UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/The Rooster/2010-02-13 Re-Evaluation

Administration » Sysop Archives » The Rooster » 2010-02-13 Re-Evaluation

The Rooster

Scheduled Re-evaluation of The Rooster. Community input now!--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:58, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

You know, the least you could have done, as the bid creator, is told him about his own bid. This may have slipped past him since it's such an underused page and he only comes here periodically. --

 

 

 

 

08:11, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks DDR. Anyway, not much to say, I would think my use of the tools is not an issue. I'm periodically less active and don't offer opinions on A/VD or A/M so feel free to take issue with that. Otherwise I would hope I'm up to scratch. --  RoosterDragon  14:46, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Damn, sorry, Rooster. It was 10 o'clock at night, and I guess I just assumed it would be found.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

• Vouch --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:58, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
• Me Rikey - That's a vouch. 22:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
• Vouch - Can't see any problems here. --Honestmistake 00:25, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
• Yarp - 'nuff said. -- Cheese 00:46, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
• Auto-vouch --Bob Boberton^{TF / DW} 01:45, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
• Question: Given some of the messages on your user page, do you actually still want to be a sysop during 2010? --MHSstaff 01:54, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

  Sure I do, I just expect to be less active for a while. No doubt I'll be suddenly return to super-active at some point in the future though. --  RoosterDragon  14:46, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

  Vouch As Maverick. -- MHSstaff 17:05, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

• Vouch - Unless Rooster decides that he no longer wants the buttons, I see no reason to take them away. --Maverick ^{Talk - OBR 404} 07:46, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
• Vouch I put him up for his initial bid (1) 8 months ago and he hasn't disappointed. --
   
   
   
   
  09:45, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
• Vouch - durr Cyberbob  Talk  10:29, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
• Against - Far, far too inactive as a person. Rooster has made many bots, but sometimes I think he is one himself. Against until he makes an actual response on his re-evaluation. -- Thadeous Oakley 14:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

  I am less active of late, tis a fair point. What do you mean that I'm 'like a bot' though? --  RoosterDragon  14:46, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

  You do allot of work here, but you rarely interact with the community, that's all. Anyway, Vouch for taking the time to respond. Most people wouldn't bother doing so with a clear pro-majority like this. --Thadeous Oakley 15:07, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

• Vouch - As Mav. Linkthewindow  Talk  06:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
• Vouch - As Mav too. —Aichon— 07:20, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
• Vouch - I feel that we can still trust him with the tools.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 08:52, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
• Vouch - damn it.. i want moar drama. where is izzy?----sexualharrison ¯\()/¯ 05:36, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
• Vouch - Could be a bit more actve in at least A/M, but on the basis of the excellent work he does elsewhere he deserves his buttons.-- Adward  14:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
• Vouch - This is an easy decision.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 20:07, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
• Vouch - Bandwagon. --^A_O^R_D^M_O^P_R^I _! ^T 21:02, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
• Against - I have seen no effort to change the mob mentality of the sysop community and undo the faggotry created by the current regime of retards. The current sysops are so far up each others' asses that they've formed a gaytrain bound for fail and sodomy. You are guilty of promoting the nepotism and e-corruption created by the other sysops by not fighting it. --Sonny Corleone ^{DORIS I jizzed in my pants pr0n} 04:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
• Vouch - Haven't done anything that would require him to be demoted --^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 11:09, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
• Vouch WHY THE FUCK NOT?--Arthur Dent BIN LADEN IS DEAD!!!!! 15:04, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
• Vouch As Armpit. Cookies and Cream 21:25, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
• Against - You make cheese and J3D look like the definition of respectable sysops. You have done nothing but fed into the circlejerk power whoring ways of the sysops team, and have done nothing to even try and change things. Enjoy keeping the UDwiki shitty. --/~Rakuen~\^Talk I Still Love Grim 03:24, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
• Vouch - Sonny and WOOT are pretty much dead on (I can't believe I'm saying that...) However, Roosters make poor scapegoats. --WanYao 04:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

  additional conversation on talk page --

   

   

   

   

  13:33, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

• Vouch - allah akbar--star 08:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC) - Vandal contribution struck. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 04:53, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
• Vouch - even stronger vouch if he can make a bot to ban the spammer above me. -- 
  •   Timmah!  
  •   Talk  
  16:48, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
• One of the responses above makes it pointless for anyone else to even bother contributing to this re-evaluation. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 04:53, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
• Against For the same reason as Thadeous, when he asked his question. The mass majority of things I've seen Rooster do have been bot contolled. If not for that, and based on his limited interactions with the community.... I doubt he'd even be here himself. However, if having several bots that are capable of performing your duties for you,... Given some time, I think I could do a better job once I get my own up and running.... -Poodle of Doom^{M! T} 16:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

The Rooster has fulfilled the communities requirement for a successful re-evaluation, so it's been decided that he may keep his Sysop status. Successful. --

 

 

 

 

22:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)