|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{TOCleft}} | | {{TOCright}} |
| =Obtaining Historical Status= | | =Obtaining Historical Status= |
| A [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Historical_Groups|policy]] is in place which outlines the method to attain historical status. | | A [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Historical_Groups|policy]] is in place which outlines the method to attain historical status. |
| Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| #Groups must allow 4 months in between when the group disbands and when they can be nominated for Historical Status. (Note: Only for [[Malton]]-based groups) | | #Groups must allow 4 months in between when the group disbands and when they can be nominated for Historical Status. (Note: Only for [[Malton]]-based groups) |
| |} | | |} |
| <br clear=both />
| |
|
| |
|
| =Nominations for Historical Status= | | =Nominations for Historical Status= |
| When nominating a group, please add a note to [[Template:Wiki News]] and add {{CodeInline|<nowiki>{{HistoricalGroupVoting}}</nowiki>}} to the top of the group's page. Also, please add {{CodeInline|<nowiki>{{HistoricalVotingRules}}</nowiki>}} under the group's application for historical status. | | When nominating a group, please add a note to [[Template:Wiki News]] and add {{CodeInline|<nowiki>{{HistoricalGroupVoting}}</nowiki>}} to the top of the group's page. Also, please add {{CodeInline|<nowiki>{{HistoricalVotingRules}}</nowiki>}} under the group's application for historical status. |
| | |
| | {{HistoricalGroupVotingDeadline}} |
|
| |
|
| =New Nominations= | | =New Nominations= |
| ''Place new nominations for voting here.'' | | ''Place new nominations for voting here.'' |
|
| |
|
| == [[Feral Undead]] == | | = Successful Nominations = |
| Another long-lasting and impactful zombie group. They didn't walk around and steamroll the map like RRF or MOB, but they greatly affected the area around [[Fort Perryn]], and offered a more casual playing style than the organized hordes with their striketimes. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 19:34, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|404: Barhah not found}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|The Abandoned}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Brain Curators}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|The Burchell Arms Regulars}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Creedy Defense Force}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Creedy Guerilla Raiders}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|The Dead}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|DEM|DEM Groups}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|The Dribbling Beavers}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|DSS}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Feral Undead}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Flowers of Decay}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Fort Perryn Defense Force}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|The Fortress}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Knights Templar}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|LUE}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Malton Medical Staff}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|The Malton Zookeepers}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Militant Order of Barhah}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Minions of the Apocalypse}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Philosophe Knights}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Quartly Study Group}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|The Randoms}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|The Ridleybank Resistance Front}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Roftwood Communication Center}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|The Scourge}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|SillyLillyPilly}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Soldiers of Crossman}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|South Paynterton Aces}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|THEM}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Yagoton Revivification Clinic}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Zerg Hunters Unlimited}} |
|
| |
|
| === Yes ===
| |
| # --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 19:34, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| #A vastly important group in Urban Dead's history. --[[User:LordMoloch|LordMoloch]] ([[User talk:LordMoloch|talk]]) 19:38, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| === No === | | = Unsuccessful Nominations = |
|
| |
|
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Bandit Queens}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|CCPD Family}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Cannibal Corps}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|DORIS}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|ENVY}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Escape}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Legends of Darkness}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Manhunt All-Stars}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|McZeds}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|PTT}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Pathetic Bill Tribute Band}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|The Penguin Mafia}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Team Xtreme}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Wulves}} |
| | {{HistoricalVotingEntry|Zone Defenders}} |
|
| |
|
| == [[Militant Order of Barhah]] == | | =Previous Discussions= |
| As we are loosening the standards to also allow active groups, and since [[:Category_talk:Historical_Groups#Militant_Order_of_Barhah|last time]] MOB very heavily favoured and only failed on a technicality, I am resubmitting them. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 19:34, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| | '''General Discussion''' |
| | | * '''[[:Category talk:Historical Groups/Archive|General Discussion (2006–2025)]]''' |
| === Yes ===
| |
| # --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 19:34, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| #Obviously. --[[User:LordMoloch|LordMoloch]] ([[User talk:LordMoloch|talk]]) 19:37, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| === No ===
| |
|
| |
|
| == [[The Ridleybank Resistance Front]] ==
| | '''Successful Nominations''' |
| There can be no question that the RRF has been a historical group. I would suggest that it has been the ''most'' historical group in the game. No suburb is synonymous with threat to human life in the way that Ridleybank is. The Blackmore Building has been the center of countless large sieges between the RRF and humans fascinated by the danger they cause. The RRF has, simultaneously, menaced whatever area of Malton drew their attention at any particular time. From their founding in 2005 by the mythical Petrosjko to this very day, they have been one of the largest, most powerful, most respected groups in the city. Really, this vote is not over whether the RRF is historical, but rather it is over whether it is appropriate, in this final week, to override the rule against making a group which is still very much active into a historical group. I believe that it is appropriate. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 02:19, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| | * '''[[:Category_talk:Historical_Groups/SucceededArchive/1|Successful Nominations (2006–2008)]]''' |
| | * '''[[:Category talk:Historical Groups/SucceededArchive|Successful Nominations (2008–2024)]]''' |
| | * '''[[:Category:Historical_Group_Votings/Succeeded|Successful Nominations (2025–)]]''' |
|
| |
|
| === Yes===
| | '''Failed Nominations''' |
| # '''Yes''' - Author Vote. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 02:19, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| | * '''[[:Category talk:Historical Groups/FailedArchive|Failed Nominations (2010–2024)]]''' |
| # '''Yes''' - Sadly, it'll be inactive in a few days regardless... [[User:Levixorz|Levixorz]] ([[User talk:Levixorz|talk]]) 02:25, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| | * '''[[:Category:Historical_Group_Votings/Failed|Failed Nominations (2025–)]]''' |
| #I think we can dispense with the inactivity requirement since, yes, all the groups will shortly be inactive anyway. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}}
| |
| #Of course. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:32, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes'''. {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 12:37, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| #--[[User:Axe Hack|<span style="border: 1px solid #556b2f; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #2f4f4f, #1c2926); text-align: justify; box-shadow: 2px 2px 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7); padding: 2px 5px; color: #98FB98; font-size: smaller; border-radius: 10px;">Axe Hack</span>]] [[User talk:Axe Hack|<span style="border: 1px solid #556b2f; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #2f4f4f, #1c2926); text-align: justify; box-shadow: 2px 2px 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7); padding: 2px 5px; color: #98FB98; font-size: smaller; border-radius: 10px;">Talk</span>]] 13:52, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| #I don't even know where to begin. The whole history of UD is heavily intertwined with that of the RRF, and many many historical events like the Blackmore Sieges wouldn't have happened without them. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 14:09, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| #Without question. The eternal 'Big Bad' of Urban Dead. Insomniac by Choice said years ago (2008/9 time) that if the RRF didn't exist, it was possible that the game itself might have died entirely at that time. That's probably a little excessive, but by no means as much so as it might first appear. --[[User:LordMoloch|LordMoloch]] ([[User talk:LordMoloch|talk]]) 19:27, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| # “Yes”[[User:NZ Idol|NZ Idol]] ([[User talk:NZ Idol|talk]]) 19:43, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Yes''' --{{User:CyanEyed/Sig}} 19:49, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| === No ===
| |
| | |
| == [[Quartly Study Group]] ==
| |
| Helping a friend with this nomination, but there's no doubt in my head that QSG is worthy of Historical Group. With their [[Quartly_Study_Group/Quartly_Lecture_Group|famous lecture series]] that invited guests from all walks, their impact was felt in the meta community for decades after. Friends to survivors, PKers, death cultists, and zombies alike, they brought people together in a way that few other groups could accomplish and succeeded in carving out a sacred ground that was respected by nearly all groups, even years later. Though, to be fair to the zombies who ate them, QSG ''was'' known for having some of the juiciest brains around. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 22:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| === Yes ===
| |
| # Author vote. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 22:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| # QSG was unique, one of the very few groups that managed to be respected and liked across all playing styles. They might not have set off great events, but they were one of the very unique things that lent UD character and distinctiveness. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 22:46, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| # Second. [[User:Senisterdenister|SenisterDenister]]
| |
| # 0.95 L or 1.14 L? --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 03:09, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| #Yes. {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 12:37, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| #Technically speaking, the QSG is responsible for the UD Reunion being a thing. I mean, when you're bringing together a community just like that... --[[User:Axe Hack|<span style="border: 1px solid #556b2f; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #2f4f4f, #1c2926); text-align: justify; box-shadow: 2px 2px 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7); padding: 2px 5px; color: #98FB98; font-size: smaller; border-radius: 10px;">Axe Hack</span>]] [[User talk:Axe Hack|<span style="border: 1px solid #556b2f; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #2f4f4f, #1c2926); text-align: justify; box-shadow: 2px 2px 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7); padding: 2px 5px; color: #98FB98; font-size: smaller; border-radius: 10px;">Talk</span>]] 13:51, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| === No ===
| |
| | |
| == [[Escape]] ==
| |
| They were robbed [[:Category_talk:Historical_Groups/FailedArchive#Escape|last time in 2010]] over still heated feelings about the event. In hindsight, Escape wasn't just the most significant thing to happen in 2010 - it was the most significant thing for many years to come that wasn't just a reheated version of things that have already been done before. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 22:48, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| === Yes ===
| |
| # Author vote. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 22:48, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| # Escape was one of the first "historic" groups/events I learned about when I started observing UD's oral culture. The original event has been on the [[Template:UDThisMonth|This Month template]] every June since 2013. {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 23:36, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| # I strongly feel this deserves historical status, either as a group or an event. A fascinating and unique bit of UD history. Being in that group, the largest of its size for a couple years at that point, I really thought Kevan might have responded to it if the survivors made it to the leave date. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 23:48, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| # Yes, but I think this should be filed under historical events. Also, regrettable that I somehow completely missed this thing. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 03:16, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - I disagree that Escape (the group) was robbed before. It was the ''event'' of the same name that was robbed of historical status before, with the group not being in the least bit noteworthy, but no one ever made a page for the event (so far as I know) and we aren't going to at this point, so it's better to have a little confusion for future UD historians than nothing at all. Especially so since the event itself was not only historical, it was the catalyst for all sorts of other historical groups/events. I stand by my previous No vote and its reasoning, but we're out of time to do it right, so it isn't a hill worth dying on. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 20:29, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Event''' - I voted No last time, in favor of the event. But I think Aichon is correct that calling the group historical is close enough given the circumstances. I will point out, though, that we ''do'' have a page about the event: '''[[Escape (event)]]'''. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 02:06, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| === No ===
| |
| # An event, surely (and I'd vote Yes for that) --[[User:LordMoloch|LordMoloch]] ([[User talk:LordMoloch|talk]]) 20:08, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == [[Team Xtreme]] ==
| |
| Team Xtreme deserves more credit [[:Category_talk:Historical_Groups/FailedArchive#Team_Xtreme|than they got back in 2012]]. They have been the most signicant group within the tiny niche of bounty-hunting, and since the breakdown of the [[Rogues Gallery]] and its sanctioned bounty-hunting they weren't going to be surpassed within this niche either. Let's give them their trophy as the game is on the way out. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 22:48, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| === Yes ===
| |
| # Author vote. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 22:48, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| # yes. Never was very large, but definitely made a mark on the bounty hunting sub game. --{{User:A.schwan/sig}} <sup>7 March 2025</sup>
| |
| | |
| === No ===
| |
| # '''No''' - Who? --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 06:55, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| # I think not. Especially if the fucking MOB somehow didn't make it (and can't now because they're back, but whatever). --[[User:LordMoloch|LordMoloch]] ([[User talk:LordMoloch|talk]]) 20:08, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| =Recent Nominations=
| |
| | |
| ==[[Militant Order of Barhah]]==
| |
| The MOB defined [[Barhah#Controversy and Fundamentalis|Barhah Fundamentalism]] for Malton, putting into sharp focus the philosophy of always-dead, migratory, horde-focused zombies. While the MOB reigned, zombies and death cultists everywhere had to reconsider or sheepishly justify their necro-religious beliefs. The MOB maintained multiple effective strike teams for years. For years, zombie activity in Malton consisted primarily of a deep red Ridleybank and an uncontrollable wrecking ball in the form of the MOB. It was like a nonstop, all-seasons Mall Tour or Big Bash. Survivors could not stop it, so they resorted to [[River Tactics|fleeing in terror and picking up the mess left behind]]. Jorm, The Prophet of Barhah, is personally notable for:
| |
| *Being [[Mayor]] of Malton from 2010 to today, following the Misanthropy/Revenant administration fulfilling their campaign promise to betray the electorate by handing the keys to the city to Jorm.
| |
| *Hosting the IRC server that was a longtime favorite for UD live chat.
| |
| *Hosting [[Unofficial UD Forums#Barhah.com|barhah.com]], the forum that was a longtime favorite for zombie groups.
| |
| *Making [[:Category:Related Games#Inspired by Urban Dead|Nexus War]], which was more than a little popular. The spiritual successor, [https://www.nexusclash.com/ Nexus Clash], is still entirely alive.
| |
| *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jorm Working for WikiMedia], where you may have seen him asking for donations.
| |
| The Prophet of Barhah himself once made the case for his horde in [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Militant Order of Barhah vs Malton Mob|an arbitration case over the MOB redirect]]. In his trademarked steel wool and whiskey style, he addressed another group that hoped to be known as "the mob":
| |
| Your group consists of less than 20 and has done *nothing*; my group is over 70 and has *smashed suburbs*. We are the MOB; you are the "Malton Mob."
| |
| Hagnat further noted:
| |
| They are larger. They are famous. They have Zombies. They have Jorm.
| |
| I submit the MOB for your consideration. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 07:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| === Yes ===
| |
| # '''Yes''' - Author vote. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 07:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - Easily one of the most notable zombie groups to have ever shambled the streets of Malton. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 21:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - One of the most significant zombie groups in the game's history. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 04:37, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' Jorm Made me do it. [[User:Rosslessness|<span style="color: MidnightBlue ">R</span><span style="color: Navy">o</span><span style="color: DarkBlue">s</span><span style="color: MediumBlue">s</span><span style="color: RoyalBlue"></span>]][[User_Talk:Rosslessness|<span style="color: RoyalBlue">l</span><span style="color: CornflowerBlue">e</span><span style="color: SkyBlue">s</span><span style="color: LightskyBlue">s</span>]][[User_Talk:Rosslessness/Quiz|<span style="color: LightBlue">n</span><span style="color: PowderBlue">e</span>]][[Monroeville Many|<span style="color: PaleTurquoise">s</span>]][[The Great Suburb Group Massacre|<span style="color: PaleTurquoise">s</span>]]<sup>[[Location Page Building Toolkit|<span style="color: DarkRed">Want a Location Image?]] </span> </sup> 18:36, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - I have played Urban Dead for almost 20 years, and have been part of MOB for almost as long (19 years, give or take). No zombie group has been as impactful as MOB, and perhaps no zombie group ever will. [[User:Liche|Liche]] ([[User talk:Liche|talk]]) 19:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
| |
| #'''I guess so.''' ^ Has this game been around for nearly 20 years? Ah, well. That can't be. (Really?) --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 04:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Yes''' {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 07:37, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
| |
| #'''yes''' - i was told there would be chum. [[User:Hajen|hajen]] ([[User talk:Hajen|talk]]) 15:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Yes''' [[User:Clayton Carmine|Clayton Carmine]] ([[User talk:Clayton Carmine|talk]]) 15:30, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| === No ===
| |
| | |
| With voting finished, MOB hasn't passed the minimum 15 votes to be made historical. That said, you can [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion|change historical voting policy]] (which doesn't have minimum vote requirements). --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 17:57, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==[[East Becktown Defenders]]==
| |
| {{HistoricalVotingRules}}
| |
| The East Becktown Defenders officially disbanded on [[EBD/Epitaph|May 1st, 2020]], which makes them eligible for Historical Group status.
| |
| The EBD had been active since 2016, and included dozens of members, including both veterans and entire newbies. They maintained good relationships with survivor groups (including, but not limited to the DHPD, SoC, Knights Templar and the DEM) and zombie groups (specifically the Daubeney Resident Zombies next door, and of course our favourite frenemies in the RRF).
| |
| Aside from regular survivor-style operations, they also brought a fun, no-pressure approach to the game, along with [[East_Becktown_Defenders/Tools|wiki-tools]] (like the automatic SitRep on their group page) and weird events (like the [[EBD_Stat_Party_2016|EBD StatParty]]).
| |
| The group decided not to fade away like many others, but officially disbanded after exactly 4 years of activity.
| |
| | |
| === Yes ===
| |
| | |
| # '''Yes''' - {{User:Peralta/Signature}} 13:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - [[User:Clayton Carmine|Clayton Carmine]] ([[User talk:Clayton Carmine|talk]]) 13:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - [[User:MicoolTNT|MicoolTNT]] 13:57, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - {{User:Stelar/sig}} 14:00, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - [[User:Roddy Winters|Roddy Winters]] ([[User talk:Roddy Winters|talk]]) 17:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - [[User:Matt Langley|Matt Langley]] ([[User talk:Matt Langley|talk]]) 18:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - [[User:Tarkenton|Tarkenton]] ([[User talk:Tarkenton|talk]]) 20:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 23:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - [[User:Simcoe|Simcoe]] 07:00, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - [[User:Yo Ris|Yo Ris]] ([[User talk:Yo Ris|talk]]) 07:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - [[User:RaiNo|RaiNo]] 10:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - [[User:Frank Burn|Frank Burn]] ([[User talk:Frank Burn|talk]]) 13:46, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - [[User:DoXBr|DoXBr]] ([[User talk:DoXBr|talk]]) 14:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - [[User:Richardskull16|Richardskull16]] ([[User talk:Richardskull16|talk]]) 09:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - The Malton Globetrotters turbodunk the ayes! --{{User:Dragonshardz/dragonshardz}} {{Goonsig|Dragonshardz}} 00:58, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| # '''Yes''' - {{User:Benigno/sig}} 16:57, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| === No ===
| |
| #I was going to go with “Who?” but [[Talk:East_Becktown_Defenders#Your_page|apparently we’ve spoken]]. As they did not fix their page in the entire 4 years they spent as a group, I cannot in good conscience vote for this group to be historical. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} {{Goonsig|Revenant}} 16:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| #From what I see is a run-of-the-mill survivor group engaged in standard survivor play of maintaining a particular area. It was not innovative (like MCM or 404 were), it didn't have a distinctive style (like for example B.A.R. or ULC would have), nor was it involved in significant events (like Escape or c4NT were). --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 20:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| #As Spiderzed. Groups that had some members, did some things, and had a central pitch of being "well liked" didn't classify as historical when Urban Dead was bigger. I don't believe that should change for groups that existed during UD's [[Survivor-Zombie_Imbalance#7|long tail]]. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 05:55, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| #As Spiderzed. --[[User:Papa John Schnatter|Papa John Schnatter]] ([[User talk:Papa John Schnatter|talk]]) 17:25, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| With voting well and truly finished, the East Becktown Defenders have become a '''historical group'''. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 07:53, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| =Previous Discussions=
| |
| There are 3 archives for this page.
| |
| ==General Discussion==
| |
| {{ArchiveNoticeSmall|ArchiveName=Archive}}
| |
| ==Voting Succeeded==
| |
| {{ArchiveNoticeSmall|ArchiveName=SucceededArchive}}
| |
| ==Voting Failed==
| |
| {{ArchiveNoticeSmall|ArchiveName=FailedArchive}}
| |
