokes was here

And associated talk page. This has been moved from A/SD, and was a graffiti campaign that never took off, or had any noticeable impact on the game or community. It is not linked to from anywhere -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:07 28 November 2010 (BST)

1. Delete -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:07 28 November 2010 (BST)
2. Delete ~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 01:21, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete Pointless page about a non-event. -- Spiderzed▋ 01:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
4. Delete -- LEMON #1 01:27, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
5. Delete --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 10:40, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
6. Delete - Linkthewindow  Talk  11:28, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
7. Delete. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 04:25, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
8. Delete ~ 06:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
9. Delete - Bill Stokes was here, but not for much longer. ~~ Chief Seagull ~~ ^talk 14:14, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
10. Delete - I don't think I've ever seen it sprayed, so its some sort of obscure. --VVV ^RPGMBCWS 23:41, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

    Then again, we could merge it with Streets, Blades, etc. into Common Graffiti. --VVV ^RPGMBCWS 23:44, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

    I would fight to keep Blades, it's exactly the same as Blanemcc is a PKer and surprisingly, as prominent, and I don't mind them having their own pages. -- LEMON #1 00:18, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

11. Delete. G F J 15:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
12. Delete Bandwagon --Thadeous Oakley 10:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleted --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 00:01, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

More cats

Don't let the title of "groups" fool you. These cats are basically a list of templates that have nothing to do with each other whatsoever except for the fact, you guessed it, they all start with the same letter. Originally created by Nubis, these cats are incomplete, wrong (some templates don't start with the corresponding letter), generally useless, and most importantly an inferior dupe of this page--Thadeous Oakley 09:42, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

1. Delete All of them. --Thadeous Oakley 09:42, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
2. Delete - nubis/dcc did some good shit, but this wasn't one of em. This has also been succeeded by Rooster's better template categorising efforts too. -- LEMON #1 09:59, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 15:04, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
4. Delete -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:07 28 November 2010 (BST)
5. Delete Linkthewindow  Talk  11:28, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
6. Delete - Just makes it harder to find shit.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 12:51, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

   But surely shit is in Category:S Groups?--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 13:05, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

7. delete ~ 03:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
8. Delete -- Spiderzed▋ 12:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
9. Delete. G F J 15:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleted, and all pages decategorised.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 23:59, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Malton Manhunt/Player Hunt 2008

This Malton Manhunt event has never really kicked off. It's one of those Malton Manhunt events that just faded from existence.

1. Delete --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 20:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Delete ~ 20:21, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Keep - Ahahah. I like the history of this manhunt that everyone got involved in and that petered out. Also, now I know when Axe Hack graduated highschool. Mwahahaha. Stalker XP+1.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 03:34, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Keep - This is my page. In a namespace I made. It came as humanly close to starting (we all got together in the starting zone, everything was ready and the day before it was supposed to start, zombies rolled in and fucked everyone over and the contestants scattered making it hard to re-co-ordinate the thing again) without having actually got off the starting mark, but that doesn't make it a useless page. It's mine and I don't want it gone. -- LEMON #1 04:52, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

   Well, since you did start the Malton Manhunt, I can't argue with you there. What's the procedures for retracting this deletion request? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 05:26, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

   Just cycle it early, shouldn't be much of a problem. -- LEMON #1 05:29, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Kept early -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 09:24 11 December 2010 (BST)

Clearing Short Pages

Crit 1's

• Night Ravers/Icehawg.
• Bad Habit/Enshrinement (And it's a crit 13 to boot).
• Socialist Survivor Network/ Military.
• The Rebellion/Recruitment (The page creator said he's not going to finish work on it).

That's all I got time for now. ~ 02:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Bad Habit still exists, so it's not a crit 13. If there's no objection I'll nerf these in a bit. 02:06, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

I'm willing to haggle on this, but for now,... I'd be willing to vote keep... I didn't think we deleted group pages,... plus disk space=cheap. -Estacado^Talk 02:44, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

We're not deleting them as group pages, but as short pages. (That is, under C.1). Also, I'm going to pretend I didn't hear that piece of trash you just said. That said, are you sure you want to vote keep (in which case they'll just go to A/D and be deleted in a few weeks), or would you like to change your mind so we can skip the red tape and get rid of them here? ~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 23:06, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

My group.. Keep--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks ^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 01:22, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Which one? ~ 01:39, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Well, now, it never worked when I tried it Red... convience me more. And I haven't necessarily voted keep yet. -Estacado^Talk 04:32, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Because 1) you're overreacting, the majority of the time your requests have been deleted; 2) the ones that were denied had valid justification; and 3) voting keep is just delaying the inevitable. ~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 05:21, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

But I have valid uses for each of these pages. Keep -Estacado^Talk 23:49, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Just realized I neglected to put the speedydelete template on these pages. As Hawk said, these are all speedy delete worthy. No need to move to A/D. ~ 23:18, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

1. Speedy Delete as crit 1. Shame Poodle is a faggot. -- LEMON #1 00:47, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Crit One Speedy 00:55, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete Bad Habit/Enshrinement, Speedy Delete the rest. --VVV ^RPGMBCWS 00:59, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Speedy As we have no bolded keeps, and 3 speedies, I'm tempted to cycle this right now. ~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 01:19, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
5. Technically, my vote up above constatuted a keep, otherwise it didn't need to be moved here. Speedy Delete it now... -Estacado^Talk 01:30, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
6. Speedy ~ 02:32, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleted as per the speedy deletions clause. I would like to remind poodle as per his vote above, that moving a/sd entries to a/d is the only purpose of voting keep on a/sd so the fact that you were surprised that this would happen just bewilders me. You might want to heed a well learned lesson regarding keeping A/SD entries just to make a point or piss people off; you may think you're achieving something or annoying your enemies but it won't last long. You keep our shit for shits and giggles, we'll put it straight on A/D and people will come to vote on an entry which essentially has become an irreversible record of how much of an idiot you were for keeping it in the first place. Iscariot did this too and even he stopped once I started putting his fails on a pedestal at a/d, so here's some food for thought; you throw the red tape in our face, we throw the community into yours. -- LEMON #1 03:07, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Chekken and related pages

Specifically, User:Chekken/Penehzmcgee, Department_of_Emotional_Man-love, User:Chekken/nav, User:Chekken/Sandbox, User:Chekken/sig, Naked_Twister_party/History, Naked_Twister_Party/Strike_Teams, Naked_Twister_Party/09, Malton_roadtrip_'09/map, Malton_roadtrip_'09, Wind_and_Fire_Tour.

I know it's a lot of stuff, but it all has to go. I'm done with the game, and it's time to move on. --Chex 09:06, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

1. Scheduled --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 11:40, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   Except for Malton roadtrip '09, to which I only say Delete.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:16, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

2. Speedy - None of those pages are remotely worth keeping. --Thadeous Oakley 11:50, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
3. Scheduled - awww man, I've been holiday-post-uni drinking and am too ruined to comprehend the request, lest fulfil it. What I'd do is delete everything (bar his signature),fix the links from the pages being deleted (bar the subpages), redirect dem to DEM as per common sense, and.... uyeah... And I'd do it as soon as I'm sober. So unless soemoen votes keep inbetween here and then, I'd do it by tomorow. And if someone voted keep I'd probably do it anyway. -- LEMON #1 13:09, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   Instead of not deleting his sig, just replace it with [[User:Chekken|Chekken]], so it's like deleting it only without the mess of broken template calls. 18:55, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   The map is really nice. :( -MHSstaff 19:13, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   I've Deleted everything except for the signature and Malton roadtrip '09, which has multiple contibutors, so I'm only voting delete on that, and hence it only has 2 Speedy votes. The sig needs sorting and I'll leave it to someone else to decide how.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:15, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

4. Delete for the Roadtrip '09 page You have already blown the supporting map page and with that gone, I don't see much point in keeping this one. Shame because both were nice pages. -MHSstaff 19:18, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   *Cough*--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:26, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   Yeah but that image is basically on a death row now so it is more or less deleted. -MHSstaff 19:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   There we go, arked for keeping. 19:40, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

5. Keep Naked_Twister_Party/09. I don't know why Yonn deleted it already, considering it has about two-and-a-half dozen edits from other authors. Heck, I even had it linked from one of my character's bios on the wiki, since it was an actual event page that several dozen or hundred zombies and survivors were present for. Now all I have is a red-link. —Aichon— 21:10, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   Because it had three speedy deletion votes and hence the rules above say it should be deleted?--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:12, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   Fair enough, though considering you didn't offer your own Speedy for the Malton roadtrip page on the basis of having multiple contributors, I'd have hoped for the same here as well. —Aichon— 21:14, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   From the tone of roadtrip, I felt the other contributor was more important in the creation of the event, and since half the edits to that page were made by the other contributor, I feel there was a substantial difference. :P --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:28, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

6. Delete. G F J 16:54, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

This was done a while ago. -- LEMON #1 03:07, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Archive

e Deletions Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2014 Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Years 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020