UDWiki:Administration/Protections/Archive/2011 06: Difference between revisions
Red Hawk One (talk | contribs) |
Cyberbob240 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==Requested Edits== | ==Requested Edits== | ||
<!--''Place pages requiring editing here.''--> | <!--''Place pages requiring editing here.''--> | ||
''Place pages requiring editing here.'' | |||
==Recent Actions== | |||
===[[The Dead]]=== | ===[[The Dead]]=== | ||
I request that [[The Dead]] be added to [[:Category:Confirmed Groups]], as they have 131 active members and are currently ranked 4th on [http://www.urbandead.com/stats.html the stats page], making them meet the criteria for this category.--{{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 22:32, 6 September 2009 (BST) | I request that [[The Dead]] be added to [[:Category:Confirmed Groups]], as they have 131 active members and are currently ranked 4th on [http://www.urbandead.com/stats.html the stats page], making them meet the criteria for this category.--{{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 22:32, 6 September 2009 (BST) | ||
Line 37: | Line 40: | ||
===[[Blackmore Bastard Brigade]]=== | ===[[Blackmore Bastard Brigade]]=== | ||
I request that [[Blackmore Bastard Brigade]] be added to [[:Category:Confirmed Groups]], as they have 10 active members and are currently ranked on [http://www.urbandead.com/stats.html the stats page], making them meet the criteria for this category.--{{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 00:30, 7 September 2009 (BST) | I request that [[Blackmore Bastard Brigade]] be added to [[:Category:Confirmed Groups]], as they have 10 active members and are currently ranked on [http://www.urbandead.com/stats.html the stats page], making them meet the criteria for this category.--{{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 00:30, 7 September 2009 (BST) | ||
===Admin templates=== | ===Admin templates=== |
Revision as of 23:30, 6 September 2009
This page is for the request of page protection within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to philosophical concerns, the ability to protect pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a protection from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.
Guidelines for Protection Requests
All Protection Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:
- A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility.
- A reason for protection. This should be short and to the point.
- A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.
Any protection request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.
Once the protection request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be reviewed by a member of the Sysop team, and action taken accordingly. Once action has been taken, the system operator will add a comment including a signed datestamp detailing his course of action, and the request will be moved into the Recent Actions queue, where it will remain for one week. After that week is up, it may be moved to the archive (see navigation box below). If the Protection has been granted, the system operator should place the tag {{protect}} on the page(s) that have been protected.
In the event of a system operator requesting a Protection, all the previous points will apply, excepting that a system operator other than the requestor shall review and take action on the request.
Pages in the Protection Queue may already be scheduled protections. For a list of scheduled protections, see here.
Protections Archive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Protection Queue
Could one of you unprotect all of my user pages and all the pages under my namespace?Please include the unlinked archives as well. They were put under protection when a vandal was playing at smack-the-conn back in the day. ConndrakaTAZM CFT 14:13, 5 September 2009 (BST)
Requested Edits
Place pages requiring editing here.
Recent Actions
The Dead
I request that The Dead be added to Category:Confirmed Groups, as they have 131 active members and are currently ranked 4th on the stats page, making them meet the criteria for this category.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 22:32, 6 September 2009 (BST)
- This should probably go to the Historical Groups pages first. Cyberbob Talk 00:07, 7 September 2009 (BST)
- Both The Dead and LUE are listed on the stats page (LUE is already in the category). I'll drop a notice on the Historic Group's talk, although I don't see why we can't just add this tag now.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 00:19, 7 September 2009 (BST)
- Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmok. Though it will be kind of odd to have a group simultaneously Historical and Confirmed - at least until the Historical crowd are done mulling it over. :d Cyberbob Talk 00:22, 7 September 2009 (BST)
- Historic, defunct, AND confirmed? That ought to throw off anyone who looks at it.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 00:25, 7 September 2009 (BST)
- Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmok. Though it will be kind of odd to have a group simultaneously Historical and Confirmed - at least until the Historical crowd are done mulling it over. :d Cyberbob Talk 00:22, 7 September 2009 (BST)
- Both The Dead and LUE are listed on the stats page (LUE is already in the category). I'll drop a notice on the Historic Group's talk, although I don't see why we can't just add this tag now.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 00:19, 7 September 2009 (BST)
Blackmore Bastard Brigade
I request that Blackmore Bastard Brigade be added to Category:Confirmed Groups, as they have 10 active members and are currently ranked on the stats page, making them meet the criteria for this category.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 00:30, 7 September 2009 (BST)
Admin templates
I've protected Template:RERej and Template:RESuc, the new A/RE archive templates, upon their creation. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 09:20, 3 September 2009 (BST)
Protections Scheduling Queue
Protection Scheduling requests should be requested in the same general format as Deletions. Votes will occur in the same general manner, and like deletion scheduling requests will be voted on for two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. Valid votes are:
- Yea - Approval of Schedule Request
- Nay - Disapproval of Schedule Request
Note: The archive for Scheduled Protections can be found here.
Recently Concluded Requests
Historical Events with 13 for, 1 against. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 15:34, 19 August 2009 (BST)