UDWiki:Administration/Protections/Archive/2011 06
This page is for the request of page protection within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to philosophical concerns, the ability to protect pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a protection from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.
Guidelines for Protection Requests
All Protection Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:
- A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility.
- A reason for protection. This should be short and to the point.
- A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.
Any protection request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.
Once the protection request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be reviewed by a member of the Sysop team, and action taken accordingly. Once action has been taken, the system operator will add a comment including a signed datestamp detailing his course of action, and the request will be moved into the Recent Actions queue, where it will remain for one week. After that week is up, it may be moved to the archive (see navigation box below). If the Protection has been granted, the system operator should place the tag {{protect}} on the page(s) that have been protected.
In the event of a system operator requesting a Protection, all the previous points will apply, excepting that a system operator other than the requestor shall review and take action on the request.
Pages in the Protection Queue may already be scheduled protections. For a list of scheduled protections, see here.
|
Protections Archive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Protection Queue
Place pages requiring protection here.
Requested Edits
Place pages requiring editing here.
Recent Actions
winman
User talk:Winman1 reason:I am constantly being insulted and flamed on my talk page. --Winman1 18:25, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- Personally, I'd recommend it being blanked before the protect, so that you don't have trolling on there permanently.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:46, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
I've wiped all the text not made by Winman and protected it. I would suggest, Winman, asking for an unprotection soon, it isn't a particularly efficient thing to do on a wiki and I'd only want, myself, this protection to stay up for a week or so. --
23:11, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
DHPD
I've unprotected it so Sanpedro could edit it.-- SA 13:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks SA Sanpedro 23:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Imagery
Given there's likely to be some targeted vandalism aimed at me shortly, best protect this, this and this to prevent potential disruption. -- 
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 21:18, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Sure, why not?-- SA 23:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
A/VB request
I'd like to comment on my own A/VB case (tops).--
Thadeous Oakley 10:56, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- And what comment would you like to add? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 13:25, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- A few of my thoughts on the matter. If it weren't on the end of the month, I would already be finished.--
Thadeous Oakley 13:27, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- If you want to post them below, I'll add them. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 13:33, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- I was planning on writing a whole lot of nasty words, but since you're the one adding them, I'll preserve your innocence and drop this issue. --Thadeous Oakley 13:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- I was planning on writing a whole lot of nasty words, but since you're the one adding them, I'll preserve your innocence and drop this issue. --
- If you want to post them below, I'll add them. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 13:33, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- A few of my thoughts on the matter. If it weren't on the end of the month, I would already be finished.--
No, how about you learn your lesson and use the talk page? The case was open and shut and it doesn't necessarily need any more input from you, especially of which, in a more violate form, got you into trouble in the first place. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:42, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- It's my case, it's my right as a involved party. I never had a chance to give input, seeing as I was banned almost instantly. --Thadeous Oakley 13:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- By what you said above, it looks like my call was exactly right. Sorry buddy. The talk page is the place for idiotic, butthurt profanities. Learn your lesson already! --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:52, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- And exactly. Talking on the main page was your right, not you privilege. We don't keel over and let banned vandals come back and complain about their rightful bans on their cases. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:53, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Err... shouldnt this page be left unprotected for a week at least ? Its the first day of the december, and there is still a case waiting to be ruled on, and users (like mistargayme) might want to make comment there. --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 21:21, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- lol-- SA 23:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
User talk:Red Hawk One/Archive 1
Personal talk archieve.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 04:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Dun --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 08:35, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Protections Scheduling Queue
Protection Scheduling requests should be requested in the same general format as Deletions. Votes will occur in the same general manner, and like deletion scheduling requests will be voted on for two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. Valid votes are:
- Yea - Approval of Schedule Request
- Nay - Disapproval of Schedule Request
Note: The archive for Scheduled Protections can be found here.
