UDWiki:Administration/Move Requests/Archive/2011 05

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

This page is for the requesting of page moves by normal users. The average user's ability to move pages has been rescinded due to frequent abuse by vandals; as such, users will need to submit requests (similar in nature to those on Speedy Deletions and Protections) for pages to be moved by a sysop.

Guidelines for requesting a Page Move

Copy the template below (Or just type it), replace the text in red with the relevant details, and paste the template under the Move Request Queue heading. A day after a sysop has taken action on the request, move requests should be moved to the Archive.

===[[PAGENAME]]===
*[[MOVE TO HERE]]
*~~~~

New Requests

Recent Actions

Humanity's Saviors

Requester:	Labine50 ^{MEMS \| MHG} 17:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Reason:	Obviously a group subpage.
Destination:	Philosophe Knights/Humanity's Saviors

Obviously? --Midianian^|T|DS|C:RCS| 17:24, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Obviously.--Labine50 ^{MEMS | MHG} 18:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

You really are a fucking idiot. I'm going to say this clearly These. Are. Not. A. Subgroup. The Order of Philosophe Knights has no active subgroups. That category was overlooked in the recoding, if you hadn't noticed the page is based on the Knight's design. --

.

. <== DDR Approved Editor 18:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Let me get this straight, Iscariot. You would argue that two groups, one created by the other, are somehow less connected (and thus worthy of demotion to a subpage) than an alliance and the groups in it? Interesting logic.--Labine50 ^{MEMS | MHG} 19:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm not arguing with you at all, you're wrong and I'm right, I'm enlightening you. I have two very simple questions for you. Should we move MOB into RRF's space? and Of the two of us, who has access to the Philosophe Knights board and therefore understands what Humanity's Saviours actually are?

The Knights have one subgroup, this isn't it. --

.

. <== DDR Approved Editor 19:38, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

You say that I cannot understand how the HS and PK work without access to their forums, yet you think you to have a sufficient amount of knowledge in the inner workings of the DEM to both pass judgement on whether we function as one group or not, in the case of the Recruitment page, and that all the DEM groups are really just subgroups of an alliance, in the case of your recent actions on this page.

To answer your question, no, I don't believe the MOB page should be a subgroup of the RRF, though your logic seems to say they should be.--Labine50 ^{MEMS | MHG} 20:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

If you want the DEM to be treated as just an alliance, then maybe you shouldn't call it an "organizational construct" that "oversees and coordinates the operations" of its member groups and that "Member groups are in all senses part of the DEM, fully sharing information and resources with the core groups and are bound by all DEM policies." This opposed to what's on HS's page: "The connection between HS and the Philosophe Knights is fairly weak", "neither group has command over the other" and so on. Is it really so surprising that you're treated the way you describe yourselves? --Midianian^|T|DS|C:RCS| 21:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Not done. And it should be noted that all DEM member groups are now in individual pages. Get an actual page owner for PK to say as much and it might be taken more seriously than a DEM member trying to game the system.--Judge Karke, self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All 01:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Given that I checked, and as you no longer hold a seat on the War Council and therefore may not speak for the RRF, and as per every DEM argument below, do we get the GC and BC pages moved back to where they rightfully belong under the DEM's justifications? --

.

. <== DDR Approved Editor 02:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

No, because you don't know what you're talking about any more than Labine does and you know it. Stop trolling admin pages, and consider that your only soft warning on this matter.--Judge Karke, self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All 03:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Soft warning me over a case you're involved in? Regardless, I know less than Labine? Is he a serving member of the Gore Corps? Are you?

My word was good enough to take in the case of Humanity's Saviours, it's odd that's not the case here. Are you or are you not a current member of the RRF War Council? Accordingly are you authorised to speak for the RRF in this case? Am I a member of the group in question as were the requesters of the DEM below? This is nothing but your own pride speaking, every point the DEM can make the GC and the BC can respind with in kind, this is nothing but pure bias. Until such time as a member of the War Council overrules me, I am the user with the most relevant information regarding the RRF, not you. If this was any other group these pages would be moved back as the DEM's were, the only difference is yourself and whatever feelings you may have over the group you no longer speak for. --

.

. <== DDR Approved Editor 03:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

What difference does it make that Karek is not part of the RRF WC ? He ruled on this case in favor of the HS, keeping their page in its rightful place (as in not being a subpage of the PK). We rule against your interest and its bias, we rule for your interest is bias as well ? WTF ? BTW, stop shitting on admin pages. Last warning, --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{talk mod} 03:49, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

How is it my favour? I am not a member of Humanity's Saviours. Kindly trying to place words into my mouth, it is disingenuous.

The fact, as Karek is aware, concerns an earlier case that he said he would research on and provisionally ruled on based on his own experience. My own research has proven that his initial ruling had no basis over that of rumour. Therefore I question the basis of his original assumption,as is my right as a member of a group he has disadvantaged by declining its return to its own group space. My questions are pertinent to the validity of his ruling to the cases I originally brought and that he promised he would look into. The fact that I have found and know the base and validity of his statements to be fallacious do not make my posts here in bad faith, no matter of how you prefer to remove me. My edits are an attempt to resolve a pending case in the appropriate administration page. --

.

. <== DDR Approved Editor 03:57, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Humanity’s Saviors/Operations

Requester:	Labine50 ^{MEMS \| MHG} 17:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Reason:	A subpage of an obvious group subpage.
Destination:	Philosophe Knights/Humanity's Saviors/Operations

Not done.--Judge Karke, self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All 01:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

The humanity doctrine

Requester:	Labine50 ^{MEMS \| MHG} 17:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Reason:	Incorrectly placed. Should be a subpage of the subpage.
Destination:	Philosophe Knights/Humanity's Saviors/The humanity doctrine

Not done.--Judge Karke, self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All 01:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Humanity’s Saviors/organization

Requester:	Labine50 ^{MEMS \| MHG} 17:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Reason:	Another subpage of the obvious group subpage.
Destination:	Philosophe Knights/Humanity's Saviors/organization

Not done.--Judge Karke, self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All 01:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Humanity’s Saviors/policies

Requester:	Labine50 ^{MEMS \| MHG} 17:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Reason:	The last of the subpages of the soon to be subpage.
Destination:	Philosophe Knights/Humanity's Saviors/policies

Not done.--Judge Karke, self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All 01:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Department of Emergency Management/Malton Police Department

Requester:	Linkthewindow Talk 14:55, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Reason:	The MPD page was moved manually. The talk page was not moved.
Destination:	Talk:Malton Police Department

Should be fixed now.-Judge Karke, self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All 01:46, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

The following requests are all made for the same reason. I copy the reason into each of them so the requests can be handled one at a time. Stephen Krantz 10:49, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Done, I've been waiting for these for a bit.--Judge Karke, self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All 12:14, 10 January 2009 (UTC)