UDWiki:Administration/Protections/Archive/2011 06

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Template:Moderationnav

This page is for the request of page protection within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to philosophical concerns, the ability to protect pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a protection from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.

Guidelines for Protection Requests

All Protection Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:

  • A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility.
  • A reason for protection. This should be short and to the point.
  • A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.

Any protection request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.

Once the protection request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be reviewed by a member of the Sysop team, and action taken accordingly. Once action has been taken, the system operator will add a comment including a signed datestamp detailing his course of action, and the request will be moved into the Recent Actions queue, where it will remain for one week. After that week is up, it may be moved to the archive (see navigation box below). If the Protection has been granted, the system operator should place the tag {{protect}} on the page(s) that have been protected.

In the event of a system operator requesting a Protection, all the previous points will apply, excepting that a system operator other than the requestor shall review and take action on the request.

Pages in the Protection Queue may already be scheduled protections. For a list of scheduled protections, see here.

Protections Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019



Protection Queue

News/2010

Hmm. An oddity, has the protect template but isn't protected. What say you guys? I guess since it won't be updated with 2010 info until the end of the year protection couldn't hurt. --

15:02, 14 June 2010 (BST)

Ehh, why not? ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 18:58, 14 June 2010 (BST)

Protect due to vandal spree?

- User:Whitehouse 16:24, 14 June 2010 (BST)

No. These things tend not to last long enough to worry about protections. The sun shone, having no alternative, on the nothing new 16:26, 14 June 2010 (BST)
Right o. Delete request or move to recent actions despite nothing actually changing? :P - User:Whitehouse 16:28, 14 June 2010 (BST)

Requested Edits

Place pages requiring editing here.

Recent Actions

A Bunch of Subpages and Redirect pages

The subpages:

The Redirects:

These are just a bunch of my pages that I want protected. I'm sorry if I'm causing the SysOps who protects these too much work. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs (status:‎Mudkip!) 00:22, 11 June 2010 (BST)

*twitch* ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 00:52, 11 June 2010 (BST)
Sorry if I probably killed 5 minutes of your life, dude. How about I make it up with a cookie? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs (status:‎Mudkip!) 00:54, 11 June 2010 (BST)

User talk:Axe Hack/WN

It's a Redirect page on one of my subpages going to my Talk page. A protection would be nice. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs (status:‎Mudkip!) 23:03, 10 June 2010 (BST)

Done. The sun shone, having no alternative, on the nothing new 23:05, 10 June 2010 (BST)

UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/DanceDanceRevolution vs Boxy

I've withdrawn my case now, so it's a scheduled. --

12:16, 8 June 2010 (BST)

Done. —Aichon— 12:28, 8 June 2010 (BST)
Since when is one side unilaterally withdrawing, to shop for a better result elsewhere on the wiki, enough to end a case? -- boxy talk • teh rulz 22:43 8 June 2010 (BST)
He was the one who brought the case, and arbitration had not yet started. I agree that he's shopping around, but it's his prerogative to withdraw (and I think it's a BS precedent that people can be forced into arbitration). If you'd like to pursue the issue, you're welcome to do so, and you'd have no objections from me (nor would I take offense) if the case were unprotected and brought back up for arbitration. —Aichon— 00:45, 9 June 2010 (BST)
Iscariot did it all the time, and while my actions have been very much like his in the past, the raw truth was Arbies was my second choice and getting a simple vote of sysop confidence was my first. As it happens, my first choice came second. -- 02:24, 9 June 2010 (BST)
Plus, in line with "sysop opinion" Misanthropy gave his own solution which I accepted but you ignored in way to allow Jorm some space to argue. Not my bag, sorry. -- 02:25, 9 June 2010 (BST)
Man you know you've jumped the shark when you have to compare yourself to Iscariot as a defence. I pray that day never comes for me. Cyberbob  Talk  02:32, 9 June 2010 (BST)
It wasn't in my defence, I was just being realistic... -- 02:39, 9 June 2010 (BST)
I don't want to have to chase you all around the wiki to get this finished with. Arbitration is the place to discuss things in a controlled, thought out manner, and you choose to close it in favour of some idiotic vote in the middle of a VB case. I did indeed agree to Mis's "solution", however I wanted to make sure that Jorm would be alright with it as well, because my main concern is resolving the matter, amicably if possible, rather than winning anything -- boxy talk • teh rulz 02:59 9 June 2010 (BST)
Well if we both agree with what Mis said there isn't even a need for abies, I don't intend on going back on an agreement like that (as I doubt you would either) so we can just agree here, promise to just abide by that suggestion, and just have this whole thing done? -- 03:13, 9 June 2010 (BST)

UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Poodle of doom vs DanceDanceRevolution

This needs protecting. While I'm here, I found a few messys (and made a few of my own) so in this request I am adding UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/The Entire Wiki Community vs Cornhoolio which needs to be protected and moved to UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/The Entire Wiki Community vs Cornholioo cause Cheese got the "oo"s wrong, and UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Poodle of Doom vs DanceDanceRevolution needs to be deleted (cause I made a messy with the capitalisation with Pod's name) as a crit 7 by proxy/ish? --

09:37, 3 June 2010 (BST)

Incredibly complicated request served.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 10:57, 3 June 2010 (BST)

Talk Page

Just want my talk page permantly protected.... again. -Poodle of DoomM! Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.T 22:28, 31 May 2010 (BST)

No. Unless you plan on leaving here. As long you edit on this wiki, people should be able to contact you. --Umbrella-White.pngThadeous OakleyUmbrella-White.png 22:39, 31 May 2010 (BST)
Also make up your mind. The sun shone, having no alternative, on the nothing new 22:40, 31 May 2010 (BST)
Also, something happening permanently again is a paradox. Permanent only happens once. --Umbrella-White.pngThadeous OakleyUmbrella-White.png 22:50, 31 May 2010 (BST)
Thad is right. Without a specific and compelling reason, unless you're going to be inactive for an extended period or banned once again, limiting access to your talk page is not standard procedure. I don't mean for this to sound rude, but perhaps you could merely make yourself a lower profile target? You've been doing a lot of things to draw attention to yourself recently (e.g. arbies case, back and forth on protections, self-imposed ban, posting rants, all in the last two weeks), which obviously will get reactions from people. If you don't want attention from others, don't move in such a public way and simply don't respond to comments made against you. I mean that as honest advice. —Aichon— 23:46, 31 May 2010 (BST)
I'll take another fucking ban if I have too... though I was only planning on leaving. I have two more requests to make though before I leave again. I'm planning another gap in status, like the one I had shortly after I registered. So please lock the page... -Poodle of DoomM! Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.T 01:44, 1 June 2010 (BST)
You don't have to take a ban. We can protect your page for you just fine if you're going to be inactive (similar to Iscariot's). Being inactive is the important part. If you're still going to be editing around the wiki for your group though, it really shouldn't be protected. —Aichon— 03:05, 1 June 2010 (BST)
One thing at a time. I am leaving the game/wiki for a while. The next step though is something I don't want any backlash on. I'm deleting my group, and all five hundred and twenty nine of it's subpages after this is sent through. Again, I don't want any whine ass bitching on my talk page from some pansy assed little bitch who doesn't like my decision. -Poodle of DoomM! Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.T 03:26, 1 June 2010 (BST)
Realistically, we can't protect your page until you're gone. Oh, and I should be able to get some of your pages today if you post the request soon.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 10:03, 1 June 2010 (BST)
Fine... ban request first... and deletion second... I see how it is... I'll have someone contact you soon. -Poodle of DoomM! Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.T 00:46, 2 June 2010 (BST)
As I said, there's no need for a ban. Just inactivity. —Aichon— 02:35, 2 June 2010 (BST)
Now, I can't very well request protection when I'm inactive can I? -Poodle of DoomM! Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.T 02:43, 2 June 2010 (BST)
You've already requested protection (that's what this is, after all). We'd honor it now, as we have with others in the past, but you're still active, so it wouldn't make sense to honor it yet. Once again, there's no need for a ban. —Aichon— 03:09, 2 June 2010 (BST)

Protected - as poodle has been banned for a year after requesting a perma -- boxy talk • teh rulz 08:17 3 June 2010 (BST)

Protections Scheduling Queue

Protection Scheduling requests should be requested in the same general format as Deletions. Votes will occur in the same general manner, and like deletion scheduling requests will be voted on for two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. Valid votes are:

  • Yea - Approval of Schedule Request
  • Nay - Disapproval of Schedule Request

Note: The archive for Scheduled Protections can be found here.

Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Protections/Archive/2011_06&oldid=1727245"